You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@phoenix.apache.org by Josh Elser <el...@apache.org> on 2019/04/30 14:39:20 UTC
[DISCUSS] Next Phoenix 5.x release (was "Board report due in ~1
week")
Let's leave the other thread for the board report, please. I've changed
the subject as such.
Thanks for volunteering to be RM.
I'm of the opinion that we should just update to the latest HBase 2.0.x
line. The compatibility assertions from HBase should make this a no-op
for us to change versions. There are arguments, however, in both ways
that we should use the earliest, non-breaking version of HBase.
As the RM, it is your prerogative to tell everyone else how you are
tracking it :). Figure out what fixVersion you're using on Jira, and
then either manage the list of open issues in there yourself, or push
out issues and have folks put issues back in which they feel must be
included.
Since this is your first time, I would prioritize an rc0 ASAP so that
you can get comfortable with the process (even if we know that there are
other fixes which must be made before the final release).
On 4/30/19 2:34 AM, Jaanai Zhang wrote:
> I will try doing release 5.0.1. Tow things need to confirm:
>
> 1. According to the thread[1], a new Phoenix 5.0.1 will support HBase
> 2.0.2, right? As far as I know, some improvements of HBase 2.0.2 will cause
> some critical issues, for example,
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-5250 (This issue from our
> production environments, we had used HBase 2.0.2 in Phoenix 5.0).
>
> 2. We should have a clear JIRA list for a 5.0.1, I am not sure what JIRAs
> should go into it, only critical and blocked JIRAs apply for a 5.0.1? If I
> know what priority need to pick, I will collect them.
>
>
> ----------------------------------------
> Jaanai Zhang
> Best regards!
>
>
>
> Thomas D'Silva <td...@salesforce.com.invalid> 于2019年4月30日周二 上午10:06写道：
>
>> Jaanai,
>>
>> We are waiting for a few omid bug fixes to do the 4.15/5.1 release that
>> will have splittable system catalog and the omid integration.
>> Are you interested in doing a 5.0.1 release that has the HBase 2.0.x
>> compatibility fixes that were discussed in a previous thread[1]?
>>
>> The steps to create a RC are straightforward and documented here:
>> https://phoenix.apache.org/release.html.
>> The main thing you need to do is to add your code signing key to
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/phoenix/KEYS (follow the steps at
>> the start of that file)
>> and then commit using svn. Then you can follow the rest of the steps listed
>> in "How to do a release"
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Thomas
>>
>> [1]
>>
>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/99fcc737d7a8f82ddffb1b34a64f7099f7909900b8bea36dd6afca16@%3Cdev.phoenix.apache.org%3E
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 6:33 PM Jaanai Zhang <cl...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I would like to volunteer for a new 5.x release if someone can guide me
>>> release process. Thanks.
>>>
>>> ----------------------------------------
>>> Jaanai Zhang
>>> Best regards!
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Josh Elser <el...@apache.org> 于2019年4月30日周二 上午12:39写道：
>>>
>>>> Hiya folks,
>>>>
>>>> It's about that time for another board report. Please reply here with
>>>> anything of merit that you think the board might find
>>>> interesting/useful. As a reminder, they board is typically more
>>>> concerned with high-level project/community details than the
>>>> nuts-and-bolts of the code changes for the project.
>>>>
>>>> On my radar already is...
>>>>
>>>> * Multiple new committers and PMC'ers (thanks so much to the folks who
>>>> have been driving votes!)
>>>> * NoSQL day in May
>>>> * 4.14.2 in vote
>>>> * Need for a new 5.x.y release (if there are no volunteers, I may have
>>>> to find the time to make this happen. It's been too long)
>>>>
>>>> Thanks!
>>>>
>>>> - Josh
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Next Phoenix 5.x release (was "Board report due in ~1
week")
Posted by Josh Elser <el...@apache.org>.
I'd say we update to HBase-2.0.3 as that is the latest, known-good
version. Of course, I thought the same of that for 2.0.5 up until a week
or two ago :)
Let's get a branch made and check it out.
On 5/13/19 9:00 AM, Jaanai Zhang wrote:
> So we can keep the current HBase version in 5.0.1?
>
> ----------------------------------------
> Jaanai Zhang
> Best regards!
>
>
>
> Jaanai Zhang <cl...@gmail.com> 于2019年5月13日周一 下午8:22写道：
>
>> +1
>>
>> ----------------------------------------
>> Jaanai Zhang
>> Best regards!
>>
>>
>>
>> Thomas D'Silva <td...@salesforce.com.invalid> 于2019年5月10日周五 下午1:25写道：
>>
>>> +1 to this approach.
>>>
>>> On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 9:22 AM Josh Elser <el...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> After working on trying to make Phoenix compatible with >=HBase 2.0.4,
>>>> I'm wondering if it would just be good to get 5.0.1 out the door and try
>>>> to fix HBase compat in a 5.1.0, acknowledging that we don't work with
>>>> the newer 2.0.x HBase versions (really, anything that contains
>>>> HBASE-21401[1]).
>>>>
>>>> I feel like it's much less risky to just acknowledge that we're limited
>>>> in target HBase version for a bug-fix release.
>>>>
>>>> What do folks think? That would lessen the burden on you, Jaanai.
>>>>
>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21401
>>>>
>>>> On 5/1/19 5:35 PM, Josh Elser wrote:
>>>>> I think it would be better to figure out if there is anything
>>> currently
>>>>> on master that _shouldn't_ be included in a 5.0.1. My guess would be
>>>>> "no". It feels like branching for the sake of branching to keep 5.0.1
>>>>> and 5.1.0 distinct.
>>>>>
>>>>> On 5/1/19 12:38 AM, Thomas D'Silva wrote:> Should we use 2.0.5 ( the
>>>>> latest released HBase version )? If PHOENIX-5250
>>>>> > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-5250> is a blocker
>>>> we
>>>>> will
>>>>> > need to fix it before we can release 5.0.1 (or 5.1).
>>>>> >
>>>>> > These are the list of bugs that have a fix version of 5.1 :
>>>>> >
>>>>>
>>>>
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20PHOENIX%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%205.1.0%20AND%20issuetype%20%20%3D%20Bug
>>>>>
>>>>> > We should figure out which of these we want to cherrypick for the
>>>> 5.0.1
>>>>> > release.
>>>>>
>>>>> On 4/30/19 10:39 AM, Josh Elser wrote:
>>>>>> Let's leave the other thread for the board report, please. I've
>>>>>> changed the subject as such.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks for volunteering to be RM.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm of the opinion that we should just update to the latest HBase
>>>>>> 2.0.x line. The compatibility assertions from HBase should make this
>>> a
>>>>>> no-op for us to change versions. There are arguments, however, in
>>> both
>>>>>> ways that we should use the earliest, non-breaking version of HBase.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> As the RM, it is your prerogative to tell everyone else how you are
>>>>>> tracking it :). Figure out what fixVersion you're using on Jira, and
>>>>>> then either manage the list of open issues in there yourself, or push
>>>>>> out issues and have folks put issues back in which they feel must be
>>>>>> included.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Since this is your first time, I would prioritize an rc0 ASAP so that
>>>>>> you can get comfortable with the process (even if we know that there
>>>>>> are other fixes which must be made before the final release).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 4/30/19 2:34 AM, Jaanai Zhang wrote:
>>>>>>> I will try doing release 5.0.1. Tow things need to confirm:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 1. According to the thread[1], a new Phoenix 5.0.1 will support
>>> HBase
>>>>>>> 2.0.2, right? As far as I know, some improvements of HBase 2.0.2
>>> will
>>>>>>> cause
>>>>>>> some critical issues, for example,
>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-5250 (This issue from
>>>> our
>>>>>>> production environments, we had used HBase 2.0.2 in Phoenix 5.0).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 2. We should have a clear JIRA list for a 5.0.1, I am not sure what
>>>>>>> JIRAs
>>>>>>> should go into it, only critical and blocked JIRAs apply for a
>>> 5.0.1?
>>>>>>> If I
>>>>>>> know what priority need to pick, I will collect them.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ----------------------------------------
>>>>>>> Jaanai Zhang
>>>>>>> Best regards!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thomas D'Silva <td...@salesforce.com.invalid> 于2019年4月30日周二
>>>>>>> 上 午10:06写道：
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Jaanai,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> We are waiting for a few omid bug fixes to do the 4.15/5.1 release
>>>> that
>>>>>>>> will have splittable system catalog and the omid integration.
>>>>>>>> Are you interested in doing a 5.0.1 release that has the HBase
>>> 2.0.x
>>>>>>>> compatibility fixes that were discussed in a previous thread[1]?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The steps to create a RC are straightforward and documented here:
>>>>>>>> https://phoenix.apache.org/release.html.
>>>>>>>> The main thing you need to do is to add your code signing key to
>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/phoenix/KEYS (follow the
>>>>>>>> steps at
>>>>>>>> the start of that file)
>>>>>>>> and then commit using svn. Then you can follow the rest of the
>>> steps
>>>>>>>> listed
>>>>>>>> in "How to do a release"
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>> Thomas
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>
>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/99fcc737d7a8f82ddffb1b34a64f7099f7909900b8bea36dd6afca16@%3Cdev.phoenix.apache.org%3E
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 6:33 PM Jaanai Zhang <
>>> cloud.poster@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I would like to volunteer for a new 5.x release if someone can
>>>>>>>>> guide me
>>>>>>>>> release process. Thanks.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ----------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>> Jaanai Zhang
>>>>>>>>> Best regards!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Josh Elser <el...@apache.org> 于2019年4月30日周二 上午12:39写道：
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hiya folks,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> It's about that time for another board report. Please reply here
>>>> with
>>>>>>>>>> anything of merit that you think the board might find
>>>>>>>>>> interesting/useful. As a reminder, they board is typically more
>>>>>>>>>> concerned with high-level project/community details than the
>>>>>>>>>> nuts-and-bolts of the code changes for the project.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On my radar already is...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> * Multiple new committers and PMC'ers (thanks so much to the
>>> folks
>>>>>>>>>> who
>>>>>>>>>> have been driving votes!)
>>>>>>>>>> * NoSQL day in May
>>>>>>>>>> * 4.14.2 in vote
>>>>>>>>>> * Need for a new 5.x.y release (if there are no volunteers, I may
>>>>>>>>>> have
>>>>>>>>>> to find the time to make this happen. It's been too long)
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> - Josh
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Next Phoenix 5.x release (was "Board report due in ~1 week")
Posted by Jaanai Zhang <cl...@gmail.com>.
So we can keep the current HBase version in 5.0.1?
----------------------------------------
Jaanai Zhang
Best regards!
Jaanai Zhang <cl...@gmail.com> 于2019年5月13日周一 下午8:22写道：
> +1
>
> ----------------------------------------
> Jaanai Zhang
> Best regards!
>
>
>
> Thomas D'Silva <td...@salesforce.com.invalid> 于2019年5月10日周五 下午1:25写道：
>
>> +1 to this approach.
>>
>> On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 9:22 AM Josh Elser <el...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> > After working on trying to make Phoenix compatible with >=HBase 2.0.4,
>> > I'm wondering if it would just be good to get 5.0.1 out the door and try
>> > to fix HBase compat in a 5.1.0, acknowledging that we don't work with
>> > the newer 2.0.x HBase versions (really, anything that contains
>> > HBASE-21401[1]).
>> >
>> > I feel like it's much less risky to just acknowledge that we're limited
>> > in target HBase version for a bug-fix release.
>> >
>> > What do folks think? That would lessen the burden on you, Jaanai.
>> >
>> > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21401
>> >
>> > On 5/1/19 5:35 PM, Josh Elser wrote:
>> > > I think it would be better to figure out if there is anything
>> currently
>> > > on master that _shouldn't_ be included in a 5.0.1. My guess would be
>> > > "no". It feels like branching for the sake of branching to keep 5.0.1
>> > > and 5.1.0 distinct.
>> > >
>> > > On 5/1/19 12:38 AM, Thomas D'Silva wrote:> Should we use 2.0.5 ( the
>> > > latest released HBase version )? If PHOENIX-5250
>> > > > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-5250> is a blocker
>> > we
>> > > will
>> > > > need to fix it before we can release 5.0.1 (or 5.1).
>> > > >
>> > > > These are the list of bugs that have a fix version of 5.1 :
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20PHOENIX%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%205.1.0%20AND%20issuetype%20%20%3D%20Bug
>> > >
>> > > > We should figure out which of these we want to cherrypick for the
>> > 5.0.1
>> > > > release.
>> > >
>> > > On 4/30/19 10:39 AM, Josh Elser wrote:
>> > >> Let's leave the other thread for the board report, please. I've
>> > >> changed the subject as such.
>> > >>
>> > >> Thanks for volunteering to be RM.
>> > >>
>> > >> I'm of the opinion that we should just update to the latest HBase
>> > >> 2.0.x line. The compatibility assertions from HBase should make this
>> a
>> > >> no-op for us to change versions. There are arguments, however, in
>> both
>> > >> ways that we should use the earliest, non-breaking version of HBase.
>> > >>
>> > >> As the RM, it is your prerogative to tell everyone else how you are
>> > >> tracking it :). Figure out what fixVersion you're using on Jira, and
>> > >> then either manage the list of open issues in there yourself, or push
>> > >> out issues and have folks put issues back in which they feel must be
>> > >> included.
>> > >>
>> > >> Since this is your first time, I would prioritize an rc0 ASAP so that
>> > >> you can get comfortable with the process (even if we know that there
>> > >> are other fixes which must be made before the final release).
>> > >>
>> > >> On 4/30/19 2:34 AM, Jaanai Zhang wrote:
>> > >>> I will try doing release 5.0.1. Tow things need to confirm:
>> > >>>
>> > >>> 1. According to the thread[1], a new Phoenix 5.0.1 will support
>> HBase
>> > >>> 2.0.2, right? As far as I know, some improvements of HBase 2.0.2
>> will
>> > >>> cause
>> > >>> some critical issues, for example,
>> > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-5250 (This issue from
>> > our
>> > >>> production environments, we had used HBase 2.0.2 in Phoenix 5.0).
>> > >>>
>> > >>> 2. We should have a clear JIRA list for a 5.0.1, I am not sure what
>> > >>> JIRAs
>> > >>> should go into it, only critical and blocked JIRAs apply for a
>> 5.0.1?
>> > >>> If I
>> > >>> know what priority need to pick, I will collect them.
>> > >>>
>> > >>>
>> > >>> ----------------------------------------
>> > >>> Jaanai Zhang
>> > >>> Best regards!
>> > >>>
>> > >>>
>> > >>>
>> > >>> Thomas D'Silva <td...@salesforce.com.invalid> 于2019年4月30日周二
>> > >>> 上 午10:06写道：
>> > >>>
>> > >>>> Jaanai,
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>> We are waiting for a few omid bug fixes to do the 4.15/5.1 release
>> > that
>> > >>>> will have splittable system catalog and the omid integration.
>> > >>>> Are you interested in doing a 5.0.1 release that has the HBase
>> 2.0.x
>> > >>>> compatibility fixes that were discussed in a previous thread[1]?
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>> The steps to create a RC are straightforward and documented here:
>> > >>>> https://phoenix.apache.org/release.html.
>> > >>>> The main thing you need to do is to add your code signing key to
>> > >>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/phoenix/KEYS (follow the
>> > >>>> steps at
>> > >>>> the start of that file)
>> > >>>> and then commit using svn. Then you can follow the rest of the
>> steps
>> > >>>> listed
>> > >>>> in "How to do a release"
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>> Thanks,
>> > >>>> Thomas
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>> [1]
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>>
>> >
>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/99fcc737d7a8f82ddffb1b34a64f7099f7909900b8bea36dd6afca16@%3Cdev.phoenix.apache.org%3E
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>> On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 6:33 PM Jaanai Zhang <
>> cloud.poster@gmail.com>
>> > >>>> wrote:
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>>> I would like to volunteer for a new 5.x release if someone can
>> > >>>>> guide me
>> > >>>>> release process. Thanks.
>> > >>>>>
>> > >>>>> ----------------------------------------
>> > >>>>> Jaanai Zhang
>> > >>>>> Best regards!
>> > >>>>>
>> > >>>>>
>> > >>>>>
>> > >>>>> Josh Elser <el...@apache.org> 于2019年4月30日周二 上午12:39写道：
>> > >>>>>
>> > >>>>>> Hiya folks,
>> > >>>>>>
>> > >>>>>> It's about that time for another board report. Please reply here
>> > with
>> > >>>>>> anything of merit that you think the board might find
>> > >>>>>> interesting/useful. As a reminder, they board is typically more
>> > >>>>>> concerned with high-level project/community details than the
>> > >>>>>> nuts-and-bolts of the code changes for the project.
>> > >>>>>>
>> > >>>>>> On my radar already is...
>> > >>>>>>
>> > >>>>>> * Multiple new committers and PMC'ers (thanks so much to the
>> folks
>> > >>>>>> who
>> > >>>>>> have been driving votes!)
>> > >>>>>> * NoSQL day in May
>> > >>>>>> * 4.14.2 in vote
>> > >>>>>> * Need for a new 5.x.y release (if there are no volunteers, I may
>> > >>>>>> have
>> > >>>>>> to find the time to make this happen. It's been too long)
>> > >>>>>>
>> > >>>>>> Thanks!
>> > >>>>>>
>> > >>>>>> - Josh
>> > >>>>>>
>> > >>>>>
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>
>> >
>>
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Next Phoenix 5.x release (was "Board report due in ~1 week")
Posted by Jaanai Zhang <cl...@gmail.com>.
+1
----------------------------------------
Jaanai Zhang
Best regards!
Thomas D'Silva <td...@salesforce.com.invalid> 于2019年5月10日周五 下午1:25写道：
> +1 to this approach.
>
> On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 9:22 AM Josh Elser <el...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > After working on trying to make Phoenix compatible with >=HBase 2.0.4,
> > I'm wondering if it would just be good to get 5.0.1 out the door and try
> > to fix HBase compat in a 5.1.0, acknowledging that we don't work with
> > the newer 2.0.x HBase versions (really, anything that contains
> > HBASE-21401[1]).
> >
> > I feel like it's much less risky to just acknowledge that we're limited
> > in target HBase version for a bug-fix release.
> >
> > What do folks think? That would lessen the burden on you, Jaanai.
> >
> > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21401
> >
> > On 5/1/19 5:35 PM, Josh Elser wrote:
> > > I think it would be better to figure out if there is anything currently
> > > on master that _shouldn't_ be included in a 5.0.1. My guess would be
> > > "no". It feels like branching for the sake of branching to keep 5.0.1
> > > and 5.1.0 distinct.
> > >
> > > On 5/1/19 12:38 AM, Thomas D'Silva wrote:> Should we use 2.0.5 ( the
> > > latest released HBase version )? If PHOENIX-5250
> > > > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-5250> is a blocker
> > we
> > > will
> > > > need to fix it before we can release 5.0.1 (or 5.1).
> > > >
> > > > These are the list of bugs that have a fix version of 5.1 :
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20PHOENIX%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%205.1.0%20AND%20issuetype%20%20%3D%20Bug
> > >
> > > > We should figure out which of these we want to cherrypick for the
> > 5.0.1
> > > > release.
> > >
> > > On 4/30/19 10:39 AM, Josh Elser wrote:
> > >> Let's leave the other thread for the board report, please. I've
> > >> changed the subject as such.
> > >>
> > >> Thanks for volunteering to be RM.
> > >>
> > >> I'm of the opinion that we should just update to the latest HBase
> > >> 2.0.x line. The compatibility assertions from HBase should make this a
> > >> no-op for us to change versions. There are arguments, however, in both
> > >> ways that we should use the earliest, non-breaking version of HBase.
> > >>
> > >> As the RM, it is your prerogative to tell everyone else how you are
> > >> tracking it :). Figure out what fixVersion you're using on Jira, and
> > >> then either manage the list of open issues in there yourself, or push
> > >> out issues and have folks put issues back in which they feel must be
> > >> included.
> > >>
> > >> Since this is your first time, I would prioritize an rc0 ASAP so that
> > >> you can get comfortable with the process (even if we know that there
> > >> are other fixes which must be made before the final release).
> > >>
> > >> On 4/30/19 2:34 AM, Jaanai Zhang wrote:
> > >>> I will try doing release 5.0.1. Tow things need to confirm:
> > >>>
> > >>> 1. According to the thread[1], a new Phoenix 5.0.1 will support
> HBase
> > >>> 2.0.2, right? As far as I know, some improvements of HBase 2.0.2 will
> > >>> cause
> > >>> some critical issues, for example,
> > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-5250 (This issue from
> > our
> > >>> production environments, we had used HBase 2.0.2 in Phoenix 5.0).
> > >>>
> > >>> 2. We should have a clear JIRA list for a 5.0.1, I am not sure what
> > >>> JIRAs
> > >>> should go into it, only critical and blocked JIRAs apply for a 5.0.1?
> > >>> If I
> > >>> know what priority need to pick, I will collect them.
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> ----------------------------------------
> > >>> Jaanai Zhang
> > >>> Best regards!
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> Thomas D'Silva <td...@salesforce.com.invalid> 于2019年4月30日周二
> > >>> 上 午10:06写道：
> > >>>
> > >>>> Jaanai,
> > >>>>
> > >>>> We are waiting for a few omid bug fixes to do the 4.15/5.1 release
> > that
> > >>>> will have splittable system catalog and the omid integration.
> > >>>> Are you interested in doing a 5.0.1 release that has the HBase 2.0.x
> > >>>> compatibility fixes that were discussed in a previous thread[1]?
> > >>>>
> > >>>> The steps to create a RC are straightforward and documented here:
> > >>>> https://phoenix.apache.org/release.html.
> > >>>> The main thing you need to do is to add your code signing key to
> > >>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/phoenix/KEYS (follow the
> > >>>> steps at
> > >>>> the start of that file)
> > >>>> and then commit using svn. Then you can follow the rest of the steps
> > >>>> listed
> > >>>> in "How to do a release"
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Thanks,
> > >>>> Thomas
> > >>>>
> > >>>> [1]
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> >
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/99fcc737d7a8f82ddffb1b34a64f7099f7909900b8bea36dd6afca16@%3Cdev.phoenix.apache.org%3E
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 6:33 PM Jaanai Zhang <
> cloud.poster@gmail.com>
> > >>>> wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> I would like to volunteer for a new 5.x release if someone can
> > >>>>> guide me
> > >>>>> release process. Thanks.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> ----------------------------------------
> > >>>>> Jaanai Zhang
> > >>>>> Best regards!
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Josh Elser <el...@apache.org> 于2019年4月30日周二 上午12:39写道：
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> Hiya folks,
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> It's about that time for another board report. Please reply here
> > with
> > >>>>>> anything of merit that you think the board might find
> > >>>>>> interesting/useful. As a reminder, they board is typically more
> > >>>>>> concerned with high-level project/community details than the
> > >>>>>> nuts-and-bolts of the code changes for the project.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> On my radar already is...
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> * Multiple new committers and PMC'ers (thanks so much to the folks
> > >>>>>> who
> > >>>>>> have been driving votes!)
> > >>>>>> * NoSQL day in May
> > >>>>>> * 4.14.2 in vote
> > >>>>>> * Need for a new 5.x.y release (if there are no volunteers, I may
> > >>>>>> have
> > >>>>>> to find the time to make this happen. It's been too long)
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Thanks!
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> - Josh
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>
> >
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Next Phoenix 5.x release (was "Board report due in ~1 week")
Posted by Thomas D'Silva <td...@salesforce.com.INVALID>.
+1 to this approach.
On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 9:22 AM Josh Elser <el...@apache.org> wrote:
> After working on trying to make Phoenix compatible with >=HBase 2.0.4,
> I'm wondering if it would just be good to get 5.0.1 out the door and try
> to fix HBase compat in a 5.1.0, acknowledging that we don't work with
> the newer 2.0.x HBase versions (really, anything that contains
> HBASE-21401[1]).
>
> I feel like it's much less risky to just acknowledge that we're limited
> in target HBase version for a bug-fix release.
>
> What do folks think? That would lessen the burden on you, Jaanai.
>
> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21401
>
> On 5/1/19 5:35 PM, Josh Elser wrote:
> > I think it would be better to figure out if there is anything currently
> > on master that _shouldn't_ be included in a 5.0.1. My guess would be
> > "no". It feels like branching for the sake of branching to keep 5.0.1
> > and 5.1.0 distinct.
> >
> > On 5/1/19 12:38 AM, Thomas D'Silva wrote:> Should we use 2.0.5 ( the
> > latest released HBase version )? If PHOENIX-5250
> > > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-5250> is a blocker
> we
> > will
> > > need to fix it before we can release 5.0.1 (or 5.1).
> > >
> > > These are the list of bugs that have a fix version of 5.1 :
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20PHOENIX%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%205.1.0%20AND%20issuetype%20%20%3D%20Bug
> >
> > > We should figure out which of these we want to cherrypick for the
> 5.0.1
> > > release.
> >
> > On 4/30/19 10:39 AM, Josh Elser wrote:
> >> Let's leave the other thread for the board report, please. I've
> >> changed the subject as such.
> >>
> >> Thanks for volunteering to be RM.
> >>
> >> I'm of the opinion that we should just update to the latest HBase
> >> 2.0.x line. The compatibility assertions from HBase should make this a
> >> no-op for us to change versions. There are arguments, however, in both
> >> ways that we should use the earliest, non-breaking version of HBase.
> >>
> >> As the RM, it is your prerogative to tell everyone else how you are
> >> tracking it :). Figure out what fixVersion you're using on Jira, and
> >> then either manage the list of open issues in there yourself, or push
> >> out issues and have folks put issues back in which they feel must be
> >> included.
> >>
> >> Since this is your first time, I would prioritize an rc0 ASAP so that
> >> you can get comfortable with the process (even if we know that there
> >> are other fixes which must be made before the final release).
> >>
> >> On 4/30/19 2:34 AM, Jaanai Zhang wrote:
> >>> I will try doing release 5.0.1. Tow things need to confirm:
> >>>
> >>> 1. According to the thread[1], a new Phoenix 5.0.1 will support HBase
> >>> 2.0.2, right? As far as I know, some improvements of HBase 2.0.2 will
> >>> cause
> >>> some critical issues, for example,
> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-5250 (This issue from
> our
> >>> production environments, we had used HBase 2.0.2 in Phoenix 5.0).
> >>>
> >>> 2. We should have a clear JIRA list for a 5.0.1, I am not sure what
> >>> JIRAs
> >>> should go into it, only critical and blocked JIRAs apply for a 5.0.1?
> >>> If I
> >>> know what priority need to pick, I will collect them.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> ----------------------------------------
> >>> Jaanai Zhang
> >>> Best regards!
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Thomas D'Silva <td...@salesforce.com.invalid> 于2019年4月30日周二
> >>> 上 午10:06写道：
> >>>
> >>>> Jaanai,
> >>>>
> >>>> We are waiting for a few omid bug fixes to do the 4.15/5.1 release
> that
> >>>> will have splittable system catalog and the omid integration.
> >>>> Are you interested in doing a 5.0.1 release that has the HBase 2.0.x
> >>>> compatibility fixes that were discussed in a previous thread[1]?
> >>>>
> >>>> The steps to create a RC are straightforward and documented here:
> >>>> https://phoenix.apache.org/release.html.
> >>>> The main thing you need to do is to add your code signing key to
> >>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/phoenix/KEYS (follow the
> >>>> steps at
> >>>> the start of that file)
> >>>> and then commit using svn. Then you can follow the rest of the steps
> >>>> listed
> >>>> in "How to do a release"
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks,
> >>>> Thomas
> >>>>
> >>>> [1]
> >>>>
> >>>>
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/99fcc737d7a8f82ddffb1b34a64f7099f7909900b8bea36dd6afca16@%3Cdev.phoenix.apache.org%3E
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 6:33 PM Jaanai Zhang <cl...@gmail.com>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> I would like to volunteer for a new 5.x release if someone can
> >>>>> guide me
> >>>>> release process. Thanks.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> ----------------------------------------
> >>>>> Jaanai Zhang
> >>>>> Best regards!
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Josh Elser <el...@apache.org> 于2019年4月30日周二 上午12:39写道：
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Hiya folks,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> It's about that time for another board report. Please reply here
> with
> >>>>>> anything of merit that you think the board might find
> >>>>>> interesting/useful. As a reminder, they board is typically more
> >>>>>> concerned with high-level project/community details than the
> >>>>>> nuts-and-bolts of the code changes for the project.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On my radar already is...
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> * Multiple new committers and PMC'ers (thanks so much to the folks
> >>>>>> who
> >>>>>> have been driving votes!)
> >>>>>> * NoSQL day in May
> >>>>>> * 4.14.2 in vote
> >>>>>> * Need for a new 5.x.y release (if there are no volunteers, I may
> >>>>>> have
> >>>>>> to find the time to make this happen. It's been too long)
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Thanks!
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> - Josh
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Next Phoenix 5.x release (was "Board report due in ~1
week")
Posted by Josh Elser <el...@apache.org>.
After working on trying to make Phoenix compatible with >=HBase 2.0.4,
I'm wondering if it would just be good to get 5.0.1 out the door and try
to fix HBase compat in a 5.1.0, acknowledging that we don't work with
the newer 2.0.x HBase versions (really, anything that contains
HBASE-21401[1]).
I feel like it's much less risky to just acknowledge that we're limited
in target HBase version for a bug-fix release.
What do folks think? That would lessen the burden on you, Jaanai.
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-21401
On 5/1/19 5:35 PM, Josh Elser wrote:
> I think it would be better to figure out if there is anything currently
> on master that _shouldn't_ be included in a 5.0.1. My guess would be
> "no". It feels like branching for the sake of branching to keep 5.0.1
> and 5.1.0 distinct.
>
> On 5/1/19 12:38 AM, Thomas D'Silva wrote:> Should we use 2.0.5 ( the
> latest released HBase version )? If PHOENIX-5250
> > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-5250> is a blocker we
> will
> > need to fix it before we can release 5.0.1 (or 5.1).
> >
> > These are the list of bugs that have a fix version of 5.1 :
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20PHOENIX%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%205.1.0%20AND%20issuetype%20%20%3D%20Bug
>
> > We should figure out which of these we want to cherrypick for the 5.0.1
> > release.
>
> On 4/30/19 10:39 AM, Josh Elser wrote:
>> Let's leave the other thread for the board report, please. I've
>> changed the subject as such.
>>
>> Thanks for volunteering to be RM.
>>
>> I'm of the opinion that we should just update to the latest HBase
>> 2.0.x line. The compatibility assertions from HBase should make this a
>> no-op for us to change versions. There are arguments, however, in both
>> ways that we should use the earliest, non-breaking version of HBase.
>>
>> As the RM, it is your prerogative to tell everyone else how you are
>> tracking it :). Figure out what fixVersion you're using on Jira, and
>> then either manage the list of open issues in there yourself, or push
>> out issues and have folks put issues back in which they feel must be
>> included.
>>
>> Since this is your first time, I would prioritize an rc0 ASAP so that
>> you can get comfortable with the process (even if we know that there
>> are other fixes which must be made before the final release).
>>
>> On 4/30/19 2:34 AM, Jaanai Zhang wrote:
>>> I will try doing release 5.0.1. Tow things need to confirm:
>>>
>>> 1. According to the thread[1], a new Phoenix 5.0.1 will support HBase
>>> 2.0.2, right? As far as I know, some improvements of HBase 2.0.2 will
>>> cause
>>> some critical issues, for example,
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-5250 (This issue from our
>>> production environments, we had used HBase 2.0.2 in Phoenix 5.0).
>>>
>>> 2. We should have a clear JIRA list for a 5.0.1, I am not sure what
>>> JIRAs
>>> should go into it, only critical and blocked JIRAs apply for a 5.0.1?
>>> If I
>>> know what priority need to pick, I will collect them.
>>>
>>>
>>> ----------------------------------------
>>> Jaanai Zhang
>>> Best regards!
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Thomas D'Silva <td...@salesforce.com.invalid> 于2019年4月30日周二
>>> 上 午10:06写道：
>>>
>>>> Jaanai,
>>>>
>>>> We are waiting for a few omid bug fixes to do the 4.15/5.1 release that
>>>> will have splittable system catalog and the omid integration.
>>>> Are you interested in doing a 5.0.1 release that has the HBase 2.0.x
>>>> compatibility fixes that were discussed in a previous thread[1]?
>>>>
>>>> The steps to create a RC are straightforward and documented here:
>>>> https://phoenix.apache.org/release.html.
>>>> The main thing you need to do is to add your code signing key to
>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/phoenix/KEYS (follow the
>>>> steps at
>>>> the start of that file)
>>>> and then commit using svn. Then you can follow the rest of the steps
>>>> listed
>>>> in "How to do a release"
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Thomas
>>>>
>>>> [1]
>>>>
>>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/99fcc737d7a8f82ddffb1b34a64f7099f7909900b8bea36dd6afca16@%3Cdev.phoenix.apache.org%3E
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 6:33 PM Jaanai Zhang <cl...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I would like to volunteer for a new 5.x release if someone can
>>>>> guide me
>>>>> release process. Thanks.
>>>>>
>>>>> ----------------------------------------
>>>>> Jaanai Zhang
>>>>> Best regards!
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Josh Elser <el...@apache.org> 于2019年4月30日周二 上午12:39写道：
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hiya folks,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It's about that time for another board report. Please reply here with
>>>>>> anything of merit that you think the board might find
>>>>>> interesting/useful. As a reminder, they board is typically more
>>>>>> concerned with high-level project/community details than the
>>>>>> nuts-and-bolts of the code changes for the project.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On my radar already is...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> * Multiple new committers and PMC'ers (thanks so much to the folks
>>>>>> who
>>>>>> have been driving votes!)
>>>>>> * NoSQL day in May
>>>>>> * 4.14.2 in vote
>>>>>> * Need for a new 5.x.y release (if there are no volunteers, I may
>>>>>> have
>>>>>> to find the time to make this happen. It's been too long)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> - Josh
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
Re: [DISCUSS] Next Phoenix 5.x release (was "Board report due in ~1
week")
Posted by Josh Elser <el...@apache.org>.
I think it would be better to figure out if there is anything currently
on master that _shouldn't_ be included in a 5.0.1. My guess would be
"no". It feels like branching for the sake of branching to keep 5.0.1
and 5.1.0 distinct.
On 5/1/19 12:38 AM, Thomas D'Silva wrote:> Should we use 2.0.5 ( the
latest released HBase version )? If PHOENIX-5250
> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-5250> is a blocker we
will
> need to fix it before we can release 5.0.1 (or 5.1).
>
> These are the list of bugs that have a fix version of 5.1 :
>
https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20PHOENIX%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%205.1.0%20AND%20issuetype%20%20%3D%20Bug
> We should figure out which of these we want to cherrypick for the 5.0.1
> release.
On 4/30/19 10:39 AM, Josh Elser wrote:
> Let's leave the other thread for the board report, please. I've changed
> the subject as such.
>
> Thanks for volunteering to be RM.
>
> I'm of the opinion that we should just update to the latest HBase 2.0.x
> line. The compatibility assertions from HBase should make this a no-op
> for us to change versions. There are arguments, however, in both ways
> that we should use the earliest, non-breaking version of HBase.
>
> As the RM, it is your prerogative to tell everyone else how you are
> tracking it :). Figure out what fixVersion you're using on Jira, and
> then either manage the list of open issues in there yourself, or push
> out issues and have folks put issues back in which they feel must be
> included.
>
> Since this is your first time, I would prioritize an rc0 ASAP so that
> you can get comfortable with the process (even if we know that there are
> other fixes which must be made before the final release).
>
> On 4/30/19 2:34 AM, Jaanai Zhang wrote:
>> I will try doing release 5.0.1. Tow things need to confirm:
>>
>> 1. According to the thread[1], a new Phoenix 5.0.1 will support HBase
>> 2.0.2, right? As far as I know, some improvements of HBase 2.0.2 will
>> cause
>> some critical issues, for example,
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-5250 (This issue from our
>> production environments, we had used HBase 2.0.2 in Phoenix 5.0).
>>
>> 2. We should have a clear JIRA list for a 5.0.1, I am not sure what
>> JIRAs
>> should go into it, only critical and blocked JIRAs apply for a 5.0.1?
>> If I
>> know what priority need to pick, I will collect them.
>>
>>
>> ----------------------------------------
>> Jaanai Zhang
>> Best regards!
>>
>>
>>
>> Thomas D'Silva <td...@salesforce.com.invalid> 于2019年4月30日周二 上
>> 午10:06写道：
>>
>>> Jaanai,
>>>
>>> We are waiting for a few omid bug fixes to do the 4.15/5.1 release that
>>> will have splittable system catalog and the omid integration.
>>> Are you interested in doing a 5.0.1 release that has the HBase 2.0.x
>>> compatibility fixes that were discussed in a previous thread[1]?
>>>
>>> The steps to create a RC are straightforward and documented here:
>>> https://phoenix.apache.org/release.html.
>>> The main thing you need to do is to add your code signing key to
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/phoenix/KEYS (follow the steps at
>>> the start of that file)
>>> and then commit using svn. Then you can follow the rest of the steps
>>> listed
>>> in "How to do a release"
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Thomas
>>>
>>> [1]
>>>
>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/99fcc737d7a8f82ddffb1b34a64f7099f7909900b8bea36dd6afca16@%3Cdev.phoenix.apache.org%3E
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 6:33 PM Jaanai Zhang <cl...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I would like to volunteer for a new 5.x release if someone can guide me
>>>> release process. Thanks.
>>>>
>>>> ----------------------------------------
>>>> Jaanai Zhang
>>>> Best regards!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Josh Elser <el...@apache.org> 于2019年4月30日周二 上午12:39写道：
>>>>
>>>>> Hiya folks,
>>>>>
>>>>> It's about that time for another board report. Please reply here with
>>>>> anything of merit that you think the board might find
>>>>> interesting/useful. As a reminder, they board is typically more
>>>>> concerned with high-level project/community details than the
>>>>> nuts-and-bolts of the code changes for the project.
>>>>>
>>>>> On my radar already is...
>>>>>
>>>>> * Multiple new committers and PMC'ers (thanks so much to the folks who
>>>>> have been driving votes!)
>>>>> * NoSQL day in May
>>>>> * 4.14.2 in vote
>>>>> * Need for a new 5.x.y release (if there are no volunteers, I may have
>>>>> to find the time to make this happen. It's been too long)
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>>
>>>>> - Josh
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
Re: [DISCUSS] Next Phoenix 5.x release (was "Board report due in ~1 week")
Posted by Pedro Boado <pe...@gmail.com>.
Hi,
I'd like to include the cdh version within the release but I have a few IT
failing in branch 5.x-cdh6 . Any help would be really appreciated.
Is 'MutableIndexSplitForwardScanIT' failing for you guys in 'master' branch?
Thanks!
On Tue, 30 Apr 2019 at 15:39, Josh Elser <el...@apache.org> wrote:
> Let's leave the other thread for the board report, please. I've changed
> the subject as such.
>
> Thanks for volunteering to be RM.
>
> I'm of the opinion that we should just update to the latest HBase 2.0.x
> line. The compatibility assertions from HBase should make this a no-op
> for us to change versions. There are arguments, however, in both ways
> that we should use the earliest, non-breaking version of HBase.
>
> As the RM, it is your prerogative to tell everyone else how you are
> tracking it :). Figure out what fixVersion you're using on Jira, and
> then either manage the list of open issues in there yourself, or push
> out issues and have folks put issues back in which they feel must be
> included.
>
> Since this is your first time, I would prioritize an rc0 ASAP so that
> you can get comfortable with the process (even if we know that there are
> other fixes which must be made before the final release).
>
> On 4/30/19 2:34 AM, Jaanai Zhang wrote:
> > I will try doing release 5.0.1. Tow things need to confirm:
> >
> > 1. According to the thread[1], a new Phoenix 5.0.1 will support HBase
> > 2.0.2, right? As far as I know, some improvements of HBase 2.0.2 will
> cause
> > some critical issues, for example,
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-5250 (This issue from our
> > production environments, we had used HBase 2.0.2 in Phoenix 5.0).
> >
> > 2. We should have a clear JIRA list for a 5.0.1, I am not sure what
> JIRAs
> > should go into it, only critical and blocked JIRAs apply for a 5.0.1?
> If I
> > know what priority need to pick, I will collect them.
> >
> >
> > ----------------------------------------
> > Jaanai Zhang
> > Best regards!
> >
> >
> >
> > Thomas D'Silva <td...@salesforce.com.invalid> 于2019年4月30日周二 上午10:06写道：
> >
> >> Jaanai,
> >>
> >> We are waiting for a few omid bug fixes to do the 4.15/5.1 release that
> >> will have splittable system catalog and the omid integration.
> >> Are you interested in doing a 5.0.1 release that has the HBase 2.0.x
> >> compatibility fixes that were discussed in a previous thread[1]?
> >>
> >> The steps to create a RC are straightforward and documented here:
> >> https://phoenix.apache.org/release.html.
> >> The main thing you need to do is to add your code signing key to
> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/phoenix/KEYS (follow the steps
> at
> >> the start of that file)
> >> and then commit using svn. Then you can follow the rest of the steps
> listed
> >> in "How to do a release"
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Thomas
> >>
> >> [1]
> >>
> >>
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/99fcc737d7a8f82ddffb1b34a64f7099f7909900b8bea36dd6afca16@%3Cdev.phoenix.apache.org%3E
> >>
> >> On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 6:33 PM Jaanai Zhang <cl...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> I would like to volunteer for a new 5.x release if someone can guide me
> >>> release process. Thanks.
> >>>
> >>> ----------------------------------------
> >>> Jaanai Zhang
> >>> Best regards!
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Josh Elser <el...@apache.org> 于2019年4月30日周二 上午12:39写道：
> >>>
> >>>> Hiya folks,
> >>>>
> >>>> It's about that time for another board report. Please reply here with
> >>>> anything of merit that you think the board might find
> >>>> interesting/useful. As a reminder, they board is typically more
> >>>> concerned with high-level project/community details than the
> >>>> nuts-and-bolts of the code changes for the project.
> >>>>
> >>>> On my radar already is...
> >>>>
> >>>> * Multiple new committers and PMC'ers (thanks so much to the folks who
> >>>> have been driving votes!)
> >>>> * NoSQL day in May
> >>>> * 4.14.2 in vote
> >>>> * Need for a new 5.x.y release (if there are no volunteers, I may have
> >>>> to find the time to make this happen. It's been too long)
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks!
> >>>>
> >>>> - Josh
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
> >
>
--
Un saludo.
Pedro Boado.