You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to dev@sling.apache.org by GitBox <gi...@apache.org> on 2018/09/10 07:36:55 UTC

[GitHub] dichaudh commented on issue #6: SLING-7793 ACLs pipes

dichaudh commented on issue #6: SLING-7793 ACLs pipes
URL: https://github.com/apache/sling-org-apache-sling-pipes/pull/6#issuecomment-419817087
 
 
   @npeltier 
   I already tried with  .acls('allow')  or .acls('deny')  but api expect conf params to be even in number  so went with similar implementation as done in Authorizable pipe -https://sling.apache.org/documentation/bundles/sling-pipes/writers.html
   
   .acls('authorizable','true') can be changed to simply .acls() but I thought of differentiating between the use case when only the acls under authorizable node has to be put or the acls of authorizable on the repository has to be put in bindings based on authorizable is true or not
   let me know your thought on it ,
   Thanks,
   Dinesh

----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org


With regards,
Apache Git Services