Re: [DISCUSS] 1.0 Release?

[Rupert Westenthaler <ru...@gmail.com>]

On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 10:53 AM, Sergio Fernández
<se...@salzburgresearch.at> wrote:
> -1
>
> Releasing a 1.0 version would mean from my point of view:
>
> * Well tested source base
> * Significance evolution regarding features and/or performance
> * An opportunity to break backwards compatibility (like the evolution
>   of FISE)
> * Documentation about the transition

The Idea was to make the 1.0.0 release compatible with the 0.12.*
releases and move all non-backward compatible changes to 2.0.0 . This
would e.g. mean that 1.0.0 still uses FISE as enhancement structure.
Related to this discussions I have already created a 2.0.0 release in
JIRA some time ago.

> * Ability of doing binary releases (right now there is not even a
>   working WAR launcher, see STANBOL-1190)

+1 .. having WAR support is essential


>
> And the current trunk lacks many of these things... so I think it's a bit
> hasty to thing about 1.0.

such as

* (Re-)Adding CORS support to 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT
* create a JAR and WAR launcher that we can release as binary.

If we follow this scheme for 1.0.0 we are not so far off a 1.0.0
release. As soon as the 0.12.1 release is done I will have some time
to work towards 1.0.0. I think the first thing will be to care about
STANBOL-1190.

best
Rupert



-- 
| Rupert Westenthaler             rupert.westenthaler@gmail.com
| Bodenlehenstraße 11                              ++43-699-11108907
| A-5500 Bischofshofen
| REDLINK.CO ..........................................................................
| http://redlink.co/