You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commons-dev@ws.apache.org by Jarek Gawor <jg...@gmail.com> on 2008/12/05 19:51:39 UTC
Time for Axiom 1.2.8 release?
As mentioned before there is a need for a new Axiom release for Axis2,
Geronimo, etc. The question is, are there any critical issues that
need to be fixed for the new release or things are in good shape now?
Either way, I would like to volunteer as a release manager for this
release.
Thanks,
Jarek
Re: Time for Axiom 1.2.8 release?
Posted by Andreas Veithen <an...@gmail.com>.
I think that the problem described WSCOMMONS-372 needs to be addressed
urgently. Can you please review and give your opinion on this one?
Andreas
On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 19:51, Jarek Gawor <jg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> As mentioned before there is a need for a new Axiom release for Axis2,
> Geronimo, etc. The question is, are there any critical issues that
> need to be fixed for the new release or things are in good shape now?
> Either way, I would like to volunteer as a release manager for this
> release.
>
> Thanks,
> Jarek
>
Re: Time for Axiom 1.2.8 release?
Posted by David Illsley <da...@gmail.com>.
Done.
David
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 4:27 PM, Andreas Veithen
<an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> If somebody adds me to the list of committers in JIRA, I will also
> process some AXIS2 issues.
>
> Andreas
>
> On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 03:34, Davanum Srinivas <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> w00t! excellent work Andreas.
>>
>> - -- dims
>>
>> Andreas Veithen wrote:
>>> Jarek,
>>>
>>> I have reviewed all the open issues and fixed (or rejected) most of
>>> them. The remaining ones are either incomplete or should be left for
>>> 1.2.9 or 1.3. I think it's now time to go ahead with the release
>>> process.
>>>
>>> Andreas
>>>
>>> On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 19:51, Jarek Gawor <jg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> As mentioned before there is a need for a new Axiom release for Axis2,
>>>> Geronimo, etc. The question is, are there any critical issues that
>>>> need to be fixed for the new release or things are in good shape now?
>>>> Either way, I would like to volunteer as a release manager for this
>>>> release.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Jarek
>>>>
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>> Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
>>
>> iEYEARECAAYFAklJtpwACgkQgNg6eWEDv1mx4QCgjlafQTEo13pVbkUvCCY80dEr
>> mP8AoIW1B68D9vBR4h9/wHxiSXZrc/oN
>> =wH+5
>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>
>
Re: Time for Axiom 1.2.8 release?
Posted by Andreas Veithen <an...@gmail.com>.
If somebody adds me to the list of committers in JIRA, I will also
process some AXIS2 issues.
Andreas
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 03:34, Davanum Srinivas <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> w00t! excellent work Andreas.
>
> - -- dims
>
> Andreas Veithen wrote:
>> Jarek,
>>
>> I have reviewed all the open issues and fixed (or rejected) most of
>> them. The remaining ones are either incomplete or should be left for
>> 1.2.9 or 1.3. I think it's now time to go ahead with the release
>> process.
>>
>> Andreas
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 19:51, Jarek Gawor <jg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> As mentioned before there is a need for a new Axiom release for Axis2,
>>> Geronimo, etc. The question is, are there any critical issues that
>>> need to be fixed for the new release or things are in good shape now?
>>> Either way, I would like to volunteer as a release manager for this
>>> release.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Jarek
>>>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAklJtpwACgkQgNg6eWEDv1mx4QCgjlafQTEo13pVbkUvCCY80dEr
> mP8AoIW1B68D9vBR4h9/wHxiSXZrc/oN
> =wH+5
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
Re: Time for Axiom 1.2.8 release?
Posted by "Asankha C. Perera" <as...@apache.org>.
Excellent indeed! Great news Andreas :-)
asankha
Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> w00t! excellent work Andreas.
>
> - -- dims
>
> Andreas Veithen wrote:
>
>> Jarek,
>>
>> I have reviewed all the open issues and fixed (or rejected) most of
>> them. The remaining ones are either incomplete or should be left for
>> 1.2.9 or 1.3. I think it's now time to go ahead with the release
>> process.
>>
>> Andreas
>>
>>
--
Asankha C. Perera
http://adroitlogic.org
http://esbmagic.blogspot.com
Re: Time for Axiom 1.2.8 release?
Posted by Davanum Srinivas <da...@gmail.com>.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
w00t! excellent work Andreas.
- -- dims
Andreas Veithen wrote:
> Jarek,
>
> I have reviewed all the open issues and fixed (or rejected) most of
> them. The remaining ones are either incomplete or should be left for
> 1.2.9 or 1.3. I think it's now time to go ahead with the release
> process.
>
> Andreas
>
> On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 19:51, Jarek Gawor <jg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> As mentioned before there is a need for a new Axiom release for Axis2,
>> Geronimo, etc. The question is, are there any critical issues that
>> need to be fixed for the new release or things are in good shape now?
>> Either way, I would like to volunteer as a release manager for this
>> release.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Jarek
>>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAklJtpwACgkQgNg6eWEDv1mx4QCgjlafQTEo13pVbkUvCCY80dEr
mP8AoIW1B68D9vBR4h9/wHxiSXZrc/oN
=wH+5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Re: Time for Axiom 1.2.8 release?
Posted by Andreas Veithen <an...@gmail.com>.
Glen,
I have some other things on my todo list, so if you could take over
the RM job, I would be happy. Thanks.
Andreas
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 18:36, Glen Daniels <gl...@thoughtcraft.com> wrote:
> +1 on all counts. Huge props to Andreas, and have a great vacation, Jarek!
>
> If we can get this done soon then we can lock Axis2 1.5 to the new Axiom,
> which would be great - so I'm for someone else grabbing the reins for now.
> Andreas, do you want to stand in as RM for this one? I'm happy to do it as
> well.
>
> Thanks,
> --Glen
>
> Jarek Gawor wrote:
>>
>> Andreas,
>>
>> Awesome work on resolving all the bugs! Unfortunately, I'm going to be
>> traveling for the next week or so and won't have a reliable net access
>> so I won't be able to work on the release any time soon. If you or
>> somebody else wants to take care of the release before then that would
>> be great too.
>>
>> Thanks a lot,
>> Jarek
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 9:13 PM, Andreas Veithen
>> <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Jarek,
>>>
>>> I have reviewed all the open issues and fixed (or rejected) most of
>>> them. The remaining ones are either incomplete or should be left for
>>> 1.2.9 or 1.3. I think it's now time to go ahead with the release
>>> process.
>>>
>>> Andreas
>>>
>>> On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 19:51, Jarek Gawor <jg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> As mentioned before there is a need for a new Axiom release for Axis2,
>>>> Geronimo, etc. The question is, are there any critical issues that
>>>> need to be fixed for the new release or things are in good shape now?
>>>> Either way, I would like to volunteer as a release manager for this
>>>> release.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Jarek
>>>>
>
Re: Time for Axiom 1.2.8 release?
Posted by Glen Daniels <gl...@thoughtcraft.com>.
+1 on all counts. Huge props to Andreas, and have a great vacation, Jarek!
If we can get this done soon then we can lock Axis2 1.5 to the new
Axiom, which would be great - so I'm for someone else grabbing the reins
for now. Andreas, do you want to stand in as RM for this one? I'm
happy to do it as well.
Thanks,
--Glen
Jarek Gawor wrote:
> Andreas,
>
> Awesome work on resolving all the bugs! Unfortunately, I'm going to be
> traveling for the next week or so and won't have a reliable net access
> so I won't be able to work on the release any time soon. If you or
> somebody else wants to take care of the release before then that would
> be great too.
>
> Thanks a lot,
> Jarek
>
> On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 9:13 PM, Andreas Veithen
> <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Jarek,
>>
>> I have reviewed all the open issues and fixed (or rejected) most of
>> them. The remaining ones are either incomplete or should be left for
>> 1.2.9 or 1.3. I think it's now time to go ahead with the release
>> process.
>>
>> Andreas
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 19:51, Jarek Gawor <jg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> As mentioned before there is a need for a new Axiom release for Axis2,
>>> Geronimo, etc. The question is, are there any critical issues that
>>> need to be fixed for the new release or things are in good shape now?
>>> Either way, I would like to volunteer as a release manager for this
>>> release.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Jarek
>>>
Re: Time for Axiom 1.2.8 release?
Posted by Jarek Gawor <jg...@gmail.com>.
Andreas,
Awesome work on resolving all the bugs! Unfortunately, I'm going to be
traveling for the next week or so and won't have a reliable net access
so I won't be able to work on the release any time soon. If you or
somebody else wants to take care of the release before then that would
be great too.
Thanks a lot,
Jarek
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 9:13 PM, Andreas Veithen
<an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Jarek,
>
> I have reviewed all the open issues and fixed (or rejected) most of
> them. The remaining ones are either incomplete or should be left for
> 1.2.9 or 1.3. I think it's now time to go ahead with the release
> process.
>
> Andreas
>
> On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 19:51, Jarek Gawor <jg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> As mentioned before there is a need for a new Axiom release for Axis2,
>> Geronimo, etc. The question is, are there any critical issues that
>> need to be fixed for the new release or things are in good shape now?
>> Either way, I would like to volunteer as a release manager for this
>> release.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Jarek
>>
>
Re: Time for Axiom 1.2.8 release?
Posted by Andreas Veithen <an...@gmail.com>.
Jarek,
I have reviewed all the open issues and fixed (or rejected) most of
them. The remaining ones are either incomplete or should be left for
1.2.9 or 1.3. I think it's now time to go ahead with the release
process.
Andreas
On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 19:51, Jarek Gawor <jg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> As mentioned before there is a need for a new Axiom release for Axis2,
> Geronimo, etc. The question is, are there any critical issues that
> need to be fixed for the new release or things are in good shape now?
> Either way, I would like to volunteer as a release manager for this
> release.
>
> Thanks,
> Jarek
>
Re: Time for Axiom 1.2.8 release?
Posted by "Asankha C. Perera" <as...@apache.org>.
Hi Andreas
> I currently don't have the required access rights in JIRA to mark them
> as resolved (I asked Glen already twice, but he seems to be too
> busy...). Can somebody update the status or grant me the required
> access rights?
>
Can you check now? I've added you as a committer
cheers
asankha
--
Asankha C. Perera
http://adroitlogic.org
http://esbmagic.blogspot.com
Re: Time for Axiom 1.2.8 release?
Posted by Andreas Veithen <an...@gmail.com>.
There are currently 57 open issues for Axiom. I think we should be
able to review them all and fix those that are critical or that can
easily be fixed. I've done a first iteration and the following issues
can be marked as resolved now:
WSCOMMONS-100: Duplicate of WSCOMMONS-245, which has been fixed already.
WSCOMMONS-101: Fixed in r724042.
WSCOMMONS-115: Fixed in r724029.
WSCOMMONS-235: According to the comments, the proposed patch has
already been committed over a year ago.
WSCOMMONS-237: Fixed in r724045.
WSCOMMONS-254: Fixed in r724046.
WSCOMMONS-340: Fixed in r724004.
WSCOMMONS-386: Fixed in r724005.
WSCOMMONS-393: Fixed in r724004.
WSCOMMONS-399: The reported of the issue confirmed that is solved in
trunk, but didn't resolve/close the issue.
I currently don't have the required access rights in JIRA to mark them
as resolved (I asked Glen already twice, but he seems to be too
busy...). Can somebody update the status or grant me the required
access rights?
Andreas
On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 19:51, Jarek Gawor <jg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> As mentioned before there is a need for a new Axiom release for Axis2,
> Geronimo, etc. The question is, are there any critical issues that
> need to be fixed for the new release or things are in good shape now?
> Either way, I would like to volunteer as a release manager for this
> release.
>
> Thanks,
> Jarek
>