You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@rocketmq.apache.org by "TheR1sing3un (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org> on 2023/02/21 14:56:43 UTC

[GitHub] [rocketmq] TheR1sing3un opened a new issue, #6154: Support Azamon S3 backend in TieredStorage

TheR1sing3un opened a new issue, #6154:
URL: https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/issues/6154

   The issue tracker is used for bug reporting purposes **ONLY** whereas feature request needs to follow the [RIP process](https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/wiki/RocketMQ-Improvement-Proposal). To avoid unnecessary duplication, please check whether there is a previous issue before filing a new one.
   
   It is recommended to start a discussion thread in the [mailing lists](http://rocketmq.apache.org/about/contact/) in cases of discussing your deployment plan, API clarification, and other non-bug-reporting issues.
   We welcome any friendly suggestions, bug fixes, collaboration, and other improvements.
   
   Please ensure that your bug report is clear and self-contained. Otherwise, it would take additional rounds of communication, thus more time, to understand the problem itself.
   
   Generally, fixing an issue goes through the following steps:
   1. Understand the issue reported;
       Support Azamon S3 backend in TieredStorage
   1. Reproduce the unexpected behavior locally;
   1. Perform root cause analysis to identify the underlying problem;
   1. Create test cases to cover the identified problem;
   1. Work out a solution to rectify the behavior and make the newly created test cases pass;
   1. Make a pull request and go through peer review;
   
   As a result, it would be very helpful yet challenging if you could provide an isolated project reproducing your reported issue. Anyway, please ensure your issue report is informative enough for the community to pick up. At a minimum, include the following hints:
   
   **BUG REPORT**
   
   1. Please describe the issue you observed:
   
   - What did you do (The steps to reproduce)?
   
   - What is expected to see?
   
   - What did you see instead?
   
   3. Please tell us about your environment:
   
   4. Other information (e.g. detailed explanation, logs, related issues, suggestions on how to fix, etc):
   
   **FEATURE REQUEST**
   
   1. Please describe the feature you are requesting.
   
   2. Provide any additional detail on your proposed use case for this feature.
   
   2. Indicate the importance of this issue to you (blocker, must-have, should-have, nice-to-have). Are you currently using any workarounds to address this issue?
   
   5. If there are some sub-tasks involved, use -[] for each sub-task and create a corresponding issue to map to the sub-task:
   
   - [sub-task1-issue-number](example_sub_issue1_link_here): sub-task1 description here, 
   - [sub-task2-issue-number](example_sub_issue2_link_here): sub-task2 description here,
   - ...
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscribe@rocketmq.apache.org.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org

[GitHub] [rocketmq] TheR1sing3un commented on issue #6154: Support Amazon S3 backend in TieredStorage

Posted by "TheR1sing3un (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org>.
TheR1sing3un commented on issue #6154:
URL: https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/issues/6154#issuecomment-1498814202

   > Would it be better to implement the universal object storage tiered storage rather than just AWS S3?
   > 
   > From my understanding, there's no huge difference in object storage for cloud vendors. The main difference is the client interface that accesses the API. Maybe we can propose a client interface like K8S CNI to adapt for all cloud vendors? If I try to implement it in Azure or AlibabaCloud, just implement the client interface.
   
   Great point! But one thing to consider is some object storage products support `append` operation for an object, such as COS and OSS, but some object storage product only support `put` operation such as Amazon S3. So there will be diffenerent for how we implement for these two types of object storage product.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscribe@rocketmq.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org

[GitHub] [rocketmq] TheR1sing3un closed issue #6154: Support Amazon S3 backend in TieredStorage

Posted by "TheR1sing3un (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org>.
TheR1sing3un closed issue #6154: Support Amazon S3 backend in TieredStorage
URL: https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/issues/6154


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscribe@rocketmq.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org

[GitHub] [rocketmq] TheR1sing3un commented on issue #6154: Support Azamon S3 backend in TieredStorage

Posted by "TheR1sing3un (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org>.
TheR1sing3un commented on issue #6154:
URL: https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/issues/6154#issuecomment-1438631884

   @ShadowySpirits I would like to implement this feature! Plz assign it to me~


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscribe@rocketmq.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org

[GitHub] [rocketmq] drpmma commented on issue #6154: Support Amazon S3 backend in TieredStorage

Posted by "drpmma (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org>.
drpmma commented on issue #6154:
URL: https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/issues/6154#issuecomment-1498799539

   Would it be better to implement the universal object storage tiered storage rather than just AWS S3?
   
   From my understanding, there's no huge difference in object storage for cloud vendors. The main difference is the client interface that accesses the API. Maybe we can propose a client interface like K8S CNI to adapt for all cloud vendors? If I try to implement it in Azure or AlibabaCloud, just implement the client interface.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscribe@rocketmq.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org

[GitHub] [rocketmq] zhouxinyu closed issue #6154: Support Amazon S3 backend in TieredStorage

Posted by "zhouxinyu (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org>.
zhouxinyu closed issue #6154: Support Amazon S3 backend in TieredStorage
URL: https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/issues/6154


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscribe@rocketmq.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org