You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to general@portals.apache.org by Santiago Gala <sg...@hisitech.com> on 2004/10/27 10:55:49 UTC
Re: [VOTE:RESULT] Promote portals-bridges as a sub-project of
Portals
El dom, 24-10-2004 a las 22:57 +0200, Raphaël Luta escribió:
> Santiago should be able to set you up, he's supposed to have the
> necessary karma.
>
Nope. I asked for either Ate being added to our group in
asf-authorization or me or you been given infrastructure group in
subversion, but nothing has happened yet.
I'll insist today.
Re: being in the pmc, I think portals should aim to have all active
developers in the pmc, so that coordination is easier and we don't
"balkanize" too much between the different sub-projects.
Is it the case that you don't want to be involved, Ate? I think we
should follow more the cocoon "everybody's in" model than the old
jakarta "only a few" model.
Regards
--
Santiago Gala <sg...@hisitech.com>
High Sierra Technology, SLU
Re: [VOTE:RESULT] Promote portals-bridges as a sub-project of Portals
Posted by "Scott T. Weaver" <sc...@binary-designs.net>.
+1 on committer == pmc member
Santiago Gala wrote:
>El dom, 24-10-2004 a las 22:57 +0200, Raphaël Luta escribió:
>
>
>
>>Santiago should be able to set you up, he's supposed to have the
>>necessary karma.
>>
>>
>>
>
>Nope. I asked for either Ate being added to our group in
>asf-authorization or me or you been given infrastructure group in
>subversion, but nothing has happened yet.
>
>I'll insist today.
>
>Re: being in the pmc, I think portals should aim to have all active
>developers in the pmc, so that coordination is easier and we don't
>"balkanize" too much between the different sub-projects.
>
>Is it the case that you don't want to be involved, Ate? I think we
>should follow more the cocoon "everybody's in" model than the old
>jakarta "only a few" model.
>
>Regards
>
>
--
"Great minds discuss ideas. Average minds discuss events. Small minds discuss people." - Admiral Hyman Rickover
*******************************************
* Scott T. Weaver *
* <we...@apache.org> *
* <http://www.einnovation.com> *
* -------------------------------------- *
* Apache Jetspeed Enterprise Portal *
* Apache Pluto Portlet Container *
* *
* OpenEdit, Website Content Management *
* <http://www.openedit.org> *
*******************************************
Re: PMC Membership (was Re: [VOTE:RESULT] Promote portals-bridges
as a sub-project of Portals)
Posted by Raphaël Luta <ra...@apache.org>.
David H. DeWolf wrote:
> Santiago Gala wrote:
>
>> Re: being in the pmc, I think portals should aim to have all active
>> developers in the pmc, so that coordination is easier and we don't
>> "balkanize" too much between the different sub-projects.
>>
>
> In that case, I would like to be considered for a spot on the PMC.
> Hopefully it's not considered rude to ask :)
>
> I'm not sure what the makeup of the pmc actually is, but it seems that
> it may be made up of mostly jetspeed committers (probably rightly so).
> In any case, it may be beneficial to the "de-balkanization" effort to
> have another Pluto committer on the pmc.
>
> Thanks,
>
> David
>
+1 both to the request and the context
Also note that I have updated in SVN a whoweare.xml xdocs listing all
the PMC members (I think I have the list
right). When you are accepted, feel free to add yourself in the file to
keep it accurate.
--
Raphaël Luta - raphael@apache.org
Apache Portals - Enterprise Portal in Java
http://portals.apache.org/
Re: PMC Membership (was Re: [VOTE:RESULT] Promote portals-bridges
as a sub-project of Portals)
Posted by "Scott T. Weaver" <sc...@binary-designs.net>.
I feel all of the currently active Pluto committers should be offered
PMC spots.
Regards,
David H. DeWolf wrote:
> Santiago Gala wrote:
>
>> Re: being in the pmc, I think portals should aim to have all active
>> developers in the pmc, so that coordination is easier and we don't
>> "balkanize" too much between the different sub-projects.
>>
>
> In that case, I would like to be considered for a spot on the PMC.
> Hopefully it's not considered rude to ask :)
>
> I'm not sure what the makeup of the pmc actually is, but it seems that
> it may be made up of mostly jetspeed committers (probably rightly so).
> In any case, it may be beneficial to the "de-balkanization" effort to
> have another Pluto committer on the pmc.
>
> Thanks,
>
> David
>
>
--
"Great minds discuss ideas. Average minds discuss events. Small minds discuss people." - Admiral Hyman Rickover
*******************************************
* Scott T. Weaver *
* <we...@apache.org> *
* <http://www.einnovation.com> *
* -------------------------------------- *
* Apache Jetspeed Enterprise Portal *
* Apache Pluto Portlet Container *
* *
* OpenEdit, Website Content Management *
* <http://www.openedit.org> *
*******************************************
PMC Membership (was Re: [VOTE:RESULT] Promote portals-bridges as
a sub-project of Portals)
Posted by "David H. DeWolf" <dd...@apache.org>.
Santiago Gala wrote:
> Re: being in the pmc, I think portals should aim to have all active
> developers in the pmc, so that coordination is easier and we don't
> "balkanize" too much between the different sub-projects.
>
In that case, I would like to be considered for a spot on the PMC.
Hopefully it's not considered rude to ask :)
I'm not sure what the makeup of the pmc actually is, but it seems that
it may be made up of mostly jetspeed committers (probably rightly so).
In any case, it may be beneficial to the "de-balkanization" effort to
have another Pluto committer on the pmc.
Thanks,
David
Re: [VOTE:RESULT] Promote portals-bridges as a sub-project of
Portals
Posted by Ate Douma <at...@douma.nu>.
Santiago Gala said:
> El dom, 24-10-2004 a las 22:57 +0200, Raphaël Luta escribió:
>
>> Santiago should be able to set you up, he's supposed to have the
>> necessary karma.
>>
>
> Nope. I asked for either Ate being added to our group in
> asf-authorization or me or you been given infrastructure group in
> subversion, but nothing has happened yet.
>
> I'll insist today.
>
> Re: being in the pmc, I think portals should aim to have all active
> developers in the pmc, so that coordination is easier and we don't
> "balkanize" too much between the different sub-projects.
>
> Is it the case that you don't want to be involved, Ate? I think we
> should follow more the cocoon "everybody's in" model than the old
> jakarta "only a few" model.
I've thought about it some time ago, but never got around to actually do ask.
So no, I'd like to be involved and maybe this is a good time.
Should I do that in a more formal way or is this enough?
Regards, Ate
>
> Regards
> --
> Santiago Gala <sg...@hisitech.com>
> High Sierra Technology, SLU
>