You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@plc4x.apache.org by Lukas Ott <ot...@gmail.com> on 2020/12/13 15:53:20 UTC
[DISCUSS] Apache PLC4X 1.4.0 RC2
This is the discussion thread for the corresponding VOTE thread.
Please keep discussions in this thread to simplify the counting of votes.
If you have to vote -1 please mention a brief description on why and
then take the details to this thread.
AW: [DISCUSS] Apache PLC4X 1.4.0 RC2
Posted by Christofer Dutz <ch...@c-ware.de>.
Hi Otto,
I think this is the standard we have been using in all other projects that use the Maven-Wrapper.
Therefore I would assume that this is ok this way.
I just checked in IoTDB and there they have it the same way. Juding from the fact, that they just left the incubator, I would have expected Justin to complain if this wasn't correct.
I do remember discussions about this cause initially using the Maven-Wrapper was a taboo for Apache projects, till I submitted a PR to it that was a source-only version. We then added it sort of everywhere and had some discussions about what to attribute and where to put it.
Chris
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Otto Fowler <ot...@gmail.com>
Gesendet: Montag, 14. Dezember 2020 15:07
An: dev@plc4x.apache.org
Betreff: Re: [DISCUSS] Apache PLC4X 1.4.0 RC2
shasum works for me. I think I got gshasum512 from the site.
Ok, I have an possible issue:
The License has the information about mvnw stuff’s inclusion.
As far as I understand it, this belongs in the NOTICE, not the LICENSE.
> On Dec 14, 2020, at 01:50, Lukas Ott <ot...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> This happens in my terminal:
> $gpg --verify
> apache-plc4x-code-generation-1.4.0-source-release.zip.asc
> apache-plc4x-code-generation-1.4.0-source-release.zip
> gpg: Signatur vom So 13 Dez 2020 17:39:46 CET
> gpg: mittels RSA-Schlüssel
> B6AC3BF1A0F08554144EEC56027975C99CBA22C7
> gpg: Korrekte Signatur von "Lukas Ott <ot...@apache.org>" [ultimativ]
> $ shasum -a512 apache-plc4x-code-generation-1.4.0-source-release.zip
> 7a906395077f34cbb6c0d66241d17784c9ad7077d8533553fee7cd2d2cae0e88779339
> 69fe3424f29f32af2094af952067ca3887adf178fe08e5f012f77a412f
> apache-plc4x-code-generation-1.4.0-source-release.zip
>
> Am Mo., 14. Dez. 2020 um 04:26 Uhr schrieb Otto Fowler <
> ottobackwards@gmail.com>:
>
>> gsha512sum -c
>> apache-plc4x-code-generation-1.4.0-source-release.zip.sha512
>> gsha512sum: apache-plc4x-code-generation-1.4.0-source-release.zip.sha512:
>> no properly formatted SHA512 checksum lines found
>>
>> anyone seeing this?
>>
>>> On Dec 13, 2020, at 10:53, Lukas Ott <ot...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> This is the discussion thread for the corresponding VOTE thread.
>>>
>>> Please keep discussions in this thread to simplify the counting of
>> votes.
>>>
>>> If you have to vote -1 please mention a brief description on why
>>> and then take the details to this thread.
>>
>>
Re: [DISCUSS] Apache PLC4X 1.4.0 RC2
Posted by Otto Fowler <ot...@gmail.com>.
shasum works for me. I think I got gshasum512 from the site.
Ok, I have an possible issue:
The License has the information about mvnw stuff’s inclusion.
As far as I understand it, this belongs in the NOTICE, not the LICENSE.
> On Dec 14, 2020, at 01:50, Lukas Ott <ot...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> This happens in my terminal:
> $gpg --verify apache-plc4x-code-generation-1.4.0-source-release.zip.asc
> apache-plc4x-code-generation-1.4.0-source-release.zip
> gpg: Signatur vom So 13 Dez 2020 17:39:46 CET
> gpg: mittels RSA-Schlüssel
> B6AC3BF1A0F08554144EEC56027975C99CBA22C7
> gpg: Korrekte Signatur von "Lukas Ott <ot...@apache.org>" [ultimativ]
> $ shasum -a512 apache-plc4x-code-generation-1.4.0-source-release.zip
> 7a906395077f34cbb6c0d66241d17784c9ad7077d8533553fee7cd2d2cae0e8877933969fe3424f29f32af2094af952067ca3887adf178fe08e5f012f77a412f
> apache-plc4x-code-generation-1.4.0-source-release.zip
>
> Am Mo., 14. Dez. 2020 um 04:26 Uhr schrieb Otto Fowler <
> ottobackwards@gmail.com>:
>
>> gsha512sum -c apache-plc4x-code-generation-1.4.0-source-release.zip.sha512
>> gsha512sum: apache-plc4x-code-generation-1.4.0-source-release.zip.sha512:
>> no properly formatted SHA512 checksum lines found
>>
>> anyone seeing this?
>>
>>> On Dec 13, 2020, at 10:53, Lukas Ott <ot...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> This is the discussion thread for the corresponding VOTE thread.
>>>
>>> Please keep discussions in this thread to simplify the counting of
>> votes.
>>>
>>> If you have to vote -1 please mention a brief description on why and
>>> then take the details to this thread.
>>
>>
Re: [DISCUSS] Apache PLC4X 1.4.0 RC2
Posted by Lukas Ott <ot...@gmail.com>.
This happens in my terminal:
$gpg --verify apache-plc4x-code-generation-1.4.0-source-release.zip.asc
apache-plc4x-code-generation-1.4.0-source-release.zip
gpg: Signatur vom So 13 Dez 2020 17:39:46 CET
gpg: mittels RSA-Schlüssel
B6AC3BF1A0F08554144EEC56027975C99CBA22C7
gpg: Korrekte Signatur von "Lukas Ott <ot...@apache.org>" [ultimativ]
$ shasum -a512 apache-plc4x-code-generation-1.4.0-source-release.zip
7a906395077f34cbb6c0d66241d17784c9ad7077d8533553fee7cd2d2cae0e8877933969fe3424f29f32af2094af952067ca3887adf178fe08e5f012f77a412f
apache-plc4x-code-generation-1.4.0-source-release.zip
Am Mo., 14. Dez. 2020 um 04:26 Uhr schrieb Otto Fowler <
ottobackwards@gmail.com>:
> gsha512sum -c apache-plc4x-code-generation-1.4.0-source-release.zip.sha512
> gsha512sum: apache-plc4x-code-generation-1.4.0-source-release.zip.sha512:
> no properly formatted SHA512 checksum lines found
>
> anyone seeing this?
>
> > On Dec 13, 2020, at 10:53, Lukas Ott <ot...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > This is the discussion thread for the corresponding VOTE thread.
> >
> > Please keep discussions in this thread to simplify the counting of
> votes.
> >
> > If you have to vote -1 please mention a brief description on why and
> > then take the details to this thread.
>
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Apache PLC4X 1.4.0 RC2
Posted by Ben Hutcheson <be...@gmail.com>.
Just commenting on my mistake,
I have verified the actual release now. It looks good :)
On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 2:00 AM Christofer Dutz <ch...@c-ware.de>
wrote:
> There are different ways to generate the content of the hash file.
>
> Some tools as the filename at the end.
>
> I guess that's what it's missing.
>
> I this case the tool doesn't know which file it should compare the current
> hash to.
>
> Unfortunately I couldn't find any option to have the maven plugin create
> that sort of output.
>
> Chris
>
> ________________________________
> Von: Otto Fowler <ot...@gmail.com>
> Gesendet: Montag, 14. Dezember 2020 04:26
> An: dev@plc4x.apache.org <de...@plc4x.apache.org>
> Betreff: Re: [DISCUSS] Apache PLC4X 1.4.0 RC2
>
> gsha512sum -c apache-plc4x-code-generation-1.4.0-source-release.zip.sha512
> gsha512sum: apache-plc4x-code-generation-1.4.0-source-release.zip.sha512:
> no properly formatted SHA512 checksum lines found
>
> anyone seeing this?
>
> > On Dec 13, 2020, at 10:53, Lukas Ott <ot...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > This is the discussion thread for the corresponding VOTE thread.
> >
> > Please keep discussions in this thread to simplify the counting of
> votes.
> >
> > If you have to vote -1 please mention a brief description on why and
> > then take the details to this thread.
>
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Apache PLC4X 1.4.0 RC2
Posted by Christofer Dutz <ch...@c-ware.de>.
There are different ways to generate the content of the hash file.
Some tools as the filename at the end.
I guess that's what it's missing.
I this case the tool doesn't know which file it should compare the current hash to.
Unfortunately I couldn't find any option to have the maven plugin create that sort of output.
Chris
________________________________
Von: Otto Fowler <ot...@gmail.com>
Gesendet: Montag, 14. Dezember 2020 04:26
An: dev@plc4x.apache.org <de...@plc4x.apache.org>
Betreff: Re: [DISCUSS] Apache PLC4X 1.4.0 RC2
gsha512sum -c apache-plc4x-code-generation-1.4.0-source-release.zip.sha512
gsha512sum: apache-plc4x-code-generation-1.4.0-source-release.zip.sha512: no properly formatted SHA512 checksum lines found
anyone seeing this?
> On Dec 13, 2020, at 10:53, Lukas Ott <ot...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> This is the discussion thread for the corresponding VOTE thread.
>
> Please keep discussions in this thread to simplify the counting of votes.
>
> If you have to vote -1 please mention a brief description on why and
> then take the details to this thread.
Re: [DISCUSS] Apache PLC4X 1.4.0 RC2
Posted by Otto Fowler <ot...@gmail.com>.
gsha512sum -c apache-plc4x-code-generation-1.4.0-source-release.zip.sha512
gsha512sum: apache-plc4x-code-generation-1.4.0-source-release.zip.sha512: no properly formatted SHA512 checksum lines found
anyone seeing this?
> On Dec 13, 2020, at 10:53, Lukas Ott <ot...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> This is the discussion thread for the corresponding VOTE thread.
>
> Please keep discussions in this thread to simplify the counting of votes.
>
> If you have to vote -1 please mention a brief description on why and
> then take the details to this thread.