You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@esme.apache.org by David Pollak <fe...@gmail.com> on 2009/06/13 02:24:31 UTC

User no longer contains view code

Folks,

User no longer contains view code.

Next step is to make user work with plugable authentication mechanisms.

Thanks,

David

-- 
Lift, the simply functional web framework http://liftweb.net
Beginning Scala http://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890
Follow me: http://twitter.com/dpp
Git some: http://github.com/dpp

Re: User no longer contains view code

Posted by Anne Kathrine Petterøe <yo...@gmail.com>.
A question that came up for me yesterday when reading these emails,  
was the token.
What did we decide on here?
Do we keep the token?

/Anne


On 14. juni. 2009, at 19.56, David Pollak wrote:

> On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 10:50 AM, Vassil Dichev <vd...@gmail.com>  
> wrote:
>
>>> User no longer contains view code.
>>
>> Thanks, that was a much needed change!
>>
>>> Next step is to make user work with plugable authentication  
>>> mechanisms.
>>
>> I noticed that by moving the code from MetaMegaSuperDuperUser you've
>> also copied some of the methods which are responsible for password
>> authentication- but commented. Can we reuse these or is it better not
>> to?
>>
>
> This stuff was from MegaProtoUser... but don't use it.
>
> I'm going to split out the authentication piece... hopefully on  
> Tuesday.
> This will allow plugable authentication with multiple mechanisms per  
> user
> (OpenId and username/pwd will ship by default).  There'll be a  
> separate
> table for this stuff... and hopefully I can make it backward  
> compatible.
>
> Thanks,
>
> David
>
>
>>
>> Vassil
>>
>
>
>
> -- 
> Lift, the simply functional web framework http://liftweb.net
> Beginning Scala http://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890
> Follow me: http://twitter.com/dpp
> Git some: http://github.com/dpp

Re: User no longer contains view code

Posted by David Pollak <fe...@gmail.com>.
On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 10:50 AM, Vassil Dichev <vd...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > User no longer contains view code.
>
> Thanks, that was a much needed change!
>
> > Next step is to make user work with plugable authentication mechanisms.
>
> I noticed that by moving the code from MetaMegaSuperDuperUser you've
> also copied some of the methods which are responsible for password
> authentication- but commented. Can we reuse these or is it better not
> to?
>

This stuff was from MegaProtoUser... but don't use it.

I'm going to split out the authentication piece... hopefully on Tuesday.
 This will allow plugable authentication with multiple mechanisms per user
(OpenId and username/pwd will ship by default).  There'll be a separate
table for this stuff... and hopefully I can make it backward compatible.

Thanks,

David


>
> Vassil
>



-- 
Lift, the simply functional web framework http://liftweb.net
Beginning Scala http://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890
Follow me: http://twitter.com/dpp
Git some: http://github.com/dpp

Re: User no longer contains view code

Posted by Vassil Dichev <vd...@gmail.com>.
> User no longer contains view code.

Thanks, that was a much needed change!

> Next step is to make user work with plugable authentication mechanisms.

I noticed that by moving the code from MetaMegaSuperDuperUser you've
also copied some of the methods which are responsible for password
authentication- but commented. Can we reuse these or is it better not
to?

Vassil

Re: User no longer contains view code

Posted by Anne Kathrine Petterøe <yo...@gmail.com>.
Thank you David!

On 13. juni. 2009, at 02.24, David Pollak wrote:

> Folks,
>
> User no longer contains view code.
>
> Next step is to make user work with plugable authentication  
> mechanisms.
>
> Thanks,
>
> David
>
> -- 
> Lift, the simply functional web framework http://liftweb.net
> Beginning Scala http://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890
> Follow me: http://twitter.com/dpp
> Git some: http://github.com/dpp