You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to soap-dev@ws.apache.org by Niclas Hedhman <ni...@ewarna.com> on 2002/11/20 02:53:26 UTC
Question about JDK 1.1
I don't expect Apache SOAP to be 1.1 compatible (maybe it is), but is there an
older version around, available for download?
Niclas
Re: Question about JDK 1.1
Posted by Niclas Hedhman <ni...@ewarna.com>.
On Friday 22 November 2002 09:53, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
> On Thursday 21 November 2002 22:51, Scott Nichol wrote:
> > Niclas,
> >
> > What version of Apache SOAP will you be starting with? The use of JDK
> > 1.2 features has accelerated over the last 4-6 weeks. As you guessed,
> > this is mostly collection classes. Fortunately, the changes are limited
> > to implementations; I don't think any public methods have JDK 1.2
> > classes in their signature.
> >
> > If your ultimate target is J2ME CLDC, have you considered kSOAP
> > (http://ksoap.enhydra.org/)? It is nice, small and targeted at this
> > platform. With dependencies on JAF and JavaMail, Apache SOAP brings a
> > lot of baggage to small (in RAM) devices.
>
> Thanks for the pointer, will look into that before starting on
> re-implementations.
Also found a pointer to XML-RPC conviently located on the kXML page, so I took
a look at it. It is much better suited for what I am planning to do....
Niclas
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@xml.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@xml.apache.org>
Re: Question about JDK 1.1
Posted by Niclas Hedhman <ni...@ewarna.com>.
On Friday 22 November 2002 09:53, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
> On Thursday 21 November 2002 22:51, Scott Nichol wrote:
> > Niclas,
> >
> > What version of Apache SOAP will you be starting with? The use of JDK
> > 1.2 features has accelerated over the last 4-6 weeks. As you guessed,
> > this is mostly collection classes. Fortunately, the changes are limited
> > to implementations; I don't think any public methods have JDK 1.2
> > classes in their signature.
> >
> > If your ultimate target is J2ME CLDC, have you considered kSOAP
> > (http://ksoap.enhydra.org/)? It is nice, small and targeted at this
> > platform. With dependencies on JAF and JavaMail, Apache SOAP brings a
> > lot of baggage to small (in RAM) devices.
>
> Thanks for the pointer, will look into that before starting on
> re-implementations.
Also found a pointer to XML-RPC conviently located on the kXML page, so I took
a look at it. It is much better suited for what I am planning to do....
Niclas
Re: Question about JDK 1.1
Posted by Niclas Hedhman <ni...@ewarna.com>.
On Thursday 21 November 2002 22:51, Scott Nichol wrote:
> Niclas,
>
> What version of Apache SOAP will you be starting with? The use of JDK
> 1.2 features has accelerated over the last 4-6 weeks. As you guessed,
> this is mostly collection classes. Fortunately, the changes are limited
> to implementations; I don't think any public methods have JDK 1.2
> classes in their signature.
>
> If your ultimate target is J2ME CLDC, have you considered kSOAP
> (http://ksoap.enhydra.org/)? It is nice, small and targeted at this
> platform. With dependencies on JAF and JavaMail, Apache SOAP brings a
> lot of baggage to small (in RAM) devices.
Thanks for the pointer, will look into that before starting on
re-implementations.
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@xml.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@xml.apache.org>
Re: Question about JDK 1.1
Posted by Niclas Hedhman <ni...@ewarna.com>.
On Thursday 21 November 2002 22:51, Scott Nichol wrote:
> Niclas,
>
> What version of Apache SOAP will you be starting with? The use of JDK
> 1.2 features has accelerated over the last 4-6 weeks. As you guessed,
> this is mostly collection classes. Fortunately, the changes are limited
> to implementations; I don't think any public methods have JDK 1.2
> classes in their signature.
>
> If your ultimate target is J2ME CLDC, have you considered kSOAP
> (http://ksoap.enhydra.org/)? It is nice, small and targeted at this
> platform. With dependencies on JAF and JavaMail, Apache SOAP brings a
> lot of baggage to small (in RAM) devices.
Thanks for the pointer, will look into that before starting on
re-implementations.
Re: Question about JDK 1.1
Posted by Scott Nichol <sn...@scottnichol.com>.
Niclas,
What version of Apache SOAP will you be starting with? The use of JDK
1.2 features has accelerated over the last 4-6 weeks. As you guessed,
this is mostly collection classes. Fortunately, the changes are limited
to implementations; I don't think any public methods have JDK 1.2
classes in their signature.
If your ultimate target is J2ME CLDC, have you considered kSOAP
(http://ksoap.enhydra.org/)? It is nice, small and targeted at this
platform. With dependencies on JAF and JavaMail, Apache SOAP brings a
lot of baggage to small (in RAM) devices.
Scott Nichol
----- Original Message -----
From: "Niclas Hedhman" <ni...@ewarna.com>
To: <so...@xml.apache.org>
Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 10:04 PM
Subject: Re: Question about JDK 1.1
On Wednesday 20 November 2002 12:38, Scott Nichol wrote:
> I believe 2.2 worked with JDK 1.1, and I think you'll find that 2.3.1
is
> at least mostly compatible (maybe some serializer does not work, but
> most of the code should). Of course, this assumes the required
> supporting jars, such as JavaMail and JAF work with JDK 1.1, too.
Ok, the undertaking is massive in other aspects, so ripping out 1.2
dependencies here and there is Ok, not if every second line is using
Collections (typically the most used 1.2 feature).
Next step is to check the usage of non J2ME CLDC features in Apache SOAP
and
"down-port" them. I assume this will largely be in the java.io package.
A
first assault in the weekend...
I will let you know on my progress with this.
Niclas
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@xml.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@xml.apache.org>
Re: Question about JDK 1.1
Posted by Scott Nichol <sn...@scottnichol.com>.
Niclas,
What version of Apache SOAP will you be starting with? The use of JDK
1.2 features has accelerated over the last 4-6 weeks. As you guessed,
this is mostly collection classes. Fortunately, the changes are limited
to implementations; I don't think any public methods have JDK 1.2
classes in their signature.
If your ultimate target is J2ME CLDC, have you considered kSOAP
(http://ksoap.enhydra.org/)? It is nice, small and targeted at this
platform. With dependencies on JAF and JavaMail, Apache SOAP brings a
lot of baggage to small (in RAM) devices.
Scott Nichol
----- Original Message -----
From: "Niclas Hedhman" <ni...@ewarna.com>
To: <so...@xml.apache.org>
Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 10:04 PM
Subject: Re: Question about JDK 1.1
On Wednesday 20 November 2002 12:38, Scott Nichol wrote:
> I believe 2.2 worked with JDK 1.1, and I think you'll find that 2.3.1
is
> at least mostly compatible (maybe some serializer does not work, but
> most of the code should). Of course, this assumes the required
> supporting jars, such as JavaMail and JAF work with JDK 1.1, too.
Ok, the undertaking is massive in other aspects, so ripping out 1.2
dependencies here and there is Ok, not if every second line is using
Collections (typically the most used 1.2 feature).
Next step is to check the usage of non J2ME CLDC features in Apache SOAP
and
"down-port" them. I assume this will largely be in the java.io package.
A
first assault in the weekend...
I will let you know on my progress with this.
Niclas
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@xml.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@xml.apache.org>
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@xml.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@xml.apache.org>
Re: Question about JDK 1.1
Posted by Niclas Hedhman <ni...@ewarna.com>.
On Wednesday 20 November 2002 12:38, Scott Nichol wrote:
> I believe 2.2 worked with JDK 1.1, and I think you'll find that 2.3.1 is
> at least mostly compatible (maybe some serializer does not work, but
> most of the code should). Of course, this assumes the required
> supporting jars, such as JavaMail and JAF work with JDK 1.1, too.
Ok, the undertaking is massive in other aspects, so ripping out 1.2
dependencies here and there is Ok, not if every second line is using
Collections (typically the most used 1.2 feature).
Next step is to check the usage of non J2ME CLDC features in Apache SOAP and
"down-port" them. I assume this will largely be in the java.io package. A
first assault in the weekend...
I will let you know on my progress with this.
Niclas
Re: Question about JDK 1.1
Posted by Niclas Hedhman <ni...@ewarna.com>.
On Wednesday 20 November 2002 12:38, Scott Nichol wrote:
> I believe 2.2 worked with JDK 1.1, and I think you'll find that 2.3.1 is
> at least mostly compatible (maybe some serializer does not work, but
> most of the code should). Of course, this assumes the required
> supporting jars, such as JavaMail and JAF work with JDK 1.1, too.
Ok, the undertaking is massive in other aspects, so ripping out 1.2
dependencies here and there is Ok, not if every second line is using
Collections (typically the most used 1.2 feature).
Next step is to check the usage of non J2ME CLDC features in Apache SOAP and
"down-port" them. I assume this will largely be in the java.io package. A
first assault in the weekend...
I will let you know on my progress with this.
Niclas
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@xml.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@xml.apache.org>
Re: Question about JDK 1.1
Posted by Scott Nichol <sn...@scottnichol.com>.
I believe 2.2 worked with JDK 1.1, and I think you'll find that 2.3.1 is
at least mostly compatible (maybe some serializer does not work, but
most of the code should). Of course, this assumes the required
supporting jars, such as JavaMail and JAF work with JDK 1.1, too.
Scott Nichol
----- Original Message -----
From: "Niclas Hedhman" <ni...@ewarna.com>
To: <xm...@apache.org>
Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2002 8:53 PM
Subject: Question about JDK 1.1
I don't expect Apache SOAP to be 1.1 compatible (maybe it is), but is
there an
older version around, available for download?
Niclas
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@xml.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@xml.apache.org>
Re: Question about JDK 1.1
Posted by Scott Nichol <sn...@scottnichol.com>.
I believe 2.2 worked with JDK 1.1, and I think you'll find that 2.3.1 is
at least mostly compatible (maybe some serializer does not work, but
most of the code should). Of course, this assumes the required
supporting jars, such as JavaMail and JAF work with JDK 1.1, too.
Scott Nichol
----- Original Message -----
From: "Niclas Hedhman" <ni...@ewarna.com>
To: <xm...@apache.org>
Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2002 8:53 PM
Subject: Question about JDK 1.1
I don't expect Apache SOAP to be 1.1 compatible (maybe it is), but is
there an
older version around, available for download?
Niclas
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@xml.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@xml.apache.org>
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@xml.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@xml.apache.org>