Re: [vote] HARMONY-4689 - JVMTI Extension: Native Code Access Interface implementation

[Mark Hindess <ma...@googlemail.com>]

+1 for both acceptance and integration.  If someone will find it useful
today, then let's integrate it.  If Vasily makes it redundant next month
(and I can debug entirely from gdb) then we can remove it.

-Mark.

On 18 October 2007 at 14:37, Tim Ellison <t....@gmail.com> wrote:
> It would be good to see some more votes expressing an opinion one way or
> the other.
> 
> *Everyone* is invited to cast a vote for or against the proposal.  PMC
> members are charged with such project oversight, and committers are
> expected to participate (hint, hint).
> 
> Regards,
> Tim
> 
> Mikhail Loenko wrote:
> > We now have all requisite paperwork in place for
> > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-4689, so let's vote to accept:
> > 
> > [ ] +1 Accept this contribution
> > [ ] -1 Reject because...
> > 
> > As usual, 3 days unless someone complains they need more time.
> > 
> 

Re: [vote] HARMONY-4689 - JVMTI Extension: Native Code Access Interface implementation

[Mikhail Loenko <ml...@gmail.com>]

agree with Mark +1 for accepting and integrating

Thanks,
Mikhail

2007/10/18, Mark Hindess <ma...@googlemail.com>:
>
> +1 for both acceptance and integration.  If someone will find it useful
> today, then let's integrate it.  If Vasily makes it redundant next month
> (and I can debug entirely from gdb) then we can remove it.
>
> -Mark.
>
> On 18 October 2007 at 14:37, Tim Ellison <t....@gmail.com> wrote:
> > It would be good to see some more votes expressing an opinion one way or
> > the other.
> >
> > *Everyone* is invited to cast a vote for or against the proposal.  PMC
> > members are charged with such project oversight, and committers are
> > expected to participate (hint, hint).
> >
> > Regards,
> > Tim
> >
> > Mikhail Loenko wrote:
> > > We now have all requisite paperwork in place for
> > > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-4689, so let's vote to accept:
> > >
> > > [ ] +1 Accept this contribution
> > > [ ] -1 Reject because...
> > >
> > > As usual, 3 days unless someone complains they need more time.
> > >
> >
>
>
>