You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@servicemix.apache.org by "Guillaume Nodet (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2008/09/09 09:41:52 UTC
[jira] Closed: (SMX4-10) Investigate camel / servicemix integration
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SMX4-10?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Guillaume Nodet closed SMX4-10.
-------------------------------
Assignee: (was: Santosh R Dubey)
Resolution: Won't Fix
Camel is now asynchronous (though stateful)
> Investigate camel / servicemix integration
> ------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SMX4-10
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SMX4-10
> Project: ServiceMix 4
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Reporter: Guillaume Nodet
>
> Currently camel and servicemix works mainly side by side.
> The main value added of Camel is the DSL, so I'm wondering if it would be possible / worthwhile to rebuild the camel dsl on top of a stateless asynchronous api like servicemix one. This would enable a complete integration by not only sharing the exchange model, but also the endpoints and components.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.