You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to user@spot.apache.org by Christos Mathas <ma...@gmail.com> on 2018/01/20 16:27:21 UTC
Re: Re: Evaluating the ML for netflow, proxy, dns
Hi,
I'm currently evaluating spot and I'm also using ROC-AUC, but I'm not
experienced in these evaluation methods. If you could share some of the
data you mention or set up a meeting as you say to explain how you're
conducting the evaluation process it would be really useful.
Also, I would like to ask about the topics parameter:
How can I calculate an approximation of the number of topics based on
the setup/traffic of my network?
Thanks in advance
On 06/05/2017 05:40 PM, Lujan Moreno, Gustavo wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have plenty of information about how to compute spot-ml performance
> in terms of ROC-AUC and we are getting good results with internal
> data. In order to compute the AUC we are injecting artificial attacks
> and track their rank on the final score. Once we know the ranks of the
> attacks we can compute the AUC. On proxy we are getting > 0.90 on AUC
> and on net flow >0.99. I understand improvements on DNS are being done
> and results of AUC should be computed soon.
>
> The data is internal and I don’t think I can share it. The attacks are
> being generated using breaking point. I will ask if I can share this.
>
> We can also set up a meeting to explain how I’m conducting the
> evaluation process.
>
> Best,
>
> Gustavo
>
>
>
> From: Giacomo Bernardi <mino@minux.it <ma...@minux.it>>
> Reply-To: "user@spot.incubator.apache.org
> <ma...@spot.incubator.apache.org>"
> <user@spot.incubator.apache.org <ma...@spot.incubator.apache.org>>
> Date: Saturday, June 3, 2017 at 1:28 PM
> To: "user@spot.incubator.apache.org
> <ma...@spot.incubator.apache.org>"
> <user@spot.incubator.apache.org <ma...@spot.incubator.apache.org>>
> Subject: Re: Evaluating the ML for netflow, proxy, dns
>
> +1
> On the same boat.
>
> I've been trying Spot on two different networks (a large office, and a
> large event venue) but I haven't been able to extract useful anomalies
> so far. I understand the algorithm, but to be honest all the results I
> get from spot-ml->spot-oa seem a bit random and not "anomalous" at all.
>
> I played a bit with the LDA parameters but that hasn't helped.
>
> Thanks.
> ps: i'm only looking at the netflow feed, no dns/proxy.
>
>
> On 3 June 2017 at 17:48, D.Anil <anilcseiitm2006@gmail.com
> <ma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I would like to know if any of us have test data (for netflow,
> proxy, dns) that have certain events to be detected as
> threat/anomalies such that we can run ML on top of the test data
> to evaluate the ML algorithm.
>
> I would like to understand the concept of threshold in the score
> calculation of LDA algorithm and how can we fine tune the
> threshold to give best results for the model.
>
> Looking forward to hear the experiences from the community.
>
> Thanks,
> Anil.
>
>