Re: [collections] svn commit: r321112 - /jakarta/commons/proper/collections/trunk/project.xml

[Stephen Colebourne <sc...@btopenworld.com>]

Brett (or others!),
Do we actually need the junit dependency to be declared in project.xml? 
Recently, I've just been deleting it as unecessary.

Stephen


brett@apache.org wrote:
> Author: brett
> Date: Fri Oct 14 06:34:14 2005
> New Revision: 321112
>    <dependencies>
>      <dependency>
> -      <id>junit</id>
> +      <groupId>junit</groupId>
> +      <artifactId>junit</artifactId>
>        <version>3.8.1</version>
> +      <properties>
> +        <scope>test</scope>
> +      </properties>
>      </dependency>
>    </dependencies>
>  
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
> 
> 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org

Re: [collections] svn commit: r321112 - /jakarta/commons/proper/collections/trunk/project.xml

[Brett Porter <br...@apache.org>]

I think that technically no, but I'd suggest keeping it. At some point,
there will be users of junit 4.0, so it's best to express which version
your test code is designed to run with.

Cheers,
Brett

Stephen Colebourne wrote:

> Brett (or others!),
> Do we actually need the junit dependency to be declared in
> project.xml? Recently, I've just been deleting it as unecessary.
>
> Stephen


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org