You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@stanbol.apache.org by "Concetto Elvio Bonafede (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2011/02/18 09:22:12 UTC
[jira] Commented: (STANBOL-100) Ontology rmi_config.owl used for
test has an individual with a wrong prefix.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STANBOL-100?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12996283#comment-12996283 ]
Concetto Elvio Bonafede commented on STANBOL-100:
-------------------------------------------------
With this change the problem is fixed.
> Ontology rmi_config.owl used for test has an individual with a wrong prefix.
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: STANBOL-100
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STANBOL-100
> Project: Stanbol
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: KReS
> Reporter: Concetto Elvio Bonafede
> Priority: Minor
>
> There is the sequence of rules for recipe MyRecipeA with a wrong prefix.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
Re: [jira] Commented: (STANBOL-100) Ontology rmi_config.owl used for
test has an individual with a wrong prefix.
Posted by Concetto Bonafede <in...@gmail.com>.
Ok, thanks for suggestions!
The next time the comment will be more explicative.
Best
- Elvio
2011/2/18 Fabian Christ <ch...@googlemail.com>
> Hi Elvio,
>
> just wanted to note that comments like this are not very helpful in
> JIRA issues. What change do you mean? We should all try to write
> self-explaining comments and commit messages.
>
> Thank you!
> - Fabian
>
> 2011/2/18 Concetto Elvio Bonafede (JIRA) <ji...@apache.org>:
> >
> > [
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STANBOL-100?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12996283#comment-12996283]
> >
> > Concetto Elvio Bonafede commented on STANBOL-100:
> > -------------------------------------------------
> >
> > With this change the problem is fixed.
> >
> >> Ontology rmi_config.owl used for test has an individual with a wrong
> prefix.
> >>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>
> >> Key: STANBOL-100
> >> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STANBOL-100
> >> Project: Stanbol
> >> Issue Type: Bug
> >> Components: KReS
> >> Reporter: Concetto Elvio Bonafede
> >> Priority: Minor
> >>
> >> There is the sequence of rules for recipe MyRecipeA with a wrong prefix.
> >
> > --
> > This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
> > -
> > For more information on JIRA, see:
> http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Fabian
>
Re: [jira] Commented: (STANBOL-100) Ontology rmi_config.owl used for
test has an individual with a wrong prefix.
Posted by Fabian Christ <ch...@googlemail.com>.
Hi Elvio,
just wanted to note that comments like this are not very helpful in
JIRA issues. What change do you mean? We should all try to write
self-explaining comments and commit messages.
Thank you!
- Fabian
2011/2/18 Concetto Elvio Bonafede (JIRA) <ji...@apache.org>:
>
> [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STANBOL-100?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12996283#comment-12996283 ]
>
> Concetto Elvio Bonafede commented on STANBOL-100:
> -------------------------------------------------
>
> With this change the problem is fixed.
>
>> Ontology rmi_config.owl used for test has an individual with a wrong prefix.
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> Key: STANBOL-100
>> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STANBOL-100
>> Project: Stanbol
>> Issue Type: Bug
>> Components: KReS
>> Reporter: Concetto Elvio Bonafede
>> Priority: Minor
>>
>> There is the sequence of rules for recipe MyRecipeA with a wrong prefix.
>
> --
> This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
> -
> For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
>
>
>
--
Fabian