You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@openoffice.apache.org by Pedro Lino <pe...@mailbox.org.INVALID> on 2021/05/04 14:51:08 UTC
Re: Sourceforge project activity feedback
Hi all
The Sourceforge activity is now up-to-date with version 4.1.10 ;)
Small victories on May the Fourth!
All the best,
Pedro
> On 03/30/2021 5:19 PM Marcus <ma...@wtnet.de> wrote:
>
>
> Am 30.03.21 um 15:33 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
> > Am 30.03.21 um 11:29 schrieb Pedro Lino:
> >>
> >> Following up on the issue I raised about the Project Activity at
> >> https://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/
> >> (that shows version 4.1.4 from 3 years ago)
> >>
> >> the answer from the Sourceforge staff was
> >>
> >>> On 03/24/2021 4:15 PM SourceForge.net Support & Ops <sf...@slashdotmedia.com> wrote:
> >>> Your activity feed has been fixed for any releases you make going forward, but unfortunately, we're not able to backfill the previous releases.
> > Thanks for the heads up!
>
> yes, thanks
>
> >> This is not what I expected but hopefully it will be fixed with the next release.
> >
> > I am OK with that, given that we are already planning on the next version.
>
> If this will still not work like we would expect it, I suggest to delete
> it completely as IMHO the value add for the user is really low.
>
> Marcus
>
>
>
> >>> On 03/02/2021 11:33 PM Matthias Seidel <ma...@hamburg.de> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Am 03.03.21 um 00:24 schrieb Pedro Lino:
> >>>>
> >>>>> On 03/02/2021 11:05 PM Matthias Seidel <ma...@hamburg.de> wrote:
> >>>>> Am 14.02.21 um 17:35 schrieb Pedro Lino:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On 02/14/2021 3:36 PM Marcus <ma...@wtnet.de> wrote:
> >>>>>>>> One question: does someone have the permissions to update the Sourceforge page?
> >>>>>>> I don't know how to edit this. I don't find any hint for it - even as
> >>>>>>> admin. Must be a thing of SF.net.
> >>>>>> Can we ask them? I volunteer to do that on behalf of AOO if you don't have the time.
> >>>>> Do you have a SourceForge account?
> >>>> I have an old one but not associated to OpenOffice
> >>> No problem, I only thought about giving you administrative rights.
> >>>> In any case I wrote to support and they answered that they are investigating the issue. It has been a week since they answered. I will give them a few more days before asking for progress.
> >>> Thanks, I did not find any possibility to change it.
> >>>
> >>> It seems to be a generated RSS feed that stopped working years ago...
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Sourceforge project activity feedback
Posted by Matthias Seidel <ma...@hamburg.de>.
Hi Pedro,
Am 04.05.21 um 16:51 schrieb Pedro Lino:
> Hi all
>
> The Sourceforge activity is now up-to-date with version 4.1.10 ;)
> Small victories on May the Fourth!
Yes!
And thank you for using the 4th...
Matthias
>
> All the best,
> Pedro
>
>
>> On 03/30/2021 5:19 PM Marcus <ma...@wtnet.de> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Am 30.03.21 um 15:33 schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>>> Am 30.03.21 um 11:29 schrieb Pedro Lino:
>>>> Following up on the issue I raised about the Project Activity at
>>>> https://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/
>>>> (that shows version 4.1.4 from 3 years ago)
>>>>
>>>> the answer from the Sourceforge staff was
>>>>
>>>>> On 03/24/2021 4:15 PM SourceForge.net Support & Ops <sf...@slashdotmedia.com> wrote:
>>>>> Your activity feed has been fixed for any releases you make going forward, but unfortunately, we're not able to backfill the previous releases.
>>> Thanks for the heads up!
>> yes, thanks
>>
>>>> This is not what I expected but hopefully it will be fixed with the next release.
>>> I am OK with that, given that we are already planning on the next version.
>> If this will still not work like we would expect it, I suggest to delete
>> it completely as IMHO the value add for the user is really low.
>>
>> Marcus
>>
>>
>>
>>>>> On 03/02/2021 11:33 PM Matthias Seidel <ma...@hamburg.de> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Am 03.03.21 um 00:24 schrieb Pedro Lino:
>>>>>>> On 03/02/2021 11:05 PM Matthias Seidel <ma...@hamburg.de> wrote:
>>>>>>> Am 14.02.21 um 17:35 schrieb Pedro Lino:
>>>>>>>>> On 02/14/2021 3:36 PM Marcus <ma...@wtnet.de> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> One question: does someone have the permissions to update the Sourceforge page?
>>>>>>>>> I don't know how to edit this. I don't find any hint for it - even as
>>>>>>>>> admin. Must be a thing of SF.net.
>>>>>>>> Can we ask them? I volunteer to do that on behalf of AOO if you don't have the time.
>>>>>>> Do you have a SourceForge account?
>>>>>> I have an old one but not associated to OpenOffice
>>>>> No problem, I only thought about giving you administrative rights.
>>>>>> In any case I wrote to support and they answered that they are investigating the issue. It has been a week since they answered. I will give them a few more days before asking for progress.
>>>>> Thanks, I did not find any possibility to change it.
>>>>>
>>>>> It seems to be a generated RSS feed that stopped working years ago...
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
>
>