[jira] [Commented] (CAMEL-16825) can not use endChoice() in nest choice DSL

["tang honggang (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org>]

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-16825?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17391319#comment-17391319 ] 

tang honggang commented on CAMEL-16825:
---------------------------------------

[~d.vanhaute]  The code will run like this, 

ProcessorDefinition<?> end = from("timer:foo?period=1000&synchronous=true")
 .transform(simple("${random(1000)}"))
 .choice()
 .when(simple("${body} > 500")).log("High number ${body}")
 .choice()
 .when(simple("${body} > 750")).log("High number >750 ${body}")
 .otherwise().log("High number <750 ${body}")
 .end().log("extra log")
 .endChoice()
 .end();

> can not use endChoice() in nest choice DSL
> ------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CAMEL-16825
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-16825
>             Project: Camel
>          Issue Type: Wish
>          Components: camel-core, eip
>    Affects Versions: 3.6.0, 3.11.0
>            Reporter: tang honggang
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 3.x
>
>
> I want to use nest choice DSL to finish some job, but it doesn't work well in my test case.  When I use endChoice() in the inner choice clause, it return back to the outer choice definition actually. 
> And this is the test case:
> ProcessorDefinition<?> end = from("timer:foo?period=5000&synchronous=true")
>  .transform(simple("${random(1000)}"))
>  .choice()
>  .when(simple("${body} > 500"))
>  .log("High number ${body}")
>  .choice()
>  .when(simple("${body} > 750"))
>  .log("High number >750 ${body}")
>  .endChoice()
>  .otherwise()
>  .log("High number <750 ${body}")
>  .endChoice()
>  .endChoice()
>  .otherwise()
>  .log("Low number ${body}")
>  .endChoice();
>  
> Though in this case, I can fix the problem by not use endChoice(), I see the code of endChoice(). I found that change the sequence of the two judgement below can fix my problem, but I am not sure the influence. So I hope you can give me an answer, thx!
> // are we nested choice?
> ProcessorDefinition<?> def = this;
> if (def.getParent() instanceof WhenDefinition) {
>  return (ChoiceDefinition) def.getParent().getParent();
> }
> // are we already a choice?
> if (def instanceof ChoiceDefinition) {
>  return (ChoiceDefinition) def;
> }
>  



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)