org.apache.qpid.server.store.berkeleydb.BDBMessageStore Weirdness

[Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com>]

By the looks of the website documentation and example configs in the
source code, It looks like
org.apache.qpid.server.store.berkeleydb.BDBMessageStore is the
preferred persistence mechanism for QPID java.

But it seems it's not actually hosted in the ASF source tree.  What's
the story here?  I'm guessing it was removed due to the BDB licensing
issues.  But if so shouldn't the doco and configuration files get
updated?


-- 
Regards,
Hiram

Blog: http://hiramchirino.com

Open Source SOA
http://open.iona.com

Re: org.apache.qpid.server.store.berkeleydb.BDBMessageStore Weirdness

[Marnie McCormack <ma...@googlemail.com>]

Hi Hiram,

We don't have a preference in simple terms, but yes - the BDBStore is one
way to plug persistence into Qpid. License issues are the reason why the
hosting is detached.

We provide several config files and we documented them and the use of a 3rd
party lib at:

http://cwiki.apache.org/qpid/getting-started-guide.html

and

http://cwiki.apache.org/qpid/3rd-party-libraries.html

hth,
Marnie



On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 9:48 PM, Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com>wrote:

> By the looks of the website documentation and example configs in the
> source code, It looks like
> org.apache.qpid.server.store.berkeleydb.BDBMessageStore is the
> preferred persistence mechanism for QPID java.
>
> But it seems it's not actually hosted in the ASF source tree.  What's
> the story here?  I'm guessing it was removed due to the BDB licensing
> issues.  But if so shouldn't the doco and configuration files get
> updated?
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Hiram
>
> Blog: http://hiramchirino.com
>
> Open Source SOA
> http://open.iona.com
>