You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to notifications@jclouds.apache.org by Ignasi Barrera <no...@github.com> on 2014/10/27 22:59:09 UTC
[jclouds-karaf] Added the CloudSigma2 providers (#58)
You can merge this Pull Request by running:
git pull https://github.com/nacx/jclouds-karaf cloudsigma
Or you can view, comment on it, or merge it online at:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-karaf/pull/58
-- Commit Summary --
* Added CloudSigma2 providers
-- File Changes --
M feature/pom.xml (6)
M feature/src/main/resources/feature.xml (35)
M itests/src/test/java/org/jclouds/karaf/itests/ApisFeaturesInstallationTest.java (7)
A itests/src/test/java/org/jclouds/karaf/itests/CloudSigma2FeaturesInstallationTest.java (66)
-- Patch Links --
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-karaf/pull/58.patch
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-karaf/pull/58.diff
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-karaf/pull/58
Re: [jclouds-karaf] Added the CloudSigma2 providers (#58)
Posted by CloudBees pull request builder plugin <no...@github.com>.
[jclouds-karaf-pull-requests #100](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-karaf-pull-requests/100/) SUCCESS
This pull request looks good
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-karaf/pull/58#issuecomment-61074984
Re: [jclouds-karaf] Added the CloudSigma2 providers (#58)
Posted by Ignasi Barrera <no...@github.com>.
Hmmm Looking at the test failures, the new CloudSigma tests passed but Chef and others failed. The jclouds build just populated the latest snapshots, so I'll give it another try...
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-karaf/pull/58#issuecomment-60685106
Re: [jclouds-karaf] Added the CloudSigma2 providers (#58)
Posted by Ignasi Barrera <no...@github.com>.
CloudSigma snapshots should be now in place. Retrying...
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-karaf/pull/58#issuecomment-60682902
Re: [jclouds-karaf] Added the CloudSigma2 providers (#58)
Posted by CloudBees pull request builder plugin <no...@github.com>.
[jclouds-karaf-pull-requests #96](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-karaf-pull-requests/96/) FAILURE
Looks like there's a problem with this pull request
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-karaf/pull/58#issuecomment-60677499
Re: [jclouds-karaf] Added the CloudSigma2 providers (#58)
Posted by BuildHive <no...@github.com>.
[jclouds » jclouds-karaf #1402](https://buildhive.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds/job/jclouds-karaf/1402/) UNSTABLE
Looks like there's a problem with this pull request
[(what's this?)](https://www.cloudbees.com/what-is-buildhive)
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-karaf/pull/58#issuecomment-60688751
Re: [jclouds-karaf] Added the CloudSigma2 providers (#58)
Posted by BuildHive <no...@github.com>.
[jclouds » jclouds-karaf #1403](https://buildhive.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds/job/jclouds-karaf/1403/) UNSTABLE
Looks like there's a problem with this pull request
[(what's this?)](https://www.cloudbees.com/what-is-buildhive)
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-karaf/pull/58#issuecomment-60693559
Re: [jclouds-karaf] Added the CloudSigma2 providers (#58)
Posted by Ignasi Barrera <no...@github.com>.
Closed #58.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-karaf/pull/58#event-184396378
Re: [jclouds-karaf] Added the CloudSigma2 providers (#58)
Posted by Ignasi Barrera <no...@github.com>.
Closed #58.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-karaf/pull/58#event-184388425
Re: [jclouds-karaf] Added the CloudSigma2 providers (#58)
Posted by Ignasi Barrera <no...@github.com>.
Rebased to the latest master with https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-karaf/pull/59. Let's see if Jenkins is happy now!
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-karaf/pull/58#issuecomment-61073610
Re: [jclouds-karaf] Added the CloudSigma2 providers (#58)
Posted by Ignasi Barrera <no...@github.com>.
Reopened #58.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-karaf/pull/58#event-184396386
Re: [jclouds-karaf] Added the CloudSigma2 providers (#58)
Posted by CloudBees pull request builder plugin <no...@github.com>.
[jclouds-karaf-pull-requests #97](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-karaf-pull-requests/97/) UNSTABLE
Looks like there's a problem with this pull request
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-karaf/pull/58#issuecomment-60684662
Re: [jclouds-karaf] Added the CloudSigma2 providers (#58)
Posted by CloudBees pull request builder plugin <no...@github.com>.
[jclouds-karaf-pull-requests #98](https://jclouds.ci.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds-karaf-pull-requests/98/) UNSTABLE
Looks like there's a problem with this pull request
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-karaf/pull/58#issuecomment-60686542
Re: [jclouds-karaf] Added the CloudSigma2 providers (#58)
Posted by BuildHive <no...@github.com>.
[jclouds » jclouds-karaf #1401](https://buildhive.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds/job/jclouds-karaf/1401/) FAILURE
Looks like there's a problem with this pull request
[(what's this?)](https://www.cloudbees.com/what-is-buildhive)
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-karaf/pull/58#issuecomment-60677479
Re: [jclouds-karaf] Added the CloudSigma2 providers (#58)
Posted by BuildHive <no...@github.com>.
[jclouds » jclouds-karaf #1421](https://buildhive.cloudbees.com/job/jclouds/job/jclouds-karaf/1421/) SUCCESS
This pull request looks good
[(what's this?)](https://www.cloudbees.com/what-is-buildhive)
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-karaf/pull/58#issuecomment-61078890