You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@cayenne.apache.org by Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org> on 2009/05/18 09:45:27 UTC
[VOTE] Cayenne 3.0M6
M6 release artifacts are posted here:
http://people.apache.org/~aadamchik/release/3.0M6/
Please evaluate and cats your vote. Here is my unit testing results:
HSQLDB [passed]
PostgreSQL [passed]
H2 [passed]
SQLServer [passed]
MySQL
Failed tests:
test(org.apache.cayenne.merge.SetAllowNullToDbTest)
Oracle
Failed tests:
testPerformQueryInheritanceSuper
(org.apache.cayenne.CayenneContextInheritanceTest)
test(org.apache.cayenne.merge.SetNotNullToDbTest)
testAddAndDropColumnToDb(org.apache.cayenne.merge.MergerFactoryTest)
testChangeVarcharSizeToDb(org.apache.cayenne.merge.MergerFactoryTest)
testMultipleTokensToDb(org.apache.cayenne.merge.MergerFactoryTest)
test(org.apache.cayenne.merge.ValueForNullTest)
test(org.apache.cayenne.merge.SetAllowNullToDbTest)
testDBGeneratorStrategy
(org.apache.cayenne.access.dbsync.SchemaUpdateStrategyTest)
testMixedStrategyTableNoExist
(org.apache.cayenne.access.dbsync.SchemaUpdateStrategyTest)
Derby
Tests in error:
testDifferentEntity
(org.apache.cayenne.access.DataContextEJBQLSubqueryTest)
testExists(org.apache.cayenne.access.DataContextEJBQLSubqueryTest)
testAddTable(org.apache.cayenne.merge.CreateTableToModelTest)
Andrus
Re: [VOTE] Cayenne 3.0M6
Posted by Andrey Razumovsky <ra...@gmail.com>.
Otherwise, it's all OK for my apps, +1
2009/5/18 Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org>
> Ah yeah, there was some renaming there. Should probably mention that in
> UPGRADE.txt (it will likely change in the next release again).
>
> Andrus
>
>
> On May 18, 2009, at 4:03 PM, Andrey Razumovsky wrote:
>
> Ouch, I meant OperationObserver interface..
>>
>> 2009/5/18 Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org>
>>
>>
>>> On May 18, 2009, at 12:54 PM, Andrey Razumovsky wrote:
>>>
>>> I've got my own PkGenerator and now found that interface's sugnature has
>>>
>>>> changed, and, judging on method names, they work in other way now (?). I
>>>> think this is worth mentioning
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Checking svn logs, PkGenerator interface hasn't changed since M5
>>> (actually
>>> much earlier). JdbcPkGenertor class has changed. So what problems is it
>>> causing?
>>>
>>> Andrus
>>>
>>>
>>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Cayenne 3.0M6
Posted by Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org>.
Ah yeah, there was some renaming there. Should probably mention that
in UPGRADE.txt (it will likely change in the next release again).
Andrus
On May 18, 2009, at 4:03 PM, Andrey Razumovsky wrote:
> Ouch, I meant OperationObserver interface..
>
> 2009/5/18 Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org>
>
>>
>> On May 18, 2009, at 12:54 PM, Andrey Razumovsky wrote:
>>
>> I've got my own PkGenerator and now found that interface's
>> sugnature has
>>> changed, and, judging on method names, they work in other way now
>>> (?). I
>>> think this is worth mentioning
>>>
>>
>> Checking svn logs, PkGenerator interface hasn't changed since M5
>> (actually
>> much earlier). JdbcPkGenertor class has changed. So what problems
>> is it
>> causing?
>>
>> Andrus
>>
>>
Re: [VOTE] Cayenne 3.0M6
Posted by Andrey Razumovsky <ra...@gmail.com>.
Ouch, I meant OperationObserver interface..
2009/5/18 Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org>
>
> On May 18, 2009, at 12:54 PM, Andrey Razumovsky wrote:
>
> I've got my own PkGenerator and now found that interface's sugnature has
>> changed, and, judging on method names, they work in other way now (?). I
>> think this is worth mentioning
>>
>
> Checking svn logs, PkGenerator interface hasn't changed since M5 (actually
> much earlier). JdbcPkGenertor class has changed. So what problems is it
> causing?
>
> Andrus
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Cayenne 3.0M6
Posted by Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org>.
On May 18, 2009, at 12:54 PM, Andrey Razumovsky wrote:
> I've got my own PkGenerator and now found that interface's sugnature
> has
> changed, and, judging on method names, they work in other way now
> (?). I
> think this is worth mentioning
Checking svn logs, PkGenerator interface hasn't changed since M5
(actually much earlier). JdbcPkGenertor class has changed. So what
problems is it causing?
Andrus
Re: [VOTE] Cayenne 3.0M6
Posted by Andrey Razumovsky <ra...@gmail.com>.
I've got my own PkGenerator and now found that interface's sugnature has
changed, and, judging on method names, they work in other way now (?). I
think this is worth mentioning
2009/5/18 Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org>
> M6 release artifacts are posted here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~aadamchik/release/3.0M6/<http://people.apache.org/%7Eaadamchik/release/3.0M6/>
>
> Please evaluate and cats your vote. Here is my unit testing results:
>
>
> HSQLDB [passed]
> PostgreSQL [passed]
> H2 [passed]
> SQLServer [passed]
>
> MySQL
>
> Failed tests:
> test(org.apache.cayenne.merge.SetAllowNullToDbTest)
>
> Oracle
> Failed tests:
>
> testPerformQueryInheritanceSuper(org.apache.cayenne.CayenneContextInheritanceTest)
> test(org.apache.cayenne.merge.SetNotNullToDbTest)
> testAddAndDropColumnToDb(org.apache.cayenne.merge.MergerFactoryTest)
> testChangeVarcharSizeToDb(org.apache.cayenne.merge.MergerFactoryTest)
> testMultipleTokensToDb(org.apache.cayenne.merge.MergerFactoryTest)
> test(org.apache.cayenne.merge.ValueForNullTest)
> test(org.apache.cayenne.merge.SetAllowNullToDbTest)
>
> testDBGeneratorStrategy(org.apache.cayenne.access.dbsync.SchemaUpdateStrategyTest)
>
> testMixedStrategyTableNoExist(org.apache.cayenne.access.dbsync.SchemaUpdateStrategyTest)
>
> Derby
>
> Tests in error:
>
> testDifferentEntity(org.apache.cayenne.access.DataContextEJBQLSubqueryTest)
> testExists(org.apache.cayenne.access.DataContextEJBQLSubqueryTest)
> testAddTable(org.apache.cayenne.merge.CreateTableToModelTest)
>
>
> Andrus
>
Re: [VOTE] Cayenne 3.0M6
Posted by Kevin Menard <ni...@gmail.com>.
I'm going to have to be +0, unfortunately. I began testing last
night, but my MBP graphic card died today. So, I'm largely out a
computer for the next week.
Way to "Think Different."
--
Kevin
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 7:16 AM, Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org> wrote:
> There's no rush to finish the vote, and there seem to be a consensus forming
> that the trunk code that became M6 is good enough for the release. Still we
> need at least 3 formal votes to approve it.
>
> (yeah, and let me add my +1, now that I poked around the M6 Modeler for a
> couple of days).
>
> Andrus
>
> On May 20, 2009, at 7:07 PM, Michael Gentry wrote:
>
>> It'll be Thursday at the earliest before I can examine the artifacts.
>> I don't want to hold anything up, though. Most of the tests I run
>> through are Cayenne Classic types and that stuff hasn't really
>> changed, so I probably wouldn't be testing the new stuff, anyway. At
>> the moment, I'm +0 -- please go ahead if everyone else agrees.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> mrg
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Cayenne 3.0M6
Posted by Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org>.
There's no rush to finish the vote, and there seem to be a consensus
forming that the trunk code that became M6 is good enough for the
release. Still we need at least 3 formal votes to approve it.
(yeah, and let me add my +1, now that I poked around the M6 Modeler
for a couple of days).
Andrus
On May 20, 2009, at 7:07 PM, Michael Gentry wrote:
> It'll be Thursday at the earliest before I can examine the artifacts.
> I don't want to hold anything up, though. Most of the tests I run
> through are Cayenne Classic types and that stuff hasn't really
> changed, so I probably wouldn't be testing the new stuff, anyway. At
> the moment, I'm +0 -- please go ahead if everyone else agrees.
>
> Thanks,
>
> mrg
Re: [VOTE] Cayenne 3.0M6
Posted by Michael Gentry <mg...@masslight.net>.
It'll be Thursday at the earliest before I can examine the artifacts.
I don't want to hold anything up, though. Most of the tests I run
through are Cayenne Classic types and that stuff hasn't really
changed, so I probably wouldn't be testing the new stuff, anyway. At
the moment, I'm +0 -- please go ahead if everyone else agrees.
Thanks,
mrg
Re: [VOTE] Cayenne 3.0M6
Posted by Aristedes Maniatis <ar...@ish.com.au>.
On 18/05/2009, at 5:45 PM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
> M6 release artifacts are posted here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~aadamchik/release/3.0M6/
>
> Please evaluate and cats your vote. Here is my unit testing results:
I'm +0 on this. Unfortunately this week we have a big client deadline
that is taking more of my time than I hoped, so I'm not going to get a
chance to test properly. However we are running a fairly recent svn
build in production with no problems against Derby and MS SQL. I am
all for this release and believe it should happen now and that it is
of high quality. I just can't test it against our application and
tests right now.
Ari Maniatis
-------------------------->
ish
http://www.ish.com.au
Level 1, 30 Wilson Street Newtown 2042 Australia
phone +61 2 9550 5001 fax +61 2 9550 4001
GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C 5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A
Re: [VOTE] Cayenne 3.0M6
Posted by Tore Halset <ha...@pvv.ntnu.no>.
Hello.
+1
What I did:
* Downloaded the mac version and used the modeler.
* Tested with our (company) junit tests for Derby and PostgreSQL.
Regards,
- Tore.
On 18. mai. 2009, at 09.45, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
> M6 release artifacts are posted here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~aadamchik/release/3.0M6/
>
> Please evaluate and cats your vote. Here is my unit testing results:
>
>
> HSQLDB [passed]
> PostgreSQL [passed]
> H2 [passed]
> SQLServer [passed]
>
> MySQL
>
> Failed tests:
> test(org.apache.cayenne.merge.SetAllowNullToDbTest)
>
> Oracle
> Failed tests:
>
> testPerformQueryInheritanceSuper
> (org.apache.cayenne.CayenneContextInheritanceTest)
> test(org.apache.cayenne.merge.SetNotNullToDbTest)
> testAddAndDropColumnToDb(org.apache.cayenne.merge.MergerFactoryTest)
> testChangeVarcharSizeToDb(org.apache.cayenne.merge.MergerFactoryTest)
> testMultipleTokensToDb(org.apache.cayenne.merge.MergerFactoryTest)
> test(org.apache.cayenne.merge.ValueForNullTest)
> test(org.apache.cayenne.merge.SetAllowNullToDbTest)
>
> testDBGeneratorStrategy
> (org.apache.cayenne.access.dbsync.SchemaUpdateStrategyTest)
>
> testMixedStrategyTableNoExist
> (org.apache.cayenne.access.dbsync.SchemaUpdateStrategyTest)
>
> Derby
>
> Tests in error:
>
> testDifferentEntity
> (org.apache.cayenne.access.DataContextEJBQLSubqueryTest)
> testExists(org.apache.cayenne.access.DataContextEJBQLSubqueryTest)
> testAddTable(org.apache.cayenne.merge.CreateTableToModelTest)
>
>
> Andrus
>
Re: [VOTE] Cayenne 3.0M6
Posted by Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org>.
Not a show stopper, but just noticed that the naming strategy choices
are stuck under ~/.cayenne/modeler.preferences" which is an incorrect
location. Preferences service should be used instead. So I ended up
pulling "access.reveng" old package names, and the new and correct
names weren't presented in the dropdown.
This is minor, as the file can be edited by hand, but still figured
I'd mention.
Andrus
On May 18, 2009, at 10:45 AM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
> M6 release artifacts are posted here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~aadamchik/release/3.0M6/
>
> Please evaluate and cats your vote. Here is my unit testing results:
>
>
> HSQLDB [passed]
> PostgreSQL [passed]
> H2 [passed]
> SQLServer [passed]
>
> MySQL
>
> Failed tests:
> test(org.apache.cayenne.merge.SetAllowNullToDbTest)
>
> Oracle
> Failed tests:
>
> testPerformQueryInheritanceSuper
> (org.apache.cayenne.CayenneContextInheritanceTest)
> test(org.apache.cayenne.merge.SetNotNullToDbTest)
> testAddAndDropColumnToDb(org.apache.cayenne.merge.MergerFactoryTest)
> testChangeVarcharSizeToDb(org.apache.cayenne.merge.MergerFactoryTest)
> testMultipleTokensToDb(org.apache.cayenne.merge.MergerFactoryTest)
> test(org.apache.cayenne.merge.ValueForNullTest)
> test(org.apache.cayenne.merge.SetAllowNullToDbTest)
>
> testDBGeneratorStrategy
> (org.apache.cayenne.access.dbsync.SchemaUpdateStrategyTest)
>
> testMixedStrategyTableNoExist
> (org.apache.cayenne.access.dbsync.SchemaUpdateStrategyTest)
>
> Derby
>
> Tests in error:
>
> testDifferentEntity
> (org.apache.cayenne.access.DataContextEJBQLSubqueryTest)
> testExists(org.apache.cayenne.access.DataContextEJBQLSubqueryTest)
> testAddTable(org.apache.cayenne.merge.CreateTableToModelTest)
>
>
> Andrus
>
Re: [VOTE] Cayenne 3.0M6
Posted by Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org>.
Sorry, this was a typo. Thanks for correcting.
On May 25, 2009, at 5:53 PM, Kevin Menard wrote:
> Minor correction. My vote was +0. The vote still passes, but wanted
> to correct the record.
>
> --
> Kevin
>
>
>
> On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 2:35 AM, Andrus Adamchik <andrus@objectstyle.org
> > wrote:
>> Vote results:
>>
>> Andrey Razumovsky +1
>> Ari Maniatis +0
>> Michael Gentry +0
>> Andrus Adamchik +1
>> Tore Halset +1
>> Kevin Menard +1
>>
>> So the vote has passed and we can push the artifacts. I will try to
>> do that
>> later tonight. Then we can discuss the announcement.
>>
>> Andrus
>>
>>
>> On May 18, 2009, at 10:45 AM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
>>
>>> M6 release artifacts are posted here:
>>>
>>> http://people.apache.org/~aadamchik/release/3.0M6/
>>>
>>> Please evaluate and cats your vote. Here is my unit testing results:
>>>
>>>
>>> HSQLDB [passed]
>>> PostgreSQL [passed]
>>> H2 [passed]
>>> SQLServer [passed]
>>>
>>> MySQL
>>>
>>> Failed tests:
>>> test(org.apache.cayenne.merge.SetAllowNullToDbTest)
>>>
>>> Oracle
>>> Failed tests:
>>>
>>>
>>> testPerformQueryInheritanceSuper
>>> (org.apache.cayenne.CayenneContextInheritanceTest)
>>> test(org.apache.cayenne.merge.SetNotNullToDbTest)
>>>
>>> testAddAndDropColumnToDb(org.apache.cayenne.merge.MergerFactoryTest)
>>>
>>> testChangeVarcharSizeToDb
>>> (org.apache.cayenne.merge.MergerFactoryTest)
>>> testMultipleTokensToDb(org.apache.cayenne.merge.MergerFactoryTest)
>>> test(org.apache.cayenne.merge.ValueForNullTest)
>>> test(org.apache.cayenne.merge.SetAllowNullToDbTest)
>>>
>>>
>>> testDBGeneratorStrategy
>>> (org.apache.cayenne.access.dbsync.SchemaUpdateStrategyTest)
>>>
>>>
>>> testMixedStrategyTableNoExist
>>> (org.apache.cayenne.access.dbsync.SchemaUpdateStrategyTest)
>>>
>>> Derby
>>>
>>> Tests in error:
>>>
>>>
>>> testDifferentEntity
>>> (org.apache.cayenne.access.DataContextEJBQLSubqueryTest)
>>> testExists(org.apache.cayenne.access.DataContextEJBQLSubqueryTest)
>>> testAddTable(org.apache.cayenne.merge.CreateTableToModelTest)
>>>
>>>
>>> Andrus
>>>
>>
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Cayenne 3.0M6
Posted by Kevin Menard <ni...@gmail.com>.
Minor correction. My vote was +0. The vote still passes, but wanted
to correct the record.
--
Kevin
On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 2:35 AM, Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org> wrote:
> Vote results:
>
> Andrey Razumovsky +1
> Ari Maniatis +0
> Michael Gentry +0
> Andrus Adamchik +1
> Tore Halset +1
> Kevin Menard +1
>
> So the vote has passed and we can push the artifacts. I will try to do that
> later tonight. Then we can discuss the announcement.
>
> Andrus
>
>
> On May 18, 2009, at 10:45 AM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
>
>> M6 release artifacts are posted here:
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~aadamchik/release/3.0M6/
>>
>> Please evaluate and cats your vote. Here is my unit testing results:
>>
>>
>> HSQLDB [passed]
>> PostgreSQL [passed]
>> H2 [passed]
>> SQLServer [passed]
>>
>> MySQL
>>
>> Failed tests:
>> test(org.apache.cayenne.merge.SetAllowNullToDbTest)
>>
>> Oracle
>> Failed tests:
>>
>> testPerformQueryInheritanceSuper(org.apache.cayenne.CayenneContextInheritanceTest)
>> test(org.apache.cayenne.merge.SetNotNullToDbTest)
>> testAddAndDropColumnToDb(org.apache.cayenne.merge.MergerFactoryTest)
>> testChangeVarcharSizeToDb(org.apache.cayenne.merge.MergerFactoryTest)
>> testMultipleTokensToDb(org.apache.cayenne.merge.MergerFactoryTest)
>> test(org.apache.cayenne.merge.ValueForNullTest)
>> test(org.apache.cayenne.merge.SetAllowNullToDbTest)
>>
>> testDBGeneratorStrategy(org.apache.cayenne.access.dbsync.SchemaUpdateStrategyTest)
>>
>> testMixedStrategyTableNoExist(org.apache.cayenne.access.dbsync.SchemaUpdateStrategyTest)
>>
>> Derby
>>
>> Tests in error:
>>
>> testDifferentEntity(org.apache.cayenne.access.DataContextEJBQLSubqueryTest)
>> testExists(org.apache.cayenne.access.DataContextEJBQLSubqueryTest)
>> testAddTable(org.apache.cayenne.merge.CreateTableToModelTest)
>>
>>
>> Andrus
>>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Cayenne 3.0M6
Posted by Kevin Menard <ni...@gmail.com>.
I'd like to call attention to the ant tasks being moved out to the
cayenne-tools assembly somehow. I think the cdbimport task for ant
and mojo for maven2 are noteworthy as well.
--
Kevin
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 7:09 AM, Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org> wrote:
>
> On May 25, 2009, at 10:00 PM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
>
>>
>> 1. Quoting of identifiers (a very popular request)
>> 2. EJBQL/SQLTemplate/ProcedureQuery queries catching up with SelectQuery
>> supporting the same set of configuration parameters.
>> 3. Nested contexts in ROP.
>> 4. Support for EJBQL in the Modeler
>> 5. JPA is officially out of 3.0
>> 6. *Lots* of bug fixes.
>
>
> Missed one more - "7. DB schema analysis on startup, possible creation of
> missing schema. This can help to ensure ongoing schema/model consistency, as
> well as help to bootstrap schema on first application run".
>
> Andrus
>
Re: [VOTE] Cayenne 3.0M6
Posted by Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org>.
On May 25, 2009, at 10:00 PM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
>
> 1. Quoting of identifiers (a very popular request)
> 2. EJBQL/SQLTemplate/ProcedureQuery queries catching up with
> SelectQuery supporting the same set of configuration parameters.
> 3. Nested contexts in ROP.
> 4. Support for EJBQL in the Modeler
> 5. JPA is officially out of 3.0
> 6. *Lots* of bug fixes.
Missed one more - "7. DB schema analysis on startup, possible creation
of missing schema. This can help to ensure ongoing schema/model
consistency, as well as help to bootstrap schema on first application
run".
Andrus
Re: [VOTE] Cayenne 3.0M6
Posted by Aristedes Maniatis <ar...@ish.com.au>.
On 26/05/2009, at 5:00 AM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
> Ari, do you have time to make an announcement?
No problem. My big project just yesterday had its last lurch toward
final release, so I'm much more free now.
Ari
-------------------------->
ish
http://www.ish.com.au
Level 1, 30 Wilson Street Newtown 2042 Australia
phone +61 2 9550 5001 fax +61 2 9550 4001
GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C 5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A
Re: [VOTE] Cayenne 3.0M6
Posted by Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org>.
On May 25, 2009, at 9:35 AM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
> we can push the artifacts. I will try to do that later tonight. Then
> we can discuss the announcement.
The release is done (subject to regular synchronization delays). Out
of the postrelease steps I did the Jira version status update and the
download page update. Ari, do you have time to make an announcement?
Here is an incomplete list of things from the release notes that are
worth the user attention IMO:
1. Quoting of identifiers (a very popular request)
2. EJBQL/SQLTemplate/ProcedureQuery queries catching up with
SelectQuery supporting the same set of configuration parameters.
3. Nested contexts in ROP.
4. Support for EJBQL in the Modeler
5. JPA is officially out of 3.0
6. *Lots* of bug fixes.
This list is biased towards the features and third party contributions
that I've been involved with, simply because I have a good
understanding of what those are about. Please extend it as you think
is appropriate.
Andrus
Re: [VOTE] Cayenne 3.0M6
Posted by Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org>.
Vote results:
Andrey Razumovsky +1
Ari Maniatis +0
Michael Gentry +0
Andrus Adamchik +1
Tore Halset +1
Kevin Menard +1
So the vote has passed and we can push the artifacts. I will try to do
that later tonight. Then we can discuss the announcement.
Andrus
On May 18, 2009, at 10:45 AM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
> M6 release artifacts are posted here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~aadamchik/release/3.0M6/
>
> Please evaluate and cats your vote. Here is my unit testing results:
>
>
> HSQLDB [passed]
> PostgreSQL [passed]
> H2 [passed]
> SQLServer [passed]
>
> MySQL
>
> Failed tests:
> test(org.apache.cayenne.merge.SetAllowNullToDbTest)
>
> Oracle
> Failed tests:
>
> testPerformQueryInheritanceSuper
> (org.apache.cayenne.CayenneContextInheritanceTest)
> test(org.apache.cayenne.merge.SetNotNullToDbTest)
> testAddAndDropColumnToDb(org.apache.cayenne.merge.MergerFactoryTest)
> testChangeVarcharSizeToDb(org.apache.cayenne.merge.MergerFactoryTest)
> testMultipleTokensToDb(org.apache.cayenne.merge.MergerFactoryTest)
> test(org.apache.cayenne.merge.ValueForNullTest)
> test(org.apache.cayenne.merge.SetAllowNullToDbTest)
>
> testDBGeneratorStrategy
> (org.apache.cayenne.access.dbsync.SchemaUpdateStrategyTest)
>
> testMixedStrategyTableNoExist
> (org.apache.cayenne.access.dbsync.SchemaUpdateStrategyTest)
>
> Derby
>
> Tests in error:
>
> testDifferentEntity
> (org.apache.cayenne.access.DataContextEJBQLSubqueryTest)
> testExists(org.apache.cayenne.access.DataContextEJBQLSubqueryTest)
> testAddTable(org.apache.cayenne.merge.CreateTableToModelTest)
>
>
> Andrus
>