Other assorted patches was Re: svn commit: rev 3010 - trunk/notes

[Justin Erenkrantz <je...@apache.org>]

On Thu, Aug 22, 2002 at 01:58:12PM -0400, Garrett Rooney wrote:
> is there any reason that jlibtool support won't go in?  i don't recall
> anyone objecting to it when you posted it, and i'd personally be
> interested in having it both in apr and in svn for when i'm building
> on os x.

The only thing the jlibtool patch does is switch to using APR's
libtool (SVN itself would no longer generate a libtool).  However,
that's a pseudo-problem as SVN requires a higher version of libtool
than APR.  I never got any feedback on whether that is an issue.

> and the entry caching was just an issue of the patch not being done,
> right?  in concept, that is going to happen at some point isn't it?  i
> know philip was working on things that would make it easier, and the
> collab.net guys (karl i think) said something about having that for
> 1.0 just for performance issues...

Correct, but I'm not going to finish it.  Philip's changes made parts
of it easier to complete, but it's still nasty.  -- justin

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org