[jira] Commented: (IVYDE-104) Display all resolved libraries in order

["Nicolas Lalevée (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>]

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IVYDE-104?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12631442#action_12631442 ] 

Nicolas Lalevée commented on IVYDE-104:
---------------------------------------

For your primary issue, I will make a combo box in place of the check box.

bq. In 2.00alpha1, enabling project-specific Ivy-configuration is broken for me. When I enable the project-specific configuration the whole plugin blows up and I lose my classpath container entirely. But that is beside the point...even if it was working properly, my other point is that the project-specific Ivy configuration page/screen does not ALSO have a way to specify an project-specific ordering for display of libraries which is separate from the workspace configuration. Perhaps this is not so important though.

That is weird because in the 2.0.0.alpha1, it *is* possible.
Could you check the version you are running ? (look for an  "org.apache.ivyde.eclipse" in Help>About Eclipse SDK>Plugins Details)

But I agree with you, there are a lot of configuration fields in the UI, and this can be confusing. And more option are coming with IVYDE-13 and IVYDE-106. I think we need a little of refactoring here, see IVYDE-119 I have just opened.


> Display all resolved libraries in order
> ---------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: IVYDE-104
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IVYDE-104
>             Project: IvyDE
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: classpath container
>    Affects Versions: 2.0.0.alpha1
>         Environment: Eclipse 3.3.2
>            Reporter: Jason A. Guild
>            Priority: Minor
>
> The display listing of libraries resolved in Eclipse package explorer should be in some kind of predictable order.  It can be frustrating when you are looking through a long list of libraries and can't see the one you are looking for fast.
> Right now, libraries are listed in what appears to be random order and should either be in order of resolution or (preferrably) sorted order by library name.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.