You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to general@incubator.apache.org by Yonny Hao <po...@gmail.com> on 2025/12/22 03:38:45 UTC
[VOTE] Release Apache BifroMQ 4.0.0-incubating RC2
Hi all,
The Apache BifroMQ community has voted on releasing Apache BifroMQ
4.0.0-incubating RC2. We would now like to call for a vote from the
Incubator PMC to release this version.
*Community vote thread*:
https://lists.apache.org/thread/l7ngk38zf5kmt7jvwqjx5kpw9hqxmqqz
*Vote result thread*:
https://lists.apache.org/thread/wh063yoc7d72kvxh52chgzl8dmxfkjhw
*The Release candidate*:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/bifromq/4.0.0-incubating-RC2/
*Git tag and commit*:
https://github.com/apache/bifromq/commit/878c0fc70d8346fd22fa1b52ec960728ebcec5bc
(tag: v4.0.0-incubating-RC2, hash:878c0fc)
*Release notes*:
https://github.com/apache/bifromq/releases/tag/v4.0.0-incubating-RC2
*PGP KEYS*:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/bifromq/KEYS (signer:
popduke@apache.org)
The vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
- [ ] +1 approve
- [ ] +0 no opinion
- [ ] -1 do not approve (please state your reasons)
Additional information about Apache BifroMQ is available at:
https://bifromq.apache.org/
Thanks,
–
Yonny (Yu) Hao
on behalf of the Apache BifroMQ community
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache BifroMQ 4.0.0-incubating RC2
Posted by Yonny Hao <po...@gmail.com>.
Thanks for the reviews. We’ll restart the vote once the updated RC is ready.
-- LICENSE/NOTICE are good (including content in the licenses folder). NB:
> personally, for BSD and MIT licenses, I prefer to have the actual
> dependency license more than the "generic" one as it contains the
> copyright. For instance, I would prefer licenses/pcollections.license
> (specific) instead of licenses/mit.txt (generic). But that's a detail :)
@JB — It's good advice, we’ll take that into account when fixing the binary
artifacts.
The source package looks good, but the binary package has the following
> issues:
> 1. The Jakarta RESTful Web Services API (jakarta.ws.rs:jakarta.ws.rs-api)
> is licensed under the EPL. As such, there is no requirement to add
> additional statements to the NOTICE file for this dependency. As far as I
> know, only the Apache License 2.0 (ALv2) imposes explicit requirements for
> modifying the NOTICE file.
> 2.The binary package includes components such as Netty, but these are not
> reflected in the NOTICE file.
> 3. For non-standard Apache License 2.0 license texts, we are also required
> to explicitly include them(binary package).
@Calvin — We’ll address the binary NOTICE and LICENSE issues you pointed
out.
Best,
On Mon, Dec 29, 2025 at 1:33 PM Calvin Kirs <ki...@apache.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 29, 2025 at 1:31 PM Calvin Kirs <ki...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > -1(binding) apologies for the late vote.
> >
> >
> > I checked:
> > - incubating in name
> > - signatures and hashes are fine
> > - disclaimer exists
> > - file has correct ASF headers if necessary
> >
> > The source package looks good, but the binary package has the following
> > issues:
> >
> > 1. The Jakarta RESTful Web Services API (jakarta.ws.rs:
> jakarta.ws.rs-api)
> > is licensed under the EPL. As such, there is no requirement to add
> > additional statements to the NOTICE file for this dependency. As far as I
> > know, only the Apache License 2.0 (ALv2) imposes explicit requirements
> for
> > modifying the NOTICE file.
> >
> >
> > 2.The binary package includes components such as Netty, but these are not
> > reflected in the NOTICE file.
> >
> >
> > 3. For non-standard Apache License 2.0 license texts, we are also
> required
> > to explicitly include them(binary package).
> >
>
> FYI https://infra.apache.org/licensing-howto.html
>
> >
> > On Wed, Dec 24, 2025 at 9:04 PM Christofer Dutz <
> christofer.dutz@c-ware.de>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Carrying over my +1 (binding) from the dev-list.
> >>
> >> Chris
> >>
> >> Von: Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>
> >> Datum: Mittwoch, 24. Dezember 2025 um 08:38
> >> An: general@incubator.apache.org <ge...@incubator.apache.org>
> >> Betreff: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache BifroMQ 4.0.0-incubating RC2
> >>
> >> +1 (binding)
> >>
> >> I checked:
> >> - source distribution
> >> -- incubating is in the name/version
> >> -- checksum/signature are good
> >> -- DISCLAIMER is present
> >> -- LICENSE/NOTICE are good
> >> -- ASF header present in expected files
> >> -- No binary/compiled file found
> >> -- I was able to compile from the source with ./mvnw clean install
> >> -DskipTests (I had to skip tests on the first run to avoid artifact
> >> resolution issue in the tests).
> >> - binary distribution
> >> -- incubating is in the name/version
> >> -- checksum/signature are good
> >> -- DISCLAIMER is present
> >> -- LICENSE/NOTICE are good (including content in the licenses folder).
> NB:
> >> personally, for BSD and MIT licenses, I prefer to have the actual
> >> dependency license more than the "generic" one as it contains the
> >> copyright. For instance, I would prefer licenses/pcollections.license
> >> (specific) instead of licenses/mit.txt (generic). But that's a detail :)
> >>
> >> Regards
> >> JB
> >>
> >> On Mon, Dec 22, 2025 at 4:38 AM Yonny Hao <po...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Hi all,
> >> >
> >> > The Apache BifroMQ community has voted on releasing Apache BifroMQ
> >> > 4.0.0-incubating RC2. We would now like to call for a vote from the
> >> > Incubator PMC to release this version.
> >> >
> >> > *Community vote thread*:
> >> > https://lists.apache.org/thread/l7ngk38zf5kmt7jvwqjx5kpw9hqxmqqz
> >> >
> >> > *Vote result thread*:
> >> > https://lists.apache.org/thread/wh063yoc7d72kvxh52chgzl8dmxfkjhw
> >> >
> >> > *The Release candidate*:
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/bifromq/4.0.0-incubating-RC2/
> >> >
> >> > *Git tag and commit*:
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> https://github.com/apache/bifromq/commit/878c0fc70d8346fd22fa1b52ec960728ebcec5bc
> >> > (tag: v4.0.0-incubating-RC2, hash:878c0fc)
> >> >
> >> > *Release notes*:
> >> > https://github.com/apache/bifromq/releases/tag/v4.0.0-incubating-RC2
> >> >
> >> > *PGP KEYS*:
> >> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/bifromq/KEYS
> >> (signer:
> >> > popduke@apache.org)
> >> >
> >> > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> >> > - [ ] +1 approve
> >> > - [ ] +0 no opinion
> >> > - [ ] -1 do not approve (please state your reasons)
> >> >
> >> > Additional information about Apache BifroMQ is available at:
> >> > https://bifromq.apache.org/
> >> >
> >> > Thanks,
> >> > –
> >> > Yonny (Yu) Hao
> >> > on behalf of the Apache BifroMQ community
> >> >
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> > Best wishes！
> > CalvinKirs
> >
>
>
> --
> Best wishes！
> CalvinKirs
>
--
Yonny(Yu) Hao
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache BifroMQ 4.0.0-incubating RC2
Posted by Calvin Kirs <ki...@apache.org>.
On Mon, Dec 29, 2025 at 1:31 PM Calvin Kirs <ki...@apache.org> wrote:
> -1(binding) apologies for the late vote.
>
>
> I checked:
> - incubating in name
> - signatures and hashes are fine
> - disclaimer exists
> - file has correct ASF headers if necessary
>
> The source package looks good, but the binary package has the following
> issues:
>
> 1. The Jakarta RESTful Web Services API (jakarta.ws.rs:jakarta.ws.rs-api)
> is licensed under the EPL. As such, there is no requirement to add
> additional statements to the NOTICE file for this dependency. As far as I
> know, only the Apache License 2.0 (ALv2) imposes explicit requirements for
> modifying the NOTICE file.
>
>
> 2.The binary package includes components such as Netty, but these are not
> reflected in the NOTICE file.
>
>
> 3. For non-standard Apache License 2.0 license texts, we are also required
> to explicitly include them(binary package).
>
FYI https://infra.apache.org/licensing-howto.html
>
> On Wed, Dec 24, 2025 at 9:04 PM Christofer Dutz <ch...@c-ware.de>
> wrote:
>
>> Carrying over my +1 (binding) from the dev-list.
>>
>> Chris
>>
>> Von: Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>
>> Datum: Mittwoch, 24. Dezember 2025 um 08:38
>> An: general@incubator.apache.org <ge...@incubator.apache.org>
>> Betreff: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache BifroMQ 4.0.0-incubating RC2
>>
>> +1 (binding)
>>
>> I checked:
>> - source distribution
>> -- incubating is in the name/version
>> -- checksum/signature are good
>> -- DISCLAIMER is present
>> -- LICENSE/NOTICE are good
>> -- ASF header present in expected files
>> -- No binary/compiled file found
>> -- I was able to compile from the source with ./mvnw clean install
>> -DskipTests (I had to skip tests on the first run to avoid artifact
>> resolution issue in the tests).
>> - binary distribution
>> -- incubating is in the name/version
>> -- checksum/signature are good
>> -- DISCLAIMER is present
>> -- LICENSE/NOTICE are good (including content in the licenses folder). NB:
>> personally, for BSD and MIT licenses, I prefer to have the actual
>> dependency license more than the "generic" one as it contains the
>> copyright. For instance, I would prefer licenses/pcollections.license
>> (specific) instead of licenses/mit.txt (generic). But that's a detail :)
>>
>> Regards
>> JB
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 22, 2025 at 4:38 AM Yonny Hao <po...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Hi all,
>> >
>> > The Apache BifroMQ community has voted on releasing Apache BifroMQ
>> > 4.0.0-incubating RC2. We would now like to call for a vote from the
>> > Incubator PMC to release this version.
>> >
>> > *Community vote thread*:
>> > https://lists.apache.org/thread/l7ngk38zf5kmt7jvwqjx5kpw9hqxmqqz
>> >
>> > *Vote result thread*:
>> > https://lists.apache.org/thread/wh063yoc7d72kvxh52chgzl8dmxfkjhw
>> >
>> > *The Release candidate*:
>> >
>> >
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/bifromq/4.0.0-incubating-RC2/
>> >
>> > *Git tag and commit*:
>> >
>> >
>> https://github.com/apache/bifromq/commit/878c0fc70d8346fd22fa1b52ec960728ebcec5bc
>> > (tag: v4.0.0-incubating-RC2, hash:878c0fc)
>> >
>> > *Release notes*:
>> > https://github.com/apache/bifromq/releases/tag/v4.0.0-incubating-RC2
>> >
>> > *PGP KEYS*:
>> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/bifromq/KEYS
>> (signer:
>> > popduke@apache.org)
>> >
>> > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>> > - [ ] +1 approve
>> > - [ ] +0 no opinion
>> > - [ ] -1 do not approve (please state your reasons)
>> >
>> > Additional information about Apache BifroMQ is available at:
>> > https://bifromq.apache.org/
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > –
>> > Yonny (Yu) Hao
>> > on behalf of the Apache BifroMQ community
>> >
>>
>
>
> --
> Best wishes！
> CalvinKirs
>
--
Best wishes！
CalvinKirs
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache BifroMQ 4.0.0-incubating RC2
Posted by Calvin Kirs <ki...@apache.org>.
-1(binding) apologies for the late vote.
I checked:
- incubating in name
- signatures and hashes are fine
- disclaimer exists
- file has correct ASF headers if necessary
The source package looks good, but the binary package has the following
issues:
1. The Jakarta RESTful Web Services API (jakarta.ws.rs:jakarta.ws.rs-api)
is licensed under the EPL. As such, there is no requirement to add
additional statements to the NOTICE file for this dependency. As far as I
know, only the Apache License 2.0 (ALv2) imposes explicit requirements for
modifying the NOTICE file.
2.The binary package includes components such as Netty, but these are not
reflected in the NOTICE file.
3. For non-standard Apache License 2.0 license texts, we are also required
to explicitly include them(binary package).
On Wed, Dec 24, 2025 at 9:04 PM Christofer Dutz <ch...@c-ware.de>
wrote:
> Carrying over my +1 (binding) from the dev-list.
>
> Chris
>
> Von: Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>
> Datum: Mittwoch, 24. Dezember 2025 um 08:38
> An: general@incubator.apache.org <ge...@incubator.apache.org>
> Betreff: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache BifroMQ 4.0.0-incubating RC2
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> I checked:
> - source distribution
> -- incubating is in the name/version
> -- checksum/signature are good
> -- DISCLAIMER is present
> -- LICENSE/NOTICE are good
> -- ASF header present in expected files
> -- No binary/compiled file found
> -- I was able to compile from the source with ./mvnw clean install
> -DskipTests (I had to skip tests on the first run to avoid artifact
> resolution issue in the tests).
> - binary distribution
> -- incubating is in the name/version
> -- checksum/signature are good
> -- DISCLAIMER is present
> -- LICENSE/NOTICE are good (including content in the licenses folder). NB:
> personally, for BSD and MIT licenses, I prefer to have the actual
> dependency license more than the "generic" one as it contains the
> copyright. For instance, I would prefer licenses/pcollections.license
> (specific) instead of licenses/mit.txt (generic). But that's a detail :)
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> On Mon, Dec 22, 2025 at 4:38 AM Yonny Hao <po...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > The Apache BifroMQ community has voted on releasing Apache BifroMQ
> > 4.0.0-incubating RC2. We would now like to call for a vote from the
> > Incubator PMC to release this version.
> >
> > *Community vote thread*:
> > https://lists.apache.org/thread/l7ngk38zf5kmt7jvwqjx5kpw9hqxmqqz
> >
> > *Vote result thread*:
> > https://lists.apache.org/thread/wh063yoc7d72kvxh52chgzl8dmxfkjhw
> >
> > *The Release candidate*:
> >
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/bifromq/4.0.0-incubating-RC2/
> >
> > *Git tag and commit*:
> >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/bifromq/commit/878c0fc70d8346fd22fa1b52ec960728ebcec5bc
> > (tag: v4.0.0-incubating-RC2, hash:878c0fc)
> >
> > *Release notes*:
> > https://github.com/apache/bifromq/releases/tag/v4.0.0-incubating-RC2
> >
> > *PGP KEYS*:
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/bifromq/KEYS
> (signer:
> > popduke@apache.org)
> >
> > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> > - [ ] +1 approve
> > - [ ] +0 no opinion
> > - [ ] -1 do not approve (please state your reasons)
> >
> > Additional information about Apache BifroMQ is available at:
> > https://bifromq.apache.org/
> >
> > Thanks,
> > –
> > Yonny (Yu) Hao
> > on behalf of the Apache BifroMQ community
> >
>
--
Best wishes！
CalvinKirs
AW: [VOTE] Release Apache BifroMQ 4.0.0-incubating RC2
Posted by Christofer Dutz <ch...@c-ware.de>.
Carrying over my +1 (binding) from the dev-list.
Chris
Von: Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>
Datum: Mittwoch, 24. Dezember 2025 um 08:38
An: general@incubator.apache.org <ge...@incubator.apache.org>
Betreff: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache BifroMQ 4.0.0-incubating RC2
+1 (binding)
I checked:
- source distribution
-- incubating is in the name/version
-- checksum/signature are good
-- DISCLAIMER is present
-- LICENSE/NOTICE are good
-- ASF header present in expected files
-- No binary/compiled file found
-- I was able to compile from the source with ./mvnw clean install
-DskipTests (I had to skip tests on the first run to avoid artifact
resolution issue in the tests).
- binary distribution
-- incubating is in the name/version
-- checksum/signature are good
-- DISCLAIMER is present
-- LICENSE/NOTICE are good (including content in the licenses folder). NB:
personally, for BSD and MIT licenses, I prefer to have the actual
dependency license more than the "generic" one as it contains the
copyright. For instance, I would prefer licenses/pcollections.license
(specific) instead of licenses/mit.txt (generic). But that's a detail :)
Regards
JB
On Mon, Dec 22, 2025 at 4:38 AM Yonny Hao <po...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The Apache BifroMQ community has voted on releasing Apache BifroMQ
> 4.0.0-incubating RC2. We would now like to call for a vote from the
> Incubator PMC to release this version.
>
> *Community vote thread*:
> https://lists.apache.org/thread/l7ngk38zf5kmt7jvwqjx5kpw9hqxmqqz
>
> *Vote result thread*:
> https://lists.apache.org/thread/wh063yoc7d72kvxh52chgzl8dmxfkjhw
>
> *The Release candidate*:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/bifromq/4.0.0-incubating-RC2/
>
> *Git tag and commit*:
>
> https://github.com/apache/bifromq/commit/878c0fc70d8346fd22fa1b52ec960728ebcec5bc
> (tag: v4.0.0-incubating-RC2, hash:878c0fc)
>
> *Release notes*:
> https://github.com/apache/bifromq/releases/tag/v4.0.0-incubating-RC2
>
> *PGP KEYS*:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/bifromq/KEYS (signer:
> popduke@apache.org)
>
> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> - [ ] +1 approve
> - [ ] +0 no opinion
> - [ ] -1 do not approve (please state your reasons)
>
> Additional information about Apache BifroMQ is available at:
> https://bifromq.apache.org/
>
> Thanks,
> –
> Yonny (Yu) Hao
> on behalf of the Apache BifroMQ community
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache BifroMQ 4.0.0-incubating RC2
Posted by Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>.
+1 (binding)
I checked:
- source distribution
-- incubating is in the name/version
-- checksum/signature are good
-- DISCLAIMER is present
-- LICENSE/NOTICE are good
-- ASF header present in expected files
-- No binary/compiled file found
-- I was able to compile from the source with ./mvnw clean install
-DskipTests (I had to skip tests on the first run to avoid artifact
resolution issue in the tests).
- binary distribution
-- incubating is in the name/version
-- checksum/signature are good
-- DISCLAIMER is present
-- LICENSE/NOTICE are good (including content in the licenses folder). NB:
personally, for BSD and MIT licenses, I prefer to have the actual
dependency license more than the "generic" one as it contains the
copyright. For instance, I would prefer licenses/pcollections.license
(specific) instead of licenses/mit.txt (generic). But that's a detail :)
Regards
JB
On Mon, Dec 22, 2025 at 4:38 AM Yonny Hao <po...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The Apache BifroMQ community has voted on releasing Apache BifroMQ
> 4.0.0-incubating RC2. We would now like to call for a vote from the
> Incubator PMC to release this version.
>
> *Community vote thread*:
> https://lists.apache.org/thread/l7ngk38zf5kmt7jvwqjx5kpw9hqxmqqz
>
> *Vote result thread*:
> https://lists.apache.org/thread/wh063yoc7d72kvxh52chgzl8dmxfkjhw
>
> *The Release candidate*:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/bifromq/4.0.0-incubating-RC2/
>
> *Git tag and commit*:
>
> https://github.com/apache/bifromq/commit/878c0fc70d8346fd22fa1b52ec960728ebcec5bc
> (tag: v4.0.0-incubating-RC2, hash:878c0fc)
>
> *Release notes*:
> https://github.com/apache/bifromq/releases/tag/v4.0.0-incubating-RC2
>
> *PGP KEYS*:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/bifromq/KEYS (signer:
> popduke@apache.org)
>
> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> - [ ] +1 approve
> - [ ] +0 no opinion
> - [ ] -1 do not approve (please state your reasons)
>
> Additional information about Apache BifroMQ is available at:
> https://bifromq.apache.org/
>
> Thanks,
> –
> Yonny (Yu) Hao
> on behalf of the Apache BifroMQ community
>