You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tomcat.apache.org by Konstantin Kolinko <kn...@gmail.com> on 2010/01/19 01:59:50 UTC

native-doc part of Tomcat site: outdated?

Is http://tomcat.apache.org/native-doc/  generated from /native/trunk,
or from /native/branches/1.1.x/  ?

Apparently the site for 1.1.18 was generated from trunk, but the one
for 1.1.19 from the 1.1.x branch.

There are two errors:
1. The "ChangeLog for 1.1.19" link at http://tomcat.apache.org/ should
point to [1] As of now, the link points to [2], which is a stale page
from 1.1.18 site, not mentioning 1.1.19.

[1] http://tomcat.apache.org/native-doc/miscellaneous/changelog.html
[2] http://tomcat.apache.org/native-doc/miscellaneous/changelog-1.1.x.html


2. The main page of native-doc [3] lists "10 September 2008 -
TC-Native-1.1.15 released" as the most recent news item. Subsequent
releases are not mentioned.

[3] http://tomcat.apache.org/native-doc/index.html


A bit of a mess, but I think that the site from the branch is the right one.

Probably we shouldn't maintain changelog-1.1.x.html [2] in the trunk,
because it duplicates effort.

I'll update the link on the main site. Be sure to use the right link
in the announcement.


Best regards,
Konstantin Kolinko

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org


Re: native-doc part of Tomcat site: outdated?

Posted by Konstantin Kolinko <kn...@gmail.com>.
2010/1/19 Rainer Jung <ra...@kippdata.de>:
> On 19.01.2010 01:59, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
>>
>> Is http://tomcat.apache.org/native-doc/  generated from /native/trunk,
>> or from /native/branches/1.1.x/  ?
>>
>> Apparently the site for 1.1.18 was generated from trunk, but the one
>> for 1.1.19 from the 1.1.x branch.
>
> I'd say should be generated from branches/1.1.x, because trunk is not ready.
> for docs.
>
>> 2. The main page of native-doc [3] lists "10 September 2008 -
>> TC-Native-1.1.15 released" as the most recent news item. Subsequent
>> releases are not mentioned.
>>
>> [3] http://tomcat.apache.org/native-doc/index.html
>>
>>
>> A bit of a mess, but I think that the site from the branch is the right
>> one.
>
> I updated the docs with the other release notes etc. The docs from 1.1.x
> head are now pushed to people.a.o and wait for sync to tomcat.a.o.

Thank you!

I think the download link should point to
http://tomcat.apache.org/download-native.cgi

(and not to www.apache.org/dist/ directly)

>> Probably we shouldn't maintain changelog-1.1.x.html [2] in the trunk,
>> because it duplicates effort.
>
> Probably. There's no need for maintaining before a first release of trunk is
> done, but I'd say its OK to drop it.
>
>> I'll update the link on the main site. Be sure to use the right link
>> in the announcement.
>
> Mladen: I think there was no official announcement about 1.1.19 until now,
> only a vote result and the site updates?

Also, the 1.1.18 announcement missed the new
	announce@tomcat.apache.org mail list,
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/tomcat-announce/


Best regards,
Konstantin Kolinko

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org


Re: native-doc part of Tomcat site: outdated?

Posted by Rainer Jung <ra...@kippdata.de>.
On 19.01.2010 01:59, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
> Is http://tomcat.apache.org/native-doc/  generated from /native/trunk,
> or from /native/branches/1.1.x/  ?
>
> Apparently the site for 1.1.18 was generated from trunk, but the one
> for 1.1.19 from the 1.1.x branch.

I'd say should be generated from branches/1.1.x, because trunk is not 
ready. for docs.

> 2. The main page of native-doc [3] lists "10 September 2008 -
> TC-Native-1.1.15 released" as the most recent news item. Subsequent
> releases are not mentioned.
>
> [3] http://tomcat.apache.org/native-doc/index.html
>
>
> A bit of a mess, but I think that the site from the branch is the right one.

I updated the docs with the other release notes etc. The docs from 1.1.x 
head are now pushed to people.a.o and wait for sync to tomcat.a.o.

> Probably we shouldn't maintain changelog-1.1.x.html [2] in the trunk,
> because it duplicates effort.

Probably. There's no need for maintaining before a first release of 
trunk is done, but I'd say its OK to drop it.

> I'll update the link on the main site. Be sure to use the right link
> in the announcement.

Thanks.

Mladen: I think there was no official announcement about 1.1.19 until 
now, only a vote result and the site updates?

Regards,

Rainer

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org


Re: native-doc part of Tomcat site: outdated?

Posted by jean-frederic clere <jf...@gmail.com>.
On 01/19/2010 01:59 AM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
> Is http://tomcat.apache.org/native-doc/  generated from /native/trunk,
> or from /native/branches/1.1.x/  ?
> 
> Apparently the site for 1.1.18 was generated from trunk, but the one
> for 1.1.19 from the 1.1.x branch.
> 
> There are two errors:
> 1. The "ChangeLog for 1.1.19" link at http://tomcat.apache.org/ should
> point to [1] As of now, the link points to [2], which is a stale page
> from 1.1.18 site, not mentioning 1.1.19.
> 
> [1] http://tomcat.apache.org/native-doc/miscellaneous/changelog.html
> [2] http://tomcat.apache.org/native-doc/miscellaneous/changelog-1.1.x.html
> 
> 
> 2. The main page of native-doc [3] lists "10 September 2008 -
> TC-Native-1.1.15 released" as the most recent news item. Subsequent
> releases are not mentioned.
> 
> [3] http://tomcat.apache.org/native-doc/index.html
> 
> 
> A bit of a mess, but I think that the site from the branch is the right one.
> 
> Probably we shouldn't maintain changelog-1.1.x.html [2] in the trunk,
> because it duplicates effort.
> 
> I'll update the link on the main site. Be sure to use the right link
> in the announcement.

I will look to that now.

Cheers

Jean-Frederic

> 
> 
> Best regards,
> Konstantin Kolinko
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org
> 
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org


Re: native-doc part of Tomcat site: outdated?

Posted by Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org>.
On 19/01/2010 20:11, denny joseph wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Could someone suggest me a bug on tomcat 7.0/tomcat 6.0 which i can start
> working on? I have set up the build env for Tomcat 7 and would like to start
> contributing something.
> 
> I have about 8 years exp in java...

Great - welcome, but please don't hi-jack threads. If you want to start
a discussion on a new subject, create a new message. Don't reply to an
unrelated message on the list.

Take a look at the JspC bug
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48371

On the face of it, it looks like JspC just needs to respect comments but
that might just be symptomatic of a wider parsing issue when determining
the insertion point.

If you have any questions, just ask them on the list. I wouldn't add
anything to the bugzilla entry unless it contributes to move the bug
towards a solution (ie a patch, a question for the OP etc).

Mark

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org


Re: native-doc part of Tomcat site: outdated?

Posted by denny joseph <de...@gmail.com>.
Hi,

Could someone suggest me a bug on tomcat 7.0/tomcat 6.0 which i can start
working on? I have set up the build env for Tomcat 7 and would like to start
contributing something.

I have about 8 years exp in java...

Thanks
Denny