You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to solr-user@lucene.apache.org by Andrey Klochkov <ak...@griddynamics.com> on 2009/11/30 12:29:29 UTC
Status of Spelt integration
Hi all
I searched through the mail-list archives and saw that sometime ago Toby
Cole was going to integrate a spellchecker named Spelt into Solr. Does
anyone now what's the status of this? Anyone tried to use it with Solr? Does
it make sense to try it instead of standard spell checker?
Some links on the subject:
http://markmail.org/message/cqt4qtzzwyceltqu#query:+page:1+mid:cqt4qtzzwyceltqu+state:results
http://markmail.org/search/?q=spelt#query:spelt+page:1+mid:krzofzojhg7hmms7+state:results
http://groups.google.com/group/spelt
--
Andrew Klochkov
Senior Software Engineer,
Grid Dynamics
Re: Status of Spelt integration
Posted by Toby Cole <to...@semantico.com>.
I'm pretty sure this isn't a Solr related question.
Have you tried asking on the eGroupware mailing lists? http://sourceforge.net/mail/?group_id=78745
Toby.
On 7 Dec 2009, at 08:52, freerk55 wrote:
>
> The standard spell checker of Thunderbird works in eGroupware.
> But not in Felamimail!!?? Why not?
> How can I get it working as it does in the rest of eGroupware?
>
> Freerk Jongsma
>
>
>
> Toby Cole-2 wrote:
>>
>> Hi Andrew,
>> We ended up abandoning the spelt integration as the built in solr
>> spellchecking improved so much during our project. Also, if you did
>> go
>> the route of using spelt, I'd implement it as a spellcheck plugin
>> (which didn't exist as a concept when we started trying to shoehorn
>> spelt into solr).
>> Regards, Toby.
>>
>> On 30 Nov 2009, at 11:29, Andrey Klochkov wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all
>>>
>>> I searched through the mail-list archives and saw that sometime ago
>>> Toby
>>> Cole was going to integrate a spellchecker named Spelt into Solr.
>>> Does
>>> anyone now what's the status of this? Anyone tried to use it with
>>> Solr? Does
>>> it make sense to try it instead of standard spell checker?
>>>
>>> Some links on the subject:
>>> http://markmail.org/message/cqt4qtzzwyceltqu#query:+page:1+mid:cqt4qtzzwyceltqu+state:results
>>> http://markmail.org/search/?q=spelt#query:spelt+page:1+mid:krzofzojhg7hmms7+state:results
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/spelt
>>>
>>> --
>>> Andrew Klochkov
>>> Senior Software Engineer,
>>> Grid Dynamics
>>
>>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Status-of-Spelt-integration-tp26573196p26674324.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
Re: Status of Spelt integration
Posted by freerk55 <fr...@sibranda.net>.
The standard spell checker of Thunderbird works in eGroupware.
But not in Felamimail!!?? Why not?
How can I get it working as it does in the rest of eGroupware?
Freerk Jongsma
Toby Cole-2 wrote:
>
> Hi Andrew,
> We ended up abandoning the spelt integration as the built in solr
> spellchecking improved so much during our project. Also, if you did go
> the route of using spelt, I'd implement it as a spellcheck plugin
> (which didn't exist as a concept when we started trying to shoehorn
> spelt into solr).
> Regards, Toby.
>
> On 30 Nov 2009, at 11:29, Andrey Klochkov wrote:
>
>> Hi all
>>
>> I searched through the mail-list archives and saw that sometime ago
>> Toby
>> Cole was going to integrate a spellchecker named Spelt into Solr. Does
>> anyone now what's the status of this? Anyone tried to use it with
>> Solr? Does
>> it make sense to try it instead of standard spell checker?
>>
>> Some links on the subject:
>> http://markmail.org/message/cqt4qtzzwyceltqu#query:+page:1+mid:cqt4qtzzwyceltqu+state:results
>> http://markmail.org/search/?q=spelt#query:spelt+page:1+mid:krzofzojhg7hmms7+state:results
>> http://groups.google.com/group/spelt
>>
>> --
>> Andrew Klochkov
>> Senior Software Engineer,
>> Grid Dynamics
>
>
--
View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Status-of-Spelt-integration-tp26573196p26674324.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Status of Spelt integration
Posted by Toby Cole <to...@semantico.com>.
Hi Andrew,
We ended up abandoning the spelt integration as the built in solr
spellchecking improved so much during our project. Also, if you did go
the route of using spelt, I'd implement it as a spellcheck plugin
(which didn't exist as a concept when we started trying to shoehorn
spelt into solr).
Regards, Toby.
On 30 Nov 2009, at 11:29, Andrey Klochkov wrote:
> Hi all
>
> I searched through the mail-list archives and saw that sometime ago
> Toby
> Cole was going to integrate a spellchecker named Spelt into Solr. Does
> anyone now what's the status of this? Anyone tried to use it with
> Solr? Does
> it make sense to try it instead of standard spell checker?
>
> Some links on the subject:
> http://markmail.org/message/cqt4qtzzwyceltqu#query:+page:1+mid:cqt4qtzzwyceltqu+state:results
> http://markmail.org/search/?q=spelt#query:spelt+page:1+mid:krzofzojhg7hmms7+state:results
> http://groups.google.com/group/spelt
>
> --
> Andrew Klochkov
> Senior Software Engineer,
> Grid Dynamics