You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@mina.apache.org by Emmanuel Lecharny <el...@gmail.com> on 2010/01/22 18:22:35 UTC
Are we ready for MINA 2.0.0-RC2 ?
Hi guys,
the JIRA list has been cleared, we just have 5 remaining issues so far :
Bug DIRMINA-539 NioDatagramConnector doesn't takes the TrafficClass
value set to his DatagramSessionConfig
Impr DIRMINA-682 We need a better documentation for the
ExecutorFilter [was :Writing more than one message will block until the
MessageReceived as been fully proceced]
Impr DIRMINA-593 Javadoc & documentation for
org/apache/mina/filter/reqres
Task DIRMINA-477 Update page about differences between 1.x and 2.x
Task DIRMINA-708 Unbound thread growth on discovery attempts :
Improve documentation
With one bug ony, and not even a bug I think we will fix, my opinion is
that we are ready for a release.
Should I postpone all those issues to a newly created 2.0.0-GA version
and launch a vote ?
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.nextury.com
Re: Are we ready for MINA 2.0.0-RC2 ?
Posted by Ashish <pa...@gmail.com>.
On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 12:29 PM, Ashish <pa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 10:52 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny <el...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi guys,
>>
>> the JIRA list has been cleared, we just have 5 remaining issues so far :
>>
>>
>> Bug DIRMINA-539 NioDatagramConnector doesn't takes the TrafficClass
>> value set to his DatagramSessionConfig
>> Impr DIRMINA-682 We need a better documentation for the ExecutorFilter
>> [was :Writing more than one message will block until the
>> MessageReceived as been fully proceced]
>> Impr DIRMINA-593 Javadoc & documentation for
>> org/apache/mina/filter/reqres
>> Task DIRMINA-477 Update page about differences between 1.x and 2.x
>> Task DIRMINA-708 Unbound thread growth on discovery attempts : Improve
>> documentation
>>
>> With one bug ony, and not even a bug I think we will fix, my opinion is that
>> we are ready for a release.
>
> JIRA looks a lot lot better. Thanks to Emm :-)
>
> we have 7 issue that are unscheduled
>
> B DIRMINA-737 StateMachine deadlock on StateContext synchronization
> B DIRMINA-683 APR transport on FreeBSD throwing Exceptions
> B DIRMINA-738 Using IoEventQueueThrottler with a WriteRequestFilter
> can lead to hangs
> F DIRMINA-705 Transport for unix local sockets based on APR
> B DIRMINA-379 setKeepAlive/setTcpNoDelay and exceptions in Windows Vista
> I DIRMINA-758 APR code needs unit tests
> B DIRMINA-724 getScheduledWriteMessages not zero after all sessions closed
>
> Lets park them somewhere and remove unscheduled issues.
>
> Regarding DIRMINA 593 - I thought there was an app attached with this
> or some other JIRA which used ReqRes filter.
> I am having a hard time finding it out. Anyone has a clue, about that
> attachment?
Got it. The example was with DIRMINA 92. Will look into and try to
work the details out.
thanks
ashish
Re: Are we ready for MINA 2.0.0-RC2 ?
Posted by Ashish <pa...@gmail.com>.
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 10:52 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny <el...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> the JIRA list has been cleared, we just have 5 remaining issues so far :
>
>
> Bug DIRMINA-539 NioDatagramConnector doesn't takes the TrafficClass
> value set to his DatagramSessionConfig
> Impr DIRMINA-682 We need a better documentation for the ExecutorFilter
> [was :Writing more than one message will block until the
> MessageReceived as been fully proceced]
> Impr DIRMINA-593 Javadoc & documentation for
> org/apache/mina/filter/reqres
> Task DIRMINA-477 Update page about differences between 1.x and 2.x
> Task DIRMINA-708 Unbound thread growth on discovery attempts : Improve
> documentation
>
> With one bug ony, and not even a bug I think we will fix, my opinion is that
> we are ready for a release.
JIRA looks a lot lot better. Thanks to Emm :-)
we have 7 issue that are unscheduled
B DIRMINA-737 StateMachine deadlock on StateContext synchronization
B DIRMINA-683 APR transport on FreeBSD throwing Exceptions
B DIRMINA-738 Using IoEventQueueThrottler with a WriteRequestFilter
can lead to hangs
F DIRMINA-705 Transport for unix local sockets based on APR
B DIRMINA-379 setKeepAlive/setTcpNoDelay and exceptions in Windows Vista
I DIRMINA-758 APR code needs unit tests
B DIRMINA-724 getScheduledWriteMessages not zero after all sessions closed
Lets park them somewhere and remove unscheduled issues.
Regarding DIRMINA 593 - I thought there was an app attached with this
or some other JIRA which used ReqRes filter.
I am having a hard time finding it out. Anyone has a clue, about that
attachment?
thanks
ashish
Re: Are we ready for MINA 2.0.0-RC2 ?
Posted by "Alan D. Cabrera" <li...@toolazydogs.com>.
Makes sense to me. Let loose the Kraken!
Regards,
Alan
On Jan 22, 2010, at 12:55 PM, Norman Maurer wrote:
> +1,
>
> time for 2.0 !
>
> Bye,
> Norman
>
> 2010/1/22 Niklas Gustavsson <ni...@protocol7.com>:
>> On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 6:47 PM, Jeff Genender
>> <jg...@apache.org> wrote:
>>> May I ask why this must be a RC2? I think the 2.0 series has gone
>>> on a long
>>> time and its ok to release a 2.0 version.
>>
>> +1, go for it!
>>
>> /niklas
>>
Re: Are we ready for MINA 2.0.0-RC2 ?
Posted by Norman Maurer <no...@googlemail.com>.
+1,
time for 2.0 !
Bye,
Norman
2010/1/22 Niklas Gustavsson <ni...@protocol7.com>:
> On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 6:47 PM, Jeff Genender <jg...@apache.org> wrote:
>> May I ask why this must be a RC2? I think the 2.0 series has gone on a long
>> time and its ok to release a 2.0 version.
>
> +1, go for it!
>
> /niklas
>
Re: Are we ready for MINA 2.0.0-RC2 ?
Posted by Niklas Gustavsson <ni...@protocol7.com>.
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 6:47 PM, Jeff Genender <jg...@apache.org> wrote:
> May I ask why this must be a RC2? I think the 2.0 series has gone on a long
> time and its ok to release a 2.0 version.
+1, go for it!
/niklas
Re: Are we ready for MINA 2.0.0-RC2 ?
Posted by Ashish <pa...@gmail.com>.
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 1:53 PM, Julien Vermillard
<jv...@archean.fr> wrote:
> Hi,
> IMO it's dot zero ready, the main effort is on the website and all the
> PR stuff implying the 2.0 release.
> it would be a shame to release 2.0 without good announcement and an
> updated/cleaned website.
Sorry ! didn't get much :-(
Can we list down what all we need to do like cleanup and other stuff,
so that its easy.
One thing I can think off is moving out the 1.0 documentation to achieve.
Sorry for the dumb question :-)
> Julien
>
> Le Fri, 22 Jan 2010 10:47:12 -0700,
> Jeff Genender <jg...@apache.org> a écrit :
>
>> May I ask why this must be a RC2? I think the 2.0 series has gone
>> on a long time and its ok to release a 2.0 version. Thats why we
>> can release 2.0.1, etc. Also... folks have issues with 2.0 release
>> because the dot oh have negative connotations. IMHO, lets get a
>> real 2.0 out and start working on bug fixes.
>>
>> I think we should get out a nice 2.0 and one of the guys can blast
>> it to TSS, etc to show we are moving along again.
>>
>> Thoughts?
>>
>> Jeff
>>
>> On Jan 22, 2010, at 10:41 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
>>
>> > Sorry, there are some unscheduled issues too :
>> >
>> > DIRMINA-738 Using IoEventQueueThrottler with a
>> > WriteRequestFilter can lead to hangs
>> > DIRMINA-379 setKeepAlive/setTcpNoDelay and exceptions in
>> > Windows Vista
>> > DIRMINA-724 getScheduledWriteMessages not zero after all
>> > sessions closed
>> >
>> > I think we should at least check the first one before launching a
>> > vote...
>> >
>> >
>> > Julien Vermillard a écrit :
>> >> Le Fri, 22 Jan 2010 18:22:35 +0100,
>> >> Emmanuel Lecharny <el...@gmail.com> a écrit :
>> >>
Re : Are we ready for MINA 2.0.0-RC2 ?
Posted by Edouard De Oliveira <do...@yahoo.fr>.
deep purple one is very cool :)
Cordialement, Regards,
-Edouard De Oliveira-
----- Message d'origine ----
De : Emmanuel Lcharny <el...@gmail.com>
À : dev@mina.apache.org
Envoyé le : Lun 25 Janvier 2010, 18 h 27 min 14 s
Objet : Re: Are we ready for MINA 2.0.0-RC2 ?
Julien Vermillard a écrit :
> Le Mon, 25 Jan 2010 06:09:41 -0700,
> Jeff Genender <jg...@savoirtech.com> a écrit :
>
>
>> On Jan 25, 2010, at 1:23 AM, Julien Vermillard wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Hi,
>>> IMO it's dot zero ready, the main effort is on the website and all
>>> the PR stuff implying the 2.0 release.
>>> it would be a shame to release 2.0 without good announcement and an
>>> updated/cleaned website.
>>>
>>>
>> So lets do that ;-)
>>
>> Jeff
>>
>>
>
> I created a MINA2 space in confluence for preparing the new website
> (removing all the old 1.X references).
>
Here is the new mina 2 site :
http://mina.apache.org/mina2/
If you can't wait a few hours that the mirrors get updated, you can ook
at it using a proxy :
140.211.11..10:80
There is no content yet, just a new design taken from ADS.
If you don't like the deep purple (shame on you ! The best 70's band !)
header, I have a dark grey one.
Just let me now.
Re: Are we ready for MINA 2.0.0-RC2 ?
Posted by Emmanuel Lecharny <el...@gmail.com>.
Julien Vermillard a écrit :
>
> For the content we need to remove all the 1.X references and I would
> like to provide much more visibility to sub-projects (a bit like on
> directory.apache.org).
>
We should also keep some pointer to 1.0 somewhere.
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.nextury.com
Re: Are we ready for MINA 2.0.0-RC2 ?
Posted by Julien Vermillard <jv...@archean.fr>.
Le Tue, 26 Jan 2010 08:04:28 +0530,
Ashish <pa...@gmail.com> a écrit :
> > http://mina.apache.org/mina2/
> >
> > If you can't wait a few hours that the mirrors get updated, you can
> > ook at it using a proxy :
> > 140.211.11.10:80
> >
> > There is no content yet, just a new design taken from ADS.
> >
> > If you don't like the deep purple (shame on you ! The best 70's
> > band !) header, I have a dark grey one.
> >
> > Just let me now.
>
> Its looks cool... Now its time for the content.. :-)
>
IMO the purple is perfect with the dark colors of the logo
For the content we need to remove all the 1.X references and I would
like to provide much more visibility to sub-projects (a bit like on
directory.apache.org).
Julien
--
Julien Vermillard
Archean Technologies
http://www.archean.fr
Re: Are we ready for MINA 2.0.0-RC2 ?
Posted by Ashish <pa...@gmail.com>.
> http://mina.apache.org/mina2/
>
> If you can't wait a few hours that the mirrors get updated, you can ook at
> it using a proxy :
> 140.211.11.10:80
>
> There is no content yet, just a new design taken from ADS.
>
> If you don't like the deep purple (shame on you ! The best 70's band !)
> header, I have a dark grey one.
>
> Just let me now.
Its looks cool... Now its time for the content.. :-)
--
thanks
ashish
Blog: http://www.ashishpaliwal.com/blog
My Photo Galleries: http://www.pbase.com/ashishpaliwal
Re: Are we ready for MINA 2.0.0-RC2 ?
Posted by Emmanuel Lcharny <el...@gmail.com>.
Alan D. Cabrera a écrit :
>
>
> fussy point: should the copyright include 2010?
Changed. It will be 2010 now.
>
>
>
> Regards,
> Alan
>
>
Re: Are we ready for MINA 2.0.0-RC2 ?
Posted by "Alan D. Cabrera" <li...@toolazydogs.com>.
On Jan 25, 2010, at 9:27 AM, Emmanuel Lcharny wrote:
> Julien Vermillard a écrit :
>> Le Mon, 25 Jan 2010 06:09:41 -0700,
>> Jeff Genender <jg...@savoirtech.com> a écrit :
>>
>>
>>> On Jan 25, 2010, at 1:23 AM, Julien Vermillard wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>> IMO it's dot zero ready, the main effort is on the website and all
>>>> the PR stuff implying the 2.0 release.
>>>> it would be a shame to release 2.0 without good announcement and an
>>>> updated/cleaned website.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> So lets do that ;-)
>>>
>>> Jeff
>>>
>>>
>>
>> I created a MINA2 space in confluence for preparing the new website
>> (removing all the old 1.X references).
>>
>
> Here is the new mina 2 site :
> http://mina.apache.org/mina2/
>
> If you can't wait a few hours that the mirrors get updated, you can
> ook at it using a proxy :
> 140.211.11.10:80
>
> There is no content yet, just a new design taken from ADS.
>
> If you don't like the deep purple (shame on you ! The best 70's
> band !) header, I have a dark grey one.
>
> Just let me now.
fussy point: should the copyright include 2010?
Regards,
Alan
Re: Are we ready for MINA 2.0.0-RC2 ?
Posted by Emmanuel Lcharny <el...@gmail.com>.
Julien Vermillard a écrit :
> Le Mon, 25 Jan 2010 06:09:41 -0700,
> Jeff Genender <jg...@savoirtech.com> a écrit :
>
>
>> On Jan 25, 2010, at 1:23 AM, Julien Vermillard wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Hi,
>>> IMO it's dot zero ready, the main effort is on the website and all
>>> the PR stuff implying the 2.0 release.
>>> it would be a shame to release 2.0 without good announcement and an
>>> updated/cleaned website.
>>>
>>>
>> So lets do that ;-)
>>
>> Jeff
>>
>>
>
> I created a MINA2 space in confluence for preparing the new website
> (removing all the old 1.X references).
>
Here is the new mina 2 site :
http://mina.apache.org/mina2/
If you can't wait a few hours that the mirrors get updated, you can ook
at it using a proxy :
140.211.11.10:80
There is no content yet, just a new design taken from ADS.
If you don't like the deep purple (shame on you ! The best 70's band !)
header, I have a dark grey one.
Just let me now.
Re: Are we ready for MINA 2.0.0-RC2 ?
Posted by Julien Vermillard <jv...@archean.fr>.
Le Mon, 25 Jan 2010 06:09:41 -0700,
Jeff Genender <jg...@savoirtech.com> a écrit :
>
> On Jan 25, 2010, at 1:23 AM, Julien Vermillard wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> > IMO it's dot zero ready, the main effort is on the website and all
> > the PR stuff implying the 2.0 release.
> > it would be a shame to release 2.0 without good announcement and an
> > updated/cleaned website.
> >
>
> So lets do that ;-)
>
> Jeff
>
I created a MINA2 space in confluence for preparing the new website
(removing all the old 1.X references).
>
>
> > Julien
> >
> > Le Fri, 22 Jan 2010 10:47:12 -0700,
> > Jeff Genender <jg...@apache.org> a écrit :
> >
> >> May I ask why this must be a RC2? I think the 2.0 series has gone
> >> on a long time and its ok to release a 2.0 version. Thats why we
> >> can release 2.0.1, etc. Also... folks have issues with 2.0
> >> release because the dot oh have negative connotations. IMHO, lets
> >> get a real 2.0 out and start working on bug fixes.
> >>
> >> I think we should get out a nice 2.0 and one of the guys can blast
> >> it to TSS, etc to show we are moving along again.
> >>
> >> Thoughts?
> >>
> >> Jeff
> >>
> >> On Jan 22, 2010, at 10:41 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
> >>
> >>> Sorry, there are some unscheduled issues too :
> >>>
> >>> DIRMINA-738 Using IoEventQueueThrottler with a
> >>> WriteRequestFilter can lead to hangs
> >>> DIRMINA-379 setKeepAlive/setTcpNoDelay and exceptions in
> >>> Windows Vista
> >>> DIRMINA-724 getScheduledWriteMessages not zero after all
> >>> sessions closed
> >>>
> >>> I think we should at least check the first one before launching
> >>> a vote...
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Julien Vermillard a écrit :
> >>>> Le Fri, 22 Jan 2010 18:22:35 +0100,
> >>>> Emmanuel Lecharny <el...@gmail.com> a écrit :
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>> Hi guys,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> the JIRA list has been cleared, we just have 5 remaining issues
> >>>>> so far :
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Bug DIRMINA-539 NioDatagramConnector doesn't takes the
> >>>>> TrafficClass value set to his DatagramSessionConfig
> >>>>> Impr DIRMINA-682 We need a better documentation for the
> >>>>> ExecutorFilter [was :Writing more than one message will block
> >>>>> until the MessageReceived as been fully proceced]
> >>>>> Impr DIRMINA-593 Javadoc & documentation for
> >>>>> org/apache/mina/ filter/reqres
> >>>>> Task DIRMINA-477 Update page about differences between 1.x
> >>>>> and 2.x
> >>>>> Task DIRMINA-708 Unbound thread growth on discovery
> >>>>> attempts : Improve documentation
> >>>>>
> >>>>> With one bug ony, and not even a bug I think we will fix, my
> >>>>> opinion is that we are ready for a release.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Should I postpone all those issues to a newly created 2.0.0-GA
> >>>>> version and launch a vote ?
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> +1 for RC2 and postponing remaining issues
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Regards,
> >>> Cordialement,
> >>> Emmanuel Lécharny
> >>> www.nextury.com
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> > Julien Vermillard
> >
> > Archean Technologies
> > http://www.archean.fr
>
--
Julien Vermillard
Archean Technologies
http://www.archean.fr
Re: Are we ready for MINA 2.0.0-RC2 ?
Posted by Jeff Genender <jg...@savoirtech.com>.
On Jan 25, 2010, at 1:23 AM, Julien Vermillard wrote:
> Hi,
> IMO it's dot zero ready, the main effort is on the website and all the
> PR stuff implying the 2.0 release.
> it would be a shame to release 2.0 without good announcement and an
> updated/cleaned website.
>
So lets do that ;-)
Jeff
> Julien
>
> Le Fri, 22 Jan 2010 10:47:12 -0700,
> Jeff Genender <jg...@apache.org> a écrit :
>
>> May I ask why this must be a RC2? I think the 2.0 series has gone
>> on a long time and its ok to release a 2.0 version. Thats why we
>> can release 2.0.1, etc. Also... folks have issues with 2.0 release
>> because the dot oh have negative connotations. IMHO, lets get a
>> real 2.0 out and start working on bug fixes.
>>
>> I think we should get out a nice 2.0 and one of the guys can blast
>> it to TSS, etc to show we are moving along again.
>>
>> Thoughts?
>>
>> Jeff
>>
>> On Jan 22, 2010, at 10:41 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
>>
>>> Sorry, there are some unscheduled issues too :
>>>
>>> DIRMINA-738 Using IoEventQueueThrottler with a
>>> WriteRequestFilter can lead to hangs
>>> DIRMINA-379 setKeepAlive/setTcpNoDelay and exceptions in
>>> Windows Vista
>>> DIRMINA-724 getScheduledWriteMessages not zero after all
>>> sessions closed
>>>
>>> I think we should at least check the first one before launching a
>>> vote...
>>>
>>>
>>> Julien Vermillard a écrit :
>>>> Le Fri, 22 Jan 2010 18:22:35 +0100,
>>>> Emmanuel Lecharny <el...@gmail.com> a écrit :
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Hi guys,
>>>>>
>>>>> the JIRA list has been cleared, we just have 5 remaining issues so
>>>>> far :
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Bug DIRMINA-539 NioDatagramConnector doesn't takes the
>>>>> TrafficClass value set to his DatagramSessionConfig
>>>>> Impr DIRMINA-682 We need a better documentation for the
>>>>> ExecutorFilter [was :Writing more than one message will block
>>>>> until the MessageReceived as been fully proceced]
>>>>> Impr DIRMINA-593 Javadoc & documentation for org/apache/mina/
>>>>> filter/reqres
>>>>> Task DIRMINA-477 Update page about differences between 1.x
>>>>> and 2.x
>>>>> Task DIRMINA-708 Unbound thread growth on discovery
>>>>> attempts : Improve documentation
>>>>>
>>>>> With one bug ony, and not even a bug I think we will fix, my
>>>>> opinion is that we are ready for a release.
>>>>>
>>>>> Should I postpone all those issues to a newly created 2.0.0-GA
>>>>> version and launch a vote ?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> +1 for RC2 and postponing remaining issues
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Regards,
>>> Cordialement,
>>> Emmanuel Lécharny
>>> www.nextury.com
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Julien Vermillard
>
> Archean Technologies
> http://www.archean.fr
Re: Are we ready for MINA 2.0.0-RC2 ?
Posted by Julien Vermillard <jv...@archean.fr>.
Hi,
IMO it's dot zero ready, the main effort is on the website and all the
PR stuff implying the 2.0 release.
it would be a shame to release 2.0 without good announcement and an
updated/cleaned website.
Julien
Le Fri, 22 Jan 2010 10:47:12 -0700,
Jeff Genender <jg...@apache.org> a écrit :
> May I ask why this must be a RC2? I think the 2.0 series has gone
> on a long time and its ok to release a 2.0 version. Thats why we
> can release 2.0.1, etc. Also... folks have issues with 2.0 release
> because the dot oh have negative connotations. IMHO, lets get a
> real 2.0 out and start working on bug fixes.
>
> I think we should get out a nice 2.0 and one of the guys can blast
> it to TSS, etc to show we are moving along again.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> Jeff
>
> On Jan 22, 2010, at 10:41 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
>
> > Sorry, there are some unscheduled issues too :
> >
> > DIRMINA-738 Using IoEventQueueThrottler with a
> > WriteRequestFilter can lead to hangs
> > DIRMINA-379 setKeepAlive/setTcpNoDelay and exceptions in
> > Windows Vista
> > DIRMINA-724 getScheduledWriteMessages not zero after all
> > sessions closed
> >
> > I think we should at least check the first one before launching a
> > vote...
> >
> >
> > Julien Vermillard a écrit :
> >> Le Fri, 22 Jan 2010 18:22:35 +0100,
> >> Emmanuel Lecharny <el...@gmail.com> a écrit :
> >>
> >>
> >>> Hi guys,
> >>>
> >>> the JIRA list has been cleared, we just have 5 remaining issues so
> >>> far :
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Bug DIRMINA-539 NioDatagramConnector doesn't takes the
> >>> TrafficClass value set to his DatagramSessionConfig
> >>> Impr DIRMINA-682 We need a better documentation for the
> >>> ExecutorFilter [was :Writing more than one message will block
> >>> until the MessageReceived as been fully proceced]
> >>> Impr DIRMINA-593 Javadoc & documentation for org/apache/mina/
> >>> filter/reqres
> >>> Task DIRMINA-477 Update page about differences between 1.x
> >>> and 2.x
> >>> Task DIRMINA-708 Unbound thread growth on discovery
> >>> attempts : Improve documentation
> >>>
> >>> With one bug ony, and not even a bug I think we will fix, my
> >>> opinion is that we are ready for a release.
> >>>
> >>> Should I postpone all those issues to a newly created 2.0.0-GA
> >>> version and launch a vote ?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >> +1 for RC2 and postponing remaining issues
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> > Regards,
> > Cordialement,
> > Emmanuel Lécharny
> > www.nextury.com
> >
> >
>
--
Julien Vermillard
Archean Technologies
http://www.archean.fr
Re: Are we ready for MINA 2.0.0-RC2 ?
Posted by Ashish <pa...@gmail.com>.
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 11:17 PM, Jeff Genender <jg...@apache.org> wrote:
> May I ask why this must be a RC2? I think the 2.0 series has gone on a long
> time and its ok to release a 2.0 version. Thats why we can release 2.0.1,
> etc. Also... folks have issues with 2.0 release because the dot oh have
> negative connotations. IMHO, lets get a real 2.0 out and start working on
> bug fixes.
+1
> I think we should get out a nice 2.0 and one of the guys can blast it to
> TSS, etc to show we are moving along again.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> Jeff
>
> On Jan 22, 2010, at 10:41 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
>
>> Sorry, there are some unscheduled issues too :
>>
>> DIRMINA-738 Using IoEventQueueThrottler with a WriteRequestFilter can
>> lead to hangs
>> DIRMINA-379 setKeepAlive/setTcpNoDelay and exceptions in Windows Vista
>> DIRMINA-724 getScheduledWriteMessages not zero after all sessions
>> closed
>>
>> I think we should at least check the first one before launching a vote...
>>
>>
>> Julien Vermillard a écrit :
>>>
>>> Le Fri, 22 Jan 2010 18:22:35 +0100,
>>> Emmanuel Lecharny <el...@gmail.com> a écrit :
>>>
>>>
>>>> Hi guys,
>>>>
>>>> the JIRA list has been cleared, we just have 5 remaining issues so
>>>> far :
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Bug DIRMINA-539 NioDatagramConnector doesn't takes the
>>>> TrafficClass value set to his DatagramSessionConfig
>>>> Impr DIRMINA-682 We need a better documentation for the
>>>> ExecutorFilter [was :Writing more than one message will block until
>>>> the MessageReceived as been fully proceced]
>>>> Impr DIRMINA-593 Javadoc & documentation for
>>>> org/apache/mina/filter/reqres
>>>> Task DIRMINA-477 Update page about differences between 1.x and 2.x
>>>> Task DIRMINA-708 Unbound thread growth on discovery attempts :
>>>> Improve documentation
>>>>
>>>> With one bug ony, and not even a bug I think we will fix, my opinion
>>>> is that we are ready for a release.
>>>>
>>>> Should I postpone all those issues to a newly created 2.0.0-GA
>>>> version and launch a vote ?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> +1 for RC2 and postponing remaining issues
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Regards,
>> Cordialement,
>> Emmanuel Lécharny
>> www.nextury.com
>>
>>
>
>
--
thanks
ashish
Blog: http://www.ashishpaliwal.com/blog
My Photo Galleries: http://www.pbase.com/ashishpaliwal
Re: Are we ready for MINA 2.0.0-RC2 ?
Posted by Emmanuel Lecharny <el...@gmail.com>.
Jeff Genender a écrit :
> May I ask why this must be a RC2? I think the 2.0 series has gone on
> a long time and its ok to release a 2.0 version. Thats why we can
> release 2.0.1, etc. Also... folks have issues with 2.0 release
> because the dot oh have negative connotations. IMHO, lets get a real
> 2.0 out and start working on bug fixes.
>
> I think we should get out a nice 2.0 and one of the guys can blast it
> to TSS, etc to show we are moving along again.
Hmm, ok, I think it's a decent choice at this point. Let's get a 2.0.0
oiy, see what happens in the wide, and get ready to quickly fix the code
if necessarY.
I like the idea.
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.nextury.com
Re: Are we ready for MINA 2.0.0-RC2 ?
Posted by Jeff Genender <jg...@apache.org>.
May I ask why this must be a RC2? I think the 2.0 series has gone on
a long time and its ok to release a 2.0 version. Thats why we can
release 2.0.1, etc. Also... folks have issues with 2.0 release
because the dot oh have negative connotations. IMHO, lets get a real
2.0 out and start working on bug fixes.
I think we should get out a nice 2.0 and one of the guys can blast it
to TSS, etc to show we are moving along again.
Thoughts?
Jeff
On Jan 22, 2010, at 10:41 AM, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
> Sorry, there are some unscheduled issues too :
>
> DIRMINA-738 Using IoEventQueueThrottler with a WriteRequestFilter
> can lead to hangs
> DIRMINA-379 setKeepAlive/setTcpNoDelay and exceptions in Windows
> Vista
> DIRMINA-724 getScheduledWriteMessages not zero after all sessions
> closed
>
> I think we should at least check the first one before launching a
> vote...
>
>
> Julien Vermillard a écrit :
>> Le Fri, 22 Jan 2010 18:22:35 +0100,
>> Emmanuel Lecharny <el...@gmail.com> a écrit :
>>
>>
>>> Hi guys,
>>>
>>> the JIRA list has been cleared, we just have 5 remaining issues so
>>> far :
>>>
>>>
>>> Bug DIRMINA-539 NioDatagramConnector doesn't takes the
>>> TrafficClass value set to his DatagramSessionConfig
>>> Impr DIRMINA-682 We need a better documentation for the
>>> ExecutorFilter [was :Writing more than one message will block until
>>> the MessageReceived as been fully proceced]
>>> Impr DIRMINA-593 Javadoc & documentation for org/apache/mina/
>>> filter/reqres
>>> Task DIRMINA-477 Update page about differences between 1.x and
>>> 2.x
>>> Task DIRMINA-708 Unbound thread growth on discovery attempts :
>>> Improve documentation
>>>
>>> With one bug ony, and not even a bug I think we will fix, my opinion
>>> is that we are ready for a release.
>>>
>>> Should I postpone all those issues to a newly created 2.0.0-GA
>>> version and launch a vote ?
>>>
>>>
>>
>> +1 for RC2 and postponing remaining issues
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Cordialement,
> Emmanuel Lécharny
> www.nextury.com
>
>
Re: Are we ready for MINA 2.0.0-RC2 ?
Posted by Emmanuel Lecharny <el...@gmail.com>.
Sorry, there are some unscheduled issues too :
DIRMINA-738 Using IoEventQueueThrottler with a WriteRequestFilter can
lead to hangs
DIRMINA-379 setKeepAlive/setTcpNoDelay and exceptions in Windows Vista
DIRMINA-724 getScheduledWriteMessages not zero after all sessions closed
I think we should at least check the first one before launching a vote...
Julien Vermillard a écrit :
> Le Fri, 22 Jan 2010 18:22:35 +0100,
> Emmanuel Lecharny <el...@gmail.com> a écrit :
>
>
>> Hi guys,
>>
>> the JIRA list has been cleared, we just have 5 remaining issues so
>> far :
>>
>>
>> Bug DIRMINA-539 NioDatagramConnector doesn't takes the
>> TrafficClass value set to his DatagramSessionConfig
>> Impr DIRMINA-682 We need a better documentation for the
>> ExecutorFilter [was :Writing more than one message will block until
>> the MessageReceived as been fully proceced]
>> Impr DIRMINA-593 Javadoc & documentation for
>> org/apache/mina/filter/reqres
>> Task DIRMINA-477 Update page about differences between 1.x and 2.x
>> Task DIRMINA-708 Unbound thread growth on discovery attempts :
>> Improve documentation
>>
>> With one bug ony, and not even a bug I think we will fix, my opinion
>> is that we are ready for a release.
>>
>> Should I postpone all those issues to a newly created 2.0.0-GA
>> version and launch a vote ?
>>
>>
>
> +1 for RC2 and postponing remaining issues
>
>
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.nextury.com
Re: Are we ready for MINA 2.0.0-RC2 ?
Posted by Julien Vermillard <jv...@archean.fr>.
Le Fri, 22 Jan 2010 18:22:35 +0100,
Emmanuel Lecharny <el...@gmail.com> a écrit :
> Hi guys,
>
> the JIRA list has been cleared, we just have 5 remaining issues so
> far :
>
>
> Bug DIRMINA-539 NioDatagramConnector doesn't takes the
> TrafficClass value set to his DatagramSessionConfig
> Impr DIRMINA-682 We need a better documentation for the
> ExecutorFilter [was :Writing more than one message will block until
> the MessageReceived as been fully proceced]
> Impr DIRMINA-593 Javadoc & documentation for
> org/apache/mina/filter/reqres
> Task DIRMINA-477 Update page about differences between 1.x and 2.x
> Task DIRMINA-708 Unbound thread growth on discovery attempts :
> Improve documentation
>
> With one bug ony, and not even a bug I think we will fix, my opinion
> is that we are ready for a release.
>
> Should I postpone all those issues to a newly created 2.0.0-GA
> version and launch a vote ?
>
+1 for RC2 and postponing remaining issues
--
Julien Vermillard
Archean Technologies
http://www.archean.fr