You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@cxf.apache.org by Ron Grimes <rg...@sinclairoil.com> on 2010/10/21 22:50:30 UTC

Problem with CXF site

Sorry for posting a web site usability issue here. But, not sure where is the proper place.

So, what's up with accessing the XJC Utils link on cxf.apache.org? I click on it, and makes me register. Did that, logged in, and when I click on XJC Utils, it tells me I don't have permission. Give me a break! What's so special about this link that I can't access it? I'm trying to figure out what the new *-xjc-* jars are for in the new 2.3 version, which is why I wanted in there.

Thanks,

Ron Grimes

Re: Problem with CXF site

Posted by Robert Liguori <ro...@gmail.com>.
"XJC Utils" and "Build Utils" appear to be empty place holders... guess 
someone is planning on doing something with these web pages?

--------------------------------------------------
From: "Ron Grimes" <rg...@sinclairoil.com>
Sent: Thursday, October 21, 2010 4:50 PM
To: <us...@cxf.apache.org>
Subject: Problem with CXF site

> Sorry for posting a web site usability issue here. But, not sure where is 
> the proper place.
>
> So, what's up with accessing the XJC Utils link on cxf.apache.org? I click 
> on it, and makes me register. Did that, logged in, and when I click on XJC 
> Utils, it tells me I don't have permission. Give me a break! What's so 
> special about this link that I can't access it? I'm trying to figure out 
> what the new *-xjc-* jars are for in the new 2.3 version, which is why I 
> wanted in there.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ron Grimes
>
>

Re: Problem with CXF site

Posted by Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org>.
On Thursday 21 October 2010 4:50:30 pm Ron Grimes wrote:
> Sorry for posting a web site usability issue here. But, not sure where is
> the proper place.
> 
> So, what's up with accessing the XJC Utils link on cxf.apache.org? I click
> on it, and makes me register. Did that, logged in, and when I click on XJC
> Utils, it tells me I don't have permission. Give me a break! What's so
> special about this link that I can't access it? I'm trying to figure out
> what the new *-xjc-* jars are for in the new 2.3 version, which is why I
> wanted in there.

My fault.  I was TRYING to figure out how to get Maven to generate those parts 
from the builds themselves, but failed misserably.   I'll try and get some 
content into confluence tomorrow. 


-- 
Daniel Kulp
dkulp@apache.org
http://dankulp.com/blog

Re: Apache Commons pool versions in 2.3.0

Posted by Robert Liguori <ro...@gmail.com>.
Just FYI, I previously added the request to this issue:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-3040.

Thanks,
Robert

On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 2:51 PM, Gary Gregory
<GG...@seagullsoftware.com>wrote:

> Hi All:
>
> Our server relies on Apache Commons Pool (ACP) 1.5.5 and I see that CXF
> 2.3.0 ships with ACP 1.5.2. We plan on shipping ACP 1.5.5 with our product
> and not 1.5.2. Do you see this as an issue? Could CXF 2.3.1 migrate up to
> ACP 1.5.5?
>
> Thank you,
>
> Gary Gregory
> Senior Software Engineer
> Rocket Software
> 3340 Peachtree Road, Suite 820 . Atlanta, GA 30326 . USA
> Tel: +1.404.760.1560
> Email: ggregory@seagullsoftware.com
> Web: seagull.rocketsoftware.com
>
>

RE: Jetty versions in 2.3.0

Posted by Gary Gregory <GG...@seagullsoftware.com>.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Daniel Kulp [mailto:dkulp@apache.org]
> Sent: Friday, October 22, 2010 19:49
> To: users@cxf.apache.org
> Cc: Gary Gregory
> Subject: Re: Jetty versions in 2.3.0
> 
> On Friday 22 October 2010 8:44:18 pm Gary Gregory wrote:
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Daniel Kulp [mailto:dkulp@apache.org]
> > > Sent: Friday, October 22, 2010 17:27
> > > To: users@cxf.apache.org
> > > Cc: Gary Gregory
> > > Subject: Re: Jetty versions in 2.3.0
> > >
> > > On Friday 22 October 2010 2:57:21 pm Gary Gregory wrote:
> > > > Hi All:
> > > >
> > > > Do you see any issue with replacing Jetty 7.1.6 with 7.2.0 in CXF
> > > > 2.3.0?
> > >
> > > I just ran the tests with 7.2.0 and all the session related things
> > > failed. Thus, something is wrong with how sessions are setup with 7.2.0.
> > >  Everything else passed, but you kind of have to wonder what is
> > > happening......
> > >
> > > Dan
> >
> > Wow. Weird. Not a drop in replacement then. Thank you for checking.
> 
> Well, digging through all the docs and samples on the jetty site, it looks
> like we're doing the session handler thing wrong.  Thus, not really their
> fault.   I have a fix for it that I'm testing now.   Should be part of 2.3.1,
> but it doesn't look like it's usable for 2.3.0 (although it only affect things
> if you turn sessions on which isn't the default).


Is there a ticket # I can track for this issue yet?

Thank you,
Gary

> 
> Dan
> 
> 
> >
> > Gary
> >
> > > > Thank you,
> > > >
> > > > Gary Gregory
> > > > Senior Software Engineer
> > > > Rocket Software
> > > > 3340 Peachtree Road, Suite 820 . Atlanta, GA 30326 . USA
> > > > Tel: +1.404.760.1560
> > > > Email: ggregory@seagullsoftware.com
> > > > Web: seagull.rocketsoftware.com
> > >
> > > --
> > > Daniel Kulp
> > > dkulp@apache.org
> > > http://dankulp.com/blog
> 
> --
> Daniel Kulp
> dkulp@apache.org
> http://dankulp.com/blog

Re: Jetty versions in 2.3.0

Posted by Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org>.
On Friday 22 October 2010 8:44:18 pm Gary Gregory wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Daniel Kulp [mailto:dkulp@apache.org]
> > Sent: Friday, October 22, 2010 17:27
> > To: users@cxf.apache.org
> > Cc: Gary Gregory
> > Subject: Re: Jetty versions in 2.3.0
> > 
> > On Friday 22 October 2010 2:57:21 pm Gary Gregory wrote:
> > > Hi All:
> > > 
> > > Do you see any issue with replacing Jetty 7.1.6 with 7.2.0 in CXF
> > > 2.3.0?
> > 
> > I just ran the tests with 7.2.0 and all the session related things
> > failed. Thus, something is wrong with how sessions are setup with 7.2.0.
> >  Everything else passed, but you kind of have to wonder what is
> > happening......
> > 
> > Dan
> 
> Wow. Weird. Not a drop in replacement then. Thank you for checking.

Well, digging through all the docs and samples on the jetty site, it looks 
like we're doing the session handler thing wrong.  Thus, not really their 
fault.   I have a fix for it that I'm testing now.   Should be part of 2.3.1, 
but it doesn't look like it's usable for 2.3.0 (although it only affect things 
if you turn sessions on which isn't the default).

Dan


> 
> Gary
> 
> > > Thank you,
> > > 
> > > Gary Gregory
> > > Senior Software Engineer
> > > Rocket Software
> > > 3340 Peachtree Road, Suite 820 . Atlanta, GA 30326 . USA
> > > Tel: +1.404.760.1560
> > > Email: ggregory@seagullsoftware.com
> > > Web: seagull.rocketsoftware.com
> > 
> > --
> > Daniel Kulp
> > dkulp@apache.org
> > http://dankulp.com/blog

-- 
Daniel Kulp
dkulp@apache.org
http://dankulp.com/blog

Re: Jetty versions in 2.3.0

Posted by Benson Margulies <bi...@gmail.com>.
I've found the jetty gang to have become quite responsive on their
bugzilla these days.

On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 8:44 PM, Gary Gregory
<GG...@seagullsoftware.com> wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Daniel Kulp [mailto:dkulp@apache.org]
>> Sent: Friday, October 22, 2010 17:27
>> To: users@cxf.apache.org
>> Cc: Gary Gregory
>> Subject: Re: Jetty versions in 2.3.0
>>
>> On Friday 22 October 2010 2:57:21 pm Gary Gregory wrote:
>> > Hi All:
>> >
>> > Do you see any issue with replacing Jetty 7.1.6 with 7.2.0 in CXF 2.3.0?
>>
>> I just ran the tests with 7.2.0 and all the session related things failed.
>> Thus, something is wrong with how sessions are setup with 7.2.0.  Everything
>> else passed, but you kind of have to wonder what is happening......
>>
>> Dan
>
> Wow. Weird. Not a drop in replacement then. Thank you for checking.
>
> Gary
>
>>
>>
>> >
>> > Thank you,
>> >
>> > Gary Gregory
>> > Senior Software Engineer
>> > Rocket Software
>> > 3340 Peachtree Road, Suite 820 . Atlanta, GA 30326 . USA
>> > Tel: +1.404.760.1560
>> > Email: ggregory@seagullsoftware.com
>> > Web: seagull.rocketsoftware.com
>>
>> --
>> Daniel Kulp
>> dkulp@apache.org
>> http://dankulp.com/blog
>

RE: Jetty versions in 2.3.0

Posted by Gary Gregory <GG...@seagullsoftware.com>.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Daniel Kulp [mailto:dkulp@apache.org]
> Sent: Friday, October 22, 2010 17:27
> To: users@cxf.apache.org
> Cc: Gary Gregory
> Subject: Re: Jetty versions in 2.3.0
> 
> On Friday 22 October 2010 2:57:21 pm Gary Gregory wrote:
> > Hi All:
> >
> > Do you see any issue with replacing Jetty 7.1.6 with 7.2.0 in CXF 2.3.0?
> 
> I just ran the tests with 7.2.0 and all the session related things failed.
> Thus, something is wrong with how sessions are setup with 7.2.0.  Everything
> else passed, but you kind of have to wonder what is happening......
> 
> Dan

Wow. Weird. Not a drop in replacement then. Thank you for checking.

Gary

> 
> 
> >
> > Thank you,
> >
> > Gary Gregory
> > Senior Software Engineer
> > Rocket Software
> > 3340 Peachtree Road, Suite 820 . Atlanta, GA 30326 . USA
> > Tel: +1.404.760.1560
> > Email: ggregory@seagullsoftware.com
> > Web: seagull.rocketsoftware.com
> 
> --
> Daniel Kulp
> dkulp@apache.org
> http://dankulp.com/blog

Re: Jetty versions in 2.3.0

Posted by Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org>.
On Friday 22 October 2010 2:57:21 pm Gary Gregory wrote:
> Hi All:
> 
> Do you see any issue with replacing Jetty 7.1.6 with 7.2.0 in CXF 2.3.0?

I just ran the tests with 7.2.0 and all the session related things failed.  
Thus, something is wrong with how sessions are setup with 7.2.0.  Everything 
else passed, but you kind of have to wonder what is happening......

Dan


> 
> Thank you,
> 
> Gary Gregory
> Senior Software Engineer
> Rocket Software
> 3340 Peachtree Road, Suite 820 . Atlanta, GA 30326 . USA
> Tel: +1.404.760.1560
> Email: ggregory@seagullsoftware.com
> Web: seagull.rocketsoftware.com 

-- 
Daniel Kulp
dkulp@apache.org
http://dankulp.com/blog

Jetty versions in 2.3.0

Posted by Gary Gregory <GG...@seagullsoftware.com>.
Hi All:

Do you see any issue with replacing Jetty 7.1.6 with 7.2.0 in CXF 2.3.0?

Thank you,

Gary Gregory
Senior Software Engineer
Rocket Software
3340 Peachtree Road, Suite 820 . Atlanta, GA 30326 . USA
Tel: +1.404.760.1560
Email: ggregory@seagullsoftware.com
Web: seagull.rocketsoftware.com 

RE: Apache Commons pool versions in 2.3.0

Posted by Gary Gregory <GG...@seagullsoftware.com>.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Daniel Kulp [mailto:dkulp@apache.org]
> Sent: Friday, October 22, 2010 17:28
> To: users@cxf.apache.org
> Cc: Gary Gregory
> Subject: Re: Apache Commons pool versions in 2.3.0
> 
> On Friday 22 October 2010 2:51:06 pm Gary Gregory wrote:
> > Hi All:
> >
> > Our server relies on Apache Commons Pool (ACP) 1.5.5 and I see that CXF
> > 2.3.0 ships with ACP 1.5.2. We plan on shipping ACP 1.5.5 with our product
> > and not 1.5.2. Do you see this as an issue? Could CXF 2.3.1 migrate up to
> > ACP 1.5.5?
> >
> 
> All the tests passed with 1.5.5.  I would say you are probably OK with that
> one.

Good! Thank you checking.

Gary

> 
> Dan
> 
> 
> > Thank you,
> >
> > Gary Gregory
> > Senior Software Engineer
> > Rocket Software
> > 3340 Peachtree Road, Suite 820 . Atlanta, GA 30326 . USA
> > Tel: +1.404.760.1560
> > Email: ggregory@seagullsoftware.com
> > Web: seagull.rocketsoftware.com
> 
> --
> Daniel Kulp
> dkulp@apache.org
> http://dankulp.com/blog

Re: Apache Commons pool versions in 2.3.0

Posted by Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org>.
On Friday 22 October 2010 2:51:06 pm Gary Gregory wrote:
> Hi All:
> 
> Our server relies on Apache Commons Pool (ACP) 1.5.5 and I see that CXF
> 2.3.0 ships with ACP 1.5.2. We plan on shipping ACP 1.5.5 with our product
> and not 1.5.2. Do you see this as an issue? Could CXF 2.3.1 migrate up to
> ACP 1.5.5?
>

All the tests passed with 1.5.5.  I would say you are probably OK with that 
one.

Dan


> Thank you,
> 
> Gary Gregory
> Senior Software Engineer
> Rocket Software
> 3340 Peachtree Road, Suite 820 . Atlanta, GA 30326 . USA
> Tel: +1.404.760.1560
> Email: ggregory@seagullsoftware.com
> Web: seagull.rocketsoftware.com 

-- 
Daniel Kulp
dkulp@apache.org
http://dankulp.com/blog

Apache Commons pool versions in 2.3.0

Posted by Gary Gregory <GG...@seagullsoftware.com>.
Hi All:

Our server relies on Apache Commons Pool (ACP) 1.5.5 and I see that CXF 2.3.0 ships with ACP 1.5.2. We plan on shipping ACP 1.5.5 with our product and not 1.5.2. Do you see this as an issue? Could CXF 2.3.1 migrate up to ACP 1.5.5?

Thank you,

Gary Gregory
Senior Software Engineer
Rocket Software
3340 Peachtree Road, Suite 820 . Atlanta, GA 30326 . USA
Tel: +1.404.760.1560
Email: ggregory@seagullsoftware.com
Web: seagull.rocketsoftware.com 

Re: Problem with CXF site

Posted by Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org>.
On Thursday 21 October 2010 4:50:30 pm Ron Grimes wrote:
> Sorry for posting a web site usability issue here. But, not sure where is
> the proper place.
> 
> So, what's up with accessing the XJC Utils link on cxf.apache.org? I click
> on it, and makes me register. Did that, logged in, and when I click on XJC
> Utils, it tells me I don't have permission. Give me a break! What's so
> special about this link that I can't access it? I'm trying to figure out
> what the new *-xjc-* jars are for in the new 2.3 version, which is why I
> wanted in there.

Content added.  It's currently at:
https://cwiki.apache.org/CXF/xjc-utils.html
but will sync to the main site in a few hours.

Thanks!

-- 
Daniel Kulp
dkulp@apache.org
http://dankulp.com/blog