You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@airflow.apache.org by Sung Yun <sy...@cornell.edu> on 2023/07/17 17:09:03 UTC
[VOTE] AIP-57 Refactor SLA Feature
Dear Airflow community,
I would like to start a vote for "AIP-57 Refactor SLA Feature"
You can find the AIP here:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AIRFLOW/AIP-57+Refactored+SLA+Feature
Discussion threads:
https://lists.apache.org/thread/kn1rb9l70jk16j83fycp68l2g70wnhzl
https://lists.apache.org/thread/kj33fwd9otbbm52my9j3y39rp547g0n5
https://lists.apache.org/thread/l2ho7w18d11vcnon7dxoxghzxhtjw5hf
This is my (non-binding) +1, the vote will last until 1pm PST July 24th,
and until at least 3 binding votes have been cast.
Please vote accordingly:
[ ] + 1 approve
[ ] + 0 no opinion
[ ] - 1 disapprove with the reason
Only votes from PMC members and committers are binding, but other members
of the community are encouraged to check the AIP and vote with
"(non-binding)".
Re: [VOTE] AIP-57 Refactor SLA Feature
Posted by Hussein Awala <ho...@gmail.com>.
+1 binding
On Mon 24 Jul 2023 at 20:07, rahul Vats <ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 (non binding)
>
> Looking forward to this.
>
> Regards,
> Rahul Vats
> 9953794332
>
>
> On Mon, 24 Jul 2023 at 23:27, Oliveira, Niko <on...@amazon.com.invalid>
> wrote:
>
> > Looking forward to this one! I think the new behaviours will be much
> > better than we have now.
> >
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> >
> >
> > ________________________________
> > From: Utkarsh Sharma <ut...@astronomer.io.INVALID>
> > Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2023 11:45:57 PM
> > To: dev@airflow.apache.org
> > Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL][VOTE] AIP-57 Refactor SLA Feature
> >
> > CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not
> > click links or open attachments unless you can confirm the sender and
> know
> > the content is safe.
> >
> >
> >
> > +1 (non binding)
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 11:57 PM Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > +1 (binding).
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 7:56 PM Damian Shaw <
> > dshaw@striketechnologies.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1 (Non-binding)
> > > >
> > > > Although I would like to see some version of the proposed "SlaTask"
> > > > workaround included in Airflow itself so that:
> > > > 1) Tests can be added to make sure other Airflow changes
> don't
> > > > break assumptions about how it would work, even if people mostly
> > implement
> > > > their own version, they can use this one as a base and know it works
> > > > 2) People can start migrating away from the current SLA
> > mechanism
> > > > as soon as possible
> > > >
> > > > Damian
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Sung Yun <sy...@cornell.edu>
> > > > Sent: Monday, July 17, 2023 1:09 PM
> > > > To: dev@airflow.apache.org
> > > > Subject: [VOTE] AIP-57 Refactor SLA Feature
> > > >
> > > > Dear Airflow community,
> > > >
> > > > I would like to start a vote for "AIP-57 Refactor SLA Feature"
> > > >
> > > > You can find the AIP here:
> > > >
> > > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AIRFLOW/AIP-57+Refactored+SLA+Feature
> > > >
> > > > Discussion threads:
> > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/kn1rb9l70jk16j83fycp68l2g70wnhzl
> > > >
> > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/kj33fwd9otbbm52my9j3y39rp547g0n5
> > > >
> > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/l2ho7w18d11vcnon7dxoxghzxhtjw5hf
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > This is my (non-binding) +1, the vote will last until 1pm PST July
> > 24th,
> > > > and until at least 3 binding votes have been cast.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Please vote accordingly:
> > > >
> > > > [ ] + 1 approve
> > > > [ ] + 0 no opinion
> > > > [ ] - 1 disapprove with the reason
> > > >
> > > > Only votes from PMC members and committers are binding, but other
> > members
> > > > of the community are encouraged to check the AIP and vote with
> > > > "(non-binding)".
> > > > ________________________________
> > > > Strike Technologies, LLC (“Strike”) is part of the GTS family of
> > > > companies. Strike is a technology solutions provider, and is not a
> > broker
> > > > or dealer and does not transact any securities related business
> > directly
> > > > whatsoever. This communication is the property of Strike and its
> > > > affiliates, and does not constitute an offer to sell or the
> > solicitation of
> > > > an offer to buy any security in any jurisdiction. It is intended only
> > for
> > > > the person to whom it is addressed and may contain information that
> is
> > > > privileged, confidential, or otherwise protected from disclosure.
> > > > Distribution or copying of this communication, or the information
> > contained
> > > > herein, by anyone other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If
> > you
> > > > have received this communication in error, please immediately notify
> > Strike
> > > > at info@striketechnologies.com, and delete and destroy any copies
> > hereof.
> > > > ________________________________
> > > >
> > > > CONFIDENTIALITY / PRIVILEGE NOTICE: This transmission and any
> > attachments
> > > > are intended solely for the addressee. This transmission is covered
> by
> > the
> > > > Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C ''2510-2521. The
> > > > information contained in this transmission is confidential in nature
> > and
> > > > protected from further use or disclosure under U.S. Pub. L. 106-102,
> > 113
> > > > U.S. Stat. 1338 (1999), and may be subject to attorney-client or
> other
> > > > legal privilege. Your use or disclosure of this information for any
> > purpose
> > > > other than that intended by its transmittal is strictly prohibited,
> > and may
> > > > subject you to fines and/or penalties under federal and state law. If
> > you
> > > > are not the intended recipient of this transmission, please DESTROY
> ALL
> > > > COPIES RECEIVED and confirm destruction to the sender via return
> > > > transmittal.
> > > >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@airflow.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@airflow.apache.org
> >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] AIP-57 Refactor SLA Feature
Posted by Amogh Desai <am...@gmail.com>.
+1 (non binding)
Looks like an interesting work to be done!
On Tue, Jul 25, 2023, 00:12 Collin McNulty <co...@astronomer.io.invalid>
wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> My only concern is confusion between DAG.on_sla_miss_callback and the
> deprecated DAG.sla_miss_callback due to their very similar names, but I
> don't have a better idea.
>
> On Mon, Jul 24, 2023 at 1:34 PM Hussein Awala <hu...@awala.fr> wrote:
>
> > Sorry, I voted from the wrong email
> >
> > +1 binding
> >
> > On Mon 24 Jul 2023 at 20:07, rahul Vats <ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > +1 (non binding)
> > >
> > > Looking forward to this.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Rahul Vats
> > > 9953794332
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, 24 Jul 2023 at 23:27, Oliveira, Niko
> <onikolas@amazon.com.invalid
> > >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Looking forward to this one! I think the new behaviours will be much
> > > > better than we have now.
> > > >
> > > > +1 (binding)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ________________________________
> > > > From: Utkarsh Sharma <ut...@astronomer.io.INVALID>
> > > > Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2023 11:45:57 PM
> > > > To: dev@airflow.apache.org
> > > > Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL][VOTE] AIP-57 Refactor SLA Feature
> > > >
> > > > CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do
> not
> > > > click links or open attachments unless you can confirm the sender and
> > > know
> > > > the content is safe.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > +1 (non binding)
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 11:57 PM Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com>
> > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > +1 (binding).
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 7:56 PM Damian Shaw <
> > > > dshaw@striketechnologies.com>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > +1 (Non-binding)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Although I would like to see some version of the proposed
> "SlaTask"
> > > > > > workaround included in Airflow itself so that:
> > > > > > 1) Tests can be added to make sure other Airflow changes
> > > don't
> > > > > > break assumptions about how it would work, even if people mostly
> > > > implement
> > > > > > their own version, they can use this one as a base and know it
> > works
> > > > > > 2) People can start migrating away from the current SLA
> > > > mechanism
> > > > > > as soon as possible
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Damian
> > > > > >
> > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > From: Sung Yun <sy...@cornell.edu>
> > > > > > Sent: Monday, July 17, 2023 1:09 PM
> > > > > > To: dev@airflow.apache.org
> > > > > > Subject: [VOTE] AIP-57 Refactor SLA Feature
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Dear Airflow community,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I would like to start a vote for "AIP-57 Refactor SLA Feature"
> > > > > >
> > > > > > You can find the AIP here:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AIRFLOW/AIP-57+Refactored+SLA+Feature
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Discussion threads:
> > > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/kn1rb9l70jk16j83fycp68l2g70wnhzl
> > > > > >
> > > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/kj33fwd9otbbm52my9j3y39rp547g0n5
> > > > > >
> > > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/l2ho7w18d11vcnon7dxoxghzxhtjw5hf
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > This is my (non-binding) +1, the vote will last until 1pm PST
> July
> > > > 24th,
> > > > > > and until at least 3 binding votes have been cast.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Please vote accordingly:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > [ ] + 1 approve
> > > > > > [ ] + 0 no opinion
> > > > > > [ ] - 1 disapprove with the reason
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Only votes from PMC members and committers are binding, but other
> > > > members
> > > > > > of the community are encouraged to check the AIP and vote with
> > > > > > "(non-binding)".
> > > > > > ________________________________
> > > > > > Strike Technologies, LLC (“Strike”) is part of the GTS family of
> > > > > > companies. Strike is a technology solutions provider, and is not
> a
> > > > broker
> > > > > > or dealer and does not transact any securities related business
> > > > directly
> > > > > > whatsoever. This communication is the property of Strike and its
> > > > > > affiliates, and does not constitute an offer to sell or the
> > > > solicitation of
> > > > > > an offer to buy any security in any jurisdiction. It is intended
> > only
> > > > for
> > > > > > the person to whom it is addressed and may contain information
> that
> > > is
> > > > > > privileged, confidential, or otherwise protected from disclosure.
> > > > > > Distribution or copying of this communication, or the information
> > > > contained
> > > > > > herein, by anyone other than the intended recipient is
> prohibited.
> > If
> > > > you
> > > > > > have received this communication in error, please immediately
> > notify
> > > > Strike
> > > > > > at info@striketechnologies.com, and delete and destroy any
> copies
> > > > hereof.
> > > > > > ________________________________
> > > > > >
> > > > > > CONFIDENTIALITY / PRIVILEGE NOTICE: This transmission and any
> > > > attachments
> > > > > > are intended solely for the addressee. This transmission is
> covered
> > > by
> > > > the
> > > > > > Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C ''2510-2521. The
> > > > > > information contained in this transmission is confidential in
> > nature
> > > > and
> > > > > > protected from further use or disclosure under U.S. Pub. L.
> > 106-102,
> > > > 113
> > > > > > U.S. Stat. 1338 (1999), and may be subject to attorney-client or
> > > other
> > > > > > legal privilege. Your use or disclosure of this information for
> any
> > > > purpose
> > > > > > other than that intended by its transmittal is strictly
> prohibited,
> > > > and may
> > > > > > subject you to fines and/or penalties under federal and state
> law.
> > If
> > > > you
> > > > > > are not the intended recipient of this transmission, please
> DESTROY
> > > ALL
> > > > > > COPIES RECEIVED and confirm destruction to the sender via return
> > > > > > transmittal.
> > > > > >
> > > >
> > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@airflow.apache.org
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@airflow.apache.org
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] AIP-57 Refactor SLA Feature
Posted by Collin McNulty <co...@astronomer.io.INVALID>.
+1 (non-binding)
My only concern is confusion between DAG.on_sla_miss_callback and the
deprecated DAG.sla_miss_callback due to their very similar names, but I
don't have a better idea.
On Mon, Jul 24, 2023 at 1:34 PM Hussein Awala <hu...@awala.fr> wrote:
> Sorry, I voted from the wrong email
>
> +1 binding
>
> On Mon 24 Jul 2023 at 20:07, rahul Vats <ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > +1 (non binding)
> >
> > Looking forward to this.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Rahul Vats
> > 9953794332
> >
> >
> > On Mon, 24 Jul 2023 at 23:27, Oliveira, Niko <onikolas@amazon.com.invalid
> >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Looking forward to this one! I think the new behaviours will be much
> > > better than we have now.
> > >
> > > +1 (binding)
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ________________________________
> > > From: Utkarsh Sharma <ut...@astronomer.io.INVALID>
> > > Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2023 11:45:57 PM
> > > To: dev@airflow.apache.org
> > > Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL][VOTE] AIP-57 Refactor SLA Feature
> > >
> > > CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not
> > > click links or open attachments unless you can confirm the sender and
> > know
> > > the content is safe.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > +1 (non binding)
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 11:57 PM Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com>
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > +1 (binding).
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 7:56 PM Damian Shaw <
> > > dshaw@striketechnologies.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > +1 (Non-binding)
> > > > >
> > > > > Although I would like to see some version of the proposed "SlaTask"
> > > > > workaround included in Airflow itself so that:
> > > > > 1) Tests can be added to make sure other Airflow changes
> > don't
> > > > > break assumptions about how it would work, even if people mostly
> > > implement
> > > > > their own version, they can use this one as a base and know it
> works
> > > > > 2) People can start migrating away from the current SLA
> > > mechanism
> > > > > as soon as possible
> > > > >
> > > > > Damian
> > > > >
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: Sung Yun <sy...@cornell.edu>
> > > > > Sent: Monday, July 17, 2023 1:09 PM
> > > > > To: dev@airflow.apache.org
> > > > > Subject: [VOTE] AIP-57 Refactor SLA Feature
> > > > >
> > > > > Dear Airflow community,
> > > > >
> > > > > I would like to start a vote for "AIP-57 Refactor SLA Feature"
> > > > >
> > > > > You can find the AIP here:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AIRFLOW/AIP-57+Refactored+SLA+Feature
> > > > >
> > > > > Discussion threads:
> > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/kn1rb9l70jk16j83fycp68l2g70wnhzl
> > > > >
> > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/kj33fwd9otbbm52my9j3y39rp547g0n5
> > > > >
> > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/l2ho7w18d11vcnon7dxoxghzxhtjw5hf
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > This is my (non-binding) +1, the vote will last until 1pm PST July
> > > 24th,
> > > > > and until at least 3 binding votes have been cast.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Please vote accordingly:
> > > > >
> > > > > [ ] + 1 approve
> > > > > [ ] + 0 no opinion
> > > > > [ ] - 1 disapprove with the reason
> > > > >
> > > > > Only votes from PMC members and committers are binding, but other
> > > members
> > > > > of the community are encouraged to check the AIP and vote with
> > > > > "(non-binding)".
> > > > > ________________________________
> > > > > Strike Technologies, LLC (“Strike”) is part of the GTS family of
> > > > > companies. Strike is a technology solutions provider, and is not a
> > > broker
> > > > > or dealer and does not transact any securities related business
> > > directly
> > > > > whatsoever. This communication is the property of Strike and its
> > > > > affiliates, and does not constitute an offer to sell or the
> > > solicitation of
> > > > > an offer to buy any security in any jurisdiction. It is intended
> only
> > > for
> > > > > the person to whom it is addressed and may contain information that
> > is
> > > > > privileged, confidential, or otherwise protected from disclosure.
> > > > > Distribution or copying of this communication, or the information
> > > contained
> > > > > herein, by anyone other than the intended recipient is prohibited.
> If
> > > you
> > > > > have received this communication in error, please immediately
> notify
> > > Strike
> > > > > at info@striketechnologies.com, and delete and destroy any copies
> > > hereof.
> > > > > ________________________________
> > > > >
> > > > > CONFIDENTIALITY / PRIVILEGE NOTICE: This transmission and any
> > > attachments
> > > > > are intended solely for the addressee. This transmission is covered
> > by
> > > the
> > > > > Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C ''2510-2521. The
> > > > > information contained in this transmission is confidential in
> nature
> > > and
> > > > > protected from further use or disclosure under U.S. Pub. L.
> 106-102,
> > > 113
> > > > > U.S. Stat. 1338 (1999), and may be subject to attorney-client or
> > other
> > > > > legal privilege. Your use or disclosure of this information for any
> > > purpose
> > > > > other than that intended by its transmittal is strictly prohibited,
> > > and may
> > > > > subject you to fines and/or penalties under federal and state law.
> If
> > > you
> > > > > are not the intended recipient of this transmission, please DESTROY
> > ALL
> > > > > COPIES RECEIVED and confirm destruction to the sender via return
> > > > > transmittal.
> > > > >
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@airflow.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@airflow.apache.org
> > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] AIP-57 Refactor SLA Feature
Posted by Hussein Awala <hu...@awala.fr>.
Sorry, I voted from the wrong email
+1 binding
On Mon 24 Jul 2023 at 20:07, rahul Vats <ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 (non binding)
>
> Looking forward to this.
>
> Regards,
> Rahul Vats
> 9953794332
>
>
> On Mon, 24 Jul 2023 at 23:27, Oliveira, Niko <on...@amazon.com.invalid>
> wrote:
>
> > Looking forward to this one! I think the new behaviours will be much
> > better than we have now.
> >
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> >
> >
> > ________________________________
> > From: Utkarsh Sharma <ut...@astronomer.io.INVALID>
> > Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2023 11:45:57 PM
> > To: dev@airflow.apache.org
> > Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL][VOTE] AIP-57 Refactor SLA Feature
> >
> > CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not
> > click links or open attachments unless you can confirm the sender and
> know
> > the content is safe.
> >
> >
> >
> > +1 (non binding)
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 11:57 PM Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > +1 (binding).
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 7:56 PM Damian Shaw <
> > dshaw@striketechnologies.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1 (Non-binding)
> > > >
> > > > Although I would like to see some version of the proposed "SlaTask"
> > > > workaround included in Airflow itself so that:
> > > > 1) Tests can be added to make sure other Airflow changes
> don't
> > > > break assumptions about how it would work, even if people mostly
> > implement
> > > > their own version, they can use this one as a base and know it works
> > > > 2) People can start migrating away from the current SLA
> > mechanism
> > > > as soon as possible
> > > >
> > > > Damian
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Sung Yun <sy...@cornell.edu>
> > > > Sent: Monday, July 17, 2023 1:09 PM
> > > > To: dev@airflow.apache.org
> > > > Subject: [VOTE] AIP-57 Refactor SLA Feature
> > > >
> > > > Dear Airflow community,
> > > >
> > > > I would like to start a vote for "AIP-57 Refactor SLA Feature"
> > > >
> > > > You can find the AIP here:
> > > >
> > > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AIRFLOW/AIP-57+Refactored+SLA+Feature
> > > >
> > > > Discussion threads:
> > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/kn1rb9l70jk16j83fycp68l2g70wnhzl
> > > >
> > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/kj33fwd9otbbm52my9j3y39rp547g0n5
> > > >
> > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/l2ho7w18d11vcnon7dxoxghzxhtjw5hf
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > This is my (non-binding) +1, the vote will last until 1pm PST July
> > 24th,
> > > > and until at least 3 binding votes have been cast.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Please vote accordingly:
> > > >
> > > > [ ] + 1 approve
> > > > [ ] + 0 no opinion
> > > > [ ] - 1 disapprove with the reason
> > > >
> > > > Only votes from PMC members and committers are binding, but other
> > members
> > > > of the community are encouraged to check the AIP and vote with
> > > > "(non-binding)".
> > > > ________________________________
> > > > Strike Technologies, LLC (“Strike”) is part of the GTS family of
> > > > companies. Strike is a technology solutions provider, and is not a
> > broker
> > > > or dealer and does not transact any securities related business
> > directly
> > > > whatsoever. This communication is the property of Strike and its
> > > > affiliates, and does not constitute an offer to sell or the
> > solicitation of
> > > > an offer to buy any security in any jurisdiction. It is intended only
> > for
> > > > the person to whom it is addressed and may contain information that
> is
> > > > privileged, confidential, or otherwise protected from disclosure.
> > > > Distribution or copying of this communication, or the information
> > contained
> > > > herein, by anyone other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If
> > you
> > > > have received this communication in error, please immediately notify
> > Strike
> > > > at info@striketechnologies.com, and delete and destroy any copies
> > hereof.
> > > > ________________________________
> > > >
> > > > CONFIDENTIALITY / PRIVILEGE NOTICE: This transmission and any
> > attachments
> > > > are intended solely for the addressee. This transmission is covered
> by
> > the
> > > > Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C ''2510-2521. The
> > > > information contained in this transmission is confidential in nature
> > and
> > > > protected from further use or disclosure under U.S. Pub. L. 106-102,
> > 113
> > > > U.S. Stat. 1338 (1999), and may be subject to attorney-client or
> other
> > > > legal privilege. Your use or disclosure of this information for any
> > purpose
> > > > other than that intended by its transmittal is strictly prohibited,
> > and may
> > > > subject you to fines and/or penalties under federal and state law. If
> > you
> > > > are not the intended recipient of this transmission, please DESTROY
> ALL
> > > > COPIES RECEIVED and confirm destruction to the sender via return
> > > > transmittal.
> > > >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@airflow.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@airflow.apache.org
> >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] AIP-57 Refactor SLA Feature
Posted by rahul Vats <ra...@gmail.com>.
+1 (non binding)
Looking forward to this.
Regards,
Rahul Vats
9953794332
On Mon, 24 Jul 2023 at 23:27, Oliveira, Niko <on...@amazon.com.invalid>
wrote:
> Looking forward to this one! I think the new behaviours will be much
> better than we have now.
>
> +1 (binding)
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: Utkarsh Sharma <ut...@astronomer.io.INVALID>
> Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2023 11:45:57 PM
> To: dev@airflow.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL][VOTE] AIP-57 Refactor SLA Feature
>
> CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not
> click links or open attachments unless you can confirm the sender and know
> the content is safe.
>
>
>
> +1 (non binding)
>
> On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 11:57 PM Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com> wrote:
> >
> > +1 (binding).
> >
> > On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 7:56 PM Damian Shaw <
> dshaw@striketechnologies.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > +1 (Non-binding)
> > >
> > > Although I would like to see some version of the proposed "SlaTask"
> > > workaround included in Airflow itself so that:
> > > 1) Tests can be added to make sure other Airflow changes don't
> > > break assumptions about how it would work, even if people mostly
> implement
> > > their own version, they can use this one as a base and know it works
> > > 2) People can start migrating away from the current SLA
> mechanism
> > > as soon as possible
> > >
> > > Damian
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Sung Yun <sy...@cornell.edu>
> > > Sent: Monday, July 17, 2023 1:09 PM
> > > To: dev@airflow.apache.org
> > > Subject: [VOTE] AIP-57 Refactor SLA Feature
> > >
> > > Dear Airflow community,
> > >
> > > I would like to start a vote for "AIP-57 Refactor SLA Feature"
> > >
> > > You can find the AIP here:
> > >
> > >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AIRFLOW/AIP-57+Refactored+SLA+Feature
> > >
> > > Discussion threads:
> > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/kn1rb9l70jk16j83fycp68l2g70wnhzl
> > >
> > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/kj33fwd9otbbm52my9j3y39rp547g0n5
> > >
> > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/l2ho7w18d11vcnon7dxoxghzxhtjw5hf
> > >
> > >
> > > This is my (non-binding) +1, the vote will last until 1pm PST July
> 24th,
> > > and until at least 3 binding votes have been cast.
> > >
> > >
> > > Please vote accordingly:
> > >
> > > [ ] + 1 approve
> > > [ ] + 0 no opinion
> > > [ ] - 1 disapprove with the reason
> > >
> > > Only votes from PMC members and committers are binding, but other
> members
> > > of the community are encouraged to check the AIP and vote with
> > > "(non-binding)".
> > > ________________________________
> > > Strike Technologies, LLC (“Strike”) is part of the GTS family of
> > > companies. Strike is a technology solutions provider, and is not a
> broker
> > > or dealer and does not transact any securities related business
> directly
> > > whatsoever. This communication is the property of Strike and its
> > > affiliates, and does not constitute an offer to sell or the
> solicitation of
> > > an offer to buy any security in any jurisdiction. It is intended only
> for
> > > the person to whom it is addressed and may contain information that is
> > > privileged, confidential, or otherwise protected from disclosure.
> > > Distribution or copying of this communication, or the information
> contained
> > > herein, by anyone other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If
> you
> > > have received this communication in error, please immediately notify
> Strike
> > > at info@striketechnologies.com, and delete and destroy any copies
> hereof.
> > > ________________________________
> > >
> > > CONFIDENTIALITY / PRIVILEGE NOTICE: This transmission and any
> attachments
> > > are intended solely for the addressee. This transmission is covered by
> the
> > > Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C ''2510-2521. The
> > > information contained in this transmission is confidential in nature
> and
> > > protected from further use or disclosure under U.S. Pub. L. 106-102,
> 113
> > > U.S. Stat. 1338 (1999), and may be subject to attorney-client or other
> > > legal privilege. Your use or disclosure of this information for any
> purpose
> > > other than that intended by its transmittal is strictly prohibited,
> and may
> > > subject you to fines and/or penalties under federal and state law. If
> you
> > > are not the intended recipient of this transmission, please DESTROY ALL
> > > COPIES RECEIVED and confirm destruction to the sender via return
> > > transmittal.
> > >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@airflow.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@airflow.apache.org
>
>
Re: [VOTE] AIP-57 Refactor SLA Feature
Posted by "Oliveira, Niko" <on...@amazon.com.INVALID>.
Looking forward to this one! I think the new behaviours will be much better than we have now.
+1 (binding)
________________________________
From: Utkarsh Sharma <ut...@astronomer.io.INVALID>
Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2023 11:45:57 PM
To: dev@airflow.apache.org
Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL][VOTE] AIP-57 Refactor SLA Feature
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you can confirm the sender and know the content is safe.
+1 (non binding)
On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 11:57 PM Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com> wrote:
>
> +1 (binding).
>
> On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 7:56 PM Damian Shaw <ds...@striketechnologies.com>
> wrote:
>
> > +1 (Non-binding)
> >
> > Although I would like to see some version of the proposed "SlaTask"
> > workaround included in Airflow itself so that:
> > 1) Tests can be added to make sure other Airflow changes don't
> > break assumptions about how it would work, even if people mostly implement
> > their own version, they can use this one as a base and know it works
> > 2) People can start migrating away from the current SLA mechanism
> > as soon as possible
> >
> > Damian
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Sung Yun <sy...@cornell.edu>
> > Sent: Monday, July 17, 2023 1:09 PM
> > To: dev@airflow.apache.org
> > Subject: [VOTE] AIP-57 Refactor SLA Feature
> >
> > Dear Airflow community,
> >
> > I would like to start a vote for "AIP-57 Refactor SLA Feature"
> >
> > You can find the AIP here:
> >
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AIRFLOW/AIP-57+Refactored+SLA+Feature
> >
> > Discussion threads:
> > https://lists.apache.org/thread/kn1rb9l70jk16j83fycp68l2g70wnhzl
> >
> > https://lists.apache.org/thread/kj33fwd9otbbm52my9j3y39rp547g0n5
> >
> > https://lists.apache.org/thread/l2ho7w18d11vcnon7dxoxghzxhtjw5hf
> >
> >
> > This is my (non-binding) +1, the vote will last until 1pm PST July 24th,
> > and until at least 3 binding votes have been cast.
> >
> >
> > Please vote accordingly:
> >
> > [ ] + 1 approve
> > [ ] + 0 no opinion
> > [ ] - 1 disapprove with the reason
> >
> > Only votes from PMC members and committers are binding, but other members
> > of the community are encouraged to check the AIP and vote with
> > "(non-binding)".
> > ________________________________
> > Strike Technologies, LLC (“Strike”) is part of the GTS family of
> > companies. Strike is a technology solutions provider, and is not a broker
> > or dealer and does not transact any securities related business directly
> > whatsoever. This communication is the property of Strike and its
> > affiliates, and does not constitute an offer to sell or the solicitation of
> > an offer to buy any security in any jurisdiction. It is intended only for
> > the person to whom it is addressed and may contain information that is
> > privileged, confidential, or otherwise protected from disclosure.
> > Distribution or copying of this communication, or the information contained
> > herein, by anyone other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you
> > have received this communication in error, please immediately notify Strike
> > at info@striketechnologies.com, and delete and destroy any copies hereof.
> > ________________________________
> >
> > CONFIDENTIALITY / PRIVILEGE NOTICE: This transmission and any attachments
> > are intended solely for the addressee. This transmission is covered by the
> > Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C ''2510-2521. The
> > information contained in this transmission is confidential in nature and
> > protected from further use or disclosure under U.S. Pub. L. 106-102, 113
> > U.S. Stat. 1338 (1999), and may be subject to attorney-client or other
> > legal privilege. Your use or disclosure of this information for any purpose
> > other than that intended by its transmittal is strictly prohibited, and may
> > subject you to fines and/or penalties under federal and state law. If you
> > are not the intended recipient of this transmission, please DESTROY ALL
> > COPIES RECEIVED and confirm destruction to the sender via return
> > transmittal.
> >
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@airflow.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@airflow.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] AIP-57 Refactor SLA Feature
Posted by Utkarsh Sharma <ut...@astronomer.io.INVALID>.
+1 (non binding)
On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 11:57 PM Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com> wrote:
>
> +1 (binding).
>
> On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 7:56 PM Damian Shaw <ds...@striketechnologies.com>
> wrote:
>
> > +1 (Non-binding)
> >
> > Although I would like to see some version of the proposed "SlaTask"
> > workaround included in Airflow itself so that:
> > 1) Tests can be added to make sure other Airflow changes don't
> > break assumptions about how it would work, even if people mostly implement
> > their own version, they can use this one as a base and know it works
> > 2) People can start migrating away from the current SLA mechanism
> > as soon as possible
> >
> > Damian
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Sung Yun <sy...@cornell.edu>
> > Sent: Monday, July 17, 2023 1:09 PM
> > To: dev@airflow.apache.org
> > Subject: [VOTE] AIP-57 Refactor SLA Feature
> >
> > Dear Airflow community,
> >
> > I would like to start a vote for "AIP-57 Refactor SLA Feature"
> >
> > You can find the AIP here:
> >
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AIRFLOW/AIP-57+Refactored+SLA+Feature
> >
> > Discussion threads:
> > https://lists.apache.org/thread/kn1rb9l70jk16j83fycp68l2g70wnhzl
> >
> > https://lists.apache.org/thread/kj33fwd9otbbm52my9j3y39rp547g0n5
> >
> > https://lists.apache.org/thread/l2ho7w18d11vcnon7dxoxghzxhtjw5hf
> >
> >
> > This is my (non-binding) +1, the vote will last until 1pm PST July 24th,
> > and until at least 3 binding votes have been cast.
> >
> >
> > Please vote accordingly:
> >
> > [ ] + 1 approve
> > [ ] + 0 no opinion
> > [ ] - 1 disapprove with the reason
> >
> > Only votes from PMC members and committers are binding, but other members
> > of the community are encouraged to check the AIP and vote with
> > "(non-binding)".
> > ________________________________
> > Strike Technologies, LLC (“Strike”) is part of the GTS family of
> > companies. Strike is a technology solutions provider, and is not a broker
> > or dealer and does not transact any securities related business directly
> > whatsoever. This communication is the property of Strike and its
> > affiliates, and does not constitute an offer to sell or the solicitation of
> > an offer to buy any security in any jurisdiction. It is intended only for
> > the person to whom it is addressed and may contain information that is
> > privileged, confidential, or otherwise protected from disclosure.
> > Distribution or copying of this communication, or the information contained
> > herein, by anyone other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you
> > have received this communication in error, please immediately notify Strike
> > at info@striketechnologies.com, and delete and destroy any copies hereof.
> > ________________________________
> >
> > CONFIDENTIALITY / PRIVILEGE NOTICE: This transmission and any attachments
> > are intended solely for the addressee. This transmission is covered by the
> > Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C ''2510-2521. The
> > information contained in this transmission is confidential in nature and
> > protected from further use or disclosure under U.S. Pub. L. 106-102, 113
> > U.S. Stat. 1338 (1999), and may be subject to attorney-client or other
> > legal privilege. Your use or disclosure of this information for any purpose
> > other than that intended by its transmittal is strictly prohibited, and may
> > subject you to fines and/or penalties under federal and state law. If you
> > are not the intended recipient of this transmission, please DESTROY ALL
> > COPIES RECEIVED and confirm destruction to the sender via return
> > transmittal.
> >
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@airflow.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@airflow.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] AIP-57 Refactor SLA Feature
Posted by Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com>.
+1 (binding).
On Mon, Jul 17, 2023 at 7:56 PM Damian Shaw <ds...@striketechnologies.com>
wrote:
> +1 (Non-binding)
>
> Although I would like to see some version of the proposed "SlaTask"
> workaround included in Airflow itself so that:
> 1) Tests can be added to make sure other Airflow changes don't
> break assumptions about how it would work, even if people mostly implement
> their own version, they can use this one as a base and know it works
> 2) People can start migrating away from the current SLA mechanism
> as soon as possible
>
> Damian
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sung Yun <sy...@cornell.edu>
> Sent: Monday, July 17, 2023 1:09 PM
> To: dev@airflow.apache.org
> Subject: [VOTE] AIP-57 Refactor SLA Feature
>
> Dear Airflow community,
>
> I would like to start a vote for "AIP-57 Refactor SLA Feature"
>
> You can find the AIP here:
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AIRFLOW/AIP-57+Refactored+SLA+Feature
>
> Discussion threads:
> https://lists.apache.org/thread/kn1rb9l70jk16j83fycp68l2g70wnhzl
>
> https://lists.apache.org/thread/kj33fwd9otbbm52my9j3y39rp547g0n5
>
> https://lists.apache.org/thread/l2ho7w18d11vcnon7dxoxghzxhtjw5hf
>
>
> This is my (non-binding) +1, the vote will last until 1pm PST July 24th,
> and until at least 3 binding votes have been cast.
>
>
> Please vote accordingly:
>
> [ ] + 1 approve
> [ ] + 0 no opinion
> [ ] - 1 disapprove with the reason
>
> Only votes from PMC members and committers are binding, but other members
> of the community are encouraged to check the AIP and vote with
> "(non-binding)".
> ________________________________
> Strike Technologies, LLC (“Strike”) is part of the GTS family of
> companies. Strike is a technology solutions provider, and is not a broker
> or dealer and does not transact any securities related business directly
> whatsoever. This communication is the property of Strike and its
> affiliates, and does not constitute an offer to sell or the solicitation of
> an offer to buy any security in any jurisdiction. It is intended only for
> the person to whom it is addressed and may contain information that is
> privileged, confidential, or otherwise protected from disclosure.
> Distribution or copying of this communication, or the information contained
> herein, by anyone other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you
> have received this communication in error, please immediately notify Strike
> at info@striketechnologies.com, and delete and destroy any copies hereof.
> ________________________________
>
> CONFIDENTIALITY / PRIVILEGE NOTICE: This transmission and any attachments
> are intended solely for the addressee. This transmission is covered by the
> Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C ''2510-2521. The
> information contained in this transmission is confidential in nature and
> protected from further use or disclosure under U.S. Pub. L. 106-102, 113
> U.S. Stat. 1338 (1999), and may be subject to attorney-client or other
> legal privilege. Your use or disclosure of this information for any purpose
> other than that intended by its transmittal is strictly prohibited, and may
> subject you to fines and/or penalties under federal and state law. If you
> are not the intended recipient of this transmission, please DESTROY ALL
> COPIES RECEIVED and confirm destruction to the sender via return
> transmittal.
>
RE: [VOTE] AIP-57 Refactor SLA Feature
Posted by Damian Shaw <ds...@striketechnologies.com>.
+1 (Non-binding)
Although I would like to see some version of the proposed "SlaTask" workaround included in Airflow itself so that:
1) Tests can be added to make sure other Airflow changes don't break assumptions about how it would work, even if people mostly implement their own version, they can use this one as a base and know it works
2) People can start migrating away from the current SLA mechanism as soon as possible
Damian
-----Original Message-----
From: Sung Yun <sy...@cornell.edu>
Sent: Monday, July 17, 2023 1:09 PM
To: dev@airflow.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] AIP-57 Refactor SLA Feature
Dear Airflow community,
I would like to start a vote for "AIP-57 Refactor SLA Feature"
You can find the AIP here:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AIRFLOW/AIP-57+Refactored+SLA+Feature
Discussion threads:
https://lists.apache.org/thread/kn1rb9l70jk16j83fycp68l2g70wnhzl
https://lists.apache.org/thread/kj33fwd9otbbm52my9j3y39rp547g0n5
https://lists.apache.org/thread/l2ho7w18d11vcnon7dxoxghzxhtjw5hf
This is my (non-binding) +1, the vote will last until 1pm PST July 24th, and until at least 3 binding votes have been cast.
Please vote accordingly:
[ ] + 1 approve
[ ] + 0 no opinion
[ ] - 1 disapprove with the reason
Only votes from PMC members and committers are binding, but other members of the community are encouraged to check the AIP and vote with "(non-binding)".
________________________________
Strike Technologies, LLC (“Strike”) is part of the GTS family of companies. Strike is a technology solutions provider, and is not a broker or dealer and does not transact any securities related business directly whatsoever. This communication is the property of Strike and its affiliates, and does not constitute an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy any security in any jurisdiction. It is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential, or otherwise protected from disclosure. Distribution or copying of this communication, or the information contained herein, by anyone other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify Strike at info@striketechnologies.com, and delete and destroy any copies hereof.
________________________________
CONFIDENTIALITY / PRIVILEGE NOTICE: This transmission and any attachments are intended solely for the addressee. This transmission is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C ''2510-2521. The information contained in this transmission is confidential in nature and protected from further use or disclosure under U.S. Pub. L. 106-102, 113 U.S. Stat. 1338 (1999), and may be subject to attorney-client or other legal privilege. Your use or disclosure of this information for any purpose other than that intended by its transmittal is strictly prohibited, and may subject you to fines and/or penalties under federal and state law. If you are not the intended recipient of this transmission, please DESTROY ALL COPIES RECEIVED and confirm destruction to the sender via return transmittal.