You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@tapestry.apache.org by "Howard M. Lewis Ship (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2014/06/03 17:07:02 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (TAP5-2331) Can't stop tapestry generating clientId for fields

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAP5-2331?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14016590#comment-14016590 ] 

Howard M. Lewis Ship commented on TAP5-2331:
--------------------------------------------

I'm working on a different approach for this that is more backwards compatible ... this particular approach caused some problems in my client's project.

> Can't stop tapestry generating clientId for fields
> --------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: TAP5-2331
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAP5-2331
>             Project: Tapestry 5
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Lance
>            Assignee: Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
>              Labels: month-of-tapestry
>             Fix For: 5.4
>
>
> I want to be able to specify a clientId so that tapestry doesn't auto-generate one for me. This works on many core tapestry components when I specify an "id" because the following code is present:
> {code}
> clientId = resources.isBound("id") ? idParameter : renderSupport.allocateClientId(resources);
> {code}
> But in AbstractField, this logic is different
> {code}
> @Parameter(value = "prop:componentResources.id", defaultPrefix = BindingConstants.LITERAL)
> private String clientId;
> final void setup() {
>    String id = clientId;
>    ...
>    assignedClientId = jsSupport.allocateClientId(id);
> }
> public final String getClientId() {
>    return assignedClientId;
> }
> {code}
> This means that tapestry will generate id's like "foo_af42a49d19a" after zone updates when I set clientId to "foo". This makes it impossible to attach clientside behaviour by field id selectors.
> As a workaround, I add "data-" attributes to my fields and select by them instead. I assume this has worse performance than id based selectors.
> Forum thread [here|http://tapestry.markmail.org/search/?q=list%3Aorg.apache.tapestry.users#query:list%3Aorg.apache.tapestry.users+page:1+mid:ccqjgtopya3xdgrd+state:results]



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)