You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@lucene.apache.org by Tomoko Uchida <to...@gmail.com> on 2022/06/02 08:40:06 UTC

Re: Lucene 9.2 release

Hi all,
Just a minor heads-up.
We will have a more fine-grained Java version check when starting
gradlew command shortly.
After PR #941 is merged into main, you need newer Java (17.0.3) for a build.

2022年5月18日(水) 19:00 Tomoko Uchida <to...@gmail.com>:
>
> Hi, I just wanted to note that I opened LUCENE-10578.
> Maybe it'd be worth having the discussion in Jira?
>
>
> 2022年5月18日(水) 18:31 Alan Woodward <ro...@gmail.com>:
>>
>> I think this release is the first time I’ve used Java 11 since 2019, yes!
>>
>> I’ll get the latest AdoptOpenJDK version and try and persuade my Mac to use it...
>>
>> > On 18 May 2022, at 10:19, Dawid Weiss <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > Living in the past, aren't we? :)
>> >
>> > D.
>> >
>> > On Wed, May 18, 2022 at 10:49 AM Alan Woodward <ro...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> $ /Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/jdk-11.jdk/Contents/Home/bin/java -version
>> >>
>> >> openjdk version "11" 2018-09-25
>> >> OpenJDK Runtime Environment 18.9 (build 11+28)
>> >> OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM 18.9 (build 11+28, mixed mode)
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>> On 18 May 2022, at 09:35, Dawid Weiss <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> Alan, what's the exact JDK vendor/ release number you used that had
>> >>> this problem? If we can reproduce it then we'd know where to look
>> >>> (bisect until we know javadoc works correctly).
>> >>>
>> >>> D.
>> >>>
>> >>> On Wed, May 18, 2022 at 10:33 AM Dawid Weiss <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>>> I'd like to draw attention to my second question while we are still here... should we limit the OpenJDK distribution (for building)? My worry here is, that minor versions could depend on the distributor.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> This is a valid concern but it'd take some trial and error to verify
>> >>>> which version numbers are used by packaging openjdk for various
>> >>>> releases. Realistically, the JDK part (standard library) is nearly the
>> >>>> same in all/ most of them? The least that could be done is to apply
>> >>>> the restriction to just a particular vendor/ release and emit a
>> >>>> warning for unrecognized ones.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Dawid
>> >>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org