You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@sling.apache.org by "Bertrand Delacretaz (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2008/02/22 09:38:19 UTC

[jira] Created: (SLING-267) Need a better name for the jcr/base module

Need a better name for the jcr/base module
------------------------------------------

                 Key: SLING-267
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-267
             Project: Sling
          Issue Type: Improvement
          Components: Repository
            Reporter: Bertrand Delacretaz
            Priority: Minor


Currently being discussed on list, http://markmail.org/message/jln65ifegh3pi5qm

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


[jira] Closed: (SLING-267) Need a better name for the jcr/base module

Posted by "Carsten Ziegeler (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-267?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Carsten Ziegeler closed SLING-267.
----------------------------------

    Resolution: Won't Fix

I see your point, so let's leave it like it it and close this issue.

> Need a better name for the jcr/base module
> ------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SLING-267
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-267
>             Project: Sling
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Repository
>            Reporter: Bertrand Delacretaz
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 2.0.0
>
>
> Currently being discussed on list, http://markmail.org/message/jln65ifegh3pi5qm

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


[jira] Commented: (SLING-267) Need a better name for the jcr/base module

Posted by "Carsten Ziegeler (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-267?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12593745#action_12593745 ] 

Carsten Ziegeler commented on SLING-267:
----------------------------------------

With the recent discussions about renaming and reorganizing, we probably should rename this to jackrabbit-base.
Setting this to be fixed for 2.0.0 to get a final consensus.

> Need a better name for the jcr/base module
> ------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SLING-267
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-267
>             Project: Sling
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Repository
>            Reporter: Bertrand Delacretaz
>            Priority: Minor
>
> Currently being discussed on list, http://markmail.org/message/jln65ifegh3pi5qm

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


[jira] Issue Comment Edited: (SLING-267) Need a better name for the jcr/base module

Posted by "Felix Meschberger (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-267?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12594197#action_12594197 ] 

fmeschbe edited comment on SLING-267 at 5/5/08 2:39 AM:
-----------------------------------------------------------------

I still think, we should not rename the jcr/base module to include the name jackrabbit, simply because the node type loader uses the Jackrabbit API.

Rather we might want to separate node type definition out into a separate, yet very small, bundle. This bundle we might name jackrabbit-nodetype-loader (or so) to indicate the Jackrabbit dependency.

Of course, when doing this, triggering node type loading is different ....

After all, this issue is neglectable as JSR-283 will (finally) bring standardized and better node type management. So we might just as well leave what we have today and move to JSR-283 node type management as soon as the API is published and implemented by Jackrabbit.

      was (Author: fmeschbe):
    I still think, we should not rename the jcr/base module to include the name jackrabbit, simply because the node type loader uses the Jackrabbit API.

Rather we might want to separate node type definition out into a separate, yet very small, bundle. This bundle we might name jackrabbit-nodetype-loader (or so) to indicate the Jackrabbit dependency.
  
> Need a better name for the jcr/base module
> ------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SLING-267
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-267
>             Project: Sling
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Repository
>            Reporter: Bertrand Delacretaz
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 2.0.0
>
>
> Currently being discussed on list, http://markmail.org/message/jln65ifegh3pi5qm

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


[jira] Updated: (SLING-267) Need a better name for the jcr/base module

Posted by "Carsten Ziegeler (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-267?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Carsten Ziegeler updated SLING-267:
-----------------------------------

    Fix Version/s: 2.0.0

> Need a better name for the jcr/base module
> ------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SLING-267
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-267
>             Project: Sling
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Repository
>            Reporter: Bertrand Delacretaz
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 2.0.0
>
>
> Currently being discussed on list, http://markmail.org/message/jln65ifegh3pi5qm

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


[jira] Commented: (SLING-267) Need a better name for the jcr/base module

Posted by "Felix Meschberger (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-267?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12594197#action_12594197 ] 

Felix Meschberger commented on SLING-267:
-----------------------------------------

I still think, we should not rename the jcr/base module to include the name jackrabbit, simply because the node type loader uses the Jackrabbit API.

Rather we might want to separate node type definition out into a separate, yet very small, bundle. This bundle we might name jackrabbit-nodetype-loader (or so) to indicate the Jackrabbit dependency.

> Need a better name for the jcr/base module
> ------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SLING-267
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-267
>             Project: Sling
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Repository
>            Reporter: Bertrand Delacretaz
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 2.0.0
>
>
> Currently being discussed on list, http://markmail.org/message/jln65ifegh3pi5qm

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.