You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@directory.apache.org by "Emmanuel Lecharny (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2007/08/25 15:47:30 UTC

[jira] Resolved: (DIRSERVER-1027) Entries must have at least one STRUCTURAL objectClass

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSERVER-1027?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Emmanuel Lecharny resolved DIRSERVER-1027.
------------------------------------------

    Resolution: Fixed

The tests have been fixed, so the issue is not fixed too.

http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=569663&view=rev
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=569664&view=rev
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=569665&view=rev
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=569666&view=rev
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=569667&view=rev

> Entries must have at least one STRUCTURAL objectClass
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DIRSERVER-1027
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSERVER-1027
>             Project: Directory ApacheDS
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 1.5.0
>            Reporter: Emmanuel Lecharny
>            Assignee: Emmanuel Lecharny
>             Fix For: 1.5.1
>
>
> While trying to fix DIRSERVER-851, I found that the server will accept entries containing no STRUCTURAL ObjectClasses. This is wrong.
> Now, there is one more question : what if the user decided that the 'ExtensibleObject' objectClass (which is an AUXILIARY ObjectClass) ? Should we consider that this is correct if no other STRUCTURAL OC is provided ? I don't think so...
> wdyt ?

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.