You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to stonehenge-dev@incubator.apache.org by Selvaratnam Uthaiyashankar <ut...@gmail.com> on 2009/05/05 03:24:22 UTC
Re: [jira] Created: (STONEHENGE-51) Create logging and debugging
messages in the .NET WCF Console Hosts
Hi Ben,
I am not clear here. STONEHENGE-21 is only to get the configurations from a
common place. It will not affect any other logic. Why do you think it will
affect the console output of .NET services?
Regards,
Shankar
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 8:46 AM, Ben Dewey <Be...@26ny.com> wrote:
> The thought was the we could place a few Console.WriteLine() around or a
> Logging Framework in place that could write things like "Order Received",
> etc.
>
> STONEHENGE-21 is the ticket for overhauling the configuration. If
> StoneHenge-21 gets prioritized low then this feature would be an easy way to
> fill the void.
>
> A logging framework could be designed to connect with future service hosts
> if we plan accordingly.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Scott Golightly [mailto:scott_golightly@hotmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, May 04, 2009 11:10 PM
> To: Stonehenge Development
> Subject: RE: [jira] Created: (STONEHENGE-51) Create logging and debugging
> messages in the .NET WCF Console Hosts
>
>
> When you say there is no way to tell if the WCF services recieved the call
> does that mean that a TraceListener does not write the output? There was a
> suggestion that we change the .NET services to run under IIS. I would vote
> against this if we are going to change to use IIS as the debugging messages
> would need to be removed.
>
>
>
> Scott Golightly
>
> > Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 14:09:30 -0700
> > From: jira@apache.org
> > To: stonehenge-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > Subject: [jira] Created: (STONEHENGE-51) Create logging and debugging
> messages in the .NET WCF Console Hosts
> >
> > Create logging and debugging messages in the .NET WCF Console Hosts
> > -------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > Key: STONEHENGE-51
> > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STONEHENGE-51
> > Project: Stonehenge
> > Issue Type: Improvement
> > Components: DOTNET_BS, DOTNET_OPS
> > Reporter: Ben Dewey
> > Priority: Minor
> >
> >
> > It would be very useful to have debugging and logging messages in the
> .NET Console Hosts. When interoperating between platforms there is no way to
> tell if the WCF services received the calls.
> >
> > This issue may conflict with STONEHENGE-21
> >
> > --
> > This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
> > -
> > You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
> >
>
--
S.Uthaiyashankar
Software Architect
WSO2 Inc.
http://wso2.com/ - "The Open Source SOA Company"
Re: [jira] Created: (STONEHENGE-51) Create logging and debugging
messages in the .NET WCF Console Hosts
Posted by Selvaratnam Uthaiyashankar <ut...@gmail.com>.
STONEHENGE-21 is different. You might have to create a separate ticket from
the other issue.
Regards,
Shankar
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 9:03 AM, Ben Dewey <Be...@26ny.com> wrote:
> I thought STONEHENGE-21 was related to overhauling the .NET service hosts.
> We had discussed, in an earlier thread, that we wanted to consider hosting
> the .NET services in something becides a console app.
>
> If STONEHENGE-21 is different, I can create a separate ticket for the
> overhaul and reference this ticket with that feature instead.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Selvaratnam Uthaiyashankar [mailto:uthaiyashankar@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, May 04, 2009 11:24 PM
> To: stonehenge-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [jira] Created: (STONEHENGE-51) Create logging and debugging
> messages in the .NET WCF Console Hosts
>
> Hi Ben,
>
> I am not clear here. STONEHENGE-21 is only to get the configurations from a
> common place. It will not affect any other logic. Why do you think it will
> affect the console output of .NET services?
>
> Regards,
> Shankar
>
> On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 8:46 AM, Ben Dewey <Be...@26ny.com> wrote:
>
> > The thought was the we could place a few Console.WriteLine() around or a
> > Logging Framework in place that could write things like "Order Received",
> > etc.
> >
> > STONEHENGE-21 is the ticket for overhauling the configuration. If
> > StoneHenge-21 gets prioritized low then this feature would be an easy way
> to
> > fill the void.
> >
> > A logging framework could be designed to connect with future service
> hosts
> > if we plan accordingly.
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Scott Golightly [mailto:scott_golightly@hotmail.com]
> > Sent: Monday, May 04, 2009 11:10 PM
> > To: Stonehenge Development
> > Subject: RE: [jira] Created: (STONEHENGE-51) Create logging and debugging
> > messages in the .NET WCF Console Hosts
> >
> >
> > When you say there is no way to tell if the WCF services recieved the
> call
> > does that mean that a TraceListener does not write the output? There was
> a
> > suggestion that we change the .NET services to run under IIS. I would
> vote
> > against this if we are going to change to use IIS as the debugging
> messages
> > would need to be removed.
> >
> >
> >
> > Scott Golightly
> >
> > > Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 14:09:30 -0700
> > > From: jira@apache.org
> > > To: stonehenge-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > > Subject: [jira] Created: (STONEHENGE-51) Create logging and debugging
> > messages in the .NET WCF Console Hosts
> > >
> > > Create logging and debugging messages in the .NET WCF Console Hosts
> > > -------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >
> > > Key: STONEHENGE-51
> > > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STONEHENGE-51
> > > Project: Stonehenge
> > > Issue Type: Improvement
> > > Components: DOTNET_BS, DOTNET_OPS
> > > Reporter: Ben Dewey
> > > Priority: Minor
> > >
> > >
> > > It would be very useful to have debugging and logging messages in the
> > .NET Console Hosts. When interoperating between platforms there is no way
> to
> > tell if the WCF services received the calls.
> > >
> > > This issue may conflict with STONEHENGE-21
> > >
> > > --
> > > This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
> > > -
> > > You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> S.Uthaiyashankar
> Software Architect
> WSO2 Inc.
> http://wso2.com/ - "The Open Source SOA Company"
>
--
S.Uthaiyashankar
Software Architect
WSO2 Inc.
http://wso2.com/ - "The Open Source SOA Company"
RE: [jira] Created: (STONEHENGE-51) Create logging and debugging
messages in the .NET WCF Console Hosts
Posted by Ben Dewey <Be...@26ny.com>.
I thought STONEHENGE-21 was related to overhauling the .NET service hosts. We had discussed, in an earlier thread, that we wanted to consider hosting the .NET services in something becides a console app.
If STONEHENGE-21 is different, I can create a separate ticket for the overhaul and reference this ticket with that feature instead.
-----Original Message-----
From: Selvaratnam Uthaiyashankar [mailto:uthaiyashankar@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, May 04, 2009 11:24 PM
To: stonehenge-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [jira] Created: (STONEHENGE-51) Create logging and debugging messages in the .NET WCF Console Hosts
Hi Ben,
I am not clear here. STONEHENGE-21 is only to get the configurations from a
common place. It will not affect any other logic. Why do you think it will
affect the console output of .NET services?
Regards,
Shankar
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 8:46 AM, Ben Dewey <Be...@26ny.com> wrote:
> The thought was the we could place a few Console.WriteLine() around or a
> Logging Framework in place that could write things like "Order Received",
> etc.
>
> STONEHENGE-21 is the ticket for overhauling the configuration. If
> StoneHenge-21 gets prioritized low then this feature would be an easy way to
> fill the void.
>
> A logging framework could be designed to connect with future service hosts
> if we plan accordingly.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Scott Golightly [mailto:scott_golightly@hotmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, May 04, 2009 11:10 PM
> To: Stonehenge Development
> Subject: RE: [jira] Created: (STONEHENGE-51) Create logging and debugging
> messages in the .NET WCF Console Hosts
>
>
> When you say there is no way to tell if the WCF services recieved the call
> does that mean that a TraceListener does not write the output? There was a
> suggestion that we change the .NET services to run under IIS. I would vote
> against this if we are going to change to use IIS as the debugging messages
> would need to be removed.
>
>
>
> Scott Golightly
>
> > Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 14:09:30 -0700
> > From: jira@apache.org
> > To: stonehenge-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > Subject: [jira] Created: (STONEHENGE-51) Create logging and debugging
> messages in the .NET WCF Console Hosts
> >
> > Create logging and debugging messages in the .NET WCF Console Hosts
> > -------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > Key: STONEHENGE-51
> > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STONEHENGE-51
> > Project: Stonehenge
> > Issue Type: Improvement
> > Components: DOTNET_BS, DOTNET_OPS
> > Reporter: Ben Dewey
> > Priority: Minor
> >
> >
> > It would be very useful to have debugging and logging messages in the
> .NET Console Hosts. When interoperating between platforms there is no way to
> tell if the WCF services received the calls.
> >
> > This issue may conflict with STONEHENGE-21
> >
> > --
> > This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
> > -
> > You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
> >
>
--
S.Uthaiyashankar
Software Architect
WSO2 Inc.
http://wso2.com/ - "The Open Source SOA Company"