You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@pinot.apache.org by Seunghyun Lee <sn...@apache.org> on 2019/01/18 23:42:00 UTC
Requesting a review for updating license & notice information
Hi Mentors,
I have recently tracked down all dependencies that we bundle for our
distribution and came up with license, notice files for Pinot project. I
followed Apache Spark's approach since it provides the detailed
documentation on how to build license, notice files.
Can someone look into the following pull request so that we can have some
initial feedbacks before we start to work on the release process?
https://github.com/apache/incubator-pinot/pull/3722
Best,
Seunghyun
Re: Requesting a review for updating license & notice information
Posted by Seunghyun Lee <sn...@apache.org>.
Thank you for the update. So, I think that we have 2 options.
1. Copy all licenses directly to "LICENSE" file.
2. Copy all licenses to "/licenses" and add a pointer to LICENSE file.
In that case, I think the current pr should be good enough (I also
separated out LICENSE-binary and NOTICE-binary).
For a source code release, we plan to include the original LICENSE, NOTICE
while we will include LICENSE-binary, NOTICE-binary for binary release.
@Felix @Kishore Can you go over the finalized pr when you find the time?
Again, I really appreciate for your help.
https://github.com/apache/incubator-pinot/pull/3722
Best,
Seunghyun
On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 10:31 PM Felix Cheung <fe...@hotmail.com>
wrote:
> Actually I’m going to retract the whole thing I said.
>
> Seems like it should carry it under license for:
>
> https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/bf4199e261c3c8dd2970e2a154c97b46fb339f02
>
> ________________________________
> From: Felix Cheung <fe...@hotmail.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2019 9:20 PM
> To: dev@pinot.apache.org; dev@pinot.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Requesting a review for updating license & notice information
>
> Hi - I believe it’s ok not to include standard passive license too. I
> think I could some pointer on that in the PR where we discussed.
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: kishore g <g....@gmail.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2019 9:18 PM
> To: dev@pinot.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Requesting a review for updating license & notice information
>
> I think that should work. Olivier, do you see any issues with that?
>
> On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 5:51 PM Seunghyun Lee <sn...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Hi Felix and Kishore,
> >
> > Can you guys confirm that if I can remove copied license files for MIT,
> BSD
> > based on http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#permissive-deps
> ?
> >
> > My understanding from the above document is that for MIT, BSD
> dependencies,
> > it is sufficient to add pointers in LICENSE file.
> >
> > However, I'm a bit confused given that the example actually points the
> full
> > license
> >
> > This product bundles SuperWidget 1.2.3, which is available under a
> > "3-clause BSD" license. For details, see *deps/superwidget/.*
> >
> >
> > As long as we don't violate the license issue, I can go ahead of removing
> > copied license files in "/licenses" for MIT, BSD related libaries.
> >
> > Best,
> > Seunghyun
> >
> > On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 9:53 PM Felix Cheung <fe...@hotmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks for doing that and sending this note.
> > >
> > > I will help check today.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ________________________________
> > > From: Seunghyun Lee <sn...@apache.org>
> > > Sent: Friday, January 18, 2019 3:42 PM
> > > To: dev@pinot.apache.org
> > > Subject: Requesting a review for updating license & notice information
> > >
> > > Hi Mentors,
> > >
> > > I have recently tracked down all dependencies that we bundle for our
> > > distribution and came up with license, notice files for Pinot project.
> I
> > > followed Apache Spark's approach since it provides the detailed
> > > documentation on how to build license, notice files.
> > >
> > > Can someone look into the following pull request so that we can have
> some
> > > initial feedbacks before we start to work on the release process?
> > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-pinot/pull/3722
> > >
> > > Best,
> > > Seunghyun
> > >
> >
>
Re: Requesting a review for updating license & notice information
Posted by Felix Cheung <fe...@hotmail.com>.
Actually I’m going to retract the whole thing I said.
Seems like it should carry it under license for:
https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/bf4199e261c3c8dd2970e2a154c97b46fb339f02
________________________________
From: Felix Cheung <fe...@hotmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2019 9:20 PM
To: dev@pinot.apache.org; dev@pinot.apache.org
Subject: Re: Requesting a review for updating license & notice information
Hi - I believe it’s ok not to include standard passive license too. I think I could some pointer on that in the PR where we discussed.
________________________________
From: kishore g <g....@gmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2019 9:18 PM
To: dev@pinot.apache.org
Subject: Re: Requesting a review for updating license & notice information
I think that should work. Olivier, do you see any issues with that?
On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 5:51 PM Seunghyun Lee <sn...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi Felix and Kishore,
>
> Can you guys confirm that if I can remove copied license files for MIT, BSD
> based on http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#permissive-deps ?
>
> My understanding from the above document is that for MIT, BSD dependencies,
> it is sufficient to add pointers in LICENSE file.
>
> However, I'm a bit confused given that the example actually points the full
> license
>
> This product bundles SuperWidget 1.2.3, which is available under a
> "3-clause BSD" license. For details, see *deps/superwidget/.*
>
>
> As long as we don't violate the license issue, I can go ahead of removing
> copied license files in "/licenses" for MIT, BSD related libaries.
>
> Best,
> Seunghyun
>
> On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 9:53 PM Felix Cheung <fe...@hotmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Thanks for doing that and sending this note.
> >
> > I will help check today.
> >
> >
> >
> > ________________________________
> > From: Seunghyun Lee <sn...@apache.org>
> > Sent: Friday, January 18, 2019 3:42 PM
> > To: dev@pinot.apache.org
> > Subject: Requesting a review for updating license & notice information
> >
> > Hi Mentors,
> >
> > I have recently tracked down all dependencies that we bundle for our
> > distribution and came up with license, notice files for Pinot project. I
> > followed Apache Spark's approach since it provides the detailed
> > documentation on how to build license, notice files.
> >
> > Can someone look into the following pull request so that we can have some
> > initial feedbacks before we start to work on the release process?
> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-pinot/pull/3722
> >
> > Best,
> > Seunghyun
> >
>
Re: Requesting a review for updating license & notice information
Posted by Felix Cheung <fe...@hotmail.com>.
Hi - I believe it’s ok not to include standard passive license too. I think I could some pointer on that in the PR where we discussed.
________________________________
From: kishore g <g....@gmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2019 9:18 PM
To: dev@pinot.apache.org
Subject: Re: Requesting a review for updating license & notice information
I think that should work. Olivier, do you see any issues with that?
On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 5:51 PM Seunghyun Lee <sn...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi Felix and Kishore,
>
> Can you guys confirm that if I can remove copied license files for MIT, BSD
> based on http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#permissive-deps ?
>
> My understanding from the above document is that for MIT, BSD dependencies,
> it is sufficient to add pointers in LICENSE file.
>
> However, I'm a bit confused given that the example actually points the full
> license
>
> This product bundles SuperWidget 1.2.3, which is available under a
> "3-clause BSD" license. For details, see *deps/superwidget/.*
>
>
> As long as we don't violate the license issue, I can go ahead of removing
> copied license files in "/licenses" for MIT, BSD related libaries.
>
> Best,
> Seunghyun
>
> On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 9:53 PM Felix Cheung <fe...@hotmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Thanks for doing that and sending this note.
> >
> > I will help check today.
> >
> >
> >
> > ________________________________
> > From: Seunghyun Lee <sn...@apache.org>
> > Sent: Friday, January 18, 2019 3:42 PM
> > To: dev@pinot.apache.org
> > Subject: Requesting a review for updating license & notice information
> >
> > Hi Mentors,
> >
> > I have recently tracked down all dependencies that we bundle for our
> > distribution and came up with license, notice files for Pinot project. I
> > followed Apache Spark's approach since it provides the detailed
> > documentation on how to build license, notice files.
> >
> > Can someone look into the following pull request so that we can have some
> > initial feedbacks before we start to work on the release process?
> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-pinot/pull/3722
> >
> > Best,
> > Seunghyun
> >
>
Re: Requesting a review for updating license & notice information
Posted by kishore g <g....@gmail.com>.
I think that should work. Olivier, do you see any issues with that?
On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 5:51 PM Seunghyun Lee <sn...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi Felix and Kishore,
>
> Can you guys confirm that if I can remove copied license files for MIT, BSD
> based on http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#permissive-deps ?
>
> My understanding from the above document is that for MIT, BSD dependencies,
> it is sufficient to add pointers in LICENSE file.
>
> However, I'm a bit confused given that the example actually points the full
> license
>
> This product bundles SuperWidget 1.2.3, which is available under a
> "3-clause BSD" license. For details, see *deps/superwidget/.*
>
>
> As long as we don't violate the license issue, I can go ahead of removing
> copied license files in "/licenses" for MIT, BSD related libaries.
>
> Best,
> Seunghyun
>
> On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 9:53 PM Felix Cheung <fe...@hotmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Thanks for doing that and sending this note.
> >
> > I will help check today.
> >
> >
> >
> > ________________________________
> > From: Seunghyun Lee <sn...@apache.org>
> > Sent: Friday, January 18, 2019 3:42 PM
> > To: dev@pinot.apache.org
> > Subject: Requesting a review for updating license & notice information
> >
> > Hi Mentors,
> >
> > I have recently tracked down all dependencies that we bundle for our
> > distribution and came up with license, notice files for Pinot project. I
> > followed Apache Spark's approach since it provides the detailed
> > documentation on how to build license, notice files.
> >
> > Can someone look into the following pull request so that we can have some
> > initial feedbacks before we start to work on the release process?
> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-pinot/pull/3722
> >
> > Best,
> > Seunghyun
> >
>
Re: Requesting a review for updating license & notice information
Posted by Seunghyun Lee <sn...@apache.org>.
Hi Felix and Kishore,
Can you guys confirm that if I can remove copied license files for MIT, BSD
based on http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#permissive-deps ?
My understanding from the above document is that for MIT, BSD dependencies,
it is sufficient to add pointers in LICENSE file.
However, I'm a bit confused given that the example actually points the full
license
This product bundles SuperWidget 1.2.3, which is available under a
"3-clause BSD" license. For details, see *deps/superwidget/.*
As long as we don't violate the license issue, I can go ahead of removing
copied license files in "/licenses" for MIT, BSD related libaries.
Best,
Seunghyun
On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 9:53 PM Felix Cheung <fe...@hotmail.com>
wrote:
> Thanks for doing that and sending this note.
>
> I will help check today.
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: Seunghyun Lee <sn...@apache.org>
> Sent: Friday, January 18, 2019 3:42 PM
> To: dev@pinot.apache.org
> Subject: Requesting a review for updating license & notice information
>
> Hi Mentors,
>
> I have recently tracked down all dependencies that we bundle for our
> distribution and came up with license, notice files for Pinot project. I
> followed Apache Spark's approach since it provides the detailed
> documentation on how to build license, notice files.
>
> Can someone look into the following pull request so that we can have some
> initial feedbacks before we start to work on the release process?
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-pinot/pull/3722
>
> Best,
> Seunghyun
>
Re: Requesting a review for updating license & notice information
Posted by Felix Cheung <fe...@hotmail.com>.
Thanks for doing that and sending this note.
I will help check today.
________________________________
From: Seunghyun Lee <sn...@apache.org>
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2019 3:42 PM
To: dev@pinot.apache.org
Subject: Requesting a review for updating license & notice information
Hi Mentors,
I have recently tracked down all dependencies that we bundle for our
distribution and came up with license, notice files for Pinot project. I
followed Apache Spark's approach since it provides the detailed
documentation on how to build license, notice files.
Can someone look into the following pull request so that we can have some
initial feedbacks before we start to work on the release process?
https://github.com/apache/incubator-pinot/pull/3722
Best,
Seunghyun