You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@commons.apache.org by an...@penumbra.com.np on 2005/01/29 16:44:04 UTC

memory FS

Hello,
Memory FS,
When it comes to speciality like performance and low footprint java always
comes at last. Instead what we can do is implement Memory FS in c or other
native language extremely coupled with OS and machine and build one common
wrapper in java.
For application who use it are always in low coupling with the complexity
through the common interface and the efficient code can be given throught
Architecture dependent technologies such as multi paging memory handling etc.

Anil Pathak.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org


Re: [vfs] Re: memory FS

Posted by "B. K. Oxley (binkley)" <bi...@alumni.rice.edu>.
Mario Ivankovits wrote:
> If there is a user who uses JAVA, VFS and its RamFS and states the RamFS 
> is too slow for its usage, we could talk about it.
> Until this appens, I dont want to see native code within VFS.
> 
> Provide native code for all possible architectures is way too much work 
> - at least this isnt work I would like to do and spend time for it.

Actually... JDK 5 has a solution.  Look at ByteBuffer.  :-)  If you're 
desperate for native memory, allocate buffers natively.  It's not my cup 
of tea, but maybe it floats your boat.


Cheers,
--binkley

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org


[vfs] Re: memory FS

Posted by Mario Ivankovits <ma...@ops.co.at>.
Hello!
>Instead what we can do is implement Memory FS in c or other
>native language extremely coupled with OS and machine and build one common
>wrapper in java.
>  
If there is a user who uses JAVA, VFS and its RamFS and states the RamFS 
is too slow for its usage, we could talk about it.
Until this appens, I dont want to see native code within VFS.

Provide native code for all possible architectures is way too much work 
- at least this isnt work I would like to do and spend time for it.

­---
Mario