You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to user@geronimo.apache.org by David Blevins <da...@visi.com> on 2006/03/28 22:00:35 UTC
User Feedback Request -- this means you!
So this is the first of what I think should be a quarterly event.
Geronimo is ultimately your project and we committers are but your
humble servants. To serve you best, we need some critical high level
feedback to help us steer the project and focus on what matters most
to you!
Please, every user out there, give us your top 5 things we can do to
make Geronimo better for you. Here is my list:
1) More interaction with you guys, the users!
2) More frequent releases incorporating more user feedback (small
releases more often vs. big releases only 4 times a year)
3) Less deployment requirements (simpler plans, more defaults, etc.)
4) More application validation at deployment
5) More powerful text configuration
That's just to get the ball rolling. More detail is always good if
you have the time. In general anything you think we need to correct
as a community, technical or non-technical. Let us know.
If you've ever uttered the words, "Geronimo would be such a great
project if it only...." then now is your time to shine.
We want to hear from everyone! This is not just for the "hard-core"
Geronimo users or J2EE experts. If you are new to J2EE and
downloaded Geronimo and had to give up after an hour of no progress,
let us know what we might do!
It's all about you.
Best Regards,
David Blevins
Re: User Feedback Request -- this means you!
Posted by Stefan Schmidt <sc...@gmail.com>.
Ok, here are my priorities:
1) JDK 1.5 support
2) EJB 3
3) JAX-WS
4) more minor releases
5) More docs on GBeans (explaining its merits and implementation in
different scenarios)
Regards,
Stefan Schmidt
David Blevins wrote:
> So this is the first of what I think should be a quarterly event.
> Geronimo is ultimately your project and we committers are but your
> humble servants. To serve you best, we need some critical high level
> feedback to help us steer the project and focus on what matters most
> to you!
>
> Please, every user out there, give us your top 5 things we can do to
> make Geronimo better for you. Here is my list:
>
> 1) More interaction with you guys, the users!
> 2) More frequent releases incorporating more user feedback (small
> releases more often vs. big releases only 4 times a year)
> 3) Less deployment requirements (simpler plans, more defaults, etc.)
> 4) More application validation at deployment
> 5) More powerful text configuration
>
> That's just to get the ball rolling. More detail is always good if
> you have the time. In general anything you think we need to correct
> as a community, technical or non-technical. Let us know.
>
> If you've ever uttered the words, "Geronimo would be such a great
> project if it only...." then now is your time to shine.
>
> We want to hear from everyone! This is not just for the "hard-core"
> Geronimo users or J2EE experts. If you are new to J2EE and downloaded
> Geronimo and had to give up after an hour of no progress, let us know
> what we might do!
>
>
> It's all about you.
>
>
> Best Regards,
> David Blevins
>
>
>
Re: User Feedback Request -- this means you!
Posted by Dain Sundstrom <da...@iq80.com>.
For everyone that listed "more documentation", can you be more
specific? It will help us prioritize the effort to hit the most
important stuff first.
Thanks,
-dain
On Mar 28, 2006, at 10:31 PM, mikael-aronsson wrote:
> Same as below for me
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Christian Stolz"
> <ch...@janitza.de>
> To: <us...@geronimo.apache.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2006 7:36 AM
> Subject: Re: User Feedback Request -- this means you!
>
>
>> Hi there,
>> here is my Top 5:
>> 1. Support for JDK1.5
>> 2. JAX-WS support
>> 3. More documentation
>> 4. NetBeans support
>> 5. More frequent releases
>> Thanks Christian
Re: User Feedback Request -- this means you!
Posted by mikael-aronsson <mi...@telia.com>.
Same as below for me
----- Original Message -----
From: "Christian Stolz" <ch...@janitza.de>
To: <us...@geronimo.apache.org>
Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2006 7:36 AM
Subject: Re: User Feedback Request -- this means you!
> Hi there,
>
> here is my Top 5:
>
> 1. Support for JDK1.5
> 2. JAX-WS support
> 3. More documentation
> 4. NetBeans support
> 5. More frequent releases
>
> Thanks Christian
Re: User Feedback Request -- this means you!
Posted by Christian Stolz <ch...@janitza.de>.
Hi there,
here is my Top 5:
1. Support for JDK1.5
2. JAX-WS support
3. More documentation
4. NetBeans support
5. More frequent releases
Thanks Christian
Re: User Feedback Request -- this means you!
Posted by Werner Punz <we...@gmx.at>.
David Blevins schrieb:
> So this is the first of what I think should be a quarterly event.
> Geronimo is ultimately your project and we committers are but your
> humble servants. To serve you best, we need some critical high level
> feedback to help us steer the project and focus on what matters most to
> you!
Two things:
Better db tools in the admin console
EJB3 support (at least javax.persistence)
Re: User Feedback Request -- this means you!
Posted by Dave Colasurdo <da...@earthlink.net>.
I've updated the wiki with all the feedback (including the latest from
Toby and Rohit)..
http://opensource.atlassian.com/confluence/oss/display/GERONIMO/Geronimo+User+Requirements
Dave Colasurdo wrote:
> I tried to order them by priority (based on number of times mentioned)
> within each category/sub-category.. The ones that were mentioned the
> most are first on the list and so forth.. Items that were mentioned
> only once are listed in random order..
>
> Anyway, I've updated the list below with the number of requests for each
> item. I've denoted with *(number)*. Absence of a number indicates one
> request for an item.
>
> Of course the community needs to digest the input and decide on
> priorities.
>
> BTW, I have added Global JNDI ENC to the list..
>
> If folks agree with the format, I will post to the wiki..
>
> -Dave-
>
>
> Matt Hogstrom wrote:
>> This is great Dave...I think we need to prioritze them as well. Can
>> you translate the priorty from the other e-mails to this?
>>
>> Matt
>>
>> Dave Colasurdo wrote:
>>> Excellent feedback from all..
>>>
>>> Here is an attempt to consolidate the feedback into one list. (Hope
>>> I'm not stepping on anyone's toes.) I've grouped by a few high level
>>> categories..
>>> Of course, one could argue that some of the items could fall into
>>> multiple categories... Any glaring omissions?
>>>
>
> Specifications/Functionality
> ****************************
> -JDK 5 for Geronimo *(11)*
> -JEE 5 *(3)*
> Enterprise JavaBeans 3.0 *(5)*
> Java Servlet 2.5
> Java ServerPages 2.1
> Java ServerPages Standard Tag Library
> Java Persistence Architecture (is this part of Java EE?)
> Java Transaction API (JTA)
> J2EE Management
> J2EE Connector Architecture
> -JAX-WS support *(4)*
> -GBean improvements (doc, lifecycle, dependencies, dep. injection, ..)
> *(2)*
> -Dynamic Queries *(2)*
> -javax.persistence
> -annotated session beans.
> -Support for JSR-168 (Portlet API)
> -ServiceMix
> -Maven2 support
> -service/daemon wrapper
> -Remove the requirement of the openejb-jar.xml??
> -Better db tools in the admin console
> -Configuration management, possibility to make a production version
> without some current modules (e.g. OpenEJB or ActiveMQ),
> there are end users who don't have the resources (memory, disk) to run
> Geronimo fully equipped and they don't need every
> feature of the J2EE stack
> - Continued support of Jetty
> -First class HttpSession clustering.
> -More integration with Apache mod_JK/mod_ajp . It would be nice if a
> request would continue through a pool until it landed
> on a server with that webapp.
> -Mass deployment tools that allow the server 'cloning' and rollout
> mentioned during Geronimos initial days.
> -Global JNDI ENC
>
> Tools
> *****
> -NetBeans support *(3)*
> -JDK 5 for launching and running the Geronimo Eclipse plugin *(2)*
> -Eclipse plugin improvement (it is really good but think it could be
> better)
> -Eclipse mini-roadmap (from Sachin)
> - run resources directly from the workspace, so the ear isn't built
> and re-packaged on every publish
> - More control over the runtime/server wizards, publish process, and
> server management
> - Continue to build up the UI so we have a complete set of "form
> editors" for the G deployment plans
> - ability to see changes reflected live in something like the Common
> Navigator as you modify your plans
> - full synchronization between the source view and views using the model
> - copy/paste, undo/redo support
> -There's also plans in WTP to improve the Server Tools Framework to
> make it easier to have more control over what defines your runtime.
>
>
> Usability
> *********
> -Deployment *(5)*
> Less deployment requirements (simpler plans, more defaults, etc.)
> Simplifying deployment (some means to generate geronimo deployment plans?
> Easier way to deploy EAR Files
> More application validation at deployment
> Better redeployment to prevent requests from failing if they hit that
> server during the redeploy.
> -More powerful text configuration
> -Migration path from Tomcat to Geronimo
> -Shortcuts for building web services
>
>
> Process
> *******
> -More frequent releases incorporating more user feedback (small releases
> more often vs. big releases only 4 times a year) *(7)*
> -Geronimo Certified Partner Program (including Jetspeed-2 as a member).
> *(2)*
>
>
> Documentation *(10)*
> *************
> -Tutorials *(4)*
> How to use Geronimo with: Apache Axis, WSS4J, ActiveMQ
> -Cookbooks
> -Better documentation on deployment descriptors
> -More detailed documentation about the architecture and Gbeans *(2)*
> -A browsable table describing where to find all plans, etc. for each
> deployed component or service.
> -More documentaion on deploying EAR's, WAR's, EJB's, RAR's, classloading
> and dependencies with that apps)
>
> Examples *(4)*
> ********
> -Examples for everything
> -More documentation/examples for me should be more explicative models of
> the basic openejb-jar.xml and ejb-jar.xml,
> explaining which tag points where or what
> Session beans, entity beans(BMP and CMP)
> Message-Driven-Bean.
>
>
>>>
>>> -Dave-
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
Re: User Feedback Request -- this means you!
Posted by John Sisson <jr...@gmail.com>.
Sachin Patel wrote:
> Yes we should have both but I'm not sure if I agree with your second
> statement. :) I think JIRA should be the first place users should go
> to request a feature. The wiki will never encapsulate all the work
> that needs to be done for a project. JIRA tells us this. Thus the
> wiki should be used to bundle the wish-list and associate them to the
> themes and priorities for a release. I think trying to keep jiras and
> the wiki synchronized is invaluable and is unnecessary work. The wiki
> should be the place where to look for what is planned for that
> release, and the discussions around and links to jiras/threads for
> those items. So the first step I think should be to open jira's and
> from there these can be sorted and prioritized and pushed up into the
> wiki, I don't think it should be the other way around. There is alot
> of things that need to be cleaned up in current in JIRA and by using
> it as the first place for work items this forces us to maintain and
> constantly scub JIRA to provide an accurate indication of project status.
>
> thats by 2 cents :)
+1 - I always look in the JIRA records for a project (to get a picture
of its stability and priorities) before adopting it. JIRA is a great
tool for prioritising and keeping track of work, lets not duplicate this
in the Wiki.
John
>
>
> - sachin
>
>
>
> On Apr 5, 2006, at 6:12 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
>
>> I think you need both. The Wiki is a place to look at what there is
>> to do...JIRA is the way to tell people your doing it.
>>
>> Dave Colasurdo wrote:
>>> Wasn't suggesting the wiki as the final resting spot, just a
>>> temporary holding spot while the user requirements were being
>>> gathered, tallied, discussed and prioritized by the community. It
>>> works better than email threads passing in the night. No objection
>>> to moving the output to JIRAs..
>>> -Dave-
>>> Sachin Patel wrote:
>>>> I don't think they should go on the wiki. Why can't we add them as
>>>> Wish List Jira's with #votes and have the wish list query exported
>>>> and posted? This way further discussion and progress on each of
>>>> the items could be tracked as well.
>>>>
>>>> - sachin
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Apr 5, 2006, at 4:07 PM, Dave Colasurdo wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I tried to order them by priority (based on number of times
>>>>> mentioned) within each category/sub-category.. The ones that were
>>>>> mentioned the most are first on the list and so forth.. Items
>>>>> that were mentioned only once are listed in random order..
>>>>>
>>>>> Anyway, I've updated the list below with the number of requests
>>>>> for each item. I've denoted with *(number)*. Absence of a
>>>>> number indicates one request for an item.
>>>>>
>>>>> Of course the community needs to digest the input and decide on
>>>>> priorities.
>>>>>
>>>>> BTW, I have added Global JNDI ENC to the list..
>>>>>
>>>>> If folks agree with the format, I will post to the wiki..
>>>>>
>>>>> -Dave-
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Matt Hogstrom wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> This is great Dave...I think we need to prioritze them as well.
>>>>>> Can you translate the priorty from the other e-mails to this?
>>>>>> Matt
>>>>>> Dave Colasurdo wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Excellent feedback from all..
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Here is an attempt to consolidate the feedback into one list.
>>>>>>> (Hope I'm not stepping on anyone's toes.) I've grouped by a few
>>>>>>> high level categories..
>>>>>>> Of course, one could argue that some of the items could fall
>>>>>>> into multiple categories... Any glaring omissions?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Specifications/Functionality
>>>>> ****************************
>>>>> -JDK 5 for Geronimo *(11)*
>>>>> -JEE 5 *(3)*
>>>>> Enterprise JavaBeans 3.0 *(5)*
>>>>> Java Servlet 2.5
>>>>> Java ServerPages 2.1
>>>>> Java ServerPages Standard Tag Library
>>>>> Java Persistence Architecture (is this part of Java EE?)
>>>>> Java Transaction API (JTA)
>>>>> J2EE Management
>>>>> J2EE Connector Architecture
>>>>> -JAX-WS support *(4)*
>>>>> -GBean improvements (doc, lifecycle, dependencies, dep. injection,
>>>>> ..) *(2)*
>>>>> -Dynamic Queries *(2)*
>>>>> -javax.persistence
>>>>> -annotated session beans.
>>>>> -Support for JSR-168 (Portlet API)
>>>>> -ServiceMix
>>>>> -Maven2 support
>>>>> -service/daemon wrapper
>>>>> -Remove the requirement of the openejb-jar.xml??
>>>>> -Better db tools in the admin console
>>>>> -Configuration management, possibility to make a production
>>>>> version without some current modules (e.g. OpenEJB or ActiveMQ),
>>>>> there are end users who don't have the resources (memory, disk)
>>>>> to run Geronimo fully equipped and they don't need every
>>>>> feature of the J2EE stack
>>>>> - Continued support of Jetty
>>>>> -First class HttpSession clustering.
>>>>> -More integration with Apache mod_JK/mod_ajp . It would be nice if
>>>>> a request would continue through a pool until it landed
>>>>> on a server with that webapp.
>>>>> -Mass deployment tools that allow the server 'cloning' and rollout
>>>>> mentioned during Geronimos initial days.
>>>>> -Global JNDI ENC
>>>>>
>>>>> Tools
>>>>> *****
>>>>> -NetBeans support *(3)*
>>>>> -JDK 5 for launching and running the Geronimo Eclipse plugin *(2)*
>>>>> -Eclipse plugin improvement (it is really good but think it could be
>>>>> better)
>>>>> -Eclipse mini-roadmap (from Sachin)
>>>>> - run resources directly from the workspace, so the ear isn't
>>>>> built and re-packaged on every publish
>>>>> - More control over the runtime/server wizards, publish process,
>>>>> and server management
>>>>> - Continue to build up the UI so we have a complete set of "form
>>>>> editors" for the G deployment plans
>>>>> - ability to see changes reflected live in something like the
>>>>> Common Navigator as you modify your plans
>>>>> - full synchronization between the source view and views using
>>>>> the model
>>>>> - copy/paste, undo/redo support
>>>>> -There's also plans in WTP to improve the Server Tools Framework
>>>>> to make it easier to have more control over what defines your
>>>>> runtime.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Usability
>>>>> *********
>>>>> -Deployment *(5)*
>>>>> Less deployment requirements (simpler plans, more defaults, etc.)
>>>>> Simplifying deployment (some means to generate geronimo
>>>>> deployment plans?
>>>>> Easier way to deploy EAR Files
>>>>> More application validation at deployment
>>>>> Better redeployment to prevent requests from failing if they hit
>>>>> that server during the redeploy.
>>>>> -More powerful text configuration
>>>>> -Migration path from Tomcat to Geronimo
>>>>> -Shortcuts for building web services
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Process
>>>>> *******
>>>>> -More frequent releases incorporating more user feedback (small
>>>>> releases more often vs. big releases only 4 times a year) *(7)*
>>>>> -Geronimo Certified Partner Program (including Jetspeed-2 as a
>>>>> member). *(2)*
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Documentation *(10)*
>>>>> *************
>>>>> -Tutorials *(4)*
>>>>> How to use Geronimo with: Apache Axis, WSS4J, ActiveMQ
>>>>> -Cookbooks
>>>>> -Better documentation on deployment descriptors
>>>>> -More detailed documentation about the architecture and Gbeans *(2)*
>>>>> -A browsable table describing where to find all plans, etc. for
>>>>> each deployed component or service.
>>>>> -More documentaion on deploying EAR's, WAR's, EJB's, RAR's,
>>>>> classloading and dependencies with that apps)
>>>>>
>>>>> Examples *(4)*
>>>>> ********
>>>>> -Examples for everything
>>>>> -More documentation/examples for me should be more explicative
>>>>> models of the basic openejb-jar.xml and ejb-jar.xml,
>>>>> explaining which tag points where or what
>>>>> Session beans, entity beans(BMP and CMP)
>>>>> Message-Driven-Bean.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -Dave-
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>
>
Re: User Feedback Request -- this means you!
Posted by Matt Hogstrom <ma...@hogstrom.org>.
Fair enough. When I made the comment I was thinking about a user that was interested in helping out
or working on Geronimo. I would expect them to look at the Wiki as opposed to mining in JIRAs.
Sachin Patel wrote:
> Yes we should have both but I'm not sure if I agree with your second
> statement. :) I think JIRA should be the first place users should go to
> request a feature. The wiki will never encapsulate all the work that
> needs to be done for a project. JIRA tells us this. Thus the wiki
> should be used to bundle the wish-list and associate them to the themes
> and priorities for a release. I think trying to keep jiras and the
> wiki synchronized is invaluable and is unnecessary work. The wiki
> should be the place where to look for what is planned for that release,
> and the discussions around and links to jiras/threads for those items.
> So the first step I think should be to open jira's and from there these
> can be sorted and prioritized and pushed up into the wiki, I don't
> think it should be the other way around. There is alot of things that
> need to be cleaned up in current in JIRA and by using it as the first
> place for work items this forces us to maintain and constantly scub
> JIRA to provide an accurate indication of project status.
>
> thats by 2 cents :)
>
>
> - sachin
>
>
>
> On Apr 5, 2006, at 6:12 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
>
>> I think you need both. The Wiki is a place to look at what there is
>> to do...JIRA is the way to tell people your doing it.
>>
>> Dave Colasurdo wrote:
>>
>>> Wasn't suggesting the wiki as the final resting spot, just a
>>> temporary holding spot while the user requirements were being
>>> gathered, tallied, discussed and prioritized by the community. It
>>> works better than email threads passing in the night. No objection
>>> to moving the output to JIRAs..
>>> -Dave-
>>> Sachin Patel wrote:
>>>
>>>> I don't think they should go on the wiki. Why can't we add them as
>>>> Wish List Jira's with #votes and have the wish list query exported
>>>> and posted? This way further discussion and progress on each of
>>>> the items could be tracked as well.
>>>>
>>>> - sachin
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Apr 5, 2006, at 4:07 PM, Dave Colasurdo wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I tried to order them by priority (based on number of times
>>>>> mentioned) within each category/sub-category.. The ones that were
>>>>> mentioned the most are first on the list and so forth.. Items
>>>>> that were mentioned only once are listed in random order..
>>>>>
>>>>> Anyway, I've updated the list below with the number of requests
>>>>> for each item. I've denoted with *(number)*. Absence of a
>>>>> number indicates one request for an item.
>>>>>
>>>>> Of course the community needs to digest the input and decide on
>>>>> priorities.
>>>>>
>>>>> BTW, I have added Global JNDI ENC to the list..
>>>>>
>>>>> If folks agree with the format, I will post to the wiki..
>>>>>
>>>>> -Dave-
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Matt Hogstrom wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> This is great Dave...I think we need to prioritze them as well.
>>>>>> Can you translate the priorty from the other e-mails to this?
>>>>>> Matt
>>>>>> Dave Colasurdo wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Excellent feedback from all..
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Here is an attempt to consolidate the feedback into one list.
>>>>>>> (Hope I'm not stepping on anyone's toes.) I've grouped by a few
>>>>>>> high level categories..
>>>>>>> Of course, one could argue that some of the items could fall
>>>>>>> into multiple categories... Any glaring omissions?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Specifications/Functionality
>>>>> ****************************
>>>>> -JDK 5 for Geronimo *(11)*
>>>>> -JEE 5 *(3)*
>>>>> Enterprise JavaBeans 3.0 *(5)*
>>>>> Java Servlet 2.5
>>>>> Java ServerPages 2.1
>>>>> Java ServerPages Standard Tag Library
>>>>> Java Persistence Architecture (is this part of Java EE?)
>>>>> Java Transaction API (JTA)
>>>>> J2EE Management
>>>>> J2EE Connector Architecture
>>>>> -JAX-WS support *(4)*
>>>>> -GBean improvements (doc, lifecycle, dependencies, dep. injection,
>>>>> ..) *(2)*
>>>>> -Dynamic Queries *(2)*
>>>>> -javax.persistence
>>>>> -annotated session beans.
>>>>> -Support for JSR-168 (Portlet API)
>>>>> -ServiceMix
>>>>> -Maven2 support
>>>>> -service/daemon wrapper
>>>>> -Remove the requirement of the openejb-jar.xml??
>>>>> -Better db tools in the admin console
>>>>> -Configuration management, possibility to make a production
>>>>> version without some current modules (e.g. OpenEJB or ActiveMQ),
>>>>> there are end users who don't have the resources (memory, disk)
>>>>> to run Geronimo fully equipped and they don't need every
>>>>> feature of the J2EE stack
>>>>> - Continued support of Jetty
>>>>> -First class HttpSession clustering.
>>>>> -More integration with Apache mod_JK/mod_ajp . It would be nice if
>>>>> a request would continue through a pool until it landed
>>>>> on a server with that webapp.
>>>>> -Mass deployment tools that allow the server 'cloning' and rollout
>>>>> mentioned during Geronimos initial days.
>>>>> -Global JNDI ENC
>>>>>
>>>>> Tools
>>>>> *****
>>>>> -NetBeans support *(3)*
>>>>> -JDK 5 for launching and running the Geronimo Eclipse plugin *(2)*
>>>>> -Eclipse plugin improvement (it is really good but think it could be
>>>>> better)
>>>>> -Eclipse mini-roadmap (from Sachin)
>>>>> - run resources directly from the workspace, so the ear isn't
>>>>> built and re-packaged on every publish
>>>>> - More control over the runtime/server wizards, publish process,
>>>>> and server management
>>>>> - Continue to build up the UI so we have a complete set of "form
>>>>> editors" for the G deployment plans
>>>>> - ability to see changes reflected live in something like the
>>>>> Common Navigator as you modify your plans
>>>>> - full synchronization between the source view and views using
>>>>> the model
>>>>> - copy/paste, undo/redo support
>>>>> -There's also plans in WTP to improve the Server Tools Framework
>>>>> to make it easier to have more control over what defines your
>>>>> runtime.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Usability
>>>>> *********
>>>>> -Deployment *(5)*
>>>>> Less deployment requirements (simpler plans, more defaults, etc.)
>>>>> Simplifying deployment (some means to generate geronimo
>>>>> deployment plans?
>>>>> Easier way to deploy EAR Files
>>>>> More application validation at deployment
>>>>> Better redeployment to prevent requests from failing if they hit
>>>>> that server during the redeploy.
>>>>> -More powerful text configuration
>>>>> -Migration path from Tomcat to Geronimo
>>>>> -Shortcuts for building web services
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Process
>>>>> *******
>>>>> -More frequent releases incorporating more user feedback (small
>>>>> releases more often vs. big releases only 4 times a year) *(7)*
>>>>> -Geronimo Certified Partner Program (including Jetspeed-2 as a
>>>>> member). *(2)*
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Documentation *(10)*
>>>>> *************
>>>>> -Tutorials *(4)*
>>>>> How to use Geronimo with: Apache Axis, WSS4J, ActiveMQ
>>>>> -Cookbooks
>>>>> -Better documentation on deployment descriptors
>>>>> -More detailed documentation about the architecture and Gbeans * (2)*
>>>>> -A browsable table describing where to find all plans, etc. for
>>>>> each deployed component or service.
>>>>> -More documentaion on deploying EAR's, WAR's, EJB's, RAR's,
>>>>> classloading and dependencies with that apps)
>>>>>
>>>>> Examples *(4)*
>>>>> ********
>>>>> -Examples for everything
>>>>> -More documentation/examples for me should be more explicative
>>>>> models of the basic openejb-jar.xml and ejb-jar.xml,
>>>>> explaining which tag points where or what
>>>>> Session beans, entity beans(BMP and CMP)
>>>>> Message-Driven-Bean.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -Dave-
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>
>
>
>
Re: User Feedback Request -- this means you!
Posted by Sachin Patel <sp...@gmail.com>.
Yes we should have both but I'm not sure if I agree with your second
statement. :) I think JIRA should be the first place users should go
to request a feature. The wiki will never encapsulate all the work
that needs to be done for a project. JIRA tells us this. Thus the
wiki should be used to bundle the wish-list and associate them to the
themes and priorities for a release. I think trying to keep jiras
and the wiki synchronized is invaluable and is unnecessary work. The
wiki should be the place where to look for what is planned for that
release, and the discussions around and links to jiras/threads for
those items. So the first step I think should be to open jira's and
from there these can be sorted and prioritized and pushed up into the
wiki, I don't think it should be the other way around. There is alot
of things that need to be cleaned up in current in JIRA and by using
it as the first place for work items this forces us to maintain and
constantly scub JIRA to provide an accurate indication of project
status.
thats by 2 cents :)
- sachin
On Apr 5, 2006, at 6:12 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
> I think you need both. The Wiki is a place to look at what there
> is to do...JIRA is the way to tell people your doing it.
>
> Dave Colasurdo wrote:
>> Wasn't suggesting the wiki as the final resting spot, just a
>> temporary holding spot while the user requirements were being
>> gathered, tallied, discussed and prioritized by the community. It
>> works better than email threads passing in the night. No
>> objection to moving the output to JIRAs..
>> -Dave-
>> Sachin Patel wrote:
>>> I don't think they should go on the wiki. Why can't we add them
>>> as Wish List Jira's with #votes and have the wish list query
>>> exported and posted? This way further discussion and progress on
>>> each of the items could be tracked as well.
>>>
>>> - sachin
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Apr 5, 2006, at 4:07 PM, Dave Colasurdo wrote:
>>>
>>>> I tried to order them by priority (based on number of times
>>>> mentioned) within each category/sub-category.. The ones that
>>>> were mentioned the most are first on the list and so forth..
>>>> Items that were mentioned only once are listed in random order..
>>>>
>>>> Anyway, I've updated the list below with the number of requests
>>>> for each item. I've denoted with *(number)*. Absence of a
>>>> number indicates one request for an item.
>>>>
>>>> Of course the community needs to digest the input and decide on
>>>> priorities.
>>>>
>>>> BTW, I have added Global JNDI ENC to the list..
>>>>
>>>> If folks agree with the format, I will post to the wiki..
>>>>
>>>> -Dave-
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Matt Hogstrom wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> This is great Dave...I think we need to prioritze them as
>>>>> well. Can you translate the priorty from the other e-mails to
>>>>> this?
>>>>> Matt
>>>>> Dave Colasurdo wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Excellent feedback from all..
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Here is an attempt to consolidate the feedback into one list.
>>>>>> (Hope I'm not stepping on anyone's toes.) I've grouped by a
>>>>>> few high level categories..
>>>>>> Of course, one could argue that some of the items could fall
>>>>>> into multiple categories... Any glaring omissions?
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Specifications/Functionality
>>>> ****************************
>>>> -JDK 5 for Geronimo *(11)*
>>>> -JEE 5 *(3)*
>>>> Enterprise JavaBeans 3.0 *(5)*
>>>> Java Servlet 2.5
>>>> Java ServerPages 2.1
>>>> Java ServerPages Standard Tag Library
>>>> Java Persistence Architecture (is this part of Java EE?)
>>>> Java Transaction API (JTA)
>>>> J2EE Management
>>>> J2EE Connector Architecture
>>>> -JAX-WS support *(4)*
>>>> -GBean improvements (doc, lifecycle, dependencies, dep.
>>>> injection, ..) *(2)*
>>>> -Dynamic Queries *(2)*
>>>> -javax.persistence
>>>> -annotated session beans.
>>>> -Support for JSR-168 (Portlet API)
>>>> -ServiceMix
>>>> -Maven2 support
>>>> -service/daemon wrapper
>>>> -Remove the requirement of the openejb-jar.xml??
>>>> -Better db tools in the admin console
>>>> -Configuration management, possibility to make a production
>>>> version without some current modules (e.g. OpenEJB or ActiveMQ),
>>>> there are end users who don't have the resources (memory,
>>>> disk) to run Geronimo fully equipped and they don't need every
>>>> feature of the J2EE stack
>>>> - Continued support of Jetty
>>>> -First class HttpSession clustering.
>>>> -More integration with Apache mod_JK/mod_ajp . It would be nice
>>>> if a request would continue through a pool until it landed
>>>> on a server with that webapp.
>>>> -Mass deployment tools that allow the server 'cloning' and
>>>> rollout mentioned during Geronimos initial days.
>>>> -Global JNDI ENC
>>>>
>>>> Tools
>>>> *****
>>>> -NetBeans support *(3)*
>>>> -JDK 5 for launching and running the Geronimo Eclipse plugin *(2)*
>>>> -Eclipse plugin improvement (it is really good but think it
>>>> could be
>>>> better)
>>>> -Eclipse mini-roadmap (from Sachin)
>>>> - run resources directly from the workspace, so the ear isn't
>>>> built and re-packaged on every publish
>>>> - More control over the runtime/server wizards, publish
>>>> process, and server management
>>>> - Continue to build up the UI so we have a complete set of
>>>> "form editors" for the G deployment plans
>>>> - ability to see changes reflected live in something like the
>>>> Common Navigator as you modify your plans
>>>> - full synchronization between the source view and views using
>>>> the model
>>>> - copy/paste, undo/redo support
>>>> -There's also plans in WTP to improve the Server Tools
>>>> Framework to make it easier to have more control over what
>>>> defines your runtime.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Usability
>>>> *********
>>>> -Deployment *(5)*
>>>> Less deployment requirements (simpler plans, more defaults, etc.)
>>>> Simplifying deployment (some means to generate geronimo
>>>> deployment plans?
>>>> Easier way to deploy EAR Files
>>>> More application validation at deployment
>>>> Better redeployment to prevent requests from failing if they
>>>> hit that server during the redeploy.
>>>> -More powerful text configuration
>>>> -Migration path from Tomcat to Geronimo
>>>> -Shortcuts for building web services
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Process
>>>> *******
>>>> -More frequent releases incorporating more user feedback (small
>>>> releases more often vs. big releases only 4 times a year) *(7)*
>>>> -Geronimo Certified Partner Program (including Jetspeed-2 as a
>>>> member). *(2)*
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Documentation *(10)*
>>>> *************
>>>> -Tutorials *(4)*
>>>> How to use Geronimo with: Apache Axis, WSS4J, ActiveMQ
>>>> -Cookbooks
>>>> -Better documentation on deployment descriptors
>>>> -More detailed documentation about the architecture and Gbeans *
>>>> (2)*
>>>> -A browsable table describing where to find all plans, etc. for
>>>> each deployed component or service.
>>>> -More documentaion on deploying EAR's, WAR's, EJB's, RAR's,
>>>> classloading and dependencies with that apps)
>>>>
>>>> Examples *(4)*
>>>> ********
>>>> -Examples for everything
>>>> -More documentation/examples for me should be more explicative
>>>> models of the basic openejb-jar.xml and ejb-jar.xml,
>>>> explaining which tag points where or what
>>>> Session beans, entity beans(BMP and CMP)
>>>> Message-Driven-Bean.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -Dave-
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
Re: User Feedback Request -- this means you!
Posted by Matt Hogstrom <ma...@hogstrom.org>.
I think you need both. The Wiki is a place to look at what there is to do...JIRA is the way to tell
people your doing it.
Dave Colasurdo wrote:
> Wasn't suggesting the wiki as the final resting spot, just a temporary
> holding spot while the user requirements were being gathered, tallied,
> discussed and prioritized by the community. It works better than email
> threads passing in the night. No objection to moving the output to JIRAs..
>
> -Dave-
>
> Sachin Patel wrote:
>
>> I don't think they should go on the wiki. Why can't we add them as
>> Wish List Jira's with #votes and have the wish list query exported and
>> posted? This way further discussion and progress on each of the items
>> could be tracked as well.
>>
>> - sachin
>>
>>
>>
>> On Apr 5, 2006, at 4:07 PM, Dave Colasurdo wrote:
>>
>>> I tried to order them by priority (based on number of times
>>> mentioned) within each category/sub-category.. The ones that were
>>> mentioned the most are first on the list and so forth.. Items that
>>> were mentioned only once are listed in random order..
>>>
>>> Anyway, I've updated the list below with the number of requests for
>>> each item. I've denoted with *(number)*. Absence of a number
>>> indicates one request for an item.
>>>
>>> Of course the community needs to digest the input and decide on
>>> priorities.
>>>
>>> BTW, I have added Global JNDI ENC to the list..
>>>
>>> If folks agree with the format, I will post to the wiki..
>>>
>>> -Dave-
>>>
>>>
>>> Matt Hogstrom wrote:
>>>
>>>> This is great Dave...I think we need to prioritze them as well. Can
>>>> you translate the priorty from the other e-mails to this?
>>>> Matt
>>>> Dave Colasurdo wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Excellent feedback from all..
>>>>>
>>>>> Here is an attempt to consolidate the feedback into one list. (Hope
>>>>> I'm not stepping on anyone's toes.) I've grouped by a few high
>>>>> level categories..
>>>>> Of course, one could argue that some of the items could fall into
>>>>> multiple categories... Any glaring omissions?
>>>>>
>>>
>>> Specifications/Functionality
>>> ****************************
>>> -JDK 5 for Geronimo *(11)*
>>> -JEE 5 *(3)*
>>> Enterprise JavaBeans 3.0 *(5)*
>>> Java Servlet 2.5
>>> Java ServerPages 2.1
>>> Java ServerPages Standard Tag Library
>>> Java Persistence Architecture (is this part of Java EE?)
>>> Java Transaction API (JTA)
>>> J2EE Management
>>> J2EE Connector Architecture
>>> -JAX-WS support *(4)*
>>> -GBean improvements (doc, lifecycle, dependencies, dep. injection,
>>> ..) *(2)*
>>> -Dynamic Queries *(2)*
>>> -javax.persistence
>>> -annotated session beans.
>>> -Support for JSR-168 (Portlet API)
>>> -ServiceMix
>>> -Maven2 support
>>> -service/daemon wrapper
>>> -Remove the requirement of the openejb-jar.xml??
>>> -Better db tools in the admin console
>>> -Configuration management, possibility to make a production version
>>> without some current modules (e.g. OpenEJB or ActiveMQ),
>>> there are end users who don't have the resources (memory, disk) to
>>> run Geronimo fully equipped and they don't need every
>>> feature of the J2EE stack
>>> - Continued support of Jetty
>>> -First class HttpSession clustering.
>>> -More integration with Apache mod_JK/mod_ajp . It would be nice if a
>>> request would continue through a pool until it landed
>>> on a server with that webapp.
>>> -Mass deployment tools that allow the server 'cloning' and rollout
>>> mentioned during Geronimos initial days.
>>> -Global JNDI ENC
>>>
>>> Tools
>>> *****
>>> -NetBeans support *(3)*
>>> -JDK 5 for launching and running the Geronimo Eclipse plugin *(2)*
>>> -Eclipse plugin improvement (it is really good but think it could be
>>> better)
>>> -Eclipse mini-roadmap (from Sachin)
>>> - run resources directly from the workspace, so the ear isn't built
>>> and re-packaged on every publish
>>> - More control over the runtime/server wizards, publish process,
>>> and server management
>>> - Continue to build up the UI so we have a complete set of "form
>>> editors" for the G deployment plans
>>> - ability to see changes reflected live in something like the
>>> Common Navigator as you modify your plans
>>> - full synchronization between the source view and views using the
>>> model
>>> - copy/paste, undo/redo support
>>> -There's also plans in WTP to improve the Server Tools Framework to
>>> make it easier to have more control over what defines your runtime.
>>>
>>>
>>> Usability
>>> *********
>>> -Deployment *(5)*
>>> Less deployment requirements (simpler plans, more defaults, etc.)
>>> Simplifying deployment (some means to generate geronimo deployment
>>> plans?
>>> Easier way to deploy EAR Files
>>> More application validation at deployment
>>> Better redeployment to prevent requests from failing if they hit
>>> that server during the redeploy.
>>> -More powerful text configuration
>>> -Migration path from Tomcat to Geronimo
>>> -Shortcuts for building web services
>>>
>>>
>>> Process
>>> *******
>>> -More frequent releases incorporating more user feedback (small
>>> releases more often vs. big releases only 4 times a year) *(7)*
>>> -Geronimo Certified Partner Program (including Jetspeed-2 as a
>>> member). *(2)*
>>>
>>>
>>> Documentation *(10)*
>>> *************
>>> -Tutorials *(4)*
>>> How to use Geronimo with: Apache Axis, WSS4J, ActiveMQ
>>> -Cookbooks
>>> -Better documentation on deployment descriptors
>>> -More detailed documentation about the architecture and Gbeans *(2)*
>>> -A browsable table describing where to find all plans, etc. for each
>>> deployed component or service.
>>> -More documentaion on deploying EAR's, WAR's, EJB's, RAR's,
>>> classloading and dependencies with that apps)
>>>
>>> Examples *(4)*
>>> ********
>>> -Examples for everything
>>> -More documentation/examples for me should be more explicative models
>>> of the basic openejb-jar.xml and ejb-jar.xml,
>>> explaining which tag points where or what
>>> Session beans, entity beans(BMP and CMP)
>>> Message-Driven-Bean.
>>>
>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> -Dave-
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
Re: User Feedback Request -- this means you!
Posted by Dave Colasurdo <da...@earthlink.net>.
Wasn't suggesting the wiki as the final resting spot, just a temporary
holding spot while the user requirements were being gathered, tallied,
discussed and prioritized by the community. It works better than email
threads passing in the night. No objection to moving the output to
JIRAs..
-Dave-
Sachin Patel wrote:
> I don't think they should go on the wiki. Why can't we add them as Wish
> List Jira's with #votes and have the wish list query exported and
> posted? This way further discussion and progress on each of the items
> could be tracked as well.
>
> - sachin
>
>
>
> On Apr 5, 2006, at 4:07 PM, Dave Colasurdo wrote:
>
>> I tried to order them by priority (based on number of times mentioned)
>> within each category/sub-category.. The ones that were mentioned the
>> most are first on the list and so forth.. Items that were mentioned
>> only once are listed in random order..
>>
>> Anyway, I've updated the list below with the number of requests for
>> each item. I've denoted with *(number)*. Absence of a number
>> indicates one request for an item.
>>
>> Of course the community needs to digest the input and decide on
>> priorities.
>>
>> BTW, I have added Global JNDI ENC to the list..
>>
>> If folks agree with the format, I will post to the wiki..
>>
>> -Dave-
>>
>>
>> Matt Hogstrom wrote:
>>> This is great Dave...I think we need to prioritze them as well. Can
>>> you translate the priorty from the other e-mails to this?
>>> Matt
>>> Dave Colasurdo wrote:
>>>> Excellent feedback from all..
>>>>
>>>> Here is an attempt to consolidate the feedback into one list. (Hope
>>>> I'm not stepping on anyone's toes.) I've grouped by a few high
>>>> level categories..
>>>> Of course, one could argue that some of the items could fall into
>>>> multiple categories... Any glaring omissions?
>>>>
>>
>> Specifications/Functionality
>> ****************************
>> -JDK 5 for Geronimo *(11)*
>> -JEE 5 *(3)*
>> Enterprise JavaBeans 3.0 *(5)*
>> Java Servlet 2.5
>> Java ServerPages 2.1
>> Java ServerPages Standard Tag Library
>> Java Persistence Architecture (is this part of Java EE?)
>> Java Transaction API (JTA)
>> J2EE Management
>> J2EE Connector Architecture
>> -JAX-WS support *(4)*
>> -GBean improvements (doc, lifecycle, dependencies, dep. injection, ..)
>> *(2)*
>> -Dynamic Queries *(2)*
>> -javax.persistence
>> -annotated session beans.
>> -Support for JSR-168 (Portlet API)
>> -ServiceMix
>> -Maven2 support
>> -service/daemon wrapper
>> -Remove the requirement of the openejb-jar.xml??
>> -Better db tools in the admin console
>> -Configuration management, possibility to make a production version
>> without some current modules (e.g. OpenEJB or ActiveMQ),
>> there are end users who don't have the resources (memory, disk) to
>> run Geronimo fully equipped and they don't need every
>> feature of the J2EE stack
>> - Continued support of Jetty
>> -First class HttpSession clustering.
>> -More integration with Apache mod_JK/mod_ajp . It would be nice if a
>> request would continue through a pool until it landed
>> on a server with that webapp.
>> -Mass deployment tools that allow the server 'cloning' and rollout
>> mentioned during Geronimos initial days.
>> -Global JNDI ENC
>>
>> Tools
>> *****
>> -NetBeans support *(3)*
>> -JDK 5 for launching and running the Geronimo Eclipse plugin *(2)*
>> -Eclipse plugin improvement (it is really good but think it could be
>> better)
>> -Eclipse mini-roadmap (from Sachin)
>> - run resources directly from the workspace, so the ear isn't built
>> and re-packaged on every publish
>> - More control over the runtime/server wizards, publish process, and
>> server management
>> - Continue to build up the UI so we have a complete set of "form
>> editors" for the G deployment plans
>> - ability to see changes reflected live in something like the Common
>> Navigator as you modify your plans
>> - full synchronization between the source view and views using the
>> model
>> - copy/paste, undo/redo support
>> -There's also plans in WTP to improve the Server Tools Framework to
>> make it easier to have more control over what defines your runtime.
>>
>>
>> Usability
>> *********
>> -Deployment *(5)*
>> Less deployment requirements (simpler plans, more defaults, etc.)
>> Simplifying deployment (some means to generate geronimo deployment
>> plans?
>> Easier way to deploy EAR Files
>> More application validation at deployment
>> Better redeployment to prevent requests from failing if they hit
>> that server during the redeploy.
>> -More powerful text configuration
>> -Migration path from Tomcat to Geronimo
>> -Shortcuts for building web services
>>
>>
>> Process
>> *******
>> -More frequent releases incorporating more user feedback (small
>> releases more often vs. big releases only 4 times a year) *(7)*
>> -Geronimo Certified Partner Program (including Jetspeed-2 as a
>> member). *(2)*
>>
>>
>> Documentation *(10)*
>> *************
>> -Tutorials *(4)*
>> How to use Geronimo with: Apache Axis, WSS4J, ActiveMQ
>> -Cookbooks
>> -Better documentation on deployment descriptors
>> -More detailed documentation about the architecture and Gbeans *(2)*
>> -A browsable table describing where to find all plans, etc. for each
>> deployed component or service.
>> -More documentaion on deploying EAR's, WAR's, EJB's, RAR's,
>> classloading and dependencies with that apps)
>>
>> Examples *(4)*
>> ********
>> -Examples for everything
>> -More documentation/examples for me should be more explicative models
>> of the basic openejb-jar.xml and ejb-jar.xml,
>> explaining which tag points where or what
>> Session beans, entity beans(BMP and CMP)
>> Message-Driven-Bean.
>>
>>
>>>>
>>>> -Dave-
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>
>
>
Re: User Feedback Request -- this means you!
Posted by Sachin Patel <sp...@gmail.com>.
I don't think they should go on the wiki. Why can't we add them as
Wish List Jira's with #votes and have the wish list query exported
and posted? This way further discussion and progress on each of the
items could be tracked as well.
- sachin
On Apr 5, 2006, at 4:07 PM, Dave Colasurdo wrote:
> I tried to order them by priority (based on number of times
> mentioned) within each category/sub-category.. The ones that were
> mentioned the most are first on the list and so forth.. Items that
> were mentioned only once are listed in random order..
>
> Anyway, I've updated the list below with the number of requests for
> each item. I've denoted with *(number)*. Absence of a number
> indicates one request for an item.
>
> Of course the community needs to digest the input and decide on
> priorities.
>
> BTW, I have added Global JNDI ENC to the list..
>
> If folks agree with the format, I will post to the wiki..
>
> -Dave-
>
>
> Matt Hogstrom wrote:
>> This is great Dave...I think we need to prioritze them as well.
>> Can you translate the priorty from the other e-mails to this?
>> Matt
>> Dave Colasurdo wrote:
>>> Excellent feedback from all..
>>>
>>> Here is an attempt to consolidate the feedback into one list.
>>> (Hope I'm not stepping on anyone's toes.) I've grouped by a few
>>> high level categories..
>>> Of course, one could argue that some of the items could fall into
>>> multiple categories... Any glaring omissions?
>>>
>
> Specifications/Functionality
> ****************************
> -JDK 5 for Geronimo *(11)*
> -JEE 5 *(3)*
> Enterprise JavaBeans 3.0 *(5)*
> Java Servlet 2.5
> Java ServerPages 2.1
> Java ServerPages Standard Tag Library
> Java Persistence Architecture (is this part of Java EE?)
> Java Transaction API (JTA)
> J2EE Management
> J2EE Connector Architecture
> -JAX-WS support *(4)*
> -GBean improvements (doc, lifecycle, dependencies, dep.
> injection, ..) *(2)*
> -Dynamic Queries *(2)*
> -javax.persistence
> -annotated session beans.
> -Support for JSR-168 (Portlet API)
> -ServiceMix
> -Maven2 support
> -service/daemon wrapper
> -Remove the requirement of the openejb-jar.xml??
> -Better db tools in the admin console
> -Configuration management, possibility to make a production version
> without some current modules (e.g. OpenEJB or ActiveMQ),
> there are end users who don't have the resources (memory, disk)
> to run Geronimo fully equipped and they don't need every
> feature of the J2EE stack
> - Continued support of Jetty
> -First class HttpSession clustering.
> -More integration with Apache mod_JK/mod_ajp . It would be nice if
> a request would continue through a pool until it landed
> on a server with that webapp.
> -Mass deployment tools that allow the server 'cloning' and rollout
> mentioned during Geronimos initial days.
> -Global JNDI ENC
>
> Tools
> *****
> -NetBeans support *(3)*
> -JDK 5 for launching and running the Geronimo Eclipse plugin *(2)*
> -Eclipse plugin improvement (it is really good but think it could be
> better)
> -Eclipse mini-roadmap (from Sachin)
> - run resources directly from the workspace, so the ear isn't
> built and re-packaged on every publish
> - More control over the runtime/server wizards, publish process,
> and server management
> - Continue to build up the UI so we have a complete set of "form
> editors" for the G deployment plans
> - ability to see changes reflected live in something like the
> Common Navigator as you modify your plans
> - full synchronization between the source view and views using
> the model
> - copy/paste, undo/redo support
> -There's also plans in WTP to improve the Server Tools Framework
> to make it easier to have more control over what defines your runtime.
>
>
> Usability
> *********
> -Deployment *(5)*
> Less deployment requirements (simpler plans, more defaults, etc.)
> Simplifying deployment (some means to generate geronimo
> deployment plans?
> Easier way to deploy EAR Files
> More application validation at deployment
> Better redeployment to prevent requests from failing if they hit
> that server during the redeploy.
> -More powerful text configuration
> -Migration path from Tomcat to Geronimo
> -Shortcuts for building web services
>
>
> Process
> *******
> -More frequent releases incorporating more user feedback (small
> releases more often vs. big releases only 4 times a year) *(7)*
> -Geronimo Certified Partner Program (including Jetspeed-2 as a
> member). *(2)*
>
>
> Documentation *(10)*
> *************
> -Tutorials *(4)*
> How to use Geronimo with: Apache Axis, WSS4J, ActiveMQ
> -Cookbooks
> -Better documentation on deployment descriptors
> -More detailed documentation about the architecture and Gbeans *(2)*
> -A browsable table describing where to find all plans, etc. for
> each deployed component or service.
> -More documentaion on deploying EAR's, WAR's, EJB's, RAR's,
> classloading and dependencies with that apps)
>
> Examples *(4)*
> ********
> -Examples for everything
> -More documentation/examples for me should be more explicative
> models of the basic openejb-jar.xml and ejb-jar.xml,
> explaining which tag points where or what
> Session beans, entity beans(BMP and CMP)
> Message-Driven-Bean.
>
>
>>>
>>> -Dave-
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
Re: User Feedback Request -- this means you!
Posted by Dave Colasurdo <da...@earthlink.net>.
I tried to order them by priority (based on number of times mentioned)
within each category/sub-category.. The ones that were mentioned the
most are first on the list and so forth.. Items that were mentioned
only once are listed in random order..
Anyway, I've updated the list below with the number of requests for each
item. I've denoted with *(number)*. Absence of a number indicates one
request for an item.
Of course the community needs to digest the input and decide on priorities.
BTW, I have added Global JNDI ENC to the list..
If folks agree with the format, I will post to the wiki..
-Dave-
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
> This is great Dave...I think we need to prioritze them as well. Can you
> translate the priorty from the other e-mails to this?
>
> Matt
>
> Dave Colasurdo wrote:
>> Excellent feedback from all..
>>
>> Here is an attempt to consolidate the feedback into one list. (Hope
>> I'm not stepping on anyone's toes.) I've grouped by a few high level
>> categories..
>> Of course, one could argue that some of the items could fall into
>> multiple categories... Any glaring omissions?
>>
Specifications/Functionality
****************************
-JDK 5 for Geronimo *(11)*
-JEE 5 *(3)*
Enterprise JavaBeans 3.0 *(5)*
Java Servlet 2.5
Java ServerPages 2.1
Java ServerPages Standard Tag Library
Java Persistence Architecture (is this part of Java EE?)
Java Transaction API (JTA)
J2EE Management
J2EE Connector Architecture
-JAX-WS support *(4)*
-GBean improvements (doc, lifecycle, dependencies, dep. injection, ..) *(2)*
-Dynamic Queries *(2)*
-javax.persistence
-annotated session beans.
-Support for JSR-168 (Portlet API)
-ServiceMix
-Maven2 support
-service/daemon wrapper
-Remove the requirement of the openejb-jar.xml??
-Better db tools in the admin console
-Configuration management, possibility to make a production version
without some current modules (e.g. OpenEJB or ActiveMQ),
there are end users who don't have the resources (memory, disk) to
run Geronimo fully equipped and they don't need every
feature of the J2EE stack
- Continued support of Jetty
-First class HttpSession clustering.
-More integration with Apache mod_JK/mod_ajp . It would be nice if a
request would continue through a pool until it landed
on a server with that webapp.
-Mass deployment tools that allow the server 'cloning' and rollout
mentioned during Geronimos initial days.
-Global JNDI ENC
Tools
*****
-NetBeans support *(3)*
-JDK 5 for launching and running the Geronimo Eclipse plugin *(2)*
-Eclipse plugin improvement (it is really good but think it could be
better)
-Eclipse mini-roadmap (from Sachin)
- run resources directly from the workspace, so the ear isn't built
and re-packaged on every publish
- More control over the runtime/server wizards, publish process, and
server management
- Continue to build up the UI so we have a complete set of "form
editors" for the G deployment plans
- ability to see changes reflected live in something like the Common
Navigator as you modify your plans
- full synchronization between the source view and views using the model
- copy/paste, undo/redo support
-There's also plans in WTP to improve the Server Tools Framework to
make it easier to have more control over what defines your runtime.
Usability
*********
-Deployment *(5)*
Less deployment requirements (simpler plans, more defaults, etc.)
Simplifying deployment (some means to generate geronimo deployment plans?
Easier way to deploy EAR Files
More application validation at deployment
Better redeployment to prevent requests from failing if they hit that
server during the redeploy.
-More powerful text configuration
-Migration path from Tomcat to Geronimo
-Shortcuts for building web services
Process
*******
-More frequent releases incorporating more user feedback (small releases
more often vs. big releases only 4 times a year) *(7)*
-Geronimo Certified Partner Program (including Jetspeed-2 as a member).
*(2)*
Documentation *(10)*
*************
-Tutorials *(4)*
How to use Geronimo with: Apache Axis, WSS4J, ActiveMQ
-Cookbooks
-Better documentation on deployment descriptors
-More detailed documentation about the architecture and Gbeans *(2)*
-A browsable table describing where to find all plans, etc. for each
deployed component or service.
-More documentaion on deploying EAR's, WAR's, EJB's, RAR's, classloading
and dependencies with that apps)
Examples *(4)*
********
-Examples for everything
-More documentation/examples for me should be more explicative models of
the basic openejb-jar.xml and ejb-jar.xml,
explaining which tag points where or what
Session beans, entity beans(BMP and CMP)
Message-Driven-Bean.
>>
>> -Dave-
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
Re: User Feedback Request -- this means you!
Posted by Matt Hogstrom <ma...@hogstrom.org>.
This is great Dave...I think we need to prioritze them as well. Can you translate the priorty from
the other e-mails to this?
Matt
Dave Colasurdo wrote:
> Excellent feedback from all..
>
> Here is an attempt to consolidate the feedback into one list. (Hope I'm
> not stepping on anyone's toes.) I've grouped by a few high level
> categories..
> Of course, one could argue that some of the items could fall into
> multiple categories... Any glaring omissions?
>
> Specifications/Functionality
> ****************************
> -JDK 5 for Geronimo
> -JEE 5
> Enterprise JavaBeans 3.0
> Java Servlet 2.5
> Java ServerPages 2.1
> Java ServerPages Standard Tag Library
> Java Persistence Architecture (is this part of Java EE?)
> Java Transaction API (JTA)
> J2EE Management
> J2EE Connector Architecture
> -JAX-WS support
> -javax.persistence
> -Dynamic Queries
> -annotated session beans.
> -Support for JSR-168 (Portlet API)
> -ServiceMix
> -GBean improvements (doc, lifecycle, dependencies, dep. injection, ..)
> -Maven2 support
> -service/daemon wrapper
> -Remove the requirement of the openejb-jar.xml??
> -Better db tools in the admin console
> -Configuration management, possibility to make a production version
> without some current modules (e.g. OpenEJB or ActiveMQ),
> there are end users who don't have the resources (memory, disk) to run
> Geronimo fully equipped and they don't need every
> feature of the J2EE stack
> - Continued support of Jetty
> -First class HttpSession clustering.
> -More integration with Apache mod_JK/mod_ajp . It would be nice if a
> request would continue through a pool until it landed
> on a server with that webapp.
> -Mass deployment tools that allow the server 'cloning' and rollout
> mentioned during Geronimos initial days.
>
> Tools
> *****
> -JDK 5 for launching and running the Geronimo Eclipse plugin
> -Eclipse plugin improvement (it is really good but think it could be
> better)
> -Eclipse mini-roadmap (from Sachin)
> - run resources directly from the workspace, so the ear isn't built
> and re-packaged on every publish
> - More control over the runtime/server wizards, publish process, and
> server management
> - Continue to build up the UI so we have a complete set of "form
> editors" for the G deployment plans
> - ability to see changes reflected live in something like the Common
> Navigator as you modify your plans
> - full synchronization between the source view and views using the model
> - copy/paste, undo/redo support
> -There's also plans in WTP to improve the Server Tools Framework to
> make it easier to have more control over what defines your runtime.
> -NetBeans support
>
> Usability
> *********
> -Deployment
> Less deployment requirements (simpler plans, more defaults, etc.)
> Simplifying deployment (some means to generate geronimo deployment plans?
> Easier way to deploy EAR Files
> More application validation at deployment
> Better redeployment to prevent requests from failing if they hit that
> server during the redeploy.
> -More powerful text configuration
> -Migration path from Tomcat to Geronimo
> -Shortcuts for building web services
>
>
> Process
> *******
> -More frequent releases incorporating more user feedback (small releases
> more often vs. big releases only 4 times a year)
> -Geronimo Certified Partner Program (including Jetspeed-2 as a member).
>
>
> Documentation
> *************
> -Tutorials
> How to use Geronimo with: Apache Axis, WSS4J, ActiveMQ
> -Cookbooks
> -Better documentation on deployment descriptors
> -More detailed documentation about the architecture.
> -A browsable table describing where to find all plans, etc. for each
> deployed component or service.
> -More documentaion on deploying EAR's, WAR's, EJB's, RAR's, classloading
> and dependencies with that apps)
>
> Examples
> ********
> -Examples for everything
> -More documentation/examples for me should be more explicative models of
> the basic openejb-jar.xml and ejb-jar.xml,
> explaining which tag points where or what
> Session beans, entity beans(BMP and CMP)
> Message-Driven-Bean.
>
>
> -Dave-
>
>
>
>
Re: User Feedback Request -- this means you!
Posted by Dain Sundstrom <da...@iq80.com>.
Dave C, can you add this to the list. It came up on the dev list the
yesterday as well.
-dain
On Apr 5, 2006, at 7:25 AM, Manu George wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is there any specific reason whythere is no Global JNDI ENC in
> Geronimo? I remember in the old days pre-M5 there used to be jndi-
> name tags in the resource deployment plans. Why was this feature
> removed if it was there?
>
> It would be helpful to have a Global JNDI ENC.
>
> Regards
> Manu
Re: User Feedback Request -- this means you!
Posted by Manu George <ma...@gmail.com>.
Hi,
Is there any specific reason whythere is no Global JNDI ENC in Geronimo? I
remember in the old days pre-M5 there used to be jndi-name tags in the
resource deployment plans. Why was this feature removed if it was there?
It would be helpful to have a Global JNDI ENC.
Regards
Manu
Re: User Feedback Request -- this means you!
Posted by Dave Colasurdo <da...@earthlink.net>.
Excellent feedback from all..
Here is an attempt to consolidate the feedback into one list. (Hope I'm
not stepping on anyone's toes.) I've grouped by a few high level
categories..
Of course, one could argue that some of the items could fall into
multiple categories... Any glaring omissions?
Specifications/Functionality
****************************
-JDK 5 for Geronimo
-JEE 5
Enterprise JavaBeans 3.0
Java Servlet 2.5
Java ServerPages 2.1
Java ServerPages Standard Tag Library
Java Persistence Architecture (is this part of Java EE?)
Java Transaction API (JTA)
J2EE Management
J2EE Connector Architecture
-JAX-WS support
-javax.persistence
-Dynamic Queries
-annotated session beans.
-Support for JSR-168 (Portlet API)
-ServiceMix
-GBean improvements (doc, lifecycle, dependencies, dep. injection, ..)
-Maven2 support
-service/daemon wrapper
-Remove the requirement of the openejb-jar.xml??
-Better db tools in the admin console
-Configuration management, possibility to make a production version
without some current modules (e.g. OpenEJB or ActiveMQ),
there are end users who don't have the resources (memory, disk) to
run Geronimo fully equipped and they don't need every
feature of the J2EE stack
- Continued support of Jetty
-First class HttpSession clustering.
-More integration with Apache mod_JK/mod_ajp . It would be nice if a
request would continue through a pool until it landed
on a server with that webapp.
-Mass deployment tools that allow the server 'cloning' and rollout
mentioned during Geronimos initial days.
Tools
*****
-JDK 5 for launching and running the Geronimo Eclipse plugin
-Eclipse plugin improvement (it is really good but think it could be
better)
-Eclipse mini-roadmap (from Sachin)
- run resources directly from the workspace, so the ear isn't built
and re-packaged on every publish
- More control over the runtime/server wizards, publish process, and
server management
- Continue to build up the UI so we have a complete set of "form
editors" for the G deployment plans
- ability to see changes reflected live in something like the Common
Navigator as you modify your plans
- full synchronization between the source view and views using the model
- copy/paste, undo/redo support
-There's also plans in WTP to improve the Server Tools Framework to
make it easier to have more control over what defines your runtime.
-NetBeans support
Usability
*********
-Deployment
Less deployment requirements (simpler plans, more defaults, etc.)
Simplifying deployment (some means to generate geronimo deployment plans?
Easier way to deploy EAR Files
More application validation at deployment
Better redeployment to prevent requests from failing if they hit that
server during the redeploy.
-More powerful text configuration
-Migration path from Tomcat to Geronimo
-Shortcuts for building web services
Process
*******
-More frequent releases incorporating more user feedback (small releases
more often vs. big releases only 4 times a year)
-Geronimo Certified Partner Program (including Jetspeed-2 as a member).
Documentation
*************
-Tutorials
How to use Geronimo with: Apache Axis, WSS4J, ActiveMQ
-Cookbooks
-Better documentation on deployment descriptors
-More detailed documentation about the architecture.
-A browsable table describing where to find all plans, etc. for each
deployed component or service.
-More documentaion on deploying EAR's, WAR's, EJB's, RAR's, classloading
and dependencies with that apps)
Examples
********
-Examples for everything
-More documentation/examples for me should be more explicative models of
the basic openejb-jar.xml and ejb-jar.xml,
explaining which tag points where or what
Session beans, entity beans(BMP and CMP)
Message-Driven-Bean.
-Dave-
Re: User Feedback Request -- this means you!
Posted by Glaucio Scheibel <gl...@datasul.com.br>.
Ok, that's what I need:
1. Support for Java 5
2. Dynamic Queries
3. Remove the requirement of the openejb-jar.xml
4. Easier way to deploy EAR Files
5. EJB 3 /JavaEE 5
David Blevins wrote:
> Very excellent feedback everyone! Keep it coming. Don't be shy.
>
> And definitely post your top 5 even if someone else has already
> covered your items. The number of times we see certain things
> mentioned is a big indicator of demand.
>
>
> -David
>
>
Re: User Feedback Request -- this means you!
Posted by Oli Kessler <ok...@ncode.ch>.
Here we go:
1. JDK 1.5
2. Better documentation (deployment descriptors, sample applications)
3. GBean improvements (doc, lifecycle, dependencies, dep. injection, ..)
4. Maven2 support
5. service/daemon wrapper
Cheers,
-ok
David Blevins wrote:
> Very excellent feedback everyone! Keep it coming. Don't be shy.
>
> And definitely post your top 5 even if someone else has already covered
> your items. The number of times we see certain things mentioned is a
> big indicator of demand.
>
>
> -David
>
Re: User Feedback Request -- this means you!
Posted by David Blevins <da...@visi.com>.
Very excellent feedback everyone! Keep it coming. Don't be shy.
And definitely post your top 5 even if someone else has already
covered your items. The number of times we see certain things
mentioned is a big indicator of demand.
-David
Re: User Feedback Request -- Usability Focus
Posted by David Blevins <da...@visi.com>.
On Apr 6, 2006, at 7:56 AM, Dave Colasurdo wrote:
> Thanks David B. for starting this valuable thread.
>
Thanks for following up, this is excellent!
-David
> I'd like to hijack a sub-thread to get the user community's
> thoughts on how the usability of Geronimo can be improved.
>
> What are the areas that you believe need improvement?
>
> Some of the areas that have already been mentioned include:
>
> deployment
> documentation
> examples
> tools
> migration
>
> Are there any specific requests in these areas that haven't yet
> been flushed out?
>
> How important are the following?
> - Classloading - simple way to have application jars easily
> override the system classpath
> - Allow simple XML updates for all configuration data (non-serialized)
> - Have exploded application directories with human-readable names
> - Ability to update piecemeal portions of a deployed application
> - Better error messages
> - Security simplification
> - GUI Installer
> - Ability to create a custom server containing just the components
> that you require
>
> Please provide specifics...
>
> What other areas require ease-of-use enhancements?
>
> Thanks
> -Dave-
>
>
> David Blevins wrote:
>> So this is the first of what I think should be a quarterly event.
>> Geronimo is ultimately your project and we committers are but your
>> humble servants. To serve you best, we need some critical high
>> level feedback to help us steer the project and focus on what
>> matters most to you!
>> Please, every user out there, give us your top 5 things we can do
>> to make Geronimo better for you. Here is my list:
>> 1) More interaction with you guys, the users!
>> 2) More frequent releases incorporating more user feedback (small
>> releases more often vs. big releases only 4 times a year)
>> 3) Less deployment requirements (simpler plans, more defaults, etc.)
>> 4) More application validation at deployment
>> 5) More powerful text configuration
>> That's just to get the ball rolling. More detail is always good
>> if you have the time. In general anything you think we need to
>> correct as a community, technical or non-technical. Let us know.
>> If you've ever uttered the words, "Geronimo would be such a great
>> project if it only...." then now is your time to shine.
>> We want to hear from everyone! This is not just for the "hard-
>> core" Geronimo users or J2EE experts. If you are new to J2EE and
>> downloaded Geronimo and had to give up after an hour of no
>> progress, let us know what we might do!
>> It's all about you.
>> Best Regards,
>> David Blevins
>
Re: User Feedback Request -- Usability Focus
Posted by Dave Colasurdo <da...@earthlink.net>.
Thanks David B. for starting this valuable thread.
I'd like to hijack a sub-thread to get the user community's thoughts on
how the usability of Geronimo can be improved.
What are the areas that you believe need improvement?
Some of the areas that have already been mentioned include:
deployment
documentation
examples
tools
migration
Are there any specific requests in these areas that haven't yet been
flushed out?
How important are the following?
- Classloading - simple way to have application jars easily override the
system classpath
- Allow simple XML updates for all configuration data (non-serialized)
- Have exploded application directories with human-readable names
- Ability to update piecemeal portions of a deployed application
- Better error messages
- Security simplification
- GUI Installer
- Ability to create a custom server containing just the components that
you require
Please provide specifics...
What other areas require ease-of-use enhancements?
Thanks
-Dave-
David Blevins wrote:
> So this is the first of what I think should be a quarterly event.
> Geronimo is ultimately your project and we committers are but your
> humble servants. To serve you best, we need some critical high level
> feedback to help us steer the project and focus on what matters most to
> you!
>
> Please, every user out there, give us your top 5 things we can do to
> make Geronimo better for you. Here is my list:
>
> 1) More interaction with you guys, the users!
> 2) More frequent releases incorporating more user feedback (small
> releases more often vs. big releases only 4 times a year)
> 3) Less deployment requirements (simpler plans, more defaults, etc.)
> 4) More application validation at deployment
> 5) More powerful text configuration
>
> That's just to get the ball rolling. More detail is always good if you
> have the time. In general anything you think we need to correct as a
> community, technical or non-technical. Let us know.
>
> If you've ever uttered the words, "Geronimo would be such a great
> project if it only...." then now is your time to shine.
>
> We want to hear from everyone! This is not just for the "hard-core"
> Geronimo users or J2EE experts. If you are new to J2EE and downloaded
> Geronimo and had to give up after an hour of no progress, let us know
> what we might do!
>
>
> It's all about you.
>
>
> Best Regards,
> David Blevins
>
>
>
>
Re: User Feedback Request -- this means you!
Posted by ia...@jpmchase.com.
+1
It's better to be hated for who you are
than loved for who you are not
Ian D. Stewart
Appl Dev Analyst-Advisory, DCS Automation
JPMorganChase Global Technology Infrastructure
Phone: (614) 244-2564
Pager: (888) 260-0078
Mario Rübsam
<mr@coderesearch. To: user@geronimo.apache.org
com> cc:
Subject: Re: User Feedback Request -- this means you!
03/29/2006 03:15
AM
Please respond to
user
Hi,
Jian Liao wrote:
> Setup something like JBoss Certified Partner Program
> <http://www.jboss.org/partners/program>. I would like to see Jetspeed-2
> joined Geronimo Certfied Partner Program:)
> It will encourage more program, opensource project to integrate with
> Geronimo.
>
> - Jian Liao
>
I really don't know why a partner program encourages integration.
There are some reasons why we moved to Geronimo. One is that certified
thingy, which brings more commercial pressure in development. I really
like the open documentation and discussion with geronimo community and
committers. No need for privileged certified partners.
-Mario
Re: User Feedback Request -- this means you!
Posted by Mario Rübsam <mr...@coderesearch.com>.
Hi,
Jian Liao wrote:
> Setup something like JBoss Certified Partner Program
> <http://www.jboss.org/partners/program>. I would like to see Jetspeed-2
> joined Geronimo Certfied Partner Program:)
> It will encourage more program, opensource project to integrate with
> Geronimo.
>
> - Jian Liao
>
I really don't know why a partner program encourages integration.
There are some reasons why we moved to Geronimo. One is that certified
thingy, which brings more commercial pressure in development. I really
like the open documentation and discussion with geronimo community and
committers. No need for privileged certified partners.
-Mario
Re: User Feedback Request -- this means you!
Posted by Jian Liao <no...@gmail.com>.
Setup something like JBoss Certified Partner
Program<http://www.jboss.org/partners/program>.
I would like to see Jetspeed-2 joined Geronimo Certfied Partner Program:)
It will encourage more program, opensource project to integrate with
Geronimo.
- Jian Liao
On 3/29/06, Mario Rübsam <mr...@coderesearch.com> wrote:
>
> Here my short list:
>
> 1) Support for JDK1.5 (both for Geronimo itself and the Geronimo
> Eclipse plugin)
>
> 2) configuration management, possibility to make a production version
> without some current modules (e.g. OpenEJB or ActiveMQ), there are
> end useres who don't have the resources (memory, disk) to run Geronimo
> fully equipped and they don't need every feature of the J2EE stack
>
> 3) more minor bugfix releases
>
> 4) More tutorials, documentaion, there is a growing base but if one is
> new to geronimo he have a hard first time (esp. deploying EAR's
> including WAR's, EJB's, RAR's, classloading and dependencies with
> that apps)
>
> 5) never push out Jetty support, we love Jetty ;)
>
> Thanks,
> Mario
>
>
> David Blevins wrote:
> > So this is the first of what I think should be a quarterly event.
> > Geronimo is ultimately your project and we committers are but your
> > humble servants. To serve you best, we need some critical high level
> > feedback to help us steer the project and focus on what matters most to
> > you!
> >
> > Please, every user out there, give us your top 5 things we can do to
> > make Geronimo better for you. Here is my list:
> >
> > 1) More interaction with you guys, the users!
> > 2) More frequent releases incorporating more user feedback (small
> > releases more often vs. big releases only 4 times a year)
> > 3) Less deployment requirements (simpler plans, more defaults, etc.)
> > 4) More application validation at deployment
> > 5) More powerful text configuration
> >
> > That's just to get the ball rolling. More detail is always good if you
> > have the time. In general anything you think we need to correct as a
> > community, technical or non-technical. Let us know.
> >
> > If you've ever uttered the words, "Geronimo would be such a great
> > project if it only...." then now is your time to shine.
> >
> > We want to hear from everyone! This is not just for the "hard-core"
> > Geronimo users or J2EE experts. If you are new to J2EE and downloaded
> > Geronimo and had to give up after an hour of no progress, let us know
> > what we might do!
> >
> >
> > It's all about you.
> >
> >
> > Best Regards,
> > David Blevins
> >
> >
> >
>
Re: User Feedback Request -- this means you!
Posted by Mario Rübsam <mr...@coderesearch.com>.
Here my short list:
1) Support for JDK1.5 (both for Geronimo itself and the Geronimo
Eclipse plugin)
2) configuration management, possibility to make a production version
without some current modules (e.g. OpenEJB or ActiveMQ), there are
end useres who don't have the resources (memory, disk) to run Geronimo
fully equipped and they don't need every feature of the J2EE stack
3) more minor bugfix releases
4) More tutorials, documentaion, there is a growing base but if one is
new to geronimo he have a hard first time (esp. deploying EAR's
including WAR's, EJB's, RAR's, classloading and dependencies with
that apps)
5) never push out Jetty support, we love Jetty ;)
Thanks,
Mario
David Blevins wrote:
> So this is the first of what I think should be a quarterly event.
> Geronimo is ultimately your project and we committers are but your
> humble servants. To serve you best, we need some critical high level
> feedback to help us steer the project and focus on what matters most to
> you!
>
> Please, every user out there, give us your top 5 things we can do to
> make Geronimo better for you. Here is my list:
>
> 1) More interaction with you guys, the users!
> 2) More frequent releases incorporating more user feedback (small
> releases more often vs. big releases only 4 times a year)
> 3) Less deployment requirements (simpler plans, more defaults, etc.)
> 4) More application validation at deployment
> 5) More powerful text configuration
>
> That's just to get the ball rolling. More detail is always good if you
> have the time. In general anything you think we need to correct as a
> community, technical or non-technical. Let us know.
>
> If you've ever uttered the words, "Geronimo would be such a great
> project if it only...." then now is your time to shine.
>
> We want to hear from everyone! This is not just for the "hard-core"
> Geronimo users or J2EE experts. If you are new to J2EE and downloaded
> Geronimo and had to give up after an hour of no progress, let us know
> what we might do!
>
>
> It's all about you.
>
>
> Best Regards,
> David Blevins
>
>
>
Re: User Feedback Request -- this means you!
Posted by Matt Hogstrom <ma...@hogstrom.org>.
Well, the *b* key is at least located next to the *n* key :) My bad.
David Blevins wrote:
>
> On Apr 5, 2006, at 3:13 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
>
>> Good points Tony, thanks. We are delinquent in the crusty bug
>> situation. We'll see if we can sort that out as we get through 1.1.
>
>
> Who's Tony ;-P
>
> Regardless, great feedback Toby. And as Matt says sorry about the lack
> of bug uptake....
>
> I whipped together this report which will now be sent to the dev list
> on the 1st and 15th of every month. I hope it will help the absorbency
> of JIRA items by both developers and people looking to contribute.
>
> Cool thing about sending them to the dev list is that they'll get
> archived and we can be embarrassed by our inaction for years to come :)
>
> You weren't kidding about some of them being old, you've got one in
> there from Aug 05, 2004 !!!
>
> -David
>
> On Apr 6, 2006, at 3:53 PM, dblevins@apache.org wrote:
>
>> Unassigned issues (273) as of 2006-04-06
>> * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
>>
>> 1 WEEK (8 issues)
>>
>> * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
>>
>> Key
>> Summary Reporter Created
>> GERONIMO-1800 SPECjAppServer2004 Deployment
>> Descriptors Vasily Zakharov Apr 03, 2006
>> GERONIMO-1804 The name of JNDI/RMI service provider is hardcoded in
>> the sources. Andrey Pavlenko Apr 05, 2006
>> GERONIMO-1805 org.apache.geronimo.directory.RunningTest hangs on BEA
>> Jrockit VMs Alexei Zakharov Apr 05, 2006
>> GERONIMO-1815 Remove empty config-store
>> directory Dain Sundstrom Apr 06,
>> 2006
>> GERONIMO-1792 Ant Tasks Mirror of Maven
>> Plugins Heinie Barnard Mar 30,
>> 2006
>> GERONIMO-1801 Restart/Shutdown functionality for Geronimo when using
>> Java Service Mario Ruebsam Apr 04, 2006
>> Wrapper
>> GERONIMO-1812 When already deployed application is hot deployed once
>> gain , Server Mansoor Apr 06, 2006
>> doesn't delete the module from hot deployed directory
>> GERONIMO-1813 When already deployed application is hot deployed once
>> gain , Server Mansoor Apr 06, 2006
>> doesn't delete the module from hot deployed directory
>>
>> * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
>>
>> 30 DAYS (37 issues)
>>
>> * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
>>
>> Key
>> Summary Reporter Created
>> GERONIMO-1733 Module migration to Maven 2:
>> mail Jacek Laskowski Mar 09, 2006
>> GERONIMO-1734 Module migration to Maven 2: naming-
>> builder Jacek Laskowski Mar 09, 2006
>> GERONIMO-1735 Module migration to Maven 2:
>> transaction Jacek Laskowski Mar 09, 2006
>> GERONIMO-1736 Module migration to Maven 2: web-
>> builder Jacek Laskowski Mar 09, 2006
>> GERONIMO-1739 Plugin migration to Maven 2: geronimo-izpack-
>> plugin Jacek Laskowski Mar 09, 2006
>> GERONIMO-1747 HTTP-methods
>> checks Ilya
>> Platonov Mar 16, 2006
>> GERONIMO-1749 Server Logs portlet - Web Access Log Viewer
>> improvements Vamsavardhana Reddy Mar 17, 2006
>> GERONIMO-1726 Module migration to Maven 2:
>> common Jacek Laskowski Mar 09, 2006
>> GERONIMO-1727 Module migration to Maven2:
>> connector Jacek Laskowski Mar 09, 2006
>> GERONIMO-1752 JMS Server portlet - Edits to JMS Network Listener are
>> lost upon Vamsavardhana Reddy Mar 20, 2006
>> server restart
>> GERONIMO-1751 Deployment of ear with external plan using "Deploy
>> New" console John Sisson Mar 20, 2006
>> option caused FileNotFoundException
>> GERONIMO-1756 Move from 1.1-dev version of commons-fileupload to
>> version 1.1 John Sisson Mar 20, 2006
>> GERONIMO-1758 Can not use Realm with SQL database over connection
>> pool Torsten Markwardt Mar 21, 2006
>> GERONIMO-1761 Change geronimo-util module to geronimo-crypto, give
>> credit where Aaron Mulder Mar 22, 2006
>> credit is due
>> GERONIMO-1762 Create a derby network /embedded XA datasource via
>> admin console Lin Sun Mar 23, 2006
>> fail
>> GERONIMO-1763 default config.xml does not list Jetty AJP
>> connector Aaron Mulder Mar 23, 2006
>> GERONIMO-1786 JMS Listeners for protocols activeio, peer and
>> openwire fail to Donald Woods Mar 28, 2006
>> start
>> GERONIMO-1789 Exceptions while adding SQL Realm thru Admin
>> Console Vamsavardhana Reddy Mar 29, 2006
>> GERONIMO-1746 Updates to Logger through Log Manager portlet under
>> Console are Vamsavardhana Reddy Mar 16, 2006
>> not reflected in the server
>> GERONIMO-1782 Properties File Login module fails after editing
>> through Admin Vamsavardhana Reddy Mar 28, 2006
>> Console
>> GERONIMO-1711 WebServer Connectors portlet should provide a
>> "restart" option Vamsavardhana Reddy Mar 08, 2006
>> for connectors
>> GERONIMO-1721 Security Realms portlet should provide link to delete
>> an existing Vamsavardhana Reddy Mar 09, 2006
>> realm
>> GERONIMO-1741 Console should provide option to "redeploy"
>> applications Vamsavardhana Reddy Mar 10, 2006
>> GERONIMO-1748 Site migration to Maven
>> 2 John Sisson Mar
>> 16, 2006
>> GERONIMO-1750 Unable to run
>> tradeStreamerAppclient Lin
>> Sun Mar 17, 2006
>> GERONIMO-1757 rarRelativePath is not set correctly cause
>> showplan.jsp Lin Sun Mar 21, 2006
>> displayswrong instruction
>> GERONIMO-1764 Daytrader createDB.sh script does not support cygwin
>> users on Bryan Noll Mar 23, 2006
>> Windows.
>> GERONIMO-1767 bad group for console has no error page that allows
>> user Joseph B. Ottinger Mar 24, 2006
>> logout/correction
>> GERONIMO-1768 bad group for console has no error page that allows
>> user Joseph B. Ottinger Mar 24, 2006
>> logout/correction
>> GERONIMO-1774 baseDir NPE in
>> org.apache.geronimo.deployment.DeploymentContext John
>> Sisson Mar 27, 2006
>> GERONIMO-1775 Internationalization of the Admin
>> Console Yeray Cabrera Santana Mar 27, 2006
>> GERONIMO-1784 SQL Login Modules logs "null" instead of the driver
>> name Vamsavardhana Reddy Mar 28, 2006
>> GERONIMO-1783 Welcome application
>> i18n Yeray Cabrera Santana
>> Mar 28, 2006
>> GERONIMO-1769 Console should create links for all sections including
>> the Joseph B. Ottinger Mar 24, 2006
>> "current section"
>> GERONIMO-1770 Console should create links for all sections including
>> the Joseph B. Ottinger Mar 24, 2006
>> "current section"
>> GERONIMO-1771 Console should create links for all sections including
>> the Joseph B. Ottinger Mar 24, 2006
>> "current section"
>> GERONIMO-1773 Automatic driver download is
>> duplicated Yiannis Mavroukakis Mar 25, 2006
>>
>> * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
>>
>> 60 DAYS (39 issues)
>>
>> * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
>>
>> Key
>> Summary Reporter Created
>> GERONIMO-1684 server does not start if openejb-jar.xml activation-
>> config had Aaron Mulder Mar 03, 2006
>> whitespace in values
>> GERONIMO-1597 Extra '/'s in webservices
>> URL Phani Balaji Madgula Feb 06,
>> 2006
>> GERONIMO-1596 Repeated interface in JMS connection factory plan
>> causes Aaron Mulder Feb 06, 2006
>> deployment failure
>> GERONIMO-1592 Add NamedUPCredentialLoginModule to Console Realm
>> Wizard Aaron Mulder Feb 06, 2006
>> GERONIMO-1594 deployment of a simple (only one jsp) web project
>> failed Mark Mauerwerk Feb 06, 2006
>> GERONIMO-1602 Switching from Tomcat causes error in JAAS module:
>> "Unable to Karsten Voges Feb 08, 2006
>> instantiate login module"
>> GERONIMO-1614 Installer - Console portal servlet fails to load
>> properly after erik daughtrey Feb 09, 2006
>> install
>> GERONIMO-1621 [Daytrader] TradeWSAction class is not a
>> Servlet Vincent Massol Feb 11, 2006
>> GERONIMO-1626 Update Wiki pages about m:
>> goals Jacek Laskowski Feb 15,
>> 2006
>> GERONIMO-1628 [DayTrader] Tweaks to some wsappclient client files to
>> match the Vincent Massol Feb 15, 2006
>> WSDL file
>> GERONIMO-1631 NoSuchConfigException when restarting app after
>> undeploying Sachin Patel Feb 15, 2006
>> GERONIMO-1642 Deployment plan namespace
>> validation Aaron Mulder Feb 20,
>> 2006
>> GERONIMO-1652 EJBModuleImpl.getEJBs() always return an empty
>> array Chris Cardona Feb 24, 2006
>> GERONIMO-1662 ActiveMQ client not able to send message to
>> destination in Tx Phani Balaji Madgula Mar 01, 2006
>> session
>> GERONIMO-1666 Console issues resulting from configID
>> changes Paul McMahan Mar 01, 2006
>> GERONIMO-1674 Daytrader gets NullPointerException attempting to log
>> in a user Joe Bohn Mar 02, 2006
>> GERONIMO-1680 MDB without activation-config in openejb-jar.xml
>> silently fails Aaron Mulder Mar 02, 2006
>> GERONIMO-1683 Web app context-root should trim
>> whitespace Aaron Mulder Mar 03, 2006
>> GERONIMO-1682 remote deployment fails when server is running on
>> machine with Song Mar 03, 2006
>> DHCP
>> GERONIMO-1687 NPE during deployment related to EJB
>> Ref Aaron Mulder Mar 03, 2006
>> GERONIMO-1691 Console should help configure Geronimo to hook up to
>> Apache HTTP Aaron Mulder Mar 04, 2006
>> GERONIMO-1695 CORBA for EJB with Local interface only causes
>> NPE Aaron Mulder Feb 06, 2006
>> GERONIMO-1701 Improve the EJB Server
>> portlet Chris Cardona Mar
>> 06, 2006
>> GERONIMO-1692 Creating Web Connectors using
>> Console Ilya Kanonirov Mar 05, 2006
>> GERONIMO-1704 Console security realm doesn't let you pick a
>> JAR Aaron Mulder Mar 07, 2006
>> GERONIMO-1663 Ability to test database pool connections after
>> editing. Hernan Cunico Mar 01, 2006
>> GERONIMO-1641 Using default Console Realm, when delete a user it
>> will not be Hernan Cunico Feb 20, 2006
>> removed from the groups
>> GERONIMO-1657 CommandSupport doesn't bubble up the exception. Prints
>> stacktrace. Prasad Kashyap Feb 27, 2006
>> GERONIMO-1709 Translate documentation to Polish
>> lang. Marcin Maciukiewicz Mar 07, 2006
>> GERONIMO-1655 Daytrader MDBs do not start
>> properly Anita Kulshreshtha Feb 27, 2006
>> GERONIMO-1665 Module migration to Maven2:
>> axis Henri Yandell Mar 01, 2006
>> GERONIMO-1588 ActiveMQ directory as peer to geronimo-1.0
>> directory Jason Dillon Feb 05, 2006
>> GERONIMO-1623 Preliminary port of the OpenWire C# into C+
>> +. Mats F Feb 13, 2006
>> GERONIMO-1633 "resource-ref" not available in ServletFilter.init
>> (..) Andrus Adamchik Feb 15, 2006
>> GERONIMO-1648 Eliminate unnecessary config parent (import)
>> dependencies Joe Bohn Feb 22, 2006
>> GERONIMO-1700 Web Console prints a stack trace when attempting to
>> deploy an Joe Bohn Mar 06, 2006
>> application that is already deployed.
>> GERONIMO-1698 Module migration to Maven2: hot-
>> deploy Rakesh Ranjan Mar 06, 2006
>> GERONIMO-1702 The latest maven 1 Build
>> process Anita Kulshreshtha Mar
>> 07, 2006
>> GERONIMO-1685 Need to ignore .DS_Store files in deployment
>> dirs Matt Bishop Mar 03, 2006
>>
>> * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
>>
>> 6 MONTHS (127 issues)
>>
>> * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
>>
>> Key
>> Summary Reporter Created
>> GERONIMO-1384 Web app with no Geronimo plan makes all secure pages
>> insecure Aaron Mulder Dec 18, 2005
>> GERONIMO-1135 Keystore password in
>> System.properties Aaron Mulder
>> Nov 05, 2005
>> GERONIMO-1053 Session Bean, Finder, & Method
>> Permissions Aaron Mulder Oct 10, 2005
>> GERONIMO-1410 Configuration geronimo/jetty/1.0-SNAPSHOT/car defines
>> Spring Gianny Damour Jan 01, 2006
>> Framework - Hibernate based Web-app do not work
>> GERONIMO-1423 log4j.properties's category is
>> ignored viewhero Jan 06, 2006
>> GERONIMO-1491 ActiveMQ plan uses hardcoded
>> obsolete Aaron Mulder Jan 18, 2006
>> org/apache/geronimo/ActiveMQ module name
>> GERONIMO-1547 Legal license issue in
>> schemas Daniel Bornkessel Jan
>> 26, 2006
>> GERONIMO-1585 Web app security on /* causes deployment
>> exception Aaron Mulder Feb 05, 2006
>> GERONIMO-1454 Deploy tool/API running on 1.5 jre fails against
>> Geronimo 1.0 Daniel S. Haischt Jan 11, 2006
>> running in 1.4
>> GERONIMO-1212 Timeouts in commons-
>> fileupload Aaron Mulder
>> Nov 21, 2005
>> GERONIMO-1204 Jetty Stack
>> Dump Aaron
>> Mulder Nov 19, 2005
>> GERONIMO-1187 Connection listeners for both Tomcat and Jetty not
>> displayed Joe Bohn Nov 16, 2005
>> GERONIMO-1180 setup a periodic clean of published
>> snapshots Brett Porter Nov 15, 2005
>> GERONIMO-1168 Bundle TranQL Oracle XA
>> Driver Aaron Mulder Nov
>> 14, 2005
>> GERONIMO-1173 Make DatabaseInfo load from file; separate JDBC and XA
>> portlets Aaron Mulder Nov 14, 2005
>> GERONIMO-1174 Hot deployer should know when a file was last
>> deployed Aaron Mulder Nov 14, 2005
>> GERONIMO-1163 improve jmx debug
>> console simon godik
>> Nov 11, 2005
>> GERONIMO-1156 Explicit support for uploading/downloading JDBC
>> driver Aaron Mulder Nov 10, 2005
>> GERONIMO-1141 Need a better way for a client to programtically
>> determine server Sachin Patel Nov 06, 2005
>> start state
>> GERONIMO-1056 Redeploy database pool, app blows up (in CMP finder/
>> prefetch Aaron Mulder Oct 10, 2005
>> code)
>> GERONIMO-1057 PKGenerators should validate their
>> configuration Aaron Mulder Oct 10, 2005
>> GERONIMO-1066 There should be an "All Application" view in the
>> console Joe Bohn Oct 13, 2005
>> GERONIMO-1081 CMP create causes update SQL
>> too Aaron Mulder Oct 17, 2005
>> GERONIMO-1082 Deployment doesn't ensure queries defined for
>> ejbSelect methods Aaron Mulder Oct 17, 2005
>> GERONIMO-1085 Authentication between an OpenEJB client and the
>> OpenEJB John Sisson Oct 17, 2005
>> EjbDaemon needs to be implemented
>> GERONIMO-1371 ActiveMQ SQL Exception logged during
>> shutdown Dave Colasurdo Dec 15, 2005
>> GERONIMO-1366 Maven deployment plugin should use deployer
>> stored Aaron Mulder Dec 14, 2005
>> username/password
>> GERONIMO-1367 Shutdown JAR should use deployer stored username/
>> password Aaron Mulder Dec 14, 2005
>> GERONIMO-1368 Remote deployment probably doesn't handle exploded
>> JARs Aaron Mulder Dec 14, 2005
>> GERONIMO-1360 Misleading error for missing web
>> deployer Aaron Mulder Dec 14, 2005
>> GERONIMO-1358 Switch database config file looking to
>> geronimo.apache.org Aaron Mulder Dec 13, 2005
>> GERONIMO-1354 The var/config.xml file is always re-written even if
>> no attribute John Sisson Dec 13, 2005
>> changes are made by the user
>> GERONIMO-1351 Separate Derby network listener from system-
>> databsae Aaron Mulder Dec 13, 2005
>> configuration
>> GERONIMO-1316 Create JMS destination pretty darn
>> broken Aaron Mulder Dec 08, 2005
>> GERONIMO-1314 Provide documentation that helps users make an
>> informed decision John Sisson Dec 08, 2005
>> as whether to use Tomcat or Jetty Web Container
>> GERONIMO-1302 Server side exception classes are exposed to EJB
>> clients Dain Sundstrom Dec 06, 2005
>> GERONIMO-1265 Preserve comments added by users in the config.xml
>> file John Sisson Dec 01, 2005
>> GERONIMO-1381 [Daytrader] Removed unused
>> code Vincent Massol Dec 18,
>> 2005
>> GERONIMO-1394 JMX Debug Console should require admin-level
>> authentication Kevan Miller Dec 19, 2005
>> GERONIMO-1393 Add test of EAR/WAR security
>> options Aaron Mulder Dec 19, 2005
>> GERONIMO-1396 Provide consistent look and feel for table views in
>> the web Joe Bohn Dec 20, 2005
>> console across all portlets
>> GERONIMO-1415 [Adventure Builder] Configure Mutual Authentication
>> for Web Jacek Laskowski Jan 03, 2006
>> Services
>> GERONIMO-1421 DB portlet failure in Tomcat
>> only Aaron Mulder Jan 05, 2006
>> GERONIMO-1427 Create a stripped down assembly that includes
>> ActiveMQ, Derby, Bruce Snyder Jan 06, 2006
>> Jetty/Tomcat and transaction
>> GERONIMO-1453 GBeanOverride throws NullPointerException when more
>> than one Kristian Koehler Jan 11, 2006
>> reference element specified
>> GERONIMO-1486 create secure vault
>> gbean simon godik
>> Jan 17, 2006
>> GERONIMO-1487 create gbean-
>> permission simon
>> godik Jan 17, 2006
>> GERONIMO-1496 purge the dependency of cookie for admin console
>> login Gao Yong Pan Jan 19, 2006
>> GERONIMO-1498 DriverDownloader.DriverInfo
>> causes Kristian Koehler Jan 19, 2006
>> java.io.NotSerializableException during server shutdown
>> GERONIMO-1511 Rewrite JMS
>> portlet Aaron
>> Mulder Jan 19, 2006
>> GERONIMO-1510 NPE in connector DConfigBeans if no config params
>> present on Aaron Mulder Jan 19, 2006
>> connection definition instance
>> GERONIMO-1512 Database driver download portlet should take HTTP
>> proxy Aaron Mulder Jan 19, 2006
>> GERONIMO-1515 Installer - some GBeans do not start correctly after
>> install erik daughtrey Jan 20, 2006
>> GERONIMO-1516 Installer - add new components to install:
>> openejb, erik daughtrey Jan 20, 2006
>> openejb-builder, axis and axis-builder
>> GERONIMO-1518 Installer - only copy jars needed by selected
>> configuration erik daughtrey Jan 20, 2006
>> GERONIMO-1521 JMSManager should participate in create connection
>> factory, Aaron Mulder Jan 21, 2006
>> create destination
>> GERONIMO-1522 Add Geronimo plan to JSR-77 API for
>> deployed Aaron Mulder Jan 21, 2006
>> modules/configurations
>> GERONIMO-1520 Add product name to
>> NetworkManager Aaron Mulder
>> Jan 21, 2006
>> GERONIMO-1526 Suppot for running applications directly from a
>> development Sachin Patel Jan 22, 2006
>> enviornment
>> GERONIMO-1542 Console portlets should validate all formatted values
>> (numbers, Aaron Mulder Jan 25, 2006
>> etc.)
>> GERONIMO-1543 Virtual Host
>> Configuration Sérgio
>> Eduardo Jan 26, 2006
>>
>> Rodrigues
>> GERONIMO-1551 Jetty and Tomcat WADI integrations do not work against
>> current Jules Gosnell Jan 29, 2006
>> WADI distro
>> GERONIMO-1556 UserTransaction may be in wrong state after ejb >> ejb
>> call David Jencks Jan 30, 2006
>> GERONIMO-1559 Console displays the incorrect
>> locale Mihael Sedmak Jan 31, 2006
>> GERONIMO-1560 [DayTrader] EJB spec
>> violations Vincent Massol
>> Jan 31, 2006
>> GERONIMO-1565 PASSWORD hashing to be considered during declarative
>> security Phani Balaji Madgula Jan 31, 2006
>> management
>> GERONIMO-1568 Installer - Have ConfigInstaller optionally delete
>> CARs after erik daughtrey Feb 01, 2006
>> configuration is complete.
>> GERONIMO-1567 Plan XML files aren't included in Geronimo
>> distributions (was John Sisson Feb 01, 2006
>> included in M5 release)
>> GERONIMO-1577 Installer - User Interface
>> changes Dave Colasurdo Feb 02,
>> 2006
>> GERONIMO-1581 webservices.xml <wsdl-file> and <jaxrpc-mapping- file>
>> values Aaron Mulder Feb 04, 2006
>> can't start with /
>> GERONIMO-1579 NPE while deploying EJB as Web
>> Service Aaron Mulder Feb 04, 2006
>> GERONIMO-1582 NPE for EJB webservices.xml with bad <jaxrpc-mapping-
>> file> Aaron Mulder Feb 04, 2006
>> GERONIMO-1580 Better error message for missing WSDL file for EJB web
>> service Aaron Mulder Feb 04, 2006
>> GERONIMO-1584 Servlet web service WSDL mangling has http://
>> host:port//path Aaron Mulder Feb 05, 2006
>> GERONIMO-1583 Servlet web service is created once and destroyed many
>> times Aaron Mulder Feb 04, 2006
>> GERONIMO-1586 In naming schema, make uri optional in
>> portType Aaron Mulder Feb 05, 2006
>> GERONIMO-1431 Make deploy tool and hot deploy directory work better
>> together Aaron Mulder Jan 08, 2006
>> GERONIMO-1130 Implement WebServer Manager (statistics gathering/
>> reporting) Joe Bohn Nov 03, 2005
>> management interface
>> GERONIMO-1493 Deadlock in ActiveMQ close
>> processing Kevan Miller Jan 18,
>> 2006
>> GERONIMO-1404 Can't set server startup verbosity to
>> INFO Sachin Patel Dec 29, 2005
>> GERONIMO-1405 support more than one config-
>> store toby cabot Dec 30, 2005
>> GERONIMO-1347 Generate a plan for a synthetic
>> EAR Dain Sundstrom Dec 12, 2005
>> GERONIMO-1492 Many "org/apache/geronimo" configIds still live in
>> source tree Aaron Mulder Jan 18, 2006
>> GERONIMO-1488 externalize sensitive data out of the deployment
>> plans simon godik Jan 17, 2006
>> GERONIMO-1142 Thread in RMI Runtime ThreadGroup occasionally keeps
>> stale Kevan Miller Nov 07, 2005
>> MultiParentClassLoader alive
>> GERONIMO-1058 Client container outputs misleading shutdown messages
>> even if Nell Gawor Oct 11, 2005
>> threads still running
>> GERONIMO-1341 POP3
>> Implementation Rajith
>> Attapattu Dec 12, 2005
>> GERONIMO-1231 Error on startup: java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError
>> at Greg Luck Nov 25, 2005
>> javax.crypto.Mac.getInstance...
>> GERONIMO-1260 simplify construction of the combined deployment plan:
>> deployment simon godik Nov 30, 2005
>> plan template and preprocessor
>> GERONIMO-1380 New Graphics for Geronimo Web
>> Site Glenn Wheaton Dec 16, 2005
>> GERONIMO-1388 "Go" button should be moved to another location on the
>> console as John Sisson Dec 19, 2005
>> it may not be visible without scrolling right
>> GERONIMO-1390 Edit TomcatWebSSLConnector option on Web Server
>> Manager page Anita Kulshreshtha Dec 19, 2005
>> should display 'LIst Connector" link on top
>> GERONIMO-1391 Portlet Exception Thrown by "generate key
>> pair" Anita Kulshreshtha Dec 19, 2005
>> GERONIMO-1392 update "additional samples" redirect in geronimo
>> website Paul McMahan Dec 19, 2005
>> GERONIMO-1389 "About" and "Logout" icons on top of console not
>> visible without John Sisson Dec 19, 2005
>> lots of scrolling to the right on server logs page
>> GERONIMO-1397 Clustering of
>> SFSB Gianny
>> Damour Dec 21, 2005
>> GERONIMO-1398 ConnectorGBean is creating an attribute 'address' with
>> value Anita Kulshreshtha Dec 21, 2005
>> /0.0.0.0
>> GERONIMO-1400 modularize daytrader deployment
>> plan simon godik Dec 22, 2005
>> GERONIMO-1403 hot-deployer reports error msg every
>> pollIntervalMillis Gao Yong Pan Dec 27, 2005
>> GERONIMO-1408 Display statistics for web
>> NetworkListeners Anita Kulshreshtha Dec 31,
>> 2005
>> GERONIMO-1413 Console needs to set JSP and Servlet contentType to
>> UTF-8 Donald Woods Jan 03, 2006
>> GERONIMO-1418 allow user to specify deployment targets by
>> "nickname" toby cabot Jan 04, 2006
>> GERONIMO-1436 [daytrader] Build instructions in applications
>> \daytrader\README John Sisson Jan 08, 2006
>> file out of date
>> GERONIMO-1439 Precompile JSPs in all apps (e.g., console, daytrader,
>> etc.) Bruce Snyder Jan 09, 2006
>> GERONIMO-1464 Avoid use of file.deleteOnExit() - will cause
>> allocation of 1K of John Sisson Jan 12, 2006
>> memory per call until JVM terminates
>> GERONIMO-1499 Daytrader: uncomment the drop table statements in
>> daytrader.sql Lin Sun Jan 19, 2006
>> GERONIMO-1501 Daytrader: remove hardcoded dependency versions in
>> project.xml Lin Sun Jan 19, 2006
>> GERONIMO-1509 Maven logging output
>> multipled Aaron Mulder
>> Jan 19, 2006
>> GERONIMO-1519 ResourceException.toString() can return
>> null Jörg Heinicke Jan 20, 2006
>> GERONIMO-1534 Daytrader: ejb-ql-compiler-factory element is wrong
>> for DB2 or Lin Sun Jan 23, 2006
>> Oracle db
>> GERONIMO-1546 Problem with ActivationSpec setters for
>> MessageDribenBean johnxmas Jan 26, 2006
>> GERONIMO-1557 When you enter the url of a web serv?ce ?n the console
>> You should Manu T George Jan 31, 2006
>> get a page show?ng the serv?ce name
>> GERONIMO-1529 Console should display Geronimo
>> Version Matthias Schmidt Jan 23, 2006
>> GERONIMO-1484 Display username who is logged into the
>> Webconsole Matthias Schmidt Jan 17, 2006
>> GERONIMO-1494 Potential infinite loop in ActiveMQ shutdown
>> processing Kevan Miller Jan 18, 2006
>> GERONIMO-1507 prototype offline deploy
>> tool toby cabot Jan
>> 19, 2006
>> GERONIMO-1113 WWW site: Add Apache Directory to list of related
>> projects Stefan Zoerner Oct 27, 2005
>> GERONIMO-1078 org.openejb.client.ServerMetadata does not handle IPv6
>> addresses John Sisson Oct 16, 2005
>> GERONIMO-1086 Implement support for JNDI_LIST and JNDI_LIST_BINDINGS
>> methods in John Sisson Oct 17, 2005
>> org.openejb.server.ejbd.JndiRequestHandler
>> GERONIMO-1356 Clean up <distributionDirectory> element in
>> project.xml files as John Sisson Dec 13, 2005
>> it contains 'incubator'
>> GERONIMO-1259 reduce the size of the combined deployment plan:
>> package simon godik Nov 30, 2005
>> deployment plans in a jar and pass this jar to the
>> deployer
>> GERONIMO-1376 Console should display context path in Installed Web
>> Applications Anita Kulshreshtha Dec 16, 2005
>> page
>> GERONIMO-1414 Console About page does not set the shortcut
>> icon Donald Woods Jan 03, 2006
>> GERONIMO-1417 [daytrader] daytrader/docs/tradeFAQ.html out of
>> date John Sisson Jan 03, 2006
>> GERONIMO-1420 HTTP Status 500 message should refer to geronimo
>> logs Anita Kulshreshtha Jan 05, 2006
>> GERONIMO-1504 scout.log is created in current directory when running
>> the Kevan Miller Jan 19, 2006
>> installer
>> GERONIMO-1552 Geronimo
>> website Anita
>> Kulshreshtha Jan 29, 2006
>>
>> * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
>>
>> 1 YEAR (40 issues)
>>
>> * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
>>
>> Key
>> Summary Reporter Created
>> GERONIMO-730 Sample application to illustrate typical webapp (WAR)
>> deployment - Sing Li Jul 08, 2005
>> webapp containing JSP, JSTL, custom tag lib, MVC servlet
>> GERONIMO-735 Openejb container is burdened with several transport
>> specific items David Jencks Jul 10, 2005
>> Sample application to illustrate EAR deployment -
>> application with
>> GERONIMO-731 JSP, taglib, servlet + stateless session bean, using
>> local EJB Sing Li Jul 08, 2005
>> reference
>> GERONIMO-734 Adding CORBA settings to local-only EJB appears to
>> give NPE Aaron Mulder Jul 10, 2005
>> GERONIMO-660 Referential integrity checking on role
>> names David Jencks Jun 02, 2005
>> GERONIMO-700 Renaming cmp-field-name to field-name in CMP
>> mapping Jacek Laskowski Jul 04, 2005
>> GERONIMO-723 Allow jUDDI configuration via a
>> GBean Jeremy Boynes Jul 06, 2005
>> GERONIMO-941 Change console-standard to portlets-for-console or
>> something Aaron Mulder Aug 29, 2005
>> GERONIMO-776 Support user-specific properties through an individual
>> property Jeremy Boynes Jul 18, 2005
>> file
>> GERONIMO-789 builder tests are ridiculously
>> overcomplicated David Jencks Jul 21, 2005
>> GERONIMO-795 Extend Portlet skin capabilities to support minimize
>> and maximize Joe Bohn Jul 22, 2005
>> GERONIMO-803 Deploy failure during redeploy leaves app
>> undeployed Aaron Mulder Jul 23, 2005
>> GERONIMO-806 Reduce log file output / separate log file for server
>> stuff Aaron Mulder Jul 24, 2005
>> GERONIMO-842 Enhance DerbyNetworkGBean to allow secure Derby
>> Network Client John Sisson Aug 02, 2005
>> connections (once Derby is enhanced to allow secure
>> connections).
>> GERONIMO-841 Provide the ability to isolate
>> applications Aaron Mulder Aug 01, 2005
>> GERONIMO-847 Better error for unmapped resource
>> reference Aaron Mulder Aug 03, 2005
>> GERONIMO-868 Management API: JMS Connection
>> Factories Aaron Mulder Aug 08, 2005
>> GERONIMO-869 Management API: JMS
>> Destinations Aaron Mulder
>> Aug 08, 2005
>> GERONIMO-891 Improve the Java Mail
>> portlet Chris Cardona Aug
>> 19, 2005
>> GERONIMO-895 Remove JAAS login's reliance on remote
>> JMX Alan Cabrera Aug 21, 2005
>> GERONIMO-897 Finish implementing JMS Broker
>> portlet Aaron Mulder Aug 21, 2005
>> GERONIMO-920 Failure in deployer:distribute plugin does not cause
>> maven build to Dain Sundstrom Aug 25, 2005
>> fail
>> GERONIMO-921 figure out if message-destination-refs from an app
>> client to a David Jencks Aug 26, 2005
>> different module make sense
>> GERONIMO-931 Rename administrative security
>> realm Aaron Mulder Aug 27, 2005
>> GERONIMO-944 Bundle a JavaMail implementation & SMTP
>> provider Aaron Mulder Aug 29, 2005
>> GERONIMO-955 Provide separate client container
>> distribution Aaron Mulder Aug 30, 2005
>> GERONIMO-960 NPE related to EJB while deploying
>> EAR Aaron Mulder Aug 31, 2005
>> GERONIMO-962 App client does not have a J2EEServer gbean, which
>> causes some David Jencks Aug 31, 2005
>> other jsr-77 beans not to start
>> GERONIMO-975 Problems with
>> SOAPArrayType Stefan
>> Schmidt Sep 03, 2005
>> GERONIMO-979 Deployment/startup hangs when another instance is
>> up Jacek Laskowski Sep 06, 2005
>> GERONIMO-1001 Derby NetworkServer does not use
>> TCCL Jeremy Boynes Sep 10, 2005
>> GERONIMO-1697 Can't set listen host/IP for Sun CORBA Name Service
>> GBean Aaron Mulder Jul 04, 2005
>> GERONIMO-663 Request to improve Geronimo's JMX support for remote
>> management Sing Li Jun 05, 2005
>> systems
>> GERONIMO-807 Better handling for system log viewer portlet render
>> requests Aaron Mulder Jul 24, 2005
>> GERONIMO-828 Add ability to detect if a server is already running
>> to maven Dain Sundstrom Jul 28, 2005
>> plugin
>> GERONIMO-917 Unfriendly error message from mavendeploy:start
>> plugin Dain Sundstrom Aug 25, 2005
>> GERONIMO-1023 Web DD option to disable directory
>> listings Aaron Mulder Sep 25, 2005
>> GERONIMO-641 Compile fails using forked compiler when directory
>> contains spaces Waimun Yeow May 04, 2005
>> GERONIMO-903 Update Log4J usage from 1.2.8 to latest maintenance
>> version of Donald Woods Aug 23, 2005
>> 1.2.11
>> GERONIMO-1037 Clicking on "uninstall" link in Applications
>> management pages Vamsavardhana Reddy Oct 04, 2005
>> deletes the configuration without any confirmation
>> from user
>>
>> * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
>>
>> OLDER THAN 1 YEAR (22 issues)
>>
>> * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
>>
>> Key
>> Summary Reporter Created
>> GERONIMO-605 ServletContext parameters are not visible
>> in Archimedes Trajano Mar 10, 2005
>> ServletContextListener.contextInitialized()
>> GERONIMO-592 Startup failure in Turkish language
>> settings Gorkem Ercan Feb 21, 2005
>> GERONIMO-583 Missing J2EE
>> Validations Aaron
>> Mulder Feb 13, 2005
>> GERONIMO-585 No indication when DefaultWorkManager pool is
>> exhausted Aaron Mulder Feb 13, 2005
>> GERONIMO-555 Write a thread-safe timer/interrupt based transaction
>> timout David Jencks Jan 27, 2005
>> implementation
>> GERONIMO-481 HTTPS Connector should work with a keystore
>> GBean Jeremy Boynes Nov 13, 2004
>> GERONIMO-470 Online deployer locks module
>> file Jeremy Boynes Nov 10, 2004
>> GERONIMO-471 M3 does not run on WinXP/
>> JRockit Jeremy Boynes Nov
>> 11, 2004
>> GERONIMO-461 Standalone remote CLI deployer/JSR-88 deployer
>> package Aaron Mulder Nov 08, 2004
>> GERONIMO-438 Deployer.deploy arguments
>> inconsistent Aaron Mulder Nov
>> 04, 2004
>> GERONIMO-440 Installing package in offline mode should fail if
>> server is running Aaron Mulder Nov 04, 2004
>> GERONIMO-436 JSR-88: Targets
>> Ignored Aaron
>> Mulder Nov 04, 2004
>> GERONIMO-344 Support Derby database admin via
>> GBean Jeremy Boynes Sep 30, 2004
>> GERONIMO-345 Integrate Geronimo and Derby
>> ThreadPools Jeremy Boynes Sep 30, 2004
>> GERONIMO-306 Implement jdbc driver specific ExceptionSorter
>> classes David Jencks Sep 16, 2004
>> GERONIMO-289 WEB-INF/lib/* and WEB-INF/classes aren't on
>> configuration class Dain Sundstrom Sep 08, 2004
>> loader
>> GERONIMO-282 servlet calls ejb: "class not found" at deployment and
>> run time toby cabot Aug 05, 2004
>> GERONIMO-226 Locical dependency
>> support David Blevins
>> Apr 26, 2004
>> GERONIMO-191 Deployment of multiple modules into a single
>> configuration Dain Sundstrom Apr 25, 2004
>> GERONIMO-557 smooth application upgrade/
>> versioning David Jencks Jan 27,
>> 2005
>> GERONIMO-593 Make error handling in deployment plugin more user
>> friendly John Sisson Feb 22, 2005
>> GERONIMO-411 Add Hash Password Rewrite to File
>> Realm Aaron Mulder Nov 01, 2004
>
>
>
>
>
>
Re: User Feedback Request -- this means you!
Posted by David Blevins <da...@visi.com>.
On Apr 5, 2006, at 3:13 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
> Good points Tony, thanks. We are delinquent in the crusty bug
> situation. We'll see if we can sort that out as we get through 1.1.
Who's Tony ;-P
Regardless, great feedback Toby. And as Matt says sorry about the
lack of bug uptake....
I whipped together this report which will now be sent to the dev list
on the 1st and 15th of every month. I hope it will help the
absorbency of JIRA items by both developers and people looking to
contribute.
Cool thing about sending them to the dev list is that they'll get
archived and we can be embarrassed by our inaction for years to come :)
You weren't kidding about some of them being old, you've got one in
there from Aug 05, 2004 !!!
-David
On Apr 6, 2006, at 3:53 PM, dblevins@apache.org wrote:
> Unassigned issues (273) as of 2006-04-06
> * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
>
> 1 WEEK (8 issues)
>
> * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
>
> Key
> Summary Reporter Created
> GERONIMO-1800 SPECjAppServer2004 Deployment
> Descriptors Vasily Zakharov Apr 03, 2006
> GERONIMO-1804 The name of JNDI/RMI service provider is hardcoded
> in the sources. Andrey Pavlenko Apr 05, 2006
> GERONIMO-1805 org.apache.geronimo.directory.RunningTest hangs on
> BEA Jrockit VMs Alexei Zakharov Apr 05, 2006
> GERONIMO-1815 Remove empty config-store
> directory Dain Sundstrom Apr
> 06, 2006
> GERONIMO-1792 Ant Tasks Mirror of Maven
> Plugins Heinie Barnard Mar
> 30, 2006
> GERONIMO-1801 Restart/Shutdown functionality for Geronimo when
> using Java Service Mario Ruebsam Apr 04, 2006
> Wrapper
> GERONIMO-1812 When already deployed application is hot deployed
> once gain , Server Mansoor Apr 06, 2006
> doesn't delete the module from hot deployed directory
> GERONIMO-1813 When already deployed application is hot deployed
> once gain , Server Mansoor Apr 06, 2006
> doesn't delete the module from hot deployed directory
>
> * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
>
> 30 DAYS (37 issues)
>
> * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
>
> Key
> Summary Reporter Created
> GERONIMO-1733 Module migration to Maven 2:
> mail Jacek Laskowski Mar 09,
> 2006
> GERONIMO-1734 Module migration to Maven 2: naming-
> builder Jacek Laskowski Mar 09, 2006
> GERONIMO-1735 Module migration to Maven 2:
> transaction Jacek Laskowski Mar 09,
> 2006
> GERONIMO-1736 Module migration to Maven 2: web-
> builder Jacek Laskowski Mar 09, 2006
> GERONIMO-1739 Plugin migration to Maven 2: geronimo-izpack-
> plugin Jacek Laskowski Mar 09, 2006
> GERONIMO-1747 HTTP-methods
> checks Ilya
> Platonov Mar 16, 2006
> GERONIMO-1749 Server Logs portlet - Web Access Log Viewer
> improvements Vamsavardhana Reddy Mar 17, 2006
> GERONIMO-1726 Module migration to Maven 2:
> common Jacek Laskowski Mar 09,
> 2006
> GERONIMO-1727 Module migration to Maven2:
> connector Jacek Laskowski Mar 09,
> 2006
> GERONIMO-1752 JMS Server portlet - Edits to JMS Network Listener
> are lost upon Vamsavardhana Reddy Mar 20, 2006
> server restart
> GERONIMO-1751 Deployment of ear with external plan using "Deploy
> New" console John Sisson Mar 20, 2006
> option caused FileNotFoundException
> GERONIMO-1756 Move from 1.1-dev version of commons-fileupload to
> version 1.1 John Sisson Mar 20, 2006
> GERONIMO-1758 Can not use Realm with SQL database over connection
> pool Torsten Markwardt Mar 21, 2006
> GERONIMO-1761 Change geronimo-util module to geronimo-crypto, give
> credit where Aaron Mulder Mar 22, 2006
> credit is due
> GERONIMO-1762 Create a derby network /embedded XA datasource via
> admin console Lin Sun Mar 23, 2006
> fail
> GERONIMO-1763 default config.xml does not list Jetty AJP
> connector Aaron Mulder Mar 23, 2006
> GERONIMO-1786 JMS Listeners for protocols activeio, peer and
> openwire fail to Donald Woods Mar 28, 2006
> start
> GERONIMO-1789 Exceptions while adding SQL Realm thru Admin
> Console Vamsavardhana Reddy Mar 29, 2006
> GERONIMO-1746 Updates to Logger through Log Manager portlet under
> Console are Vamsavardhana Reddy Mar 16, 2006
> not reflected in the server
> GERONIMO-1782 Properties File Login module fails after editing
> through Admin Vamsavardhana Reddy Mar 28, 2006
> Console
> GERONIMO-1711 WebServer Connectors portlet should provide a
> "restart" option Vamsavardhana Reddy Mar 08, 2006
> for connectors
> GERONIMO-1721 Security Realms portlet should provide link to
> delete an existing Vamsavardhana Reddy Mar 09, 2006
> realm
> GERONIMO-1741 Console should provide option to "redeploy"
> applications Vamsavardhana Reddy Mar 10, 2006
> GERONIMO-1748 Site migration to Maven
> 2 John Sisson Mar
> 16, 2006
> GERONIMO-1750 Unable to run
> tradeStreamerAppclient Lin
> Sun Mar 17, 2006
> GERONIMO-1757 rarRelativePath is not set correctly cause
> showplan.jsp Lin Sun Mar 21, 2006
> displayswrong instruction
> GERONIMO-1764 Daytrader createDB.sh script does not support cygwin
> users on Bryan Noll Mar 23, 2006
> Windows.
> GERONIMO-1767 bad group for console has no error page that allows
> user Joseph B. Ottinger Mar 24, 2006
> logout/correction
> GERONIMO-1768 bad group for console has no error page that allows
> user Joseph B. Ottinger Mar 24, 2006
> logout/correction
> GERONIMO-1774 baseDir NPE in
> org.apache.geronimo.deployment.DeploymentContext John
> Sisson Mar 27, 2006
> GERONIMO-1775 Internationalization of the Admin
> Console Yeray Cabrera Santana Mar 27, 2006
> GERONIMO-1784 SQL Login Modules logs "null" instead of the driver
> name Vamsavardhana Reddy Mar 28, 2006
> GERONIMO-1783 Welcome application
> i18n Yeray Cabrera Santana
> Mar 28, 2006
> GERONIMO-1769 Console should create links for all sections
> including the Joseph B. Ottinger Mar 24, 2006
> "current section"
> GERONIMO-1770 Console should create links for all sections
> including the Joseph B. Ottinger Mar 24, 2006
> "current section"
> GERONIMO-1771 Console should create links for all sections
> including the Joseph B. Ottinger Mar 24, 2006
> "current section"
> GERONIMO-1773 Automatic driver download is
> duplicated Yiannis Mavroukakis Mar 25,
> 2006
>
> * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
>
> 60 DAYS (39 issues)
>
> * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
>
> Key
> Summary Reporter Created
> GERONIMO-1684 server does not start if openejb-jar.xml activation-
> config had Aaron Mulder Mar 03, 2006
> whitespace in values
> GERONIMO-1597 Extra '/'s in webservices
> URL Phani Balaji Madgula Feb
> 06, 2006
> GERONIMO-1596 Repeated interface in JMS connection factory plan
> causes Aaron Mulder Feb 06, 2006
> deployment failure
> GERONIMO-1592 Add NamedUPCredentialLoginModule to Console Realm
> Wizard Aaron Mulder Feb 06, 2006
> GERONIMO-1594 deployment of a simple (only one jsp) web project
> failed Mark Mauerwerk Feb 06, 2006
> GERONIMO-1602 Switching from Tomcat causes error in JAAS module:
> "Unable to Karsten Voges Feb 08, 2006
> instantiate login module"
> GERONIMO-1614 Installer - Console portal servlet fails to load
> properly after erik daughtrey Feb 09, 2006
> install
> GERONIMO-1621 [Daytrader] TradeWSAction class is not a
> Servlet Vincent Massol Feb 11, 2006
> GERONIMO-1626 Update Wiki pages about m:
> goals Jacek Laskowski Feb
> 15, 2006
> GERONIMO-1628 [DayTrader] Tweaks to some wsappclient client files
> to match the Vincent Massol Feb 15, 2006
> WSDL file
> GERONIMO-1631 NoSuchConfigException when restarting app after
> undeploying Sachin Patel Feb 15, 2006
> GERONIMO-1642 Deployment plan namespace
> validation Aaron Mulder Feb
> 20, 2006
> GERONIMO-1652 EJBModuleImpl.getEJBs() always return an empty
> array Chris Cardona Feb 24, 2006
> GERONIMO-1662 ActiveMQ client not able to send message to
> destination in Tx Phani Balaji Madgula Mar 01, 2006
> session
> GERONIMO-1666 Console issues resulting from configID
> changes Paul McMahan Mar 01, 2006
> GERONIMO-1674 Daytrader gets NullPointerException attempting to
> log in a user Joe Bohn Mar 02, 2006
> GERONIMO-1680 MDB without activation-config in openejb-jar.xml
> silently fails Aaron Mulder Mar 02, 2006
> GERONIMO-1683 Web app context-root should trim
> whitespace Aaron Mulder Mar 03, 2006
> GERONIMO-1682 remote deployment fails when server is running on
> machine with Song Mar 03, 2006
> DHCP
> GERONIMO-1687 NPE during deployment related to EJB
> Ref Aaron Mulder Mar 03, 2006
> GERONIMO-1691 Console should help configure Geronimo to hook up to
> Apache HTTP Aaron Mulder Mar 04, 2006
> GERONIMO-1695 CORBA for EJB with Local interface only causes
> NPE Aaron Mulder Feb 06, 2006
> GERONIMO-1701 Improve the EJB Server
> portlet Chris Cardona
> Mar 06, 2006
> GERONIMO-1692 Creating Web Connectors using
> Console Ilya Kanonirov Mar 05, 2006
> GERONIMO-1704 Console security realm doesn't let you pick a
> JAR Aaron Mulder Mar 07, 2006
> GERONIMO-1663 Ability to test database pool connections after
> editing. Hernan Cunico Mar 01, 2006
> GERONIMO-1641 Using default Console Realm, when delete a user it
> will not be Hernan Cunico Feb 20, 2006
> removed from the groups
> GERONIMO-1657 CommandSupport doesn't bubble up the exception.
> Prints stacktrace. Prasad Kashyap Feb 27, 2006
> GERONIMO-1709 Translate documentation to Polish
> lang. Marcin Maciukiewicz Mar 07, 2006
> GERONIMO-1655 Daytrader MDBs do not start
> properly Anita Kulshreshtha Feb 27,
> 2006
> GERONIMO-1665 Module migration to Maven2:
> axis Henri Yandell Mar 01,
> 2006
> GERONIMO-1588 ActiveMQ directory as peer to geronimo-1.0
> directory Jason Dillon Feb 05, 2006
> GERONIMO-1623 Preliminary port of the OpenWire C# into C+
> +. Mats F Feb 13, 2006
> GERONIMO-1633 "resource-ref" not available in ServletFilter.init
> (..) Andrus Adamchik Feb 15, 2006
> GERONIMO-1648 Eliminate unnecessary config parent (import)
> dependencies Joe Bohn Feb 22, 2006
> GERONIMO-1700 Web Console prints a stack trace when attempting to
> deploy an Joe Bohn Mar 06, 2006
> application that is already deployed.
> GERONIMO-1698 Module migration to Maven2: hot-
> deploy Rakesh Ranjan Mar 06, 2006
> GERONIMO-1702 The latest maven 1 Build
> process Anita Kulshreshtha Mar
> 07, 2006
> GERONIMO-1685 Need to ignore .DS_Store files in deployment
> dirs Matt Bishop Mar 03, 2006
>
> * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
>
> 6 MONTHS (127 issues)
>
> * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
>
> Key
> Summary Reporter Created
> GERONIMO-1384 Web app with no Geronimo plan makes all secure pages
> insecure Aaron Mulder Dec 18, 2005
> GERONIMO-1135 Keystore password in
> System.properties Aaron Mulder
> Nov 05, 2005
> GERONIMO-1053 Session Bean, Finder, & Method
> Permissions Aaron Mulder Oct 10, 2005
> GERONIMO-1410 Configuration geronimo/jetty/1.0-SNAPSHOT/car
> defines Spring Gianny Damour Jan 01, 2006
> Framework - Hibernate based Web-app do not work
> GERONIMO-1423 log4j.properties's category is
> ignored viewhero Jan 06, 2006
> GERONIMO-1491 ActiveMQ plan uses hardcoded
> obsolete Aaron Mulder Jan 18,
> 2006
> org/apache/geronimo/ActiveMQ module name
> GERONIMO-1547 Legal license issue in
> schemas Daniel Bornkessel
> Jan 26, 2006
> GERONIMO-1585 Web app security on /* causes deployment
> exception Aaron Mulder Feb 05, 2006
> GERONIMO-1454 Deploy tool/API running on 1.5 jre fails against
> Geronimo 1.0 Daniel S. Haischt Jan 11, 2006
> running in 1.4
> GERONIMO-1212 Timeouts in commons-
> fileupload Aaron Mulder
> Nov 21, 2005
> GERONIMO-1204 Jetty Stack
> Dump Aaron
> Mulder Nov 19, 2005
> GERONIMO-1187 Connection listeners for both Tomcat and Jetty not
> displayed Joe Bohn Nov 16, 2005
> GERONIMO-1180 setup a periodic clean of published
> snapshots Brett Porter Nov 15, 2005
> GERONIMO-1168 Bundle TranQL Oracle XA
> Driver Aaron Mulder Nov
> 14, 2005
> GERONIMO-1173 Make DatabaseInfo load from file; separate JDBC and
> XA portlets Aaron Mulder Nov 14, 2005
> GERONIMO-1174 Hot deployer should know when a file was last
> deployed Aaron Mulder Nov 14, 2005
> GERONIMO-1163 improve jmx debug
> console simon
> godik Nov 11, 2005
> GERONIMO-1156 Explicit support for uploading/downloading JDBC
> driver Aaron Mulder Nov 10, 2005
> GERONIMO-1141 Need a better way for a client to programtically
> determine server Sachin Patel Nov 06, 2005
> start state
> GERONIMO-1056 Redeploy database pool, app blows up (in CMP finder/
> prefetch Aaron Mulder Oct 10, 2005
> code)
> GERONIMO-1057 PKGenerators should validate their
> configuration Aaron Mulder Oct 10, 2005
> GERONIMO-1066 There should be an "All Application" view in the
> console Joe Bohn Oct 13, 2005
> GERONIMO-1081 CMP create causes update SQL
> too Aaron Mulder Oct 17,
> 2005
> GERONIMO-1082 Deployment doesn't ensure queries defined for
> ejbSelect methods Aaron Mulder Oct 17, 2005
> GERONIMO-1085 Authentication between an OpenEJB client and the
> OpenEJB John Sisson Oct 17, 2005
> EjbDaemon needs to be implemented
> GERONIMO-1371 ActiveMQ SQL Exception logged during
> shutdown Dave Colasurdo Dec 15, 2005
> GERONIMO-1366 Maven deployment plugin should use deployer
> stored Aaron Mulder Dec 14, 2005
> username/password
> GERONIMO-1367 Shutdown JAR should use deployer stored username/
> password Aaron Mulder Dec 14, 2005
> GERONIMO-1368 Remote deployment probably doesn't handle exploded
> JARs Aaron Mulder Dec 14, 2005
> GERONIMO-1360 Misleading error for missing web
> deployer Aaron Mulder Dec 14, 2005
> GERONIMO-1358 Switch database config file looking to
> geronimo.apache.org Aaron Mulder Dec 13, 2005
> GERONIMO-1354 The var/config.xml file is always re-written even if
> no attribute John Sisson Dec 13, 2005
> changes are made by the user
> GERONIMO-1351 Separate Derby network listener from system-
> databsae Aaron Mulder Dec 13, 2005
> configuration
> GERONIMO-1316 Create JMS destination pretty darn
> broken Aaron Mulder Dec 08, 2005
> GERONIMO-1314 Provide documentation that helps users make an
> informed decision John Sisson Dec 08, 2005
> as whether to use Tomcat or Jetty Web Container
> GERONIMO-1302 Server side exception classes are exposed to EJB
> clients Dain Sundstrom Dec 06, 2005
> GERONIMO-1265 Preserve comments added by users in the config.xml
> file John Sisson Dec 01, 2005
> GERONIMO-1381 [Daytrader] Removed unused
> code Vincent Massol Dec
> 18, 2005
> GERONIMO-1394 JMX Debug Console should require admin-level
> authentication Kevan Miller Dec 19, 2005
> GERONIMO-1393 Add test of EAR/WAR security
> options Aaron Mulder Dec 19,
> 2005
> GERONIMO-1396 Provide consistent look and feel for table views in
> the web Joe Bohn Dec 20, 2005
> console across all portlets
> GERONIMO-1415 [Adventure Builder] Configure Mutual Authentication
> for Web Jacek Laskowski Jan 03, 2006
> Services
> GERONIMO-1421 DB portlet failure in Tomcat
> only Aaron Mulder Jan 05,
> 2006
> GERONIMO-1427 Create a stripped down assembly that includes
> ActiveMQ, Derby, Bruce Snyder Jan 06, 2006
> Jetty/Tomcat and transaction
> GERONIMO-1453 GBeanOverride throws NullPointerException when more
> than one Kristian Koehler Jan 11, 2006
> reference element specified
> GERONIMO-1486 create secure vault
> gbean simon godik
> Jan 17, 2006
> GERONIMO-1487 create gbean-
> permission simon
> godik Jan 17, 2006
> GERONIMO-1496 purge the dependency of cookie for admin console
> login Gao Yong Pan Jan 19, 2006
> GERONIMO-1498 DriverDownloader.DriverInfo
> causes Kristian Koehler Jan 19,
> 2006
> java.io.NotSerializableException during server shutdown
> GERONIMO-1511 Rewrite JMS
> portlet Aaron
> Mulder Jan 19, 2006
> GERONIMO-1510 NPE in connector DConfigBeans if no config params
> present on Aaron Mulder Jan 19, 2006
> connection definition instance
> GERONIMO-1512 Database driver download portlet should take HTTP
> proxy Aaron Mulder Jan 19, 2006
> GERONIMO-1515 Installer - some GBeans do not start correctly after
> install erik daughtrey Jan 20, 2006
> GERONIMO-1516 Installer - add new components to install:
> openejb, erik daughtrey Jan 20, 2006
> openejb-builder, axis and axis-builder
> GERONIMO-1518 Installer - only copy jars needed by selected
> configuration erik daughtrey Jan 20, 2006
> GERONIMO-1521 JMSManager should participate in create connection
> factory, Aaron Mulder Jan 21, 2006
> create destination
> GERONIMO-1522 Add Geronimo plan to JSR-77 API for
> deployed Aaron Mulder Jan 21, 2006
> modules/configurations
> GERONIMO-1520 Add product name to
> NetworkManager Aaron Mulder
> Jan 21, 2006
> GERONIMO-1526 Suppot for running applications directly from a
> development Sachin Patel Jan 22, 2006
> enviornment
> GERONIMO-1542 Console portlets should validate all formatted
> values (numbers, Aaron Mulder Jan 25, 2006
> etc.)
> GERONIMO-1543 Virtual Host
> Configuration Sérgio
> Eduardo Jan 26, 2006
>
> Rodrigues
> GERONIMO-1551 Jetty and Tomcat WADI integrations do not work
> against current Jules Gosnell Jan 29, 2006
> WADI distro
> GERONIMO-1556 UserTransaction may be in wrong state after ejb >>
> ejb call David Jencks Jan 30, 2006
> GERONIMO-1559 Console displays the incorrect
> locale Mihael Sedmak Jan 31, 2006
> GERONIMO-1560 [DayTrader] EJB spec
> violations Vincent Massol
> Jan 31, 2006
> GERONIMO-1565 PASSWORD hashing to be considered during declarative
> security Phani Balaji Madgula Jan 31, 2006
> management
> GERONIMO-1568 Installer - Have ConfigInstaller optionally delete
> CARs after erik daughtrey Feb 01, 2006
> configuration is complete.
> GERONIMO-1567 Plan XML files aren't included in Geronimo
> distributions (was John Sisson Feb 01, 2006
> included in M5 release)
> GERONIMO-1577 Installer - User Interface
> changes Dave Colasurdo Feb
> 02, 2006
> GERONIMO-1581 webservices.xml <wsdl-file> and <jaxrpc-mapping-
> file> values Aaron Mulder Feb 04, 2006
> can't start with /
> GERONIMO-1579 NPE while deploying EJB as Web
> Service Aaron Mulder Feb 04, 2006
> GERONIMO-1582 NPE for EJB webservices.xml with bad <jaxrpc-mapping-
> file> Aaron Mulder Feb 04, 2006
> GERONIMO-1580 Better error message for missing WSDL file for EJB
> web service Aaron Mulder Feb 04, 2006
> GERONIMO-1584 Servlet web service WSDL mangling has http://
> host:port//path Aaron Mulder Feb 05, 2006
> GERONIMO-1583 Servlet web service is created once and destroyed
> many times Aaron Mulder Feb 04, 2006
> GERONIMO-1586 In naming schema, make uri optional in
> portType Aaron Mulder Feb 05, 2006
> GERONIMO-1431 Make deploy tool and hot deploy directory work
> better together Aaron Mulder Jan 08, 2006
> GERONIMO-1130 Implement WebServer Manager (statistics gathering/
> reporting) Joe Bohn Nov 03, 2005
> management interface
> GERONIMO-1493 Deadlock in ActiveMQ close
> processing Kevan Miller Jan
> 18, 2006
> GERONIMO-1404 Can't set server startup verbosity to
> INFO Sachin Patel Dec 29, 2005
> GERONIMO-1405 support more than one config-
> store toby cabot Dec 30,
> 2005
> GERONIMO-1347 Generate a plan for a synthetic
> EAR Dain Sundstrom Dec 12, 2005
> GERONIMO-1492 Many "org/apache/geronimo" configIds still live in
> source tree Aaron Mulder Jan 18, 2006
> GERONIMO-1488 externalize sensitive data out of the deployment
> plans simon godik Jan 17, 2006
> GERONIMO-1142 Thread in RMI Runtime ThreadGroup occasionally keeps
> stale Kevan Miller Nov 07, 2005
> MultiParentClassLoader alive
> GERONIMO-1058 Client container outputs misleading shutdown
> messages even if Nell Gawor Oct 11, 2005
> threads still running
> GERONIMO-1341 POP3
> Implementation Rajith
> Attapattu Dec 12, 2005
> GERONIMO-1231 Error on startup: java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError
> at Greg Luck Nov 25, 2005
> javax.crypto.Mac.getInstance...
> GERONIMO-1260 simplify construction of the combined deployment
> plan: deployment simon godik Nov 30, 2005
> plan template and preprocessor
> GERONIMO-1380 New Graphics for Geronimo Web
> Site Glenn Wheaton Dec 16, 2005
> GERONIMO-1388 "Go" button should be moved to another location on
> the console as John Sisson Dec 19, 2005
> it may not be visible without scrolling right
> GERONIMO-1390 Edit TomcatWebSSLConnector option on Web Server
> Manager page Anita Kulshreshtha Dec 19, 2005
> should display 'LIst Connector" link on top
> GERONIMO-1391 Portlet Exception Thrown by "generate key
> pair" Anita Kulshreshtha Dec 19, 2005
> GERONIMO-1392 update "additional samples" redirect in geronimo
> website Paul McMahan Dec 19, 2005
> GERONIMO-1389 "About" and "Logout" icons on top of console not
> visible without John Sisson Dec 19, 2005
> lots of scrolling to the right on server logs page
> GERONIMO-1397 Clustering of
> SFSB Gianny
> Damour Dec 21, 2005
> GERONIMO-1398 ConnectorGBean is creating an attribute 'address'
> with value Anita Kulshreshtha Dec 21, 2005
> /0.0.0.0
> GERONIMO-1400 modularize daytrader deployment
> plan simon godik Dec 22, 2005
> GERONIMO-1403 hot-deployer reports error msg every
> pollIntervalMillis Gao Yong Pan Dec 27, 2005
> GERONIMO-1408 Display statistics for web
> NetworkListeners Anita Kulshreshtha Dec
> 31, 2005
> GERONIMO-1413 Console needs to set JSP and Servlet contentType to
> UTF-8 Donald Woods Jan 03, 2006
> GERONIMO-1418 allow user to specify deployment targets by
> "nickname" toby cabot Jan 04, 2006
> GERONIMO-1436 [daytrader] Build instructions in applications
> \daytrader\README John Sisson Jan 08, 2006
> file out of date
> GERONIMO-1439 Precompile JSPs in all apps (e.g., console,
> daytrader, etc.) Bruce Snyder Jan 09, 2006
> GERONIMO-1464 Avoid use of file.deleteOnExit() - will cause
> allocation of 1K of John Sisson Jan 12, 2006
> memory per call until JVM terminates
> GERONIMO-1499 Daytrader: uncomment the drop table statements in
> daytrader.sql Lin Sun Jan 19, 2006
> GERONIMO-1501 Daytrader: remove hardcoded dependency versions in
> project.xml Lin Sun Jan 19, 2006
> GERONIMO-1509 Maven logging output
> multipled Aaron Mulder
> Jan 19, 2006
> GERONIMO-1519 ResourceException.toString() can return
> null Jörg Heinicke Jan 20, 2006
> GERONIMO-1534 Daytrader: ejb-ql-compiler-factory element is wrong
> for DB2 or Lin Sun Jan 23, 2006
> Oracle db
> GERONIMO-1546 Problem with ActivationSpec setters for
> MessageDribenBean johnxmas Jan 26, 2006
> GERONIMO-1557 When you enter the url of a web serv?ce ?n the
> console You should Manu T George Jan 31, 2006
> get a page show?ng the serv?ce name
> GERONIMO-1529 Console should display Geronimo
> Version Matthias Schmidt Jan 23, 2006
> GERONIMO-1484 Display username who is logged into the
> Webconsole Matthias Schmidt Jan 17, 2006
> GERONIMO-1494 Potential infinite loop in ActiveMQ shutdown
> processing Kevan Miller Jan 18, 2006
> GERONIMO-1507 prototype offline deploy
> tool toby cabot Jan
> 19, 2006
> GERONIMO-1113 WWW site: Add Apache Directory to list of related
> projects Stefan Zoerner Oct 27, 2005
> GERONIMO-1078 org.openejb.client.ServerMetadata does not handle
> IPv6 addresses John Sisson Oct 16, 2005
> GERONIMO-1086 Implement support for JNDI_LIST and
> JNDI_LIST_BINDINGS methods in John Sisson Oct 17, 2005
> org.openejb.server.ejbd.JndiRequestHandler
> GERONIMO-1356 Clean up <distributionDirectory> element in
> project.xml files as John Sisson Dec 13, 2005
> it contains 'incubator'
> GERONIMO-1259 reduce the size of the combined deployment plan:
> package simon godik Nov 30, 2005
> deployment plans in a jar and pass this jar to the
> deployer
> GERONIMO-1376 Console should display context path in Installed Web
> Applications Anita Kulshreshtha Dec 16, 2005
> page
> GERONIMO-1414 Console About page does not set the shortcut
> icon Donald Woods Jan 03, 2006
> GERONIMO-1417 [daytrader] daytrader/docs/tradeFAQ.html out of
> date John Sisson Jan 03, 2006
> GERONIMO-1420 HTTP Status 500 message should refer to geronimo
> logs Anita Kulshreshtha Jan 05, 2006
> GERONIMO-1504 scout.log is created in current directory when
> running the Kevan Miller Jan 19, 2006
> installer
> GERONIMO-1552 Geronimo
> website Anita
> Kulshreshtha Jan 29, 2006
>
> * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
>
> 1 YEAR (40 issues)
>
> * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
>
> Key
> Summary Reporter Created
> GERONIMO-730 Sample application to illustrate typical webapp
> (WAR) deployment - Sing Li Jul 08, 2005
> webapp containing JSP, JSTL, custom tag lib, MVC
> servlet
> GERONIMO-735 Openejb container is burdened with several transport
> specific items David Jencks Jul 10, 2005
> Sample application to illustrate EAR deployment -
> application with
> GERONIMO-731 JSP, taglib, servlet + stateless session bean, using
> local EJB Sing Li Jul 08, 2005
> reference
> GERONIMO-734 Adding CORBA settings to local-only EJB appears to
> give NPE Aaron Mulder Jul 10, 2005
> GERONIMO-660 Referential integrity checking on role
> names David Jencks Jun 02, 2005
> GERONIMO-700 Renaming cmp-field-name to field-name in CMP
> mapping Jacek Laskowski Jul 04, 2005
> GERONIMO-723 Allow jUDDI configuration via a
> GBean Jeremy Boynes Jul 06, 2005
> GERONIMO-941 Change console-standard to portlets-for-console or
> something Aaron Mulder Aug 29, 2005
> GERONIMO-776 Support user-specific properties through an
> individual property Jeremy Boynes Jul 18, 2005
> file
> GERONIMO-789 builder tests are ridiculously
> overcomplicated David Jencks Jul 21, 2005
> GERONIMO-795 Extend Portlet skin capabilities to support minimize
> and maximize Joe Bohn Jul 22, 2005
> GERONIMO-803 Deploy failure during redeploy leaves app
> undeployed Aaron Mulder Jul 23, 2005
> GERONIMO-806 Reduce log file output / separate log file for
> server stuff Aaron Mulder Jul 24, 2005
> GERONIMO-842 Enhance DerbyNetworkGBean to allow secure Derby
> Network Client John Sisson Aug 02, 2005
> connections (once Derby is enhanced to allow secure
> connections).
> GERONIMO-841 Provide the ability to isolate
> applications Aaron Mulder Aug 01, 2005
> GERONIMO-847 Better error for unmapped resource
> reference Aaron Mulder Aug 03, 2005
> GERONIMO-868 Management API: JMS Connection
> Factories Aaron Mulder Aug 08, 2005
> GERONIMO-869 Management API: JMS
> Destinations Aaron Mulder
> Aug 08, 2005
> GERONIMO-891 Improve the Java Mail
> portlet Chris Cardona
> Aug 19, 2005
> GERONIMO-895 Remove JAAS login's reliance on remote
> JMX Alan Cabrera Aug 21, 2005
> GERONIMO-897 Finish implementing JMS Broker
> portlet Aaron Mulder Aug 21, 2005
> GERONIMO-920 Failure in deployer:distribute plugin does not cause
> maven build to Dain Sundstrom Aug 25, 2005
> fail
> GERONIMO-921 figure out if message-destination-refs from an app
> client to a David Jencks Aug 26, 2005
> different module make sense
> GERONIMO-931 Rename administrative security
> realm Aaron Mulder Aug 27, 2005
> GERONIMO-944 Bundle a JavaMail implementation & SMTP
> provider Aaron Mulder Aug 29, 2005
> GERONIMO-955 Provide separate client container
> distribution Aaron Mulder Aug 30, 2005
> GERONIMO-960 NPE related to EJB while deploying
> EAR Aaron Mulder Aug 31, 2005
> GERONIMO-962 App client does not have a J2EEServer gbean, which
> causes some David Jencks Aug 31, 2005
> other jsr-77 beans not to start
> GERONIMO-975 Problems with
> SOAPArrayType Stefan
> Schmidt Sep 03, 2005
> GERONIMO-979 Deployment/startup hangs when another instance is
> up Jacek Laskowski Sep 06, 2005
> GERONIMO-1001 Derby NetworkServer does not use
> TCCL Jeremy Boynes Sep 10, 2005
> GERONIMO-1697 Can't set listen host/IP for Sun CORBA Name Service
> GBean Aaron Mulder Jul 04, 2005
> GERONIMO-663 Request to improve Geronimo's JMX support for remote
> management Sing Li Jun 05, 2005
> systems
> GERONIMO-807 Better handling for system log viewer portlet render
> requests Aaron Mulder Jul 24, 2005
> GERONIMO-828 Add ability to detect if a server is already running
> to maven Dain Sundstrom Jul 28, 2005
> plugin
> GERONIMO-917 Unfriendly error message from mavendeploy:start
> plugin Dain Sundstrom Aug 25, 2005
> GERONIMO-1023 Web DD option to disable directory
> listings Aaron Mulder Sep 25, 2005
> GERONIMO-641 Compile fails using forked compiler when directory
> contains spaces Waimun Yeow May 04, 2005
> GERONIMO-903 Update Log4J usage from 1.2.8 to latest maintenance
> version of Donald Woods Aug 23, 2005
> 1.2.11
> GERONIMO-1037 Clicking on "uninstall" link in Applications
> management pages Vamsavardhana Reddy Oct 04, 2005
> deletes the configuration without any confirmation
> from user
>
> * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
>
> OLDER THAN 1 YEAR (22 issues)
>
> * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
>
> Key
> Summary Reporter Created
> GERONIMO-605 ServletContext parameters are not visible
> in Archimedes Trajano Mar 10, 2005
> ServletContextListener.contextInitialized()
> GERONIMO-592 Startup failure in Turkish language
> settings Gorkem Ercan Feb 21, 2005
> GERONIMO-583 Missing J2EE
> Validations Aaron
> Mulder Feb 13, 2005
> GERONIMO-585 No indication when DefaultWorkManager pool is
> exhausted Aaron Mulder Feb 13, 2005
> GERONIMO-555 Write a thread-safe timer/interrupt based transaction
> timout David Jencks Jan 27, 2005
> implementation
> GERONIMO-481 HTTPS Connector should work with a keystore
> GBean Jeremy Boynes Nov 13, 2004
> GERONIMO-470 Online deployer locks module
> file Jeremy Boynes Nov 10,
> 2004
> GERONIMO-471 M3 does not run on WinXP/
> JRockit Jeremy Boynes Nov
> 11, 2004
> GERONIMO-461 Standalone remote CLI deployer/JSR-88 deployer
> package Aaron Mulder Nov 08, 2004
> GERONIMO-438 Deployer.deploy arguments
> inconsistent Aaron Mulder Nov
> 04, 2004
> GERONIMO-440 Installing package in offline mode should fail if
> server is running Aaron Mulder Nov 04, 2004
> GERONIMO-436 JSR-88: Targets
> Ignored Aaron
> Mulder Nov 04, 2004
> GERONIMO-344 Support Derby database admin via
> GBean Jeremy Boynes Sep 30, 2004
> GERONIMO-345 Integrate Geronimo and Derby
> ThreadPools Jeremy Boynes Sep 30,
> 2004
> GERONIMO-306 Implement jdbc driver specific ExceptionSorter
> classes David Jencks Sep 16, 2004
> GERONIMO-289 WEB-INF/lib/* and WEB-INF/classes aren't on
> configuration class Dain Sundstrom Sep 08, 2004
> loader
> GERONIMO-282 servlet calls ejb: "class not found" at deployment
> and run time toby cabot Aug 05, 2004
> GERONIMO-226 Locical dependency
> support David
> Blevins Apr 26, 2004
> GERONIMO-191 Deployment of multiple modules into a single
> configuration Dain Sundstrom Apr 25, 2004
> GERONIMO-557 smooth application upgrade/
> versioning David Jencks Jan
> 27, 2005
> GERONIMO-593 Make error handling in deployment plugin more user
> friendly John Sisson Feb 22, 2005
> GERONIMO-411 Add Hash Password Rewrite to File
> Realm Aaron Mulder Nov 01, 2004
Re: User Feedback Request -- this means you!
Posted by Matt Hogstrom <ma...@hogstrom.org>.
Good points Tony, thanks. We are delinquent in the crusty bug situation. We'll see if we can sort
that out as we get through 1.1.
toby cabot wrote:
> Hi David!
>
> On Tue, Mar 28, 2006 at 12:00:35PM -0800, David Blevins wrote:
>
>>So this is the first of what I think should be a quarterly event.
>>Geronimo is ultimately your project and we committers are but your
>>humble servants. To serve you best, we need some critical high level
>>feedback to help us steer the project and focus on what matters most
>>to you!
>
>
> OK, I'll start with things I like about Geronimo. At the top of the
> list would have to be messages like yours. Working with the Geronimo
> team is a pleasure, and I can't say that about every open source
> project that I've worked with.
>
> I like the emphasis on making things "just work." There's lots to be
> done in that area (this is j2ee after all) but over the last couple of
> years the dev team has made it a lot easier to deploy and run by
> whittling down the complexity of the DD's needed.
>
> I like that the developers think like users. Example: a couple of
> times I've seen deployment messages like "element foo doesn't work
> anymore, try element bar." Projects like Geronimo move fast, so it's
> hard to keep up. Pointers like this help a lot because they point me
> in the right direction.
>
>
>>Please, every user out there, give us your top 5 things we can do to
>>make Geronimo better for you.
>
>
> I think my list will be a little off-the-wall since I'm not going to
> focus on features:
>
> 1. There are currently 293 unassigned bugs. A few are mine, and it's
> discouraging. I'd suggest assigning them to a developer quickly, even
> if she can't work on them right off the bat. At least that way I know
> that someone's responsible for looking at it.
>
> 2. I've lost track of the wiki situation, but it looks as if there are
> still two active wikis. It would be great if these could be merged
> into one.
>
> 3. Better Javadoc. Geronimo's code is solid and the architecture is
> very robust, but a lot of what makes Geronimo cool gets lost because
> it's not documented in places where wanna-be developers can find it.
> Javadoc is a fantastic doc system, we really need to take better
> advantage of it.
>
> That's all I can think of for now, but I'll second the previous
> suggestions for more frequent releases.
>
> Thanks!
> Toby
>
>
>
Re: User Feedback Request -- this means you!
Posted by toby cabot <to...@caboteria.org>.
Hi David!
On Tue, Mar 28, 2006 at 12:00:35PM -0800, David Blevins wrote:
> So this is the first of what I think should be a quarterly event.
> Geronimo is ultimately your project and we committers are but your
> humble servants. To serve you best, we need some critical high level
> feedback to help us steer the project and focus on what matters most
> to you!
OK, I'll start with things I like about Geronimo. At the top of the
list would have to be messages like yours. Working with the Geronimo
team is a pleasure, and I can't say that about every open source
project that I've worked with.
I like the emphasis on making things "just work." There's lots to be
done in that area (this is j2ee after all) but over the last couple of
years the dev team has made it a lot easier to deploy and run by
whittling down the complexity of the DD's needed.
I like that the developers think like users. Example: a couple of
times I've seen deployment messages like "element foo doesn't work
anymore, try element bar." Projects like Geronimo move fast, so it's
hard to keep up. Pointers like this help a lot because they point me
in the right direction.
> Please, every user out there, give us your top 5 things we can do to
> make Geronimo better for you.
I think my list will be a little off-the-wall since I'm not going to
focus on features:
1. There are currently 293 unassigned bugs. A few are mine, and it's
discouraging. I'd suggest assigning them to a developer quickly, even
if she can't work on them right off the bat. At least that way I know
that someone's responsible for looking at it.
2. I've lost track of the wiki situation, but it looks as if there are
still two active wikis. It would be great if these could be merged
into one.
3. Better Javadoc. Geronimo's code is solid and the architecture is
very robust, but a lot of what makes Geronimo cool gets lost because
it's not documented in places where wanna-be developers can find it.
Javadoc is a fantastic doc system, we really need to take better
advantage of it.
That's all I can think of for now, but I'll second the previous
suggestions for more frequent releases.
Thanks!
Toby
RE: User Feedback Request -- this means you!
Posted by Hossam Karim <hr...@gmail.com>.
Here you go,
1- Java 5.0 standard edition support
2- Java 5.0 standard edition support
3- Convince us with the GBean Architecture
4- Return back ServiceMix
5- At least EJB 3.0 and JAX-WS support
Thanks,
Hossam Karim
-----Original Message-----
From: David Blevins [mailto:david.blevins@visi.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2006 10:01 PM
To: user@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: User Feedback Request -- this means you!
So this is the first of what I think should be a quarterly event.
Geronimo is ultimately your project and we committers are but your
humble servants. To serve you best, we need some critical high level
feedback to help us steer the project and focus on what matters most
to you!
Please, every user out there, give us your top 5 things we can do to
make Geronimo better for you. Here is my list:
1) More interaction with you guys, the users!
2) More frequent releases incorporating more user feedback (small
releases more often vs. big releases only 4 times a year)
3) Less deployment requirements (simpler plans, more defaults, etc.)
4) More application validation at deployment
5) More powerful text configuration
That's just to get the ball rolling. More detail is always good if
you have the time. In general anything you think we need to correct
as a community, technical or non-technical. Let us know.
If you've ever uttered the words, "Geronimo would be such a great
project if it only...." then now is your time to shine.
We want to hear from everyone! This is not just for the "hard-core"
Geronimo users or J2EE experts. If you are new to J2EE and
downloaded Geronimo and had to give up after an hour of no progress,
let us know what we might do!
It's all about you.
Best Regards,
David Blevins
Re: User Feedback Request -- this means you!
Posted by ia...@jpmchase.com.
I would at to the other requests:
Support for JSR-168 (Portlet API)
If memory serves, the Geronimo Console is actually a Portal App, so this is
probably already implemented, but I didn't see this documented at
http://geronimo.apache.org (which doesn't necessarily mean that it isn't
documented, just that I couldn't find it).
Ian
It's better to be hated for who you are
than loved for who you are not
Ian D. Stewart
Appl Dev Analyst-Advisory, DCS Automation
JPMorganChase Global Technology Infrastructure
Phone: (614) 244-2564
Pager: (888) 260-0078
Werner Punz
<we...@gmx.at> To: user@geronimo.apache.org
Sent by: news cc:
<news@sea.gmane.o Subject: Re: User Feedback Request -- this means you!
rg>
04/04/2006 05:54
AM
Please respond to
user
Dain Sundstrom schrieb:
> On Mar 28, 2006, at 12:50 PM,
> ian.d.stewart@jpmchase.com wrote:
>
>> 2) Implementation of J2EE 1.5 (or JEE 5 or whatever we're calling it
>> these
>> days)
>
> JEE 5 is a huge cacophony of specifications. Can you be more specific
> about which specs you would like to see finished first?
>
javax.persistence
and the annotated session beans.
JSF is probably a plug and play anyway so no reason to have
that one there ;-)
Re: User Feedback Request -- this means you!
Posted by Werner Punz <we...@gmx.at>.
Dain Sundstrom schrieb:
> On Mar 28, 2006, at 12:50 PM,
> ian.d.stewart@jpmchase.com wrote:
>
>> 2) Implementation of J2EE 1.5 (or JEE 5 or whatever we're calling it
>> these
>> days)
>
> JEE 5 is a huge cacophony of specifications. Can you be more specific
> about which specs you would like to see finished first?
>
javax.persistence
and the annotated session beans.
JSF is probably a plug and play anyway so no reason to have
that one there ;-)
Re: User Feedback Request -- this means you!
Posted by ia...@jpmchase.com.
This is my personal order based on 1) what I'm using today, and 2) Where I
see potential for use in the near future. Obviously, others will have
their own priorities.
1) Java Servlet 2.5
2) Java ServerPages 2.1
3) Java ServerPages Standard Tag Library
4) Java Persistence Architecture (is this part of Java EE?)
5) Java Transaction API (JTA)
6) J2EE Management
7) Enterprise JavaBeans 3.0
8) J2EE Connector Architecture
Ian
It's better to be hated for who you are
than loved for who you are not
Ian D. Stewart
Appl Dev Analyst-Advisory, DCS Automation
JPMorganChase Global Technology Infrastructure
Phone: (614) 244-2564
Pager: (888) 260-0078
Dain Sundstrom
<da...@iq80.com> To: user@geronimo.apache.org
cc:
03/28/2006 04:05 Subject: Re: User Feedback Request -- this means you!
PM
Please respond to
user
On Mar 28, 2006, at 12:50 PM, ian.d.stewart@jpmchase.com wrote:
> 2) Implementation of J2EE 1.5 (or JEE 5 or whatever we're calling
> it these
> days)
JEE 5 is a huge cacophony of specifications. Can you be more specific
about which specs you would like to see finished first?
-dain
Re: User Feedback Request -- this means you!
Posted by Dain Sundstrom <da...@iq80.com>.
On Mar 28, 2006, at 12:50 PM, ian.d.stewart@jpmchase.com wrote:
> 2) Implementation of J2EE 1.5 (or JEE 5 or whatever we're calling
> it these
> days)
JEE 5 is a huge cacophony of specifications. Can you be more specific
about which specs you would like to see finished first?
-dain
Re: User Feedback Request -- this means you!
Posted by ia...@jpmchase.com.
Here are my top five, with the caveat that the order does not necessarily
reflect relative priority, just the order that I think of them:
1) Support for JDK1.5 (both for Geronimo itself and the Geronimo Eclipse
Plugin)
2) Implementation of J2EE 1.5 (or JEE 5 or whatever we're calling it these
days)
3) Migration path from Tomcat to Geronimo
4) More Documentation (HOWTO's, Tutorials, Cookbooks, etc)
5) And I'll go ahead and second David's #2, more frequent minor releases
Ian
It's better to be hated for who you are
than loved for who you are not
Ian D. Stewart
Appl Dev Analyst-Advisory, DCS Automation
JPMorganChase Global Technology Infrastructure
Phone: (614) 244-2564
Pager: (888) 260-0078
David Blevins
<david.blevins@vi To: user@geronimo.apache.org
si.com> cc:
Subject: User Feedback Request -- this means you!
03/28/2006 03:00
PM
Please respond to
user
So this is the first of what I think should be a quarterly event.
Geronimo is ultimately your project and we committers are but your
humble servants. To serve you best, we need some critical high level
feedback to help us steer the project and focus on what matters most
to you!
Please, every user out there, give us your top 5 things we can do to
make Geronimo better for you. Here is my list:
1) More interaction with you guys, the users!
2) More frequent releases incorporating more user feedback (small
releases more often vs. big releases only 4 times a year)
3) Less deployment requirements (simpler plans, more defaults, etc.)
4) More application validation at deployment
5) More powerful text configuration
That's just to get the ball rolling. More detail is always good if
you have the time. In general anything you think we need to correct
as a community, technical or non-technical. Let us know.
If you've ever uttered the words, "Geronimo would be such a great
project if it only...." then now is your time to shine.
We want to hear from everyone! This is not just for the "hard-core"
Geronimo users or J2EE experts. If you are new to J2EE and
downloaded Geronimo and had to give up after an hour of no progress,
let us know what we might do!
It's all about you.
Best Regards,
David Blevins