You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to mod_python-dev@quetz.apache.org by "Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy" <gr...@apache.org> on 2003/11/12 18:45:28 UTC
[REMINDER] Urgent: please test 3.0.4 and 2.7.9 (fwd)
*** I still need at least 1 +1 for 3.0.4 and 3 for 2.7.9 ***
Please take a moment to do this if you can,
Thanks!
There are two new tarballs out there in:
http://www.modpython.org/tmp/parse_qsl/
I made these in response to the following bug report by Matt Hoskins:
http://www.modpython.org/pipermail/mod_python/2003-November/003925.html
This is a pretty serious problem IMO, so the sooner we can test it the
better.
These releases only fix this problem and do not do have anything else new
(except for PY_LONG_LONG thing I snuck in there so it compiles with 2.3).
As usual, the rules:
In order for a file to be officially announced, it has to be tested by
developers on the dev list. Anyone subscribed to this list can (and should
feel obligated to :-) ) test it, and provide feedback *to _this_ list*!
(Not the mod_python@modpython.org list, and preferably not me personally)
Please download it, then do
$ ./configure --with-apxs=/wherever/it/is
$ make
$ (su)
# make install
for 3.0.4 - (as non-root user!)
$ cd test
$ python test.py
And see if any tests fail. If they pass, send a +1 to the list, if they
fail, send the details (the versions of OS, Python and Apache, the test
output, and suggestions, if any).
2.7.9 does not have a test suite, so I guess just do your best to try to
compile and run it and see that everything works.
P.S. I don't have windows binaries at this point, and probably will not
have them until at least wednesday. If someone wants to tackle creating
one (or two), you are more than welcome. (No, I don't have any
instructions, other than stuff that was posted on this list earlier,
sorry).
Thanks!
Grisha
Re: [REMINDER] Urgent: please test 3.0.4 and 2.7.9 (fwd)
Posted by David Fraser <da...@sjsoft.com>.
Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy wrote:
>*** I still need at least 1 +1 for 3.0.4 and 3 for 2.7.9 ***
>
>Please take a moment to do this if you can,
>
>Thanks!
>
>
I'll try take a look tomorrow, sorry about the delay
>
>There are two new tarballs out there in:
>
>http://www.modpython.org/tmp/parse_qsl/
>
>I made these in response to the following bug report by Matt Hoskins:
>
>http://www.modpython.org/pipermail/mod_python/2003-November/003925.html
>
>This is a pretty serious problem IMO, so the sooner we can test it the
>better.
>
>These releases only fix this problem and do not do have anything else new
>(except for PY_LONG_LONG thing I snuck in there so it compiles with 2.3).
>
>As usual, the rules:
>
>In order for a file to be officially announced, it has to be tested by
>developers on the dev list. Anyone subscribed to this list can (and should
>feel obligated to :-) ) test it, and provide feedback *to _this_ list*!
>(Not the mod_python@modpython.org list, and preferably not me personally)
>
>Please download it, then do
>
>$ ./configure --with-apxs=/wherever/it/is
>$ make
>$ (su)
># make install
>
>
>for 3.0.4 - (as non-root user!)
>
>$ cd test
>$ python test.py
>
>And see if any tests fail. If they pass, send a +1 to the list, if they
>fail, send the details (the versions of OS, Python and Apache, the test
>output, and suggestions, if any).
>
>
>2.7.9 does not have a test suite, so I guess just do your best to try to
>compile and run it and see that everything works.
>
>
>P.S. I don't have windows binaries at this point, and probably will not
>have them until at least wednesday. If someone wants to tackle creating
>one (or two), you are more than welcome. (No, I don't have any
>instructions, other than stuff that was posted on this list earlier,
>sorry).
>
>
>Thanks!
>
>Grisha
>
>
>
Re: [REMINDER] Urgent: please test 3.0.4 and 2.7.9 (fwd)
Posted by Peter Hawkins <pe...@hawkins.emu.id.au>.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi...
On Thu, 13 Nov 2003 04:45 am, Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy wrote:
> *** I still need at least 1 +1 for 3.0.4 and 3 for 2.7.9 ***
+1 for 2.7.9.
I had some problems with the 3.0.4 test suite:
* The configure script apparently does not correctly locate the apache2 binary
(/usr/sbin/apache2 on debian), but of course this only affects the test
suite. I fixed up testconf.py myself for the moment.
* The test suite also does not appear happy with http_proxy environment
variables set with proxy authentication information (in fact, it should
probably unset http_proxy before running).
Having made these two changes, I now get this:
...
* Testing internally (status messages go to error_log)
F
======================================================================
FAIL: test_internal (__main__.PerRequestTestCase)
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "test.py", line 759, in test_internal
self.fail("Some tests failed, see error_log")
File "/usr/lib/python2.3/unittest.py", line 270, in fail
raise self.failureException, msg
AssertionError: Some tests failed, see error_log
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ran 19 tests in 7.360s
FAILED (failures=1)
...
The error_log file is attached (2k gzipped).
3.0.4 seems to work fine in my tests, however, so this is probably a buggy
test suite (the same thing may well happen in 3.0.3 for all I know). I'd
probably give it a +1 anyway.
OS is Debian sid (unstable), apache2 version 2.0.47-1 (prefork mpm), python
2.3.2-2. (version parts after dashes are debian package versions).
=)
Peter
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE/syDFXjDfzL4R9DcRAtr+AJ4kf7n5Ltet0Sfwjzr9jGuzD2NWTgCfaIyU
w9VjYvQkgIj9MMrYUp4AVQw=
=N/2P
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----