RE: Include indexstore in release (Re: cvs commit: jakarta-slid e/src/webdav/client/src/org/apache/commons/httpclient/methods PutMetho d .java)

[di...@the-ecorp.com]

I only use slide in combination with webdav and I don't think the web part
is ready.
That's why I asked for an implementation status.

I would not include the search interface in this release, there is not yet
an implementation committed/integrated and I don't see any advantages in
having an interface released before the first implementation is complete.

Of couse if it's almost completely implemented then we should integrate it.
Integrating is not only adding a store but also calling the SearchImpl from
the different locations and testing it with a default store
implementation...


Raj implementation status ?


Regards,
Dirk



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Pill, Juergen [mailto:Juergen.Pill@softwareag.com]
> Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 12:51 PM
> To: 'slide-dev@jakarta.apache.org'
> Subject: RE: Include indexstore in release (Re: cvs commit: 
> jakarta-slid
> e/src/webdav/client/src/org/apache/commons/httpclient/methods 
> PutMethod
> .java)
> 
> 
> Hello Dirk,
> 
> Do you want the Search interfaces to be released too?
> 
> We could release WebDAV class1/2 and security only, if you 
> want to play
> around with the search interfaces/implementations.
> 
> Best regards
> 
> juergen
> 
> 
> 
>  -----Original Message-----
> From: 	Dirk Verbeeck [mailto:dirk.verbeeck@pandora.be] 
> Sent:	Saturday, August 18, 2001 13.38 PM
> To:	slide-dev@jakarta.apache.org
> Subject:	Include indexstore in release (Re: cvs commit:
> jakarta-slide/src/webdav/client/src/org/apache/commons/httpcli
> ent/methods
> PutMethod.java)
> 
> Raj Kumar wrote:
> 
> > hi dirk,
> >   Have the Domain.xml file and Configuration.java and all 
> the related
> > classes being changed to add an indexstore
> >   in addition to the other stores.
> >        thanks
> >        rajkumar
> 
> Hi Raj
> 
> Are the interfaces good for you ?
> Because when we add the IndexStore to slide in the release 
> that Pill asked,
> we
> cannot change those interfaces that easely anymore.
> 
> What is the status of your implementation ?
> 
> I can help you merge your code with the main distribution but 
> doing that
> with
> code that is more or less complete is nicer. Otherwise we can 
> just use dummy
> classes, then I need at least the class names that you are 
> going to use for
> the
> implementation of the abstract classes and interfaces.
> 
> Something like:
> BasicSearchQuery
> BasicSearchQueryResult
> BasicSearchLanguage
> LucineIndexStore
> ...
> 
> Dirk
>