You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to dev@geronimo.apache.org by Jason Dillon <ja...@planet57.com> on 2006/11/22 01:58:31 UTC

What is the expected format of explicit-versions.properties?

I'm not sure if this is right... but we are generating entries like:

<snip>
scout/scout//jar=scout/scout/0.5/jar
</snip>

Is that correct?  Or should it be:

<snip>
scout/scout//jar=0.5
</snip>

--jason

Re: What is the expected format of explicit-versions.properties?

Posted by Jason Dillon <ja...@planet57.com>.

k, just checking.

--jason


On Nov 22, 2006, at 12:12 AM, David Jencks wrote:

>
> On Nov 21, 2006, at 4:58 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:
>
>> I'm not sure if this is right... but we are generating entries like:
>>
>> <snip>
>> scout/scout//jar=scout/scout/0.5/jar
>> </snip>
>>
>> Is that correct?  Or should it be:
>>
>> <snip>
>> scout/scout//jar=0.5
>> </snip>
>
> what is there is correct.  This lets you substitute artifacts, as  
> is done in the sandbox/javaee5 stuff where the jta11 tx config is  
> substituted for the jta 1.0.1B one in the regular server.
>
> thanks
> david jencks
>
>>
>> --jason
>

Re: What is the expected format of explicit-versions.properties?

Posted by David Jencks <da...@yahoo.com>.

On Nov 21, 2006, at 4:58 PM, Jason Dillon wrote:

> I'm not sure if this is right... but we are generating entries like:
>
> <snip>
> scout/scout//jar=scout/scout/0.5/jar
> </snip>
>
> Is that correct?  Or should it be:
>
> <snip>
> scout/scout//jar=0.5
> </snip>

what is there is correct.  This lets you substitute artifacts, as is  
done in the sandbox/javaee5 stuff where the jta11 tx config is  
substituted for the jta 1.0.1B one in the regular server.

thanks
david jencks

>
> --jason