You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@spark.apache.org by "Yin Huai (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2016/12/21 17:27:58 UTC
[jira] [Resolved] (SPARK-18951) Upgrade
com.thoughtworks.paranamer/paranamer to 2.6
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-18951?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Yin Huai resolved SPARK-18951.
------------------------------
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.2.0
Issue resolved by pull request 16359
[https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16359]
> Upgrade com.thoughtworks.paranamer/paranamer to 2.6
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SPARK-18951
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-18951
> Project: Spark
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Build
> Reporter: Yin Huai
> Assignee: Yin Huai
> Fix For: 2.2.0
>
>
> I recently hit a bug of com.thoughtworks.paranamer/paranamer, which causes jackson fail to handle byte array defined in a case class. Then I find https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson-module-scala/issues/48, which suggests that it is caused by a bug in paranamer. Let's upgrade paranamer.
> Since we are using jackson 2.6.5 and jackson-module-paranamer 2.6.5 use com.thoughtworks.paranamer/paranamer 2.6, I suggests that we upgrade paranamer to 2.6.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscribe@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-help@spark.apache.org