You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to derby-dev@db.apache.org by "Andrew McIntyre (JIRA)" <de...@db.apache.org> on 2006/09/22 21:05:24 UTC
[jira] Resolved: (DERBY-1787) The database owner is incorrectly
referred to as dba in the code comments that were checked in Derby 10.2 for
grant revoke work. We should clean this up at some point.
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1787?page=all ]
Andrew McIntyre resolved DERBY-1787.
------------------------------------
Resolution: Fixed
Derby Info: (was: [Patch Available])
Marked resolved, merged to 10.2 with revision 449004.
> The database owner is incorrectly referred to as dba in the code comments that were checked in Derby 10.2 for grant revoke work. We should clean this up at some point.
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DERBY-1787
> URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1787
> Project: Derby
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: SQL
> Affects Versions: 10.2.1.0
> Reporter: Mamta A. Satoor
> Assigned To: Mamta A. Satoor
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 10.2.1.0, 10.3.0.0
>
> Attachments: DERBY1787_UseCorrectTerminologyV1diff.txt
>
>
> Grant revoke functionality was added in Derby 10.2 The comments that went into the grant revoke code, in some places refer to database owner as "dba". They are not the same thing. In the grant revoke world, dba is a role. We haven't added roles into Derby yet but current use of dba in comments might make it confusing when we do start working on roles including dba.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira