[jira] [Commented] (WSS-348) Refactor Caching nonces/timestamp functionality to be used by both implementations

["Marc Giger (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>]

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WSS-348?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13493126#comment-13493126 ] 

Marc Giger commented on WSS-348:
--------------------------------

The DOM code uses by default a self made InMemory cache.
The StAX code uses Apache-JCS.

Which implementation would people like to see in the WSS4J 2.0 ?

a) The simple InMemory cache from DOM
Pro's:
- Simple
- No additional dependencies needed.
- ?

Con's:
- Not distributable
- ?

b) JCS
Pro's:
- Distributable Cache (by configuration change, no programming necessary)
- Apache Project
- Does it's job very well

Con's:
- Additional dependency

c) other implementation like ehCache?
Pro's:
- ...

Con's:
- Additional dependency


Personally I would like to see jcs or another distributable cache as the default implementation because I need it:-)
                
> Refactor Caching nonces/timestamp functionality to be used by both implementations
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: WSS-348
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WSS-348
>             Project: WSS4J
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>            Reporter: Colm O hEigeartaigh
>            Assignee: Colm O hEigeartaigh
>             Fix For: 2.0
>
>
> Refactor Caching nonces/timestamp functionality to be used by both implementations.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ws.apache.org