You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@cocoon.apache.org by David Reid <da...@connect.org.uk> on 2001/11/30 11:51:06 UTC
is batik X-server needed
Hi,
I wonder if you can help me?
I am installing Cocoon2 on a HP-UX system. However, I don't want to run
an X-server on this system. I know batik/FOP requires this.
Is there anyway around this?
Is there a way to not install batik/FOP as part of cocoon2?
I would be very grateful for any suggestions.
many thanks
David Reid
Re: is batik X-server needed
Posted by Bertrand Delacretaz <bd...@codeconsult.ch>.
On Friday 30 November 2001 11:51, David Reid wrote:
> I am installing Cocoon2 on a HP-UX system. However, I don't want to run
> an X-server on this system. I know batik/FOP requires this.
>From this search on the the cocoon-users mailing list
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xml-cocoon-users&w=2&r=1&s=batik+awt&q=b
it appears that the PJA library might help (http://www.eteks.com/pja/en)
If you try it I'd be interested in the results!
--
-- Bertrand Delacrétaz, www.codeconsult.ch
-- web technologies consultant - OO, Java, XML, C++
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please check that your question has not already been answered in the
FAQ before posting. <http://xml.apache.org/cocoon/faqs.html>
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <co...@xml.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <co...@xml.apache.org>
Re: is batik X-server needed
Posted by Carlos Araya <ca...@cvc.edu>.
It is only necessary if you will be doing a lot of graphical work with FOP,
which uses Batik as the image library. In the installation page
(http://xml.apache.org/cocoon/installing/index.html) there are instructions
for installing Cocoon with an alternative AWT that does not use X.
Scroll down to the ³Linux/Headless/Batik² section under Tomcat 4.0 for the
details
HTH
Carlos
> From: "Robert J. Lebowitz" <le...@finaltouch.com>
> Reply-To: cocoon-users@xml.apache.org
> Date: Sat, 1 Dec 2001 09:22:28 -0600
> To: <co...@xml.apache.org>
> Subject: Re: is batik X-server needed
>
>
> David:
>
> I think that this is a FAQ.... look in the group for messages I sent related
> to running a "headless server". In essence, if you don't need to use batik,
> no you don't need the X-server.
>
> Some of the alternative solutions to this problem aren't really feasible... I
> wound up running the Xvbf daemon instead...
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: David Reid <ma...@connect.org.uk>
>> To: cocoon-users@xml.apache.org
>> Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 4:51 AM
>> Subject: is batik X-server needed
>>
>> Hi,
>> I wonder if you can help me?
>> I am installing Cocoon2 on a HP-UX system. However, I don't want to run
>> an X-server on this system. I know batik/FOP requires this.
>> Is there anyway around this?
>> Is there a way to not install batik/FOP as part of cocoon2?
>>
>>
>> I would be very grateful for any suggestions.
>>
>> many thanks
>>
>> David Reid
>>
>>
Re: is batik X-server needed
Posted by "Robert J. Lebowitz" <le...@finaltouch.com>.
David:
I think that this is a FAQ.... look in the group for messages I sent related to running a "headless server". In essence, if you don't need to use batik, no you don't need the X-server.
Some of the alternative solutions to this problem aren't really feasible... I wound up running the Xvbf daemon instead...
----- Original Message -----
From: David Reid
To: cocoon-users@xml.apache.org
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 4:51 AM
Subject: is batik X-server needed
Hi,
I wonder if you can help me?
I am installing Cocoon2 on a HP-UX system. However, I don't want to run
an X-server on this system. I know batik/FOP requires this.
Is there anyway around this?
Is there a way to not install batik/FOP as part of cocoon2?
I would be very grateful for any suggestions.
many thanks
David Reid