DTD or XSD for config.xml

[Michael Weissenbacher <we...@dermichi.com>]

Hi List,
is there a DTD or a XSD for validation of config.xml? It's somewhat 
annoying that my editor (JEdit) complains about undecalred element types 
all over the place while editing config.xml. Is it harmful to remove the 
DOCTYPE from config.xml?

thanks,
Michael

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-user-unsubscribe@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-user-help@james.apache.org

Re: DTD or XSD for config.xml

[Danny Angus <da...@apache.org>]

You can remove the doctype if you expend the entities, it just makes
the file smaller.
There is no dtd or schema because it isn't designed, Ahem, it has just
evolved as people need to add more config params. I tried to make a
schema, and document it, but the problem is that it can vary by
inclusion of unknown mailets we need to get the mailet config into a
generic standard format first. Its only my list of things for the
mailet-api sub-project to consider.

d.



On 1/25/07, Michael Weissenbacher <we...@dermichi.com> wrote:
> Hi List,
> is there a DTD or a XSD for validation of config.xml? It's somewhat
> annoying that my editor (JEdit) complains about undecalred element types
> all over the place while editing config.xml. Is it harmful to remove the
> DOCTYPE from config.xml?
>
> thanks,
> Michael
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-user-unsubscribe@james.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: server-user-help@james.apache.org
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-user-unsubscribe@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-user-help@james.apache.org