You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to soap-dev@ws.apache.org by Dennisf <de...@nj.paradyne.com> on 2000/10/25 21:16:35 UTC
questions
Q: why does soap code use io buffers to create xml documens instead of
dom model?
Q: are there plans to generate schema (.xsd files) at compile-time?
Q: where can I get version 3 plans or specs?
Re: questions
Posted by Dennisf <de...@nj.paradyne.com>.
come on guys, could somebody defend/comment on certain choices
in current implementation (particulary on marshalling layer), please.
am I being snobed?
are the authors of inherited code not participating anymore?
or is all attention on SSL ? :- )
I only want to participate, help and improve ...
Dennisf wrote:
> the deeper I get into soap src the more I see
> dom functionality replaced by your proprietary objects.
> why is that? is the goal to hide xml beneath "shadow objects"?
>
> Dennisf wrote:
>
> > Q: why does soap code use io buffers to create xml documens instead of
> > dom model?
> > Q: are there plans to generate schema (.xsd files) at compile-time?
> > Q: where can I get version 3 plans or specs?
Re: questions
Posted by Stoyan Jordanoff <dr...@bsc.bg>.
Hi, tell me a beginner resources for soap?
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dennisf" <de...@nj.paradyne.com>
To: <so...@xml.apache.org>
Sent: 26/10/2000 9:54 AM
Subject: Re: questions
> can someone please answer or are these questions absurd?
>
> Dennisf wrote:
>
> > the deeper I get into soap src the more I see
> > dom functionality replaced by your proprietary objects.
> > why is that? is the goal to hide xml beneath "shadow objects"?
> >
> > Dennisf wrote:
> >
> > > Q: why does soap code use io buffers to create xml documens instead of
> > > dom model?
> > > Q: are there plans to generate schema (.xsd files) at compile-time?
> > > Q: where can I get version 3 plans or specs?
>
>
Re: questions
Posted by Stoyan Jordanoff <dr...@bsc.bg>.
Hi, tell me a beginner resources for soap?
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dennisf" <de...@nj.paradyne.com>
To: <so...@xml.apache.org>
Sent: 26/10/2000 9:54 AM
Subject: Re: questions
> can someone please answer or are these questions absurd?
>
> Dennisf wrote:
>
> > the deeper I get into soap src the more I see
> > dom functionality replaced by your proprietary objects.
> > why is that? is the goal to hide xml beneath "shadow objects"?
> >
> > Dennisf wrote:
> >
> > > Q: why does soap code use io buffers to create xml documens instead of
> > > dom model?
> > > Q: are there plans to generate schema (.xsd files) at compile-time?
> > > Q: where can I get version 3 plans or specs?
>
>
Re: questions
Posted by Dennisf <de...@nj.paradyne.com>.
can someone please answer or are these questions absurd?
Dennisf wrote:
> the deeper I get into soap src the more I see
> dom functionality replaced by your proprietary objects.
> why is that? is the goal to hide xml beneath "shadow objects"?
>
> Dennisf wrote:
>
> > Q: why does soap code use io buffers to create xml documens instead of
> > dom model?
> > Q: are there plans to generate schema (.xsd files) at compile-time?
> > Q: where can I get version 3 plans or specs?
Re: questions
Posted by Dennisf <de...@nj.paradyne.com>.
can someone please answer or are these questions absurd?
Dennisf wrote:
> the deeper I get into soap src the more I see
> dom functionality replaced by your proprietary objects.
> why is that? is the goal to hide xml beneath "shadow objects"?
>
> Dennisf wrote:
>
> > Q: why does soap code use io buffers to create xml documens instead of
> > dom model?
> > Q: are there plans to generate schema (.xsd files) at compile-time?
> > Q: where can I get version 3 plans or specs?
Re: questions
Posted by Dennisf <de...@nj.paradyne.com>.
come on guys, could somebody defend/comment on certain choices
in current implementation (particulary on marshalling layer), please.
am I being snobed?
are the authors of inherited code not participating anymore?
or is all attention on SSL ? :- )
I only want to participate, help and improve ...
Dennisf wrote:
> the deeper I get into soap src the more I see
> dom functionality replaced by your proprietary objects.
> why is that? is the goal to hide xml beneath "shadow objects"?
>
> Dennisf wrote:
>
> > Q: why does soap code use io buffers to create xml documens instead of
> > dom model?
> > Q: are there plans to generate schema (.xsd files) at compile-time?
> > Q: where can I get version 3 plans or specs?
Re: questions
Posted by Dennisf <de...@nj.paradyne.com>.
the deeper I get into soap src the more I see
dom functionality replaced by your proprietary objects.
why is that? is the goal to hide xml beneath "shadow objects"?
Dennisf wrote:
> Q: why does soap code use io buffers to create xml documens instead of
> dom model?
> Q: are there plans to generate schema (.xsd files) at compile-time?
> Q: where can I get version 3 plans or specs?
Re: questions
Posted by Dennisf <de...@nj.paradyne.com>.
the deeper I get into soap src the more I see
dom functionality replaced by your proprietary objects.
why is that? is the goal to hide xml beneath "shadow objects"?
Dennisf wrote:
> Q: why does soap code use io buffers to create xml documens instead of
> dom model?
> Q: are there plans to generate schema (.xsd files) at compile-time?
> Q: where can I get version 3 plans or specs?