You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to common-dev@hadoop.apache.org by "Konstantin Shvachko (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2008/09/03 22:49:44 UTC

[jira] Commented: (HADOOP-4061) Large number of decommission freezes the Namenode

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-4061?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12628126#action_12628126 ] 

Konstantin Shvachko commented on HADOOP-4061:
---------------------------------------------

{{decommissionedDatanodeCheck()}} is very inefficient.
Every 5 minutes it scans all blocks belonging to decommissioning nodes and checks their replication. 
With 400 nodes on a 2000 node cluster it is one fifth of all blocks checked under a single lock.

> Large number of decommission freezes the Namenode
> -------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HADOOP-4061
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-4061
>             Project: Hadoop Core
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: dfs
>    Affects Versions: 0.17.2
>            Reporter: Koji Noguchi
>
> On 1900 nodes cluster, we tried decommissioning 400 nodes with 30k blocks each. Other 1500 nodes were almost empty.
> When decommission started, namenode's queue overflowed every 6 minutes.
> Looking at the cpu usage,  it showed that every 5 minutes org.apache.hadoop.dfs.FSNamesystem$DecommissionedMonitor thread was taking 100% of the CPU for 1 minute causing the queue to overflow.
> {noformat}
>   public synchronized void decommissionedDatanodeCheck() {
>     for (Iterator<DatanodeDescriptor> it = datanodeMap.values().iterator();
>          it.hasNext();) {
>       DatanodeDescriptor node = it.next();
>       checkDecommissionStateInternal(node);
>     }
>   }
> {noformat}

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.