You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@spark.apache.org by "Eren Avsarogullari (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2023/10/06 22:01:00 UTC
[jira] [Created] (SPARK-45443) Revisit TableCacheQueryStage to avoid replicated IMR materialization
Eren Avsarogullari created SPARK-45443:
------------------------------------------
Summary: Revisit TableCacheQueryStage to avoid replicated IMR materialization
Key: SPARK-45443
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-45443
Project: Spark
Issue Type: Bug
Components: SQL
Affects Versions: 3.5.0
Reporter: Eren Avsarogullari
TableCacheQueryStage is created per InMemoryTableScanExec by AdaptiveSparkPlanExec and it materializes InMemoryTableScanExec output (cached RDD) to provide runtime stats to apply AQE optimizations onto remaining physical plan stages. TableCacheQueryStage materializes InMemoryTableScanExec eagerly by submitting job per TableCacheQueryStage instance.
For example, if there are 2 TableCacheQueryStage instances referencing same IMR instance (cached RDD) and first InMemoryTableScanExec' s materialization takes longer, following logic will return false (inMemoryTableScan.isMaterialized => false) and this may cause replicated IMR materialization.
[https://github.com/apache/spark/blob/master/sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/adaptive/QueryStageExec.scala#L281]
*Sample Query to simulate the problem:*
// Both join legs uses same IMR instance
{code:java}
import spark.implicits._
val arr = (1 to 12).map { i => {
val index = i % 5
(index, s"Employee_$index", s"Department_$index")
}
}
val df = arr.toDF("id", "name", "department")
.filter('id >= 0)
.sort("id")
.groupBy('id, 'name, 'department)
.count().as("count")
df.persist()
val df2 = df.sort("count").filter('count <= 2)
val df3 = df.sort("count").filter('count >= 3)
val df4 = df2.join(df3, Seq("id", "name", "department"), "fullouter")
df4.show() {code}
*Physical Plan:*
{code:java}
== Physical Plan ==
AdaptiveSparkPlan (31)
+- == Final Plan ==
CollectLimit (21)
+- * Project (20)
+- * SortMergeJoin FullOuter (19)
:- * Sort (10)
: +- * Filter (9)
: +- TableCacheQueryStage (8), Statistics(sizeInBytes=210.0 B, rowCount=5)
: +- InMemoryTableScan (1)
: +- InMemoryRelation (2)
: +- AdaptiveSparkPlan (7)
: +- HashAggregate (6)
: +- Exchange (5)
: +- HashAggregate (4)
: +- LocalTableScan (3)
+- * Sort (18)
+- * Filter (17)
+- TableCacheQueryStage (16), Statistics(sizeInBytes=210.0 B, rowCount=5)
+- InMemoryTableScan (11)
+- InMemoryRelation (12)
+- AdaptiveSparkPlan (15)
+- HashAggregate (14)
+- Exchange (13)
+- HashAggregate (4)
+- LocalTableScan (3) {code}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscribe@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-help@spark.apache.org