[admin] Important, please read

[Vincent Hardy <vi...@eng.sun.com>]

Hello,

There has been several discussions today about features that we might
add or not to Batik. Given that the release is short of two weeks away
and that many of us will be away for a week or so (traveling or Thanks
Giving for the US), I think we should stick to two things at this point:

a. Samples. This helps debug Batik.
b. Debug. Following a, my experience is that I usually uncover problems.

I think we should talk about the after-release and discuss which 
feature we will put in and how we will do it, but I feel that we should
not attempt to make any major change in Batik before the release.

Thanks.
V.

Re: [admin] Important, please read

[Vincent Hardy <vi...@eng.sun.com>]

Thomas,

Actually, I look at the linearRGB work as bug fixing so I would still
try to go for it, unless you think the risks are higher than I think.
I also agree that feConvolve is low risk, so I would also go for it.

V.

Thomas E Deweese wrote:
> 
> >>>>> "VH" == Vincent Hardy <vi...@eng.sun.com> writes:
> 
> VH> There has been several discussions today about features that we
> VH> might add or not to Batik. Given that the release is short of two
> VH> weeks away and that many of us will be away for a week or so
> VH> (traveling or Thanks Giving for the US), I think we should stick
> VH> to two things at this point:
> 
> VH> a. Samples. This helps debug Batik.
> VH> b. Debug. Following a, my experience is that I usually uncover
> VH> problems.
> 
>     Ok, based on this I will not attempt to switch over to Linear sRGB
> in the filters.  I will also avoid adding support for Convolution (the
> two TODO things with my initials next to them) although I think the
> Convolution is relatively low risk overall, since it's affects are
> well contained.
> 
>     Any opinions?
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: batik-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: batik-dev-help@xml.apache.org

[admin] Important, please read

[Thomas E Deweese <th...@kodak.com>]

>>>>> "VH" == Vincent Hardy <vi...@eng.sun.com> writes:

VH> There has been several discussions today about features that we
VH> might add or not to Batik. Given that the release is short of two
VH> weeks away and that many of us will be away for a week or so
VH> (traveling or Thanks Giving for the US), I think we should stick
VH> to two things at this point:

VH> a. Samples. This helps debug Batik.  
VH> b. Debug. Following a, my experience is that I usually uncover
VH> problems.

    Ok, based on this I will not attempt to switch over to Linear sRGB
in the filters.  I will also avoid adding support for Convolution (the
two TODO things with my initials next to them) although I think the
Convolution is relatively low risk overall, since it's affects are
well contained.

    Any opinions?