You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@johnzon.apache.org by Hendrik Dev <he...@gmail.com> on 2014/11/16 23:15:48 UTC
[RESULT] [VOTE] Apache Johnzon 0.2-incubating release
This vote pass (either for the project and the incubator) with
* Three binding +1 votes from Justin McClean, Romain Manni-Bucau and
Mark Struberg
* Two non-binding +1 votes
* No -1 votes
Project vote: http://markmail.org/thread/okwf7wpczerz2cq6
@general: This is just to inform the incubator about the vote/release.
The vote already pass for the incubator on the project level because
we had three +1 votes from incubator PMC members.
Thanks
Hendrik
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 9:13 PM, Hendrik Dev <he...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I've created a 0.2-incubating release candidate, with the following
> artifacts up for a project vote:
>
> Git commit for the release is [56c9789]
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-johnzon.git;a=commit;h=56c9789b3de1fbdcbf0a260ba2f26fce70171ffa
>
> Maven staging repo:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachejohnzon-1001
>
> Source releases (zip/tar.gz):
> http://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachejohnzon-1001/org/apache/johnzon/johnzon/0.2-incubating/johnzon-0.2-incubating-src.zip
> http://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachejohnzon-1001/org/apache/johnzon/johnzon/0.2-incubating/johnzon-0.2-incubating-src.tar.gz
>
> Site is here:
> http://people.apache.org/~salyh/johnzon-0.2-incubating-site/
>
> PGP release keys (signed using 22D7F6EC):
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/johnzon/KEYS
>
> This release fixes a few bugs and introduce some new features for the
> mapper and the JAX-RS binding.
> It also improves performance for in memory JSON parsing.
>
> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>
> Here is my +1
>
> Thanks
> Hendrik
>
--
Hendrik Saly (salyh, hendrikdev22)
@hendrikdev22
PGP: 0x22D7F6EC
Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Apache Johnzon 0.2-incubating release
Posted by Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com>.
HI,
> Are you referring to this email, about the alternate voting rule? [1]
No, just that it already has 3 +1 IPMC votes. Advice given before on this list said you don't need to call a vote in that case but just notify the list.
Thanks,
Justin
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Apache Johnzon 0.2-incubating release
Posted by "John D. Ament" <jo...@gmail.com>.
Justin,
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 5:30 AM, Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > The IPMCs in the dev@ list should recast its +1 vote in the general
> > list to be accounted for.
>
> Which is not in line in previous advice given on the list, for instance
> see last BatchEE release..
>
Are you referring to this email, about the alternate voting rule? [1]
Even if the podling wanted to use the alternate voting rules, it needs to
be approved via a vote on general@. For these two podlings, you'll notice
that they're pretty heavy on IPMC members. I don't think the alternate
voting process would be of use to either of them.
With that said, my real interpretation of the alternate voting rule is that
if the IPMC has approved a podling to use it, and the podling has enough
community growth, it really means the podling is ready to graduate.
John
>
> What are other IPMC views on this? Happy to do it either way, but IMO .an
> extra VOTE seems unnecessary when the project already has 3 + 1 IPMC votes.
>
Revoting on general has been what people have done for a long time.
There's no reason to change that.
>
> Thanks,
> Justin
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>
[1]:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201411.mbox/%3CCAOqetn8HOKepYZ5K9P3DA%2B0u-EO%2BtMyPCgwwVmXfmvHgJ8NxKA%40mail.gmail.com%3E
Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Apache Johnzon 0.2-incubating release
Posted by Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com>.
Hi,
> The IPMCs in the dev@ list should recast its +1 vote in the general
> list to be accounted for.
Which is not in line in previous advice given on the list, for instance see last BatchEE release..
What are other IPMC views on this? Happy to do it either way, but IMO .an extra VOTE seems unnecessary when the project already has 3 + 1 IPMC votes.
Thanks,
Justin
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Apache Johnzon 0.2-incubating release
Posted by Henry Saputra <he...@gmail.com>.
A little bit formality but the idea is that the IPMC that voted in the
dev@ list act in the capacity of PPMCs.
Sending formal request to general@ list to make sure other IPMCs could
add additional pair of eyes to review the releases:
"... then the Podling SHALL send a summary of that vote to the
Incubator'sgeneral list and formally request the Incubator PMC approve
such a release. Three +1 Incubator PMC votes are required ..." [1]
The IPMCs in the dev@ list should recast its +1 vote in the general
list to be accounted for.
- Henry
[1]: http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html#Releases
On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 9:41 PM, Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> That's not how it works at all. Please review [1].
>
> Looks correct to me as there is already 3 +1 incubator PCM binding votes. What would you expect in this situation?
>
> Thanks,
> Justin
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Apache Johnzon 0.2-incubating release
Posted by "John D. Ament" <jo...@gmail.com>.
If you feel that there is something more to discuss regarding the release
process, please feel free to start another thread for it. Please do create
a vote thread.
John
On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 4:31 AM, Hendrik Dev <he...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Due to the fact that the release artifacts are not distributed yet i
> suggest that we simply start a (new) incubator vote for the release
> to resolve the idleness regarding the release process and separate the
> general discussion (if necessary) into another thread.
>
> Is that feasible ?
>
> Thanks
> Hendrik
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 2:37 PM, Marvin Humphrey <ma...@rectangular.com>
> wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 2:00 AM, Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>
> wrote:
> >> Previously there was a clear rule
> >> 1.) do the internal vote and if that succeeds
> >> 2.) do another VOTE on the general@incubator list.
> >
> > That's still the rule.
> >
> > The wider Incubator PMC must be given full opportunity to review any
> release.
> >
> > The 2013 Alternate Release Voting Process is not being used right now,
> but
> > even if it was, a VOTE on general@incubator would still be required.
> >
> > The "send a summary" phrase in the documentation for the Alternate
> process was
> > deliberately copied from the original text to avoid changing any more
> than
> > necessary.
> >
> >
> http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html#Releases
> >
> > Original:
> >
> > If the majority of all votes is positive, then the Podling SHALL
> send
> > a summary of that vote to the Incubator's general list and
> formally
> > request the Incubator PMC approve such a release.
> >
> > Alternate:
> >
> > If the majority of PPMC votes is positive, then the Podling
> SHALL send
> > a summary of that vote to the Incubator's general list and
> formally
> > request the Incubator PMC approve such a release.
> >
> > It is not sufficient to "send a summary". The podling needs to "formal
> > request that the Incubator PMC approve" -- i.e. call a VOTE on
> > general@incubator. The criteria for passing differ under the Alternate
> > process, but the general@incubator VOTE has to happen regardless.
> >
> > Now, we tend to "forward" IPMC votes from the podling dev list, which is
> > arguably confusing because it doesn't follow the letter of the law. But
> I
> > sure hope nobody wants to start failing release VOTEs because some IPMC
> member
> > voted only on the PPMC thread.
> >
> > Marvin Humphrey
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Hendrik Saly (salyh, hendrikdev22)
> @hendrikdev22
> PGP: 0x22D7F6EC
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>
Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Apache Johnzon 0.2-incubating release
Posted by "John D. Ament" <jo...@gmail.com>.
If you feel that there is something more to discuss regarding the release
process, please feel free to start another thread for it. Please do create
a vote thread.
John
On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 4:31 AM, Hendrik Dev <he...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Due to the fact that the release artifacts are not distributed yet i
> suggest that we simply start a (new) incubator vote for the release
> to resolve the idleness regarding the release process and separate the
> general discussion (if necessary) into another thread.
>
> Is that feasible ?
>
> Thanks
> Hendrik
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 2:37 PM, Marvin Humphrey <ma...@rectangular.com>
> wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 2:00 AM, Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>
> wrote:
> >> Previously there was a clear rule
> >> 1.) do the internal vote and if that succeeds
> >> 2.) do another VOTE on the general@incubator list.
> >
> > That's still the rule.
> >
> > The wider Incubator PMC must be given full opportunity to review any
> release.
> >
> > The 2013 Alternate Release Voting Process is not being used right now,
> but
> > even if it was, a VOTE on general@incubator would still be required.
> >
> > The "send a summary" phrase in the documentation for the Alternate
> process was
> > deliberately copied from the original text to avoid changing any more
> than
> > necessary.
> >
> >
> http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html#Releases
> >
> > Original:
> >
> > If the majority of all votes is positive, then the Podling SHALL
> send
> > a summary of that vote to the Incubator's general list and
> formally
> > request the Incubator PMC approve such a release.
> >
> > Alternate:
> >
> > If the majority of PPMC votes is positive, then the Podling
> SHALL send
> > a summary of that vote to the Incubator's general list and
> formally
> > request the Incubator PMC approve such a release.
> >
> > It is not sufficient to "send a summary". The podling needs to "formal
> > request that the Incubator PMC approve" -- i.e. call a VOTE on
> > general@incubator. The criteria for passing differ under the Alternate
> > process, but the general@incubator VOTE has to happen regardless.
> >
> > Now, we tend to "forward" IPMC votes from the podling dev list, which is
> > arguably confusing because it doesn't follow the letter of the law. But
> I
> > sure hope nobody wants to start failing release VOTEs because some IPMC
> member
> > voted only on the PPMC thread.
> >
> > Marvin Humphrey
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Hendrik Saly (salyh, hendrikdev22)
> @hendrikdev22
> PGP: 0x22D7F6EC
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>
Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Apache Johnzon 0.2-incubating release
Posted by Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>.
Yes absolutely.
Le mar. 18 nov. 2014 10:33, Hendrik Dev <he...@gmail.com> a écrit :
> Due to the fact that the release artifacts are not distributed yet i
> suggest that we simply start a (new) incubator vote for the release
> to resolve the idleness regarding the release process and separate the
> general discussion (if necessary) into another thread.
>
> Is that feasible ?
>
> Thanks
> Hendrik
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 2:37 PM, Marvin Humphrey <ma...@rectangular.com>
> wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 2:00 AM, Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>
> wrote:
> >> Previously there was a clear rule
> >> 1.) do the internal vote and if that succeeds
> >> 2.) do another VOTE on the general@incubator list.
> >
> > That's still the rule.
> >
> > The wider Incubator PMC must be given full opportunity to review any
> release.
> >
> > The 2013 Alternate Release Voting Process is not being used right now,
> but
> > even if it was, a VOTE on general@incubator would still be required.
> >
> > The "send a summary" phrase in the documentation for the Alternate
> process was
> > deliberately copied from the original text to avoid changing any more
> than
> > necessary.
> >
> > http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.
> html#Releases
> >
> > Original:
> >
> > If the majority of all votes is positive, then the Podling SHALL
> send
> > a summary of that vote to the Incubator's general list and
> formally
> > request the Incubator PMC approve such a release.
> >
> > Alternate:
> >
> > If the majority of PPMC votes is positive, then the Podling
> SHALL send
> > a summary of that vote to the Incubator's general list and
> formally
> > request the Incubator PMC approve such a release.
> >
> > It is not sufficient to "send a summary". The podling needs to "formal
> > request that the Incubator PMC approve" -- i.e. call a VOTE on
> > general@incubator. The criteria for passing differ under the Alternate
> > process, but the general@incubator VOTE has to happen regardless.
> >
> > Now, we tend to "forward" IPMC votes from the podling dev list, which is
> > arguably confusing because it doesn't follow the letter of the law. But
> I
> > sure hope nobody wants to start failing release VOTEs because some IPMC
> member
> > voted only on the PPMC thread.
> >
> > Marvin Humphrey
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Hendrik Saly (salyh, hendrikdev22)
> @hendrikdev22
> PGP: 0x22D7F6EC
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>
Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Apache Johnzon 0.2-incubating release
Posted by Hendrik Dev <he...@gmail.com>.
Due to the fact that the release artifacts are not distributed yet i
suggest that we simply start a (new) incubator vote for the release
to resolve the idleness regarding the release process and separate the
general discussion (if necessary) into another thread.
Is that feasible ?
Thanks
Hendrik
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 2:37 PM, Marvin Humphrey <ma...@rectangular.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 2:00 AM, Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de> wrote:
>> Previously there was a clear rule
>> 1.) do the internal vote and if that succeeds
>> 2.) do another VOTE on the general@incubator list.
>
> That's still the rule.
>
> The wider Incubator PMC must be given full opportunity to review any release.
>
> The 2013 Alternate Release Voting Process is not being used right now, but
> even if it was, a VOTE on general@incubator would still be required.
>
> The "send a summary" phrase in the documentation for the Alternate process was
> deliberately copied from the original text to avoid changing any more than
> necessary.
>
> http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html#Releases
>
> Original:
>
> If the majority of all votes is positive, then the Podling SHALL send
> a summary of that vote to the Incubator's general list and formally
> request the Incubator PMC approve such a release.
>
> Alternate:
>
> If the majority of PPMC votes is positive, then the Podling SHALL send
> a summary of that vote to the Incubator's general list and formally
> request the Incubator PMC approve such a release.
>
> It is not sufficient to "send a summary". The podling needs to "formal
> request that the Incubator PMC approve" -- i.e. call a VOTE on
> general@incubator. The criteria for passing differ under the Alternate
> process, but the general@incubator VOTE has to happen regardless.
>
> Now, we tend to "forward" IPMC votes from the podling dev list, which is
> arguably confusing because it doesn't follow the letter of the law. But I
> sure hope nobody wants to start failing release VOTEs because some IPMC member
> voted only on the PPMC thread.
>
> Marvin Humphrey
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
--
Hendrik Saly (salyh, hendrikdev22)
@hendrikdev22
PGP: 0x22D7F6EC
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Apache Johnzon 0.2-incubating release
Posted by Hendrik Dev <he...@gmail.com>.
Due to the fact that the release artifacts are not distributed yet i
suggest that we simply start a (new) incubator vote for the release
to resolve the idleness regarding the release process and separate the
general discussion (if necessary) into another thread.
Is that feasible ?
Thanks
Hendrik
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 2:37 PM, Marvin Humphrey <ma...@rectangular.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 2:00 AM, Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de> wrote:
>> Previously there was a clear rule
>> 1.) do the internal vote and if that succeeds
>> 2.) do another VOTE on the general@incubator list.
>
> That's still the rule.
>
> The wider Incubator PMC must be given full opportunity to review any release.
>
> The 2013 Alternate Release Voting Process is not being used right now, but
> even if it was, a VOTE on general@incubator would still be required.
>
> The "send a summary" phrase in the documentation for the Alternate process was
> deliberately copied from the original text to avoid changing any more than
> necessary.
>
> http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html#Releases
>
> Original:
>
> If the majority of all votes is positive, then the Podling SHALL send
> a summary of that vote to the Incubator's general list and formally
> request the Incubator PMC approve such a release.
>
> Alternate:
>
> If the majority of PPMC votes is positive, then the Podling SHALL send
> a summary of that vote to the Incubator's general list and formally
> request the Incubator PMC approve such a release.
>
> It is not sufficient to "send a summary". The podling needs to "formal
> request that the Incubator PMC approve" -- i.e. call a VOTE on
> general@incubator. The criteria for passing differ under the Alternate
> process, but the general@incubator VOTE has to happen regardless.
>
> Now, we tend to "forward" IPMC votes from the podling dev list, which is
> arguably confusing because it doesn't follow the letter of the law. But I
> sure hope nobody wants to start failing release VOTEs because some IPMC member
> voted only on the PPMC thread.
>
> Marvin Humphrey
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
--
Hendrik Saly (salyh, hendrikdev22)
@hendrikdev22
PGP: 0x22D7F6EC
Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Apache Johnzon 0.2-incubating release
Posted by Marvin Humphrey <ma...@rectangular.com>.
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 2:00 AM, Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de> wrote:
> Previously there was a clear rule
> 1.) do the internal vote and if that succeeds
> 2.) do another VOTE on the general@incubator list.
That's still the rule.
The wider Incubator PMC must be given full opportunity to review any release.
The 2013 Alternate Release Voting Process is not being used right now, but
even if it was, a VOTE on general@incubator would still be required.
The "send a summary" phrase in the documentation for the Alternate process was
deliberately copied from the original text to avoid changing any more than
necessary.
http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html#Releases
Original:
If the majority of all votes is positive, then the Podling SHALL send
a summary of that vote to the Incubator's general list and formally
request the Incubator PMC approve such a release.
Alternate:
If the majority of PPMC votes is positive, then the Podling SHALL send
a summary of that vote to the Incubator's general list and formally
request the Incubator PMC approve such a release.
It is not sufficient to "send a summary". The podling needs to "formal
request that the Incubator PMC approve" -- i.e. call a VOTE on
general@incubator. The criteria for passing differ under the Alternate
process, but the general@incubator VOTE has to happen regardless.
Now, we tend to "forward" IPMC votes from the podling dev list, which is
arguably confusing because it doesn't follow the letter of the law. But I
sure hope nobody wants to start failing release VOTEs because some IPMC member
voted only on the PPMC thread.
Marvin Humphrey
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Apache Johnzon 0.2-incubating release
Posted by Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>.
Previously there was a clear rule
1.) do the internal vote and if that succeeds
2.) do another VOTE on the general@incubator list.
This got pretty much blurred up and streamlined. And by that we now have a situation where not even old IPMC members like me know how to proceed properly. I understand the reason for this streamlining, but it seems there is no clear guideline right now.
.) Do we need to and how long shall we wait after pinging general@i.a.o ?
.) Do we need to send a ping when an incubator project starts with the VOTE?
.) How to handle multiple release attempts?
I suggest we get this straight to prevent further confusion.
LieGrue,
strub
----- Original Message -----
> From: Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com>
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Cc:
> Sent: Monday, 17 November 2014, 6:41
> Subject: Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Apache Johnzon 0.2-incubating release
>
> Hi,
>
>> That's not how it works at all. Please review [1].
>
> Looks correct to me as there is already 3 +1 incubator PCM binding votes. What
> would you expect in this situation?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Justin
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Apache Johnzon 0.2-incubating release
Posted by Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com>.
Hi,
> That's not how it works at all. Please review [1].
Looks correct to me as there is already 3 +1 incubator PCM binding votes. What would you expect in this situation?
Thanks,
Justin
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Apache Johnzon 0.2-incubating release
Posted by Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com>.
Hi,
> That's not how it works at all. Please review [1].
Looks correct to me as there is already 3 +1 IPCM binding votes. What would you expect in this situation?
Thanks,
Justin
Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Apache Johnzon 0.2-incubating release
Posted by "John D. Ament" <jo...@gmail.com>.
Hendrik,
That's not how it works at all. Please review [1].
John
[1]: http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html#Releases
On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 5:15 PM, Hendrik Dev <he...@gmail.com> wrote:
> This vote pass (either for the project and the incubator) with
>
> * Three binding +1 votes from Justin McClean, Romain Manni-Bucau and
> Mark Struberg
> * Two non-binding +1 votes
> * No -1 votes
>
> Project vote: http://markmail.org/thread/okwf7wpczerz2cq6
>
> @general: This is just to inform the incubator about the vote/release.
> The vote already pass for the incubator on the project level because
> we had three +1 votes from incubator PMC members.
>
> Thanks
> Hendrik
>
> On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 9:13 PM, Hendrik Dev <he...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > I've created a 0.2-incubating release candidate, with the following
> > artifacts up for a project vote:
> >
> > Git commit for the release is [56c9789]
> >
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-johnzon.git;a=commit;h=56c9789b3de1fbdcbf0a260ba2f26fce70171ffa
> >
> > Maven staging repo:
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachejohnzon-1001
> >
> > Source releases (zip/tar.gz):
> >
> http://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachejohnzon-1001/org/apache/johnzon/johnzon/0.2-incubating/johnzon-0.2-incubating-src.zip
> >
> http://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachejohnzon-1001/org/apache/johnzon/johnzon/0.2-incubating/johnzon-0.2-incubating-src.tar.gz
> >
> > Site is here:
> > http://people.apache.org/~salyh/johnzon-0.2-incubating-site/
> >
> > PGP release keys (signed using 22D7F6EC):
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/johnzon/KEYS
> >
> > This release fixes a few bugs and introduce some new features for the
> > mapper and the JAX-RS binding.
> > It also improves performance for in memory JSON parsing.
> >
> > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> >
> > [ ] +1 approve
> > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
> >
> > Here is my +1
> >
> > Thanks
> > Hendrik
> >
>
> --
> Hendrik Saly (salyh, hendrikdev22)
> @hendrikdev22
> PGP: 0x22D7F6EC
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>
Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Apache Johnzon 0.2-incubating release
Posted by "John D. Ament" <jo...@gmail.com>.
Hendrik,
That's not how it works at all. Please review [1].
John
[1]: http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html#Releases
On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 5:15 PM, Hendrik Dev <he...@gmail.com> wrote:
> This vote pass (either for the project and the incubator) with
>
> * Three binding +1 votes from Justin McClean, Romain Manni-Bucau and
> Mark Struberg
> * Two non-binding +1 votes
> * No -1 votes
>
> Project vote: http://markmail.org/thread/okwf7wpczerz2cq6
>
> @general: This is just to inform the incubator about the vote/release.
> The vote already pass for the incubator on the project level because
> we had three +1 votes from incubator PMC members.
>
> Thanks
> Hendrik
>
> On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 9:13 PM, Hendrik Dev <he...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > I've created a 0.2-incubating release candidate, with the following
> > artifacts up for a project vote:
> >
> > Git commit for the release is [56c9789]
> >
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-johnzon.git;a=commit;h=56c9789b3de1fbdcbf0a260ba2f26fce70171ffa
> >
> > Maven staging repo:
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachejohnzon-1001
> >
> > Source releases (zip/tar.gz):
> >
> http://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachejohnzon-1001/org/apache/johnzon/johnzon/0.2-incubating/johnzon-0.2-incubating-src.zip
> >
> http://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachejohnzon-1001/org/apache/johnzon/johnzon/0.2-incubating/johnzon-0.2-incubating-src.tar.gz
> >
> > Site is here:
> > http://people.apache.org/~salyh/johnzon-0.2-incubating-site/
> >
> > PGP release keys (signed using 22D7F6EC):
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/johnzon/KEYS
> >
> > This release fixes a few bugs and introduce some new features for the
> > mapper and the JAX-RS binding.
> > It also improves performance for in memory JSON parsing.
> >
> > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> >
> > [ ] +1 approve
> > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
> >
> > Here is my +1
> >
> > Thanks
> > Hendrik
> >
>
> --
> Hendrik Saly (salyh, hendrikdev22)
> @hendrikdev22
> PGP: 0x22D7F6EC
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>