You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@harmony.apache.org by "Fedotov, Alexei A" <al...@intel.com> on 2006/11/05 19:18:55 UTC
[drlvm][unit] Closing H-1679, H-1722
Anton,
Is it ok to close the following issues?
* HARMONY-1679 Timer.schedule(TimerTask, delay, period) doesn't cause
repetitive invocation of task
* HARMONY-1722 notify() in synchronized section makes wait(long) wait
forever
I cannot reproduce them on the latest build.
With best regards,
Alexei Fedotov,
Intel Java & XML Engineering
Re: [drlvm][unit] Closing H-1679, H-1722
Posted by Alexey Petrenko <al...@gmail.com>.
2006/11/5, Anton Luht <an...@gmail.com>:
> Hello,
>
> Both bugs are verified on
>
> svn = r471521, (Nov 5 2006), Windows/ia32/msvc 1310, debug build
>
> and can be closed.
Done.
SY, Alexey
> On 11/5/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. <ge...@pobox.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Fedotov, Alexei A wrote:
> > > Anton,
> > >
> > > Is it ok to close the following issues?
> > > * HARMONY-1679 Timer.schedule(TimerTask, delay, period) doesn't cause
> > > repetitive invocation of task
> > > * HARMONY-1722 notify() in synchronized section makes wait(long) wait
> > > forever
> > >
> >
> > I don't know about 1679, but I agree about 1722 if it can't be repeated.
> >
> > geir
> >
> > > I cannot reproduce them on the latest build.
> > >
> > > With best regards,
> > > Alexei Fedotov,
> > > Intel Java & XML Engineering
> > >
> >
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Anton Luht,
> Intel Java & XML Engineering
>
Re: [drlvm][unit] Closing H-1679, H-1722
Posted by Anton Luht <an...@gmail.com>.
Hello,
Both bugs are verified on
svn = r471521, (Nov 5 2006), Windows/ia32/msvc 1310, debug build
and can be closed.
On 11/5/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. <ge...@pobox.com> wrote:
>
>
> Fedotov, Alexei A wrote:
> > Anton,
> >
> > Is it ok to close the following issues?
> > * HARMONY-1679 Timer.schedule(TimerTask, delay, period) doesn't cause
> > repetitive invocation of task
> > * HARMONY-1722 notify() in synchronized section makes wait(long) wait
> > forever
> >
>
> I don't know about 1679, but I agree about 1722 if it can't be repeated.
>
> geir
>
> > I cannot reproduce them on the latest build.
> >
> > With best regards,
> > Alexei Fedotov,
> > Intel Java & XML Engineering
> >
>
--
Regards,
Anton Luht,
Intel Java & XML Engineering
Re: [drlvm][unit] Closing H-1679, H-1722
Posted by "Geir Magnusson Jr." <ge...@pobox.com>.
Fedotov, Alexei A wrote:
> Anton,
>
> Is it ok to close the following issues?
> * HARMONY-1679 Timer.schedule(TimerTask, delay, period) doesn't cause
> repetitive invocation of task
> * HARMONY-1722 notify() in synchronized section makes wait(long) wait
> forever
>
I don't know about 1679, but I agree about 1722 if it can't be repeated.
geir
> I cannot reproduce them on the latest build.
>
> With best regards,
> Alexei Fedotov,
> Intel Java & XML Engineering
>