You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to java-dev@axis.apache.org by Glen Daniels <gd...@macromedia.com> on 2003/03/12 19:38:36 UTC
RE: Map/HashMap with .NET (was Re: cvs commit: xml-axis/java/src/
org/apache/axis/encoding/ser MapDeserializer.java MapSerializer.java)
OK - the serialization is exactly the same, just the schema is a little different. I can't see this breaking anyone unless they're using really exacting XML mapping tools. +1 from me.
--Glen
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Davanum Srinivas [mailto:dims@yahoo.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2003 1:32 PM
> To: axis-dev@ws.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Map/HashMap with .NET (was Re: cvs commit:
> xml-axis/java/src/org/apache/axis/encoding/ser MapDeserializer.java
> MapSerializer.java)
>
>
> FYI. Ran "ant clean all-tests" :)
>
> --- Steve Loughran <st...@iseran.com> wrote:
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Davanum Srinivas" <di...@yahoo.com>
> > To: <ax...@ws.apache.org>; <xm...@apache.org>
> > Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2003 09:53
> > Subject: Map/HashMap with .NET (was Re: cvs commit:
> > xml-axis/java/src/org/apache/axis/encoding/ser MapDeserializer.java
> > MapSerializer.java)
> >
> >
> > > Folks,
> > >
> > > Any objections to this check-in?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > dims
> >
> > well, it depends on what else it breaks.
> >
>
>
> =====
> Davanum Srinivas - http://webservices.apache.org/~dims/
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Web Hosting - establish your business online
> http://webhosting.yahoo.com
>
Re: Map/HashMap with .NET (was Re: cvs commit: xml-axis/java/src/org/apache/axis/encoding/ser MapDeserializer.java MapSerializer.java)
Posted by Sanjiva Weerawarana <sa...@watson.ibm.com>.
I thought that soapenc:* was out of fashion, especially at MSFT, the
land of freedom from encoding. ;-)
I'm pretty certain that it is .. and that means MSFT will change their
mapping to use XSD's array notion (min/maxOccurs) instead at some point.
Given that the SOAPBuilders community didn't agree on standard mappings
for Maps etc, looks like we'll instead be tracking the MSFT definitions.
So in concept I think this is totally fine. In my gut it feels like
the wrong way to do Web services interop (tracking a gorilla), but OTOH
I doubt we have any choice.
Sanjiva.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Glen Daniels" <gd...@macromedia.com>
To: <ax...@ws.apache.org>
Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2003 12:38 AM
Subject: RE: Map/HashMap with .NET (was Re: cvs commit:
xml-axis/java/src/org/apache/axis/encoding/ser MapDeserializer.java
MapSerializer.java)
>
> OK - the serialization is exactly the same, just the schema is a little
different. I can't see this breaking anyone unless they're using really
exacting XML mapping tools. +1 from me.
>
> --Glen
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Davanum Srinivas [mailto:dims@yahoo.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2003 1:32 PM
> > To: axis-dev@ws.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: Map/HashMap with .NET (was Re: cvs commit:
> > xml-axis/java/src/org/apache/axis/encoding/ser MapDeserializer.java
> > MapSerializer.java)
> >
> >
> > FYI. Ran "ant clean all-tests" :)
> >
> > --- Steve Loughran <st...@iseran.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Davanum Srinivas" <di...@yahoo.com>
> > > To: <ax...@ws.apache.org>; <xm...@apache.org>
> > > Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2003 09:53
> > > Subject: Map/HashMap with .NET (was Re: cvs commit:
> > > xml-axis/java/src/org/apache/axis/encoding/ser MapDeserializer.java
> > > MapSerializer.java)
> > >
> > >
> > > > Folks,
> > > >
> > > > Any objections to this check-in?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > dims
> > >
> > > well, it depends on what else it breaks.
> > >
> >
> >
> > =====
> > Davanum Srinivas - http://webservices.apache.org/~dims/
> >
> > __________________________________________________
> > Do you Yahoo!?
> > Yahoo! Web Hosting - establish your business online
> > http://webhosting.yahoo.com
> >